DesireeNevermind said:

what happened to this thread?

Why the sad face?

paintedlady said:

DesireeNevermind said:

what happened to this thread?

Why the sad face?

we talking about fashions. that's always sad. we need to talk about how this heffa gonna get paid or if she gonna get paid at all.

come on people deliberate!!!

does she have a case?

is she just a ho tryna come up?

is she honest to goodness a hard worker who is being singled out for being better looking than the other female workers?

she has implants. they look little....stiff.

DesireeNevermind said:

paintedlady said:

Why the sad face?

we talking about fashions. that's always sad. we need to talk about how this heffa gonna get paid or if she gonna get paid at all.

come on people deliberate!!!

does she have a case?

is she just a ho tryna come up?

is she honest to goodness a hard worker who is being singled out for being better looking than the other female workers?

she has implants. they look little....stiff.

The clothing goes towards the tramp status. Will she get paid? Her lawyer is banking on it!

You think those are implants? I'd like to think those are real since she's all " Whoa is me... I am too beautiful - violins playing, fake tear on her cheek " .

Let that woman gain weigh like me... she won't have those problems anymore.

can't spell worth a damn edit

[Edited 6/8/10 17:45pm]

So it turns out that she was trying to get all that attention...

Yes, paintedlady, they are fake!

Banking beauty Debrahlee Lorenzana had two boob jobs, wanted to be stacked like Playboy Playmate

BY SIMONE WEICHSELBAUM AND JOSE MARTINEZ
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS

Wednesday, June 9th 2010, 4:00 AM

Debrahlee Lorenzana playfully uses fruit to demonstrate her preferred breast size in 2003 TV series called 'Plastic Surgery New York Style.'

Lorenzana wanted to be a cross between Pamela Anderson and Carmen Electra.

Turns out those assets are inflated.

Debrahlee Lorenzana, the bombshell banker who says Citigroup canned her because men couldn't stop gawking, repeatedly went under the knife to get her brick-house build.

A Discovery Health Channel series chronicled Lorenzana's pursuit of plastic surgery perfection, in which she described her desire to be stacked like a Playboy Playmate.

"That's what I want to be: t--- on a stick," she titters in "Plastic Surgery New York Style."

Her ultimate goal, she says, is to be a cross between Pamela Anderson and Carmen Electra.

The four-part series, which aired in 2003, features a then-26-year-old Lorenzana as she prepares for her fourth plastic surgery - a boob job by Dr. Kaven Alizadeh that she hoped would make her a "huge, double-D" with "very perky" breasts.

"I love plastic surgery," Lorenzana said. "I think it is the best thing that ever happened."

At the time, she already had had a tummy tuck, another boob job and liposuction.

A TV crew followed the curvy Queens mom on her "determined manhunt" in which she gushed about finding a blue-eyed dreamboat with the looks of a George Clooney or Ben Affleck.

"He'll be happy because I'll be looking like a little Playboy Playmate," Lorenzana chirped into the camera.

At another point, she giggles as she holds up two giant melons in front of her chest.

The amply endowed single mom made headlines around the world since news broke of her suit against Citi, which she says retaliated against her for complaining about leering male co-workers at herManhattan branch who couldn't handle her workplace clothing style.

Her lawyers insist her admitted love of plastic surgery does nothing to change her case against Citi - or her complaint that new employer JPMorgan Chase is trying to shut her up.

"Whatever her assets are, they don't have a right to comment on them or objectify her," said lawyer Jack Tuckner.

The series tracked Lorenzana before her surgery at the Long Island Plastic Surgical Group, which followed the birth of her son.

"Does that mean it's open season on a woman because she had her hair done or her nose done?" said William Sipser, another of her lawyers.

The luscious Latina has said Citi honchos ordered her to quit wearing clothes that accented her curves, and transferred her when she went to human resources.

Lorenzana seems to be craving male attention in the Discovery series, as she tries to convince Alizadeh that bigger is better and talks about her family's resistance to more plastic surgery.

