independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Fired for Being too Sexy
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 11 « First<234567891011>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 06/08/10 8:37am

heybaby

paintedlady said:

heybaby said:

I don't see anything wrong with anything thing she wore confuse. the black dress was kinda tight fitted and I agree inappropriate for a professional setting but not for the club either shrug

I do... the turtle neck for example. It looks nice, fitted... but add the wrong bra that has her nipples poking through the fabric then it becomes wrong for the work place. IF she wore a bra at all.

The trousers... fitted as well, but if she's twitching hard as she walks by, then its a distraction and over the top. A mean walk can be a distraction also, never mind adding to that fitted clothing that amplifies a gorgeous figure.

I believe the problem probrably has more to do with her attitude and how her slamming body wears in those office clothes that may make someone stare a bit too long.

I am guessing of course, but she did say that this happens at ALL her places of employment which leads me to think its more her than her employer IMHO.

Heck, they can't ALL be wrong.

I had nipple problems w/ AC in the summer. I have big tits too, and fat or thin, you have to wear the right under garmets to keep the girls under control. I know you feel me. wink

Oh, and I am not hating (not posed to you, just others that might think I'm dogging Ms. Sexy)... I was lucky enough to work at a store that had mirrors every where, when I saw my own nipples poking through shirts, bra sillouettes. This caused me to tone down my own over all look. I bet if she worked in a room full of mirrors she would see what others see and understand what to do, and what NOT to wear.

[Edited 6/7/10 22:22pm]

I get what your saying but I still can't see it. And as far as her attitude or mean walk or what ever has more to do with other peoples issues-not hers lol I just think its a bit much. And I'm not saying anyone is hating on this woman-but it happens and men do stare but how far does a person have to go to make others feel at ease? go beyond what is requested of others? I don't think so. If it is what she says it is it all just seems a bit too much...I agree with JustErin.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 06/08/10 8:41am

uPtoWnNY

paintedlady said:

Oh, and I am not hating (not posed to you, just others that might think I'm dogging Ms. Sexy)...

I wouldn't mind dogging Ms. Sexy... wink

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 06/08/10 9:36am

jone70

avatar

An opinion piece from the NY Times:

June 4, 2010
Dressed to Distract

It’s hard to feel sorry for a woman who frets about being too beautiful.

Ordinarily in life, extraordinary good looks are an advantage for men and women — and even babies. Not only do babies gaze longer at more comely adult faces, research tells us, but parents may gaze longer at more comely babies.

A research team at the University of Alberta conducted a study at a supermarket and observed that parents gave more attention and supervision to their pretty ducklings.

Aesthetic allure is evolutionary, after all. “Like lots of animals,” said Dr. Andrew Harrell, the team leader, “we tend to parcel out our resources on the basis of value.”

So it was unusual when a knockout in New York, Debrahlee Lorenzana, a 33-year-old single mother, filed suit against Citigroup, claiming that she was fired in August from the Citibank branch at the Chrysler Center for looking too sexy.

“Plaintiff was advised that as a result of the shape of her figure,” her lawsuit reads, “such clothes were purportedly `too distracting’ for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear.”

Late-night comedians and tabloids have had a field day. “She Flaunted Her Assets,” punned The New York Daily News. Last week’s Village Voice cover profile of Lorenzana, who grew up in Puerto Rico and moved to New York when she was 21, raved about the bank officer’s charms: “At five-foot-six and 125 pounds, with soft eyes and flawless bronze skin, she is J. Lo curves meets Jessica Simpson rack meets Audrey Hepburn elegance.”

TV and tabloids ran pictures, taken by a photographer who works with her lawyer, showing Lorenzana in the pencil skirts, turtlenecks, tailored jackets and stilettos that she says made her bosses at the bank concentrate on the wrong kind of figures.

“She has to manage her wardrobe so these men can manage their libidos?” said her lawyer, Jack Tuckner, adding that her bosses acted as immaturely as the boys on “Wayne’s World.”

