independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > USA TODAY: Prince shows off a different side for '21 Nights'
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 11 of 11 « First<234567891011

This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.

  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #300 posted 09/30/08 6:11am

funkyhead

carlcranshaw said:[quote]

MontRoyal said:

Nice interview. Some ideas of course you wonder if they will ever come life. The book seems cool, but more of a glorified tour program(like Lovesexy 88).There was some great photography there too! The best portion of the package might be the live CD.

But the comments of politics.



If anyone was there, they would recall:

While on stage in July 2004,(another year of election) at the Superdome in New Orleans Prince mentioned that voting (for Kerry or Bush) would change little. This was before a crowd of over 50,000 people, mostly African-American attending the Essence festival.

I was at that show. I had to have been looking at Rhonda Smith hard when he said that.

Maybe In Prince's case with his wealth the system may not change one way or the other but I think we should vote.

If something bad goes down after the election at least nobody can say to us "Tough luck, you should have voted."

ain't no surprise that P doesn't believe in 'Democrazy'. He's an autocrat by nature.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #301 posted 09/30/08 7:56am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Madison88 said:

L4OATheOriginal said:



one can't TRULY say it was 21 nights in a row because if that's the case then, that tour would have been OVER in 3 weeks NOT 2 months rolleyes


and Prince would be in a coma from exhaustion. lol lol lol


well lord knows he xhausted me from all this greatest hits material shit since the musicology tour nod
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #302 posted 09/30/08 10:45am

gyro34

pout pout bawl bawl bawl That means...I am never gonna see his booty is tight-see-through clothing ever again!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #303 posted 09/30/08 4:36pm

torasball

sounds too me like he cannot get a deal to rease an album. he has burned all of his bridges. too bad.

Check out the new N.E.R.D. album! Its great!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #304 posted 09/30/08 8:10pm

gyro34

Madison88 said:

A very disarming article.....Prince is just slinging stuff in every different direction he can. Sodomy, Chicks, Politics, His love life, Breaking the law lol on and on and on.....I guess that's whatcha call SPIN! I call it "A Hot Mess!!!!" lol lol lol lol lol lol

Oh and bibles and JWs and being his own Lawyer??? OMG!!! "Do you believe in God?". What up with da bratha??? Intelligent Design??? I'm sorry but he doesn't seem very focused at the moment. I liked him better when he was married then he can control his wife and leave the rest of the world (and internet) alone for awhile.... and just make music..... wink He can't make an appointment??? He can't be found!! He can't be relied on... lol lol lol He can't really "stick" to anything or anyone??? Structure it is not.....someone put a brick on that man's head and make him just sit still for a second and think for himself. Celibacy doesn't make better music ya doofus. Oh that's right you're free....there's an enigma!!! lol lol lol Thanks for clearing all that up for us Prince...Ya Mr. Cool/Dingbat.....I thought I was a ditz. It's like that movie "Just say Anything".... lol lol lol lol
[Edited 9/28/08 3:10am]


lol Could Prince have some Gregorian chant stuff in store for all of us? UhOh! neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #305 posted 10/01/08 12:39am

purplesweat

torasball said:

sounds too me like he cannot get a deal to rease an album. he has burned all of his bridges. too bad.

Check out the new N.E.R.D. album! Its great!!


lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #306 posted 10/01/08 9:14am

Anxiety

torasball said:

sounds too me like he cannot get a deal to rease an album. he has burned all of his bridges. too bad.

Check out the new N.E.R.D. album! Its great!!


maybe he'll remember he can release his own music if he really wants to make the effort.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #307 posted 10/01/08 2:01pm

violectrica

avatar

estelle81 said:

bellanoche said:

I usually don't respond to posts as ignorant as this, but I felt compelled to this time. Martin Luther King Jr. fought for the right for ALL citizens in this country to have equal rights, to be treated fairly as human beings with dignity and respect. He died because some idiot assasinated him. He didn't die for anyone to have the right to vote. Don't diminish/reduce his struggle to "the right to vote."