"It's my body," she said in the video. "So whether they like it or not, I [couldn't] care less about their opinion."

simonew@nydailynews.com

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.co...z0qLnjf1hD

emphasis edit

[Edited 6/9/10 4:49am]

See this ^ is what happens when you fluck around and make false claims on an employer / institution that has money. They hire the best attorneys to dig up all of your shydt. Now...I wonder how this lawsuit is going to fair when it's learned that Miss "I'm so beautiful" went and had 2 boob job and decided to wear inappropriate clothes to get her co-worker attention. See I knew she was hystrionic. The sad thing is that the NY press is going to never leave her alone. She better hope that reality TV comes a calling because she will likely not find employment anywhere else.

gee.... Didnt see THAT coming!

I'm not sure how her having fake tits and being on a show 7 years ago changes anything.

JustErin said:

I'm not sure how her having fake tits and being on a show 7 years ago changes anything.

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

tinaz said:

JustErin said:

I'm not sure how her having fake tits and being on a show 7 years ago changes anything.

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

Does any female nowadays have the credentials of being taken seriously as a professional businesswomen? Maybe if she was on BET...no I wasn't being serious.

NastradumasKid said:

tinaz said:

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

Does any female nowadays have the credentials of being taken seriously as a professional businesswomen? Maybe if she was on BET...no I wasn't being serious.

tinaz said:

JustErin said:

I'm not sure how her having fake tits and being on a show 7 years ago changes anything.

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

Oh, I beg to differ. What someone did 7 years ago does not automatically tarnish their professional lives forever. And getting fake tits and being in a show does not suddenly make someone incapable of being a professional business woman now. That's ridiculous.

I simply do not understand how this suddenly automatically disputes her allegations. It's very plausible that what she claims happened to her actually happened to her, regardless of what her past is.

It's basically like saying a woman that was sexually assaulted or harassed has no credibility because she got implants and therefore she is just looking for attention.

tinaz said:

NastradumasKid said:

Does any female nowadays have the credentials of being taken seriously as a professional businesswomen? Maybe if she was on BET...no I wasn't being serious.

I am not sexist, I'm a female, just for future references.

tinaz said:

JustErin said:

I'm not sure how her having fake tits and being on a show 7 years ago changes anything.

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

The parts I highlighted said it all:

"A TV crew followed the curvy Queens mom on her "determined manhunt" in which she gushed about finding a blue-eyed dreamboat with the looks of a George Clooney or Ben Affleck.

"He'll be happy because I'll be looking like a little Playboy Playmate," Lorenzana chirped into the camera."

She was LOOKING for the attention, trying to snag a man...

So she put herself out there and it backfired.

JustErin said:

tinaz said:

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

Oh, I beg to differ. What someone did 7 years ago does not automatically tarnish their professional lives forever. And getting fake tits and being in a show does not suddenly make someone incapable of being a professional business woman now. That's ridiculous.

I simply do not understand how this suddenly automatically disputes her allegations. It's very plausible that what she claims happened to her actually happened to her, regardless of what her past is.

It's basically like saying a woman that was sexually assaulted or harassed has no credibility because she got implants and therefore she is just looking for attention.

No Erin, thats not what I am saying... First off, when someone pays all that money to get boob jobs, tummy tucks and all the other pplastic surgery she has gotten, that means she LOVES attention... you dont make the quote of..."I wanna be tits on a stick" without basically saying she loves the attention she gets from men... Which is fine, who doesnt, but the point is, She knew EXACTLY what she was doing by wearing the tight fitting clothes...

That is why her story will have NO CREDITBILITY anymore....

She was fired from her job, not because she wore turtlenecks, but because she was a shitty employee who wouldnt adhere to the dress code...

NastradumasKid said:

tinaz said:

I am not sexist, I'm a female, just for future references.

OHHHH ok! I take the fishslap back then!!

chocolate1 said:

tinaz said:

because all of this is makes her out to be an attention whore, and she will have no credibility as a serious professional business woman now...

The parts I highlighted said it all:

"A TV crew followed the curvy Queens mom on her "determined manhunt" in which she gushed about finding a blue-eyed dreamboat with the looks of a George Clooney or Ben Affleck.

"He'll be happy because I'll be looking like a little Playboy Playmate," Lorenzana chirped into the camera."

