This or......that?

Man, these timelines suck! I miss all the fun threads living in the UK.

Just read through this debate and had a good old laugh. Had to hold back from replying to half a dozen or so of CreepyFlunk's blinkered mysogyny. Seems obsolete to do it hours after the event. But geez, he weren't lying when he put creep in his name!

Dude, asking people to respect your views is fine (if a bit whiney!), but then you can't blame the "feminists, liberals, atheists, etc..." for attempting to change an antiquated and sexist notion of a woman being 'put in her place' - it's just hypocrital. And yes, you WERE being condescending.

The concept of 'being a lady' was created by British christian upper-class men, for the same purpose that most of these types create these restrictive connotations - control and division. But that's another debate in another fourum.

As far as i'm concerned Erin is THE lady. Open minded, smart, funny, sexy, considerate (to those that deserves it), i could go on but i don't wanna blow smoke up her arse! (Well, i could think of worse things to do...)

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

ScottRob said:

Man, these timelines suck! I miss all the fun threads living in the UK.

Just read through this debate and had a good old laugh. Had to hold back from replying to half a dozen or so of CreepyFlunk's blinkered mysogyny. Seems obsolete to do it hours after the event. But geez, he weren't lying when he put creep in his name!

Dude, asking people to respect your views is fine (if a bit whiney!), but then you can't blame the "feminists, liberals, atheists, etc..." for attempting to change an antiquated and sexist notion of a woman being 'put in her place' - it's just hypocrital. And yes, you WERE being condescending.

The concept of 'being a lady' was created by British christian upper-class men, for the same purpose that most of these types create these restrictive connotations - control and division. But that's another debate in another fourum.

As far as i'm concerned Erin is THE lady. Open minded, smart, funny, sexy, considerate (to those that deserves it), i could go on but i don't wanna blow smoke up her arse! (Well, i could think of worse things to do...)

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

I'm the one who wants to treat a lady, like a lady, and I'm the creep? hmmm ok...so let me guess if I were to refer to her as a hoe, stupid b**CH, telling her to do nasty things to me, then that would be cool...right? Unbelievable!

Asking to respect my views was tongue in cheek, little disappointed you didn't catch that.

Not sure about the British thing, have to look into it, but (everybody brace themselves, going to mention the Bible), as I was saying, but the Bible predates the British folk and the Bible says to put women on a pedastal....nm...forget that, that has rabbit trail written all over it. Strike that!

As far as Erin, I'm not going to go there. I'm going to treat her like a lady, unlike somebody namely you who just had to take the post sexuall. Just had to do it huh?

Yes, this I agree with you on.....TOKYO89.........where are you? Get in here, help me out, come on, I laugh at your jokes!

Funkcreep said:

ScottRob said:

Man, these timelines suck! I miss all the fun threads living in the UK.

Just read through this debate and had a good old laugh. Had to hold back from replying to half a dozen or so of CreepyFlunk's blinkered mysogyny. Seems obsolete to do it hours after the event. But geez, he weren't lying when he put creep in his name!

Dude, asking people to respect your views is fine (if a bit whiney!), but then you can't blame the "feminists, liberals, atheists, etc..." for attempting to change an antiquated and sexist notion of a woman being 'put in her place' - it's just hypocrital. And yes, you WERE being condescending.

The concept of 'being a lady' was created by British christian upper-class men, for the same purpose that most of these types create these restrictive connotations - control and division. But that's another debate in another fourum.

As far as i'm concerned Erin is THE lady. Open minded, smart, funny, sexy, considerate (to those that deserves it), i could go on but i don't wanna blow smoke up her arse! (Well, i could think of worse things to do...)

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

I'm the one who wants to treat a lady, like a lady, and I'm the creep? hmmm ok...so let me guess if I were to refer to her as a hoe, stupid b**CH, telling her to do nasty things to me, then that would be cool...right? Unbelievable!

Asking to respect my views was tongue in cheek, little disappointed you didn't catch that.

Not sure about the British thing, have to look into it, but (everybody brace themselves, going to mention the Bible), as I was saying, but the Bible predates the British folk and the Bible says to put women on a pedastal....nm...forget that, that has rabbit trail written all over it. Strike that!

As far as Erin, I'm not going to go there. I'm going to treat her like a lady, unlike somebody namely you who just had to take the post sexuall. Just had to do it huh?

Yes, this I agree with you on.....TOKYO89.........where are you? Get in here, help me out, come on, I laugh at your jokes!

Dude - treat a woman how she wants to be treated, not how you think she wants to be treated. Get to know her, instead of sticking her in your 'lady category'. And no, i only call people bitches if they deserve it - but to be honest that's mostly men! Again you're making assumptions - stop it!