On Thursday night, as she prepared to appear on the Monday morning shows, Lorenzana recalled that her supervisors obsessed over what she was wearing, “saying things are too tight, you cannot wear turtlenecks. Well, guess what? When you say my pants are too tight when they’re not, then you must have been staring at me.

“The reality is, I’m a size 32 DD. I’m very skinny, and then I have curves. So, of course, on my body, the turtleneck is going to make it more noticeable. But I’m not showing cleavage. We wear jackets.”

She said a co-worker who shopped with her and bought the same styles and designer brands never got in trouble, and neither did some tellers who wore low-cut tops, snug pants and hot boots.

“I said, ‘You are discriminating to me, because of my body type,’ “ she said with a slight accent and a breathy voice. “This is genetic. What am I supposed to do?”

Citigroup didn’t return calls for comment on Friday. Lorenzana’s lawsuit says that her bosses told her that her female colleagues could wear what they liked because their “general unattractiveness rendered moot their sartorial choices.” Her well-tailored clothes, on the other hand, emphasized what her lawyer calls her “hourglass figure.”

This case has caused such fascination because usually it’s the other way around.

Attractive professors get better evaluations from their students, according to one study.

A 2005 analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis confirmed what seems apparent, from presidential races to executive boardrooms: Good-looking people and tall people get a “beauty premium” — an extra 5 percent an hour — while there is a “plainness penalty” of 9 percent in wages.

A study that looked at men’s height as teenagers and their salaries later found they made $789 more a year for every extra inch of height. Meanwhile, obese women tend to get substantially lower wages than women of average weight.

Although people laugh at the idea of a babe in the office being as maddening as Tantalus’s out-of-reach fruit, women do get penalized this way sometimes.

A male friend once told me he was looking for an unattractive personal assistant so he wouldn’t be tempted. And when I was hiring a Grace Kelly blonde as a researcher a few years ago, a male colleague asked me not to because it would be “too distracting” to him; two girlfriends cautioned me not to because it would be depressing — and therefore, distracting — for me to work with someone so good looking. (It wasn’t.)

“Sometimes, honestly, I wish I didn’t look the way I did,” Lorenzana says, “because people judge you right away. Other women have their guards up, they automatically categorize you as being conceited. I have to work three times as hard to prove that I earned this through my hard work.

“My life has been hard my whole entire life. People have this misconception that, ‘Oh, you do well in your life because of your looks.’ No, I am harassed.”

(Here is the direct link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/opinion/06dowd.html?src=me&ref=general I couldn't get the hyperlinking to work correctly with this new system.)

The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 06/08/10 10:02am

heybaby

“Sometimes, honestly, I wish I didn’t look the way I did,” Lorenzana says

She's a damn lie lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 06/08/10 10:20am

NDRU

avatar

Let's look at it from a different angle.

If a guy wore ballet pants, with his huge bulge on display, would anyone have a problem with it as long as they had pinstripes?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 06/08/10 10:22am

JustErin

avatar

NDRU said:

Let's look at it from a different angle.

If a guy wore ballet pants, with his huge bulge on display, would anyone have a problem with it as long as they had pinstripes?

If he is adhering to the dresscode, what is the issue?

If not, well...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 06/08/10 10:24am