She was LOOKING for the attention, trying to snag a man...

So she put herself out there and it backfired.

Ya, 7 years ago.

Besides so what if she is looking for a man. Isn't 99% of the female population doing just that?

tinaz said:

JustErin said:

Oh, I beg to differ. What someone did 7 years ago does not automatically tarnish their professional lives forever. And getting fake tits and being in a show does not suddenly make someone incapable of being a professional business woman now. That's ridiculous.

I simply do not understand how this suddenly automatically disputes her allegations. It's very plausible that what she claims happened to her actually happened to her, regardless of what her past is.

It's basically like saying a woman that was sexually assaulted or harassed has no credibility because she got implants and therefore she is just looking for attention.

No Erin, thats not what I am saying... First off, when someone pays all that money to get boob jobs, tummy tucks and all the other pplastic surgery she has gotten, that means she LOVES attention... you dont make the quote of..."I wanna be tits on a stick" without basically saying she loves the attention she gets from men... Which is fine, who doesnt, but the point is, She knew EXACTLY what she was doing by wearing the tight fitting clothes...

That is why her story will have NO CREDITBILITY anymore....

She was fired from her job, not because she wore turtlenecks, but because she was a shitty employee who wouldnt adhere to the dress code...

But that's where you're wrong. Wanting attention does not automatically dispute credibility. And no court will automatically claim it does without looking at all the facts.

but Citibank claims she was not fired over dress code infractions...

So you're basically saying that a woman that likes attention from men (and let's face it, that means certain men) should just deal with sexual harassment because she likes attention - even if it's from men she has no interest in.

That's what harassment means....unwanted sexual attention.

In a court of law...it all comes down to credibility. When you make flaming allegations against your employer, and then you mention the don't hate me because im beautiful crap, and then you are seen on a reality TV show holding melons to your tits......any judge with 1/2 a brain is going to see right through that, and not even think about rewarding her any money. That case is closed, and now she probably will end up losing her job at Chase. Women who get boob jobs, generally do not feel adequate with their own God given bodies, and they feel that they are lacking the attention that they see other women get. This woman was all about attention, and that was clear before this new article was even posted. Oh well, hope she's saving up her money. I betchu that scum bag of an attorney that she has will probably drop the case now.

tinaz said:

NastradumasKid said:

I am not sexist, I'm a female, just for future references.

OHHHH ok! I take the fishslap back then!!

Cool!!!!

JustErin said:

tinaz said:

No Erin, thats not what I am saying... First off, when someone pays all that money to get boob jobs, tummy tucks and all the other pplastic surgery she has gotten, that means she LOVES attention... you dont make the quote of..."I wanna be tits on a stick" without basically saying she loves the attention she gets from men... Which is fine, who doesnt, but the point is, She knew EXACTLY what she was doing by wearing the tight fitting clothes...

That is why her story will have NO CREDITBILITY anymore....

She was fired from her job, not because she wore turtlenecks, but because she was a shitty employee who wouldnt adhere to the dress code...

But that's where you're wrong. Wanting attention does not automatically dispute credibility. And no court will automatically claim it does without looking at all the facts.

but Citibank claims she was not fired over dress code infractions...

So you're basically saying that a woman that likes attention from men (and let's face it, that means certain men) should just deal with sexual harassment because she likes attention - even if it's from men she has no interest in.

That's what harassment means....unwanted sexual attention.

Did you read that article at all??

"

The luscious Latina has said Citi honchos ordered her to quit wearing clothes that accented her curves, and transferred her when she went to human resources.

Lorenzana seems to be craving male attention in the Discovery series, as she tries to convince Alizadeh that bigger is better and talks about her family's resistance to more plastic surgery.

"It's my body," she said in the video. "So whether they like it or not, I [couldn't] care less about their opinion."

The thing is, when you LOOK for attention, 9 out of 10 times you'll get it.

It can't be "unwanted" if she was trying to put herself out there. It's harassment when you DON'T want it.

But anyway, it is obvious that no matter how it is explained or discussed, Erin has her opinion and we have ours. If she thinks that those clothes are fine, then so be it.