Sorry, you're not too hot on subtlety, so no, you're right, i didn't catch your mahhhhvelous wit. Apologies.

The Bible says a LOT of things including how a father should let a gang of villagers rape his daughter rather than bum some visiting angel. So no, i'm not using that fantastic source of moral guidance (sarcasm) thanks all the same. My morals come from my brain rather than an obsolete collection of edited and translated folk stories. Besides, this thread was about females acting like "ladies" not just women, wasn't it?

Sexual (one 'l' not two) jokes make my life dealing with you a little easier. Besides you're a christian - forgive me.

But yes, at least you have the balls to spout your antiquated diatribe - Tokyo89 wherrrrre arrrrre yooooou?

[Edited 11/10/10 10:16am]

ScottRob said:

Funkcreep said:

I'm the one who wants to treat a lady, like a lady, and I'm the creep? hmmm ok...so let me guess if I were to refer to her as a hoe, stupid b**CH, telling her to do nasty things to me, then that would be cool...right? Unbelievable!

Asking to respect my views was tongue in cheek, little disappointed you didn't catch that.

Not sure about the British thing, have to look into it, but (everybody brace themselves, going to mention the Bible), as I was saying, but the Bible predates the British folk and the Bible says to put women on a pedastal....nm...forget that, that has rabbit trail written all over it. Strike that!

As far as Erin, I'm not going to go there. I'm going to treat her like a lady, unlike somebody namely you who just had to take the post sexuall. Just had to do it huh?

Yes, this I agree with you on.....TOKYO89.........where are you? Get in here, help me out, come on, I laugh at your jokes!

Dude - treat a woman how she wants to be treated, not how you think she wants to be treated. Get to know her, instead of sticking her in your 'lady category'. And no, i only call people bitches if they deserve it - but to be honest that's mostly men! Again you're making assumptions - stop it!

Sorry, you're not too hot on subtlety, so no, you're right, i didn't catch your mahhhhvelous wit. Apologies.

The Bible says a LOT of things including how a father should let a gang of villagers rape his daughter rather than bum some visiting angel. So no, i'm not using that fantastic source of moral guidance (sarcasm) thanks all the same. My morals come from my brain rather than an obsolete collection of edited and translated folk stories. Besides, this thread was about females acting like "ladies" not just women, wasn't it?

Sexual (one 'l' not two) jokes make my life dealing with you a little easier. Besides you're a christian - forgive me.

But yes, at least you have the balls to spout your antiquated diatribe - Tokyo89 wherrrrre arrrrre yooooou?

[Edited 11/10/10 10:16am]

Treat a women the way she wants to be treated? Get to know her? Ok, taking your advice, I don't give up my jacket at a Bronco's game because I haven't got to know her yet, and I don't give up my seat on the bus because I haven't got to know her yet, thats really silly. I like the idea of just treating women with respect, like a lady, no matter what. Unless she's a trampy whore who doesn't deserve it. But thats probably less than 2%

Thanks for the fake "apologies"...beats nothing

The Bible says .......... (see you at another thread)

So making sexual jokes towards women helps you so thats why you do it? Thats not selfish. Yes I'm a Christian, but not a auto-forgiving one like some. Jesus said to.........(see you at another thread)

At least I have the ........ to spout my antiquated diatribe? Can you go 1 post without a sexual or vulgar reference? How about 10? Just a thought, the world is in a shortage of class these days, we can sure use it in the Org.

I guess that line was written in the late-30s or the early-50s...

Funkcreep said:

At least I have the ........ to spout my antiquated diatribe?

Dude. Are you really serious with this antiquated, holier-than-thou nonsense? You can't type BALLS?! Really? I know plenty of God fearing Christians who are not afraid of BALLS, or using the word.

Funkcreep said:

Treat a women the way she wants to be treated? Get to know her? Ok, taking your advice, I don't give up my jacket at a Bronco's game because I haven't got to know her yet, and I don't give up my seat on the bus because I haven't got to know her yet, thats really silly. I like the idea of just treating women with respect, like a lady, no matter what. Unless she's a trampy whore who doesn't deserve it. But thats probably less than 2%

Thanks for the fake "apologies"...beats nothing

The Bible says .......... (see you at another thread)

So making sexual jokes towards women helps you so thats why you do it? Thats not selfish. Yes I'm a Christian, but not a auto-forgiving one like some. Jesus said to.........(see you at another thread)

At least I have the ........ to spout my antiquated diatribe? Can you go 1 post without a sexual or vulgar reference? How about 10? Just a thought, the world is in a shortage of class these days, we can sure use it in the Org.