tinaz

avatar

Why is she acting like she's the only "pretty" woman the WHOLE ENTIRE huge ass company of Citibank, has EVER hired...rolleyes

~~~~~ Oh that voice...incredible....there should be a musical instrument called George Michael... ~~~~~
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 06/08/10 10:24am

novabrkr

heybaby said:

“Sometimes, honestly, I wish I didn’t look the way I did,” Lorenzana says

She's a damn lie lol

I can relate to her. That's exactly how I often feel too.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 06/08/10 10:31am

NDRU

avatar

JustErin said:

NDRU said:

Let's look at it from a different angle.

If a guy wore ballet pants, with his huge bulge on display, would anyone have a problem with it as long as they had pinstripes?

If he is adhering to the dresscode, what is the issue?

If not, well...

What about a painted on suit? Or a bithday suit? smile

I'm sure there is something in dress codes about tight or "provocative" clothing. It might look professional to some, but I work with plenty of curvy women that are not displaying it like this chick--and again I would not have a problem with it, but I'm just saying I can see citibank's point, especially if her behavior is an issue, too.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 06/08/10 11:19am

Reel

Well damn, she has a nice body, but she is not all of that "Beautiful", she's actually kind of average. And folks are wondering why she gets no sympathy. She made statements like that when the story first dropped. I personally think she's a bit hystrionic.

Hell, and people are mean to obese too. The first thing people would have said if she was obese that "she should look in the mirror before she leaves her home". Look how many people kick sand at Aretha Franklin all of the time because of the way she dresses. So I disagree with that "If she was obese people would feel sorry for her" statement.

Again, most of the outfits shown in that clip are fine for work in my opinion...however that black fitted dress was not professional at all. Also...notice how she is posing in those pics. And who's to say that's even what she wore, those pics did not look exactly "spontaneous", perhaps she took them because she knew that she would be having an upcoming lawsuit. Who takes that many pictures of THEMSELVES at work?

Although I'm your biggest fan...I'm also your biggest critic. Can you deal with that?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 06/08/10 11:31am

FauxReal

Reel said:

Well damn, she has a nice body, but she is not all of that "Beautiful", she's actually kind of average. And folks are wondering why she gets no sympathy. She made statements like that when the story first dropped. I personally think she's a bit hystrionic.



Hell, and people are mean to obese too. The first thing people would have said if she was obese that "she should look in the mirror before she leaves her home". Look how many people kick sand at Aretha Franklin all of the time because of the way she dresses. So I disagree with that "If she was obese people would feel sorry for her" statement.



Again, most of the outfits shown in that clip are fine for work in my opinion...however that black fitted dress was not professional at all. Also...notice how she is posing in those pics. And who's to say that's even what she wore, those pics did not look exactly "spontaneous", perhaps she took them because she knew that she would be having an upcoming lawsuit. Who takes that many pictures of THEMSELVES at work?



Nobody knows at the moment what she truly wore to work but it seems like a lot of folks are intent on assuming it wasnt the clothing shown and that she's just full of shit.

I think most people on here that are saying citibank may be wrong do so by prefacing it with IF that is actually what she wore...then yes citibank was wrong.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 06/08/10 11:37am

chocolate1

avatar

NDRU said:

Let's look at it from a different angle.

If a guy wore ballet pants, with his huge bulge on display, would anyone have a problem with it as long as they had pinstripes?

Hello!

I said something similar last night!!!!


"Love Hurts.
Your lies, they cut me.
Now your words don't mean a thing.
I don't give a damn if you ever loved me..."

-Cher, "Woman's World"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 06/08/10 11:42am

NDRU

avatar

chocolate1 said:

NDRU said:

Let's look at it from a different angle.

If a guy wore ballet pants, with his huge bulge on display, would anyone have a problem with it as long as they had pinstripes?

Hello!

I said something similar last night!!!!

I always knew you were brilliant

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 06/08/10 11:42am

chocolate1

avatar

JustErin said:

heybaby said:

I don't see anything wrong with anything thing she wore confuse. the black dress was kinda tight fitted and I agree inappropriate for a professional setting but not for the club either shrug

Like I said, go to any bank or office around the city and you'll see women dressed like this - of all shapes and sizes.