Having the right to vote means that someone has the OPTION to vote or not to vote. That is the right that ALL citizens should have. It does not mean that they have to go out and vote, especially if it conflicts with their spiritual beliefs. The right to CHOOSE is the issue. When black people did not have the right to vote it meant that we did not have a choice. Prince, and the rest of us black folk now have the right to CHOOSE whether we want to take part in the voting process or not. Exercising one's right not to vote is as much about freedom as exercising the right to vote. It is not grounds to kick someone out of a country. That's a very ignorant proposition. Shouldn't people have the equal right to have views that are different from yours or even the majority for that matter?



clapping


Honestly, the fact that I've met soo many women who would rather just find a rich man, get married, and not work bothers me waay more than people who choose not to vote. The fact that there are women who get pregnant and would rather live off the system (ie. my taxes) than get a job and support their child themselves disgusts me even more. There are tons of women who fought for the right to be employed in the same jobs that men have just as much as they fought for the right to vote. All people really wanted was to be treated as equals which was the main basis behind all those rallies to obtain rights. To have met soo many girls who would rather have their husbands or the government 'take care' of them instead of them going out and bringing in their own income to support their family, disturbs and angers me more than those not wanting to go out and vote. I would much rather people go out and practice their right to equal employment instead of standing on corners with cardboard signs begging me for spare change.

Like I stated in a previous post, the Electoral college vote is the determining vote in who becomes President. I've never understood why people seem to think that the President is the one who makes all the decisions...he's not, Congress can veto anything he puts on the table. He has to get approval from Congress on any new laws or decisions he comes up with, so no matter how many good speeches either of these two candidates spew off, they still have to present them to Congress and the House has to agree to make them official after everything is all said and done. That's why Congress exists. Some people only vote for the President and that's it. If you aren't voting for members of Congress, than why yell at someone who chooses not to vote in the Presidential election? If eccentric voters are going to yell at people for not practicing their right to vote, than I expect those individiuals to vote in every single election that presents itself.

If Prince doesn't want to vote because it's against his religion than that's his right as an American citizen. Anyone who goes off of a celebrity's decisions obviously has not yet learned how to really think for themselves, so I feel sorry for them if they need a famous person to tell them what to do. My roommate is a JW and she doesn't vote nor will she do jury duty because it goes against her beliefs. If she wasn't a JW and still chose not to vote, than that's her choice and to an extent I don't disagree with her. Living in Florida, one of the states that is being hit the hardest by the state of the economy, has made me feel sorry for whoever wins, because they have to try and fix the mess that the idiot in office now is going to leave behind as he returns to his riches.

Whoever wins most likely isn't going to fix the problems in just one term regardless of how many people may think he can. Sorry, but the President of the United States is not Superman. He can put a dent in it, but if he doesn't choose to run in the next election and another 'W' gets elected President, than what? Sorry, but I stopped living a lie along time ago. What voters need to be doing is crossing their fingers and hoping that the Electoral College vote puts the right candidate into office or if the college vote ends in a tie, so that their votes are pushed into play. If someone doesn't want to vote, than they shouldn't be crucified for their decision. They have the right to think for themselves and that's a God-given right that no government can take away for you. Just my twocents


He does not vote because he is a JW.JWs do not vote because only God can run a govenrment properly and perfectly without corruption. So unless God comes down and puts himself on the ballot, he isn't going to vote. Everything else is a smaller issue compared to that. Surely can you agree that humans are corrupted.
No matter the ©️, Paisley Park "official can never ™️ prince. He gave that to us verbally on Oprah in 1996. You can't take prince away from us, corporate. I mean O ( + >
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #308 posted 10/01/08 2:01pm

Shyra

simm0061 said:

serpan99 said:


Change of religion, life

Tonight, that mood of isolation permeates Prince's luxurious 30,000-square-foot Tuscan-style villa, perched high in a gated Beverly Hills enclave.