Oh dear lord! (whoops - blasphemy!)

CreepyFlunk - chill man! Advice: stop taking life so seriously, you'll get an aneurysm or something! I mean, you're not too hot on the old debating anyway, are you? You're missing out on all the fun of rhetoric and logic and just going straight for the contradiction and repetition. Try and see (read-consider-evaluate) what someone else is saying before you spout the same thing over and over again! I know it works for a lot of you bible bashers, but the rest of us who are evolving need a little more than that to keep us entertained. And spouting random statistics that you just make up off the top of your head ("probably less than 2%") doth not winneth the argument!

Why not just stick to your "Things people do to irritate you..." thread? Being irritated and irritable is obviously what you do best anyway.

As for your latest flimsy responses - please treat EVERYBODY with respect. (Or those that deserve it at least!) Come on, you're being silly, not me. And if you're seriously gonna let a trampy whore freeze in the cold, or let her legs ache on the bus - then i'm sure you'll get struck down by your fictitious deity long before me, sir! BAD CHRISTIAN, YOU! BAD CHRISTIAN!

Also, please look up self-depreation if you get time off from your bible studies. It's a kind of comedy humbleness that probably would be Jesus' style if he was a stand-up. I'm not comparing myself to Jesus, perish the thought, but i will say that he may have understood (better than you) that in no way was I "making sexual jokes towards women". I was mocking my own choice of words when describing how cool i thought Erin was.

And you're confusing class with arrogance. That is all.

Oh, and finally;

Balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls.

ScottRob said:

Funkcreep said:

Treat a women the way she wants to be treated? Get to know her? Ok, taking your advice, I don't give up my jacket at a Bronco's game because I haven't got to know her yet, and I don't give up my seat on the bus because I haven't got to know her yet, thats really silly. I like the idea of just treating women with respect, like a lady, no matter what. Unless she's a trampy whore who doesn't deserve it. But thats probably less than 2%

Thanks for the fake "apologies"...beats nothing

The Bible says .......... (see you at another thread)

So making sexual jokes towards women helps you so thats why you do it? Thats not selfish. Yes I'm a Christian, but not a auto-forgiving one like some. Jesus said to.........(see you at another thread)

At least I have the ........ to spout my antiquated diatribe? Can you go 1 post without a sexual or vulgar reference? How about 10? Just a thought, the world is in a shortage of class these days, we can sure use it in the Org.

Oh dear lord! (whoops - blasphemy!)

CreepyFlunk - chill man! Advice: stop taking life so seriously, you'll get an aneurysm or something! I mean, you're not too hot on the old debating anyway, are you? You're missing out on all the fun of rhetoric and logic and just going straight for the contradiction and repetition. Try and see (read-consider-evaluate) what someone else is saying before you spout the same thing over and over again! I know it works for a lot of you bible bashers, but the rest of us who are evolving need a little more than that to keep us entertained. And spouting random statistics that you just make up off the top of your head ("probably less than 2%") doth not winneth the argument!

Why not just stick to your "Things people do to irritate you..." thread? Being irritated and irritable is obviously what you do best anyway.

As for your latest flimsy responses - please treat EVERYBODY with respect. (Or those that deserve it at least!) Come on, you're being silly, not me. And if you're seriously gonna let a trampy whore freeze in the cold, or let her legs ache on the bus - then i'm sure you'll get struck down by your fictitious deity long before me, sir! BAD CHRISTIAN, YOU! BAD CHRISTIAN!

Also, please look up self-depreation if you get time off from your bible studies. It's a kind of comedy humbleness that probably would be Jesus' style if he was a stand-up. I'm not comparing myself to Jesus, perish the thought, but i will say that he may have understood (better than you) that in no way was I "making sexual jokes towards women". I was mocking my own choice of words when describing how cool i thought Erin was.

And you're confusing class with arrogance. That is all.

Oh, and finally;

Balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls balls.

Chill? I don't take life so serious, I'm just stating what I believe. Seems like your the one getting bent outta shape. As far as debating, lets leave that up to the thread starter Tokyo to decide who is winning or won? Of course you're going to say you won, and I'm no match for you, I think an unbiased opinion would be better. And the 2% is based on personal experience. It might be as high as 3%, but 2% is a conservative number to use.

You're irritating comback was actually funny! Nice job, plus there was no vulagrity...I told you, you can do it if you try!

Bad Christian?? Interesting choice of words coming from somebody who is NOT a Christian.....I know, not here. Out of curisosity, what would be your defination of a "good Christian".

I know what you were doing with Erin, it's a sly way of flirting with her

Class is treating a lady with respect (EVEN IF YOU DONT KNOW HER), because we can safely assume that thats how she wants to be treated.