However, I will continue to maintain that she was not dressed appropriately and she is only seeking attention, and no amount of rationalizing it will change those thoughts.

tinaz said:

JustErin said:

But that's where you're wrong. Wanting attention does not automatically dispute credibility. And no court will automatically claim it does without looking at all the facts.

but Citibank claims she was not fired over dress code infractions...

So you're basically saying that a woman that likes attention from men (and let's face it, that means certain men) should just deal with sexual harassment because she likes attention - even if it's from men she has no interest in.

That's what harassment means....unwanted sexual attention.

Did you read that article at all??

"

The luscious Latina has said Citi honchos ordered her to quit wearing clothes that accented her curves, and transferred her when she went to human resources.

Lorenzana seems to be craving male attention in the Discovery series, as she tries to convince Alizadeh that bigger is better and talks about her family's resistance to more plastic surgery.

"It's my body," she said in the video. "So whether they like it or not, I [couldn't] care less about their opinion."

But Citbank said that's not the case at all. So who do you believe? You believe her with something and not with others?

What side are you on?

FauxReal said:

Yeah this hurts her case without a doubt, but I don't agree with the idea that it's open season for anyone and everyone to ogle, harass, discriminate, etc. Because of a choice and statement she made 7 years ago. I guess that woman that went up to Mike Tyson's room at 3AM deserved anything and everything that might've happened because she was clearly looking for attention...

Totally my point.

This just in (from NY Magazine)...

Edit: Oooops...someone already posted it.

My favorite of the comments there:

Of course, she's going to get harrassed in sweat clothes, especially if they say "Tits on a Stick" in the butt.

[Edited 6/9/10 7:31am]

chocolate1 said:

The thing is, when you LOOK for attention, 9 out of 10 times you'll get it.

It can't be "unwanted" if she was trying to put herself out there. It's harassment when you DON'T want it.

But anyway, it is obvious that no matter how it is explained or discussed, Erin has her opinion and we have ours. If she thinks that those clothes are fine, then so be it.

However, I will continue to maintain that she was not dressed appropriately and she is only seeking attention, and no amount of rationalizing it will change those thoughts.

It can't be unwanted if it's put out there?

I'm sorry, but if this is really what you mean, this is a scary comment.

So chick dresses hot for her bf and another man rapes her but she has no credibility because she put it out there?

Yikes.

JustErin said:

chocolate1 said:

The thing is, when you LOOK for attention, 9 out of 10 times you'll get it.

It can't be "unwanted" if she was trying to put herself out there. It's harassment when you DON'T want it.

But anyway, it is obvious that no matter how it is explained or discussed, Erin has her opinion and we have ours. If she thinks that those clothes are fine, then so be it.

However, I will continue to maintain that she was not dressed appropriately and she is only seeking attention, and no amount of rationalizing it will change those thoughts.

It can't be unwanted if it's put out there?

I'm sorry, but if this is really what you mean, this is a scary comment.

So chick dresses hot for her bf and another man rapes her but she has no credibility because she put it out there?

Yikes.

If she's dressing hot for her boyfriend, wouldn't her boyfriend be present, thereby lessening the risk of her receiving unwanted attention?

JustErin said:

So who do you believe?

Without knowing her job performance, I don't know who to believe.

chocolate1 said:

So it turns out that she was trying to get all that attention...

Yes, paintedlady, they are fake!

Dang.... and she's all "I wished I wasn't born this way" :blah blah:

heck, we could all look that good or better if we all had surgical proceedures to get slammin' bodies.

Now this sorta proves to me that she may NOT be wearing bras since she's got rubber tits.

Reel said:

See this ^ is what happens when you fluck around and make false claims on an employer / institution that has money. They hire the best attorneys to dig up all of your shydt. Now...I wonder how this lawsuit is going to fair when it's learned that Miss "I'm so beautiful" went and had 2 boob job and decided to wear inappropriate clothes to get her co-worker attention. See I knew she was hystrionic. The sad thing is that the NY press is going to never leave her alone. She better hope that reality TV comes a calling because she will likely not find employment anywhere else.