How do Jehovah's Witnesses feel about opulence? Is it A-OK? I mean, you can't vote but you can live like this? eek I'm not trying to be a smartalec; I'm really curious about how extravagance is viewed...

Btw Prince, You can knock on my door any time to explain this all to me! wink razz
[Edited 9/26/08 9:19am]


Probably turn a blind eye as long as they're getting their cut...ooops
evillol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #309 posted 10/01/08 2:14pm

Shyra

Anxiety said:

eaglebear4839 said:

Except he fails to realize one thing - not everyone thinks like he does, and in fact, the way people listen to music in general is not like it was even 15 years ago. I hate to say it, but idealism aside, music has been corporatized and will never be the same, save independent artists.



i think what bothers me is that prince is still trying to pimp the industry and he's trundling his wares to the big box stores now that he feels he's exhausted the major labels. meanwhile, other big artists are using their resources to release their own music and the returns have been a big success for those bands, not to mention it gives their credibility a large boost. i mean, after all, where would you rather say you got a new album from - directly from nin.com or exclusively at walmart?


Since when does where you purchased an album decrease its artistic worth? I could give a rat's behind where album is purchased as long as it's legit.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #310 posted 10/01/08 2:22pm

Anxiety

Shyra said:

Anxiety said:



i think what bothers me is that prince is still trying to pimp the industry and he's trundling his wares to the big box stores now that he feels he's exhausted the major labels. meanwhile, other big artists are using their resources to release their own music and the returns have been a big success for those bands, not to mention it gives their credibility a large boost. i mean, after all, where would you rather say you got a new album from - directly from nin.com or exclusively at walmart?


Since when does where you purchased an album decrease its artistic worth? I could give a rat's behind where album is purchased as long as it's legit.


there's the integrity of the store and its reputation, for one thing. do some reading up on walmart, it's not a pretty corporation. plus, they're notorious for demanding censored versions of the albums they stock. imagine mr. "no vulgar words" nelson getting a message from walmart corporate saying that the new prince album was STILL too vulgar for their shelves. the look on prince's face would truly be a kodak moment. lol

i don't care if he did an exclusive with target or best buy or any number of other big box retailers...i just think going with walmart is asking for trouble. other people may disagree. opinions are funny that way. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #311 posted 10/01/08 3:09pm

jdcxc

My religion states that I cannot vote, pay taxes, support outside leaders, give money to charity or political parties (except my church) or visit Washington DC. Therefore, I am excused from criticism for not participating in the democratic process.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #312 posted 10/01/08 3:19pm

Anxiety

jdcxc said:

My religion states that I cannot vote, pay taxes, support outside leaders, give money to charity or political parties (except my church) or visit Washington DC. Therefore, I am excused from criticism for not participating in the democratic process.


and by the same token, do you feel that the government is excused from your criticism since you do not participate in these matters? do you feel that your religious community is far enough removed that the government doesn't really have that much of an effect on your daily life? i'm not asking to start a debate or anything, i'm sincerely curious as to how this works in your life.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #313 posted 10/01/08 3:33pm

Madison88

jdcxc said:

My religion states that I cannot vote, pay taxes, support outside leaders, give money to charity or political parties (except my church) or visit Washington DC. Therefore, I am excused from criticism for not participating in the democratic process.


You would have loved RUSSIA back in the day.....