ScottRob said:

Had to hold back from replying to half a dozen or so of CreepyFlunk's blinkered mysogyny. Seems obsolete to do it hours after the event. But geez, he weren't lying when he put creep in his name!

C'mon, guy. Are the name calling and personal insults really useful here?

ScottRob said:

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

Well that's becuase I really don't care about this subject anymore .. and I said a few things, you'll never see me type a paragraph anywhere on this website though.. I keep it short

Tokyo89 said:

ScottRob said:

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

Well that's becuase I really don't care about this subject anymore .. and I said a few things, you'll never see me type a paragraph anywhere on this website though.. I keep it short

so Tokyo89, what is your conclusion on the following?

"If more males would stand up and be men, then more females would sit down and be ladies"

Funkcreep said:

Chill? I don't take life so serious, I'm just stating what I believe. Seems like your the one getting bent outta shape. As far as debating, lets leave that up to the thread starter Tokyo to decide who is winning or won? Of course you're going to say you won, and I'm no match for you, I think an unbiased opinion would be better. And the 2% is based on personal experience. It might be as high as 3%, but 2% is a conservative number to use.

You're irritating comback was actually funny! Nice job, plus there was no vulagrity...I told you, you can do it if you try!

Bad Christian?? Interesting choice of words coming from somebody who is NOT a Christian.....I know, not here. Out of curisosity, what would be your defination of a "good Christian".

I know what you were doing with Erin, it's a sly way of flirting with her

Class is treating a lady with respect (EVEN IF YOU DONT KNOW HER), because we can safely assume that thats how she wants to be treated.

Again - great use of stats! However i would say that i'm only 0.02% bent out of shape.

Many thanks for the condescending complement. Glad i made you ("actually") laugh - just watch your spelling (again) when trying to belittle someone, it lessens the impact; vulgarity, not vulagrity. Re: my lack of vulgarity - maybe when skim-reading my reply you missed my extra balls tho?

For my "bad christian" comment - please see 'irony'. You'll find it in the dictionary just above 'irritating'. To answer your question - a 'good christian' is a bit of an oxymoron to me really. No, maybe one that remains open-minded and doesn't rely on any arrogant belief that their personal faith is all that matters. Difficult to find.

Sorry is flirting morally wrong as well? Again i'll point you back to 'self-depreciation'.

And stating the obvious about treating a lady (or man) with respect does not solely make a person classy. A person with true class would treat a woman who wasn't a lady with respect as well. Also, true class would be beneath all this (not me!).

[Apologies to all for my past and future paragraphs - i understand that some find reading more than 5 words a little tedious. i'm a bit bored tonight]

[Edited 11/10/10 18:06pm]

Lammastide said:

ScottRob said:

Had to hold back from replying to half a dozen or so of CreepyFlunk's blinkered mysogyny. Seems obsolete to do it hours after the event. But geez, he weren't lying when he put creep in his name!

C'mon, guy. Are the name calling and personal insults really useful here?

Fair enough Lammastide, i was being facetious. I just found his comments about blaming atheists, feminists and liberals for some sort of moral degradation in today's society, extremely grating and hypocritical. But yeah, insinuating he's a pathetic creep was a little low. I stand corrected.

Apologies Flunkcreep.

Tokyo89 said:

ScottRob said:

Interesting how Tokyo89 put this out there, but had nothing to say on the matter...

Well that's becuase I really don't care about this subject anymore .. and I said a few things, you'll never see me type a paragraph anywhere on this website though.. I keep it short

How succinct.

Well you know what they say? - length isn't everything.

the world is in a shortage of class these days, we can sure use it in the Org

what? then where would I go? the Org is like school on Saturday.....no class!

...and I like it that way

Remember how I said this is like a P&R thread without the P&R?

I was wrong.

FauxReal said:

Remember how I said this is like a P&R thread without the P&R?

I was wrong.

And good evening.

Hello there.

Funkcreep said:

Tokyo89 said:

Well that's becuase I really don't care about this subject anymore .. and I said a few things, you'll never see me type a paragraph anywhere on this website though.. I keep it short

so Tokyo89, what is your conclusion on the following?

"If more males would stand up and be men, then more females would sit down and be ladies"

It's a hopeless dream, thought up by someone trying to find a good man..

Now I wanna switch it around:

If more females would sit down and be ladies, then more males would stand up and be men...

BklynBabe said:

the world is in a shortage of class these days, we can sure use it in the Org

what? then where would I go? the Org is like school on Saturday.....no class!

...and I like it that way

haha. It's like sermon on sunday at Eddie Long's church. the children are spoiled and that rod is in full use!