When I was in a more professional setting I dressed like this. It’s my style, it’s how I dress and it’s definitely professional.

And there it is...

Just because you'd wear it, does not make it "definitely professional". It's simply that you think it's okay to wear.


"Love Hurts.
Your lies, they cut me.
Now your words don't mean a thing.
I don't give a damn if you ever loved me..."

-Cher, "Woman's World"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 06/08/10 1:07pm

JustErin

avatar

tinaz said:

Why is she acting like she's the only "pretty" woman the WHOLE ENTIRE huge ass company of Citibank, has EVER hired...rolleyes

confuse

I don't get that from her at all. She simply talking about her experiences.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 06/08/10 1:35pm

uPtoWnNY

heybaby said:

“Sometimes, honestly, I wish I didn’t look the way I did,” Lorenzana says

She's a damn lie lol

nod

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 06/08/10 1:39pm

paintedlady

avatar

heybaby said:

“Sometimes, honestly, I wish I didn’t look the way I did,” Lorenzana says

She's a damn lie lol

falloff

I'm sorry but all her credibility flies out the window with that one. Shit, I love being pretty, and if I was finer, I'd love it more. lol

I really think that its her problem since she tends to have this particular problem at all her work places. If she wants to keep working in those types of enviornments then she needs to change her attitude and/or her attire to fit the bill.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 06/08/10 1:48pm

JustErin

avatar

NDRU said:

JustErin said:

If he is adhering to the dresscode, what is the issue?

If not, well...

What about a painted on suit? Or a bithday suit? smile

I'm sure there is something in dress codes about tight or "provocative" clothing. It might look professional to some, but I work with plenty of curvy women that are not displaying it like this chick--and again I would not have a problem with it, but I'm just saying I can see citibank's point, especially if her behavior is an issue, too.

She was not wearing tight or provocative clothing though.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 06/08/10 1:50pm

JustErin

avatar

chocolate1 said:

JustErin said:

Like I said, go to any bank or office around the city and you'll see women dressed like this - of all shapes and sizes.

When I was in a more professional setting I dressed like this. It’s my style, it’s how I dress and it’s definitely professional.

And there it is...

Just because you'd wear it, does not make it "definitely professional". It's simply that you think it's okay to wear.

No, it is professional wear and has been deemed so by my employers.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 06/08/10 1:53pm

NDRU

avatar

JustErin said:

NDRU said:

What about a painted on suit? Or a bithday suit? smile

I'm sure there is something in dress codes about tight or "provocative" clothing. It might look professional to some, but I work with plenty of curvy women that are not displaying it like this chick--and again I would not have a problem with it, but I'm just saying I can see citibank's point, especially if her behavior is an issue, too.

She was not wearing tight or provocative clothing though.

but you think pinstripe ballet pants are okay for guys to wear, so...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 06/08/10 1:54pm

paintedlady

avatar

uPtoWnNY said:

paintedlady said:

Oh, and I am not hating (not posed to you, just others that might think I'm dogging Ms. Sexy)...

I wouldn't mind dogging Ms. Sexy... wink

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 06/08/10 1:59pm

paintedlady

avatar

JustErin said:

chocolate1 said:

And there it is...

Just because you'd wear it, does not make it "definitely professional". It's simply that you think it's okay to wear.

No, it is professional wear and has been deemed so by my employers.

Obivously not hers, otherwise she'd have a job. wink

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 06/08/10 2:48pm

JustErin

avatar

paintedlady said:

JustErin said:

No, it is professional wear and has been deemed so by my employers.

Obivously not hers, otherwise she'd have a job. wink

And that's what the problem is. Others with different body types are wearing similar clothing, isn't that her claim?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 06/08/10 3:10pm

paintedlady

avatar

JustErin said:

paintedlady said:

Obivously not hers, otherwise she'd have a job. wink

And that's what the problem is. Others with different body types are wearing similar clothing, isn't that her claim?

Her co-workers had enough issues that it caused a problem at ALL her previous jobs.

If it was one job I would see her POV. But every job she's had? Others may dress similar but not the same, otherwise it would be a class action suit against the company.

IMHO, fat women wearing those outfits would be seen as sluts and asked immediately to wear more proper attire. Women's plus sized professional clothing lines are not made to be fitted at all, most plus sized suiting is cut to look matronly. Bigger girls hide their ample breasts under scarfs and lager jewelry also.