Actually that's got 2 b the shadiest thing I've ever heard....not to mention very pretentious. You'll never be "excused" from criticism. Sorry .... just doesn't happen....what a load a .....Though you owe no one "excuses"...so you need not be "excused". Yikes!! Sharp left turn....no signal!!!
[Edited 10/3/08 17:03pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #314 posted 10/01/08 3:36pm

Shyra

Anxiety said:

Shyra said:



Since when does where you purchased an album decrease its artistic worth? I could give a rat's behind where album is purchased as long as it's legit.


there's the integrity of the store and its reputation, for one thing. do some reading up on walmart, it's not a pretty corporation. plus, they're notorious for demanding censored versions of the albums they stock. imagine mr. "no vulgar words" nelson getting a message from walmart corporate saying that the new prince album was STILL too vulgar for their shelves. the look on prince's face would truly be a kodak moment. lol

i don't care if he did an exclusive with target or best buy or any number of other big box retailers...i just think going with walmart is asking for trouble. other people may disagree. opinions are funny that way. lol


Oh, yeah. I saw that piece about Walmart's exploitation not too long ago; however, I must have missed the part about their censorship. In any event, thanks for the update. Oh, and I agree with you regarding opionions, I mean assholes... lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #315 posted 10/01/08 4:35pm

jdcxc

Shyra said:

Anxiety said:



there's the integrity of the store and its reputation, for one thing. do some reading up on walmart, it's not a pretty corporation. plus, they're notorious for demanding censored versions of the albums they stock. imagine mr. "no vulgar words" nelson getting a message from walmart corporate saying that the new prince album was STILL too vulgar for their shelves. the look on prince's face would truly be a kodak moment. lol

i don't care if he did an exclusive with target or best buy or any number of other big box retailers...i just think going with walmart is asking for trouble. other people may disagree. opinions are funny that way. lol


Oh, yeah. I saw that piece about Walmart's exploitation not too long ago; however, I must have missed the part about their censorship. In any event, thanks for the update. Oh, and I agree with you regarding opionions, I mean assholes... lol


It would be a sad irony that the store that banned "Lovesexy" because of the cover, was now the sole retail outlet for his new album.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #316 posted 10/02/08 3:19pm

littlefrank

cool
Prouddaddyfunkateer
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #317 posted 10/05/08 2:13pm

carlcranshaw

avatar

If Prince is acting as his own lawyer what happened to Londell McMillan?

http://media.www.ncatregi...5892.shtml
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #318 posted 10/13/08 5:11am

syble

Anxiety said:

simm0061 said:

Did he just imply that he's been celibate for years...

flyingpig flyingpig flyingpig flyingpig
[Edited 9/26/08 8:14am]


i don't think it's so hard to believe that prince is celibate. sell a bit here, sell a bit there... smile


very clever! lol
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #319 posted 10/13/08 5:25am

syble

danzakairos said:

If he says he is celebate then the man more than likely is, I pose this question, why, and what reason would he have behind lying about that? Most men would not openly admit to that, think about it.... confuse


Cliff Richard did, think on that!
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #320 posted 10/13/08 5:36am

syble

alandail said:

unkleg said:

...I also think that iTunes may be an easy way distribute music, but it's monopolistic - you have to have music in THEIR format and use THEIR player (though you can work around this). Apple's interest in music stops and starts with the revenue they derive from the iPod. They are no different to the music industry, in their world, they are the music industry.

God bless (yes God) Prince for steering clear.


No you don't, iTunes plus music plays anywhere.

And NPGMC had a much worse problem, their music only played on Microsoft devices, which nobody has. It's like releasing music on an 8 track tape instead of a CD.


I think ur wrong about itunes stuff which is MP4 format which will not play on MP3 players such as phones etc. We are all mac based and our itunes downloads are encrypted and limited to ipods, macs and of course the iphone.

However the whole microsoft thing is true, I never understood that whole license shite over at npgmc, i even had to put everything onto a crap pc laptop just to play it. and Im miffed I cant now watch the vids.

Wheres our rights in all of that, surely we were sold things that should play and they dont - I know,I know - old story but still just cos we all talked about it to death dont make it right and it shouldnt be pushed under the rug either.itunes are doing the exact same thing, selling music that can only be played in their format and I dont think alot of people realise that when they click that buy button.
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 11 of 11 « First<234567891011
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)

This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.

« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > USA TODAY: Prince shows off a different side for '21 Nights'