She looks good because she is slender and curvy. Fat or thin, the more curves you have, the less people want to see them. (at the work place that is... unless its Hooters)

[Edited 6/8/10 15:12pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 06/08/10 3:16pm

JustErin

avatar

I seemed to have missed her claim that it has happened at all her jobs....Can I see the quote?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 06/08/10 3:18pm

JustErin

avatar

paintedlady said:

JustErin said:

And that's what the problem is. Others with different body types are wearing similar clothing, isn't that her claim?

Her co-workers had enough issues that it caused a problem at ALL her previous jobs.

If it was one job I would see her POV. But every job she's had? Others may dress similar but not the same, otherwise it would be a class action suit against the company.

IMHO, fat women wearing those outfits would be seen as sluts and asked immediately to wear more proper attire. Women's plus sized professional clothing lines are not made to be fitted at all, most plus sized suiting is cut to look matronly. Bigger girls hide their ample breasts under scarfs and lager jewelry also.

She looks good because she is slender and curvy. Fat or thin, the more curves you have, the less people want to see them. (at the work place that is... unless its Hooters)

[Edited 6/8/10 15:12pm]

That is absolutely not true at all.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 06/08/10 3:24pm

paintedlady

avatar

JustErin said:

paintedlady said:

Her co-workers had enough issues that it caused a problem at ALL her previous jobs.

If it was one job I would see her POV. But every job she's had? Others may dress similar but not the same, otherwise it would be a class action suit against the company.

IMHO, fat women wearing those outfits would be seen as sluts and asked immediately to wear more proper attire. Women's plus sized professional clothing lines are not made to be fitted at all, most plus sized suiting is cut to look matronly. Bigger girls hide their ample breasts under scarfs and lager jewelry also.

She looks good because she is slender and curvy. Fat or thin, the more curves you have, the less people want to see them. (at the work place that is... unless its Hooters)

[Edited 6/8/10 15:12pm]

That is absolutely not true at all.

Yes it is. Compared to the slimmer counter parts it is.

Color choices are usually toned down, prints are usually God awful and shirts are cut boxy.

I buy plus sized clothing all the time. Lane Brynat (for example) is getting better, but their cuts fall on the generous side even though the company tries hard to keep up on trend.

Women's plus sized lines tend to have that mom's jeans cut in the trousers too. High waisted for the most part.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 06/08/10 3:26pm

JustErin

avatar

paintedlady said:

JustErin said:

That is absolutely not true at all.

Yes it is. Compared to the slimmer counter parts it is.

Color choices are usually toned down, prints are usually God awful and shirts are cut boxy.

I buy plus sized clothing all the time. Lane Brynat (for example) is getting better, but their cuts fall on the generous side even though the company tries hard to keep up on trend.

Women's plus sized lines tend to have that mom's jeans cut in the trousers too. High waisted for the most part.

As someone who has shopped both plus and regular, I can tell you that this is not true.

Maybe in the states but absolutely not here.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 06/08/10 3:36pm

paintedlady

avatar

JustErin said:

paintedlady said:

Yes it is. Compared to the slimmer counter parts it is.

Color choices are usually toned down, prints are usually God awful and shirts are cut boxy.

I buy plus sized clothing all the time. Lane Brynat (for example) is getting better, but their cuts fall on the generous side even though the company tries hard to keep up on trend.

Women's plus sized lines tend to have that mom's jeans cut in the trousers too. High waisted for the most part.

As someone who has shopped both plus and regular, I can tell you that this is not true.

Maybe in the states but absolutely not here.

I bought both also.... I miss being a regular size sigh

Talbot's plus lines, Lane Bryant, Land's End, and LL Bean all have great clothing for the work place but their plus sizes lack options.

Ann Taylor and Banana Republic (etc.) don't even go into plus sizes... they only offerL- XL and those are not considered plus sized clothing so those sizes would look the same as a size XS-M.

The sizes I speak of are 16W- 32W... the clothing is just made different.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 06/08/10 4:23pm

DesireeNevermi
nd

what happened to this thread? sad

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 11 « First<234567891011>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Fired for Being too Sexy