jaimestarr79 said:

JustErin said:

jaimestarr79 said:

False! i would say that 85% probably cheat on their wifes.

Totally.

Without paying the mistress for it?

That's cheap!

dJJ said:

i think for anwsers to "men and hookers" questions its best to read the many accounts given by hookers/call girls. they would know better then anyone. men have so little sexual intergrity its rare that you'll get any anwser past the obvious stuff already posted here.

i have always wondered what the difference was btween sex with prostitues and sex with multiple partners over your lifetime. in both cases the person youre shagging has shagged loads of other people. why is one more gross than the other? men dont want girlfriends "with high numbers" but will fuck a prostitute in a minute. WTF!

more double standards and phsycho bulllshit men and society try to pass off as acceptable.

No, normal men do not consort with hookers. Losers do.

No, 85% of men have not cheated on their wives. If 85% of the guys you know have cheated on their wives, then you hang around an inordinate amount of scumbags.

wavesofbliss said:

i have always wondered what the difference was btween sex with prostitues and sex with multiple partners over your lifetime. in both cases the person youre shagging has shagged loads of other people. why is one more gross than the other? men dont want girlfriends "with high numbers" but will fuck a prostitute in a minute. WTF!

Men are generally not marrying protitutes or making them their girlfriends.

But they'll have sex with "sluts" OR "whores!"

[Edited 12/22/11 15:40pm]

Men are generally not marrying protitutes or making them their girlfriends.

But they'll have sex with "sluts" OR "whores!"

[Edited 12/22/11 15:40pm]

and in doing so become sluts and whores themselves, right? and i think u missed the point i was making.

wavesofbliss said:

Men are generally not marrying protitutes or making them their girlfriends.

But they'll have sex with "sluts" OR "whores!"

[Edited 12/22/11 15:40pm]

and in doing so become sluts and whores themselves, right? and i think u missed the point i was making.

no I got your point, did you get mine?

A hint: it was not to defend men's morals

RodeoSchro said:

No, normal men do not consort with hookers. Losers do.

No, 85% of men have not cheated on their wives. If 85% of the guys you know have cheated on their wives, then you hang around an inordinate amount of scumbags.

Or maybe you just live in your own out-of-touch-with-the-real-world bubble.

I mean, how would you know what others are doing anyway? You really think people would confide in you, with your holier than thou, you need Jesus attitude?

Not defending cheaters, just saying you seem really out of touch a lot of the time.

JustErin said:

RodeoSchro said:

No, normal men do not consort with hookers. Losers do.

No, 85% of men have not cheated on their wives. If 85% of the guys you know have cheated on their wives, then you hang around an inordinate amount of scumbags.

Or maybe you just live in your own out-of-touch-with-the-real-world bubble.

I mean, how would you know what others are doing anyway? You really think people would confide in you, with your holier than thou, you need Jesus attitude?

Not defending cheaters, just saying you seem really out of touch a lot of the time.

I do not want to be in touch with what you are in touch and thankfully, what you are in touch with actually does represent a very small minority of the world.

Trust me - most of the people in the world are better than the lowest-common-denominator examples we get here on the org.

Or don't trust me. Your choice. But there sure is a better world out there than what you think there is.

RodeoSchro said:

JustErin said:

Or maybe you just live in your own out-of-touch-with-the-real-world bubble.

I mean, how would you know what others are doing anyway? You really think people would confide in you, with your holier than thou, you need Jesus attitude?

Not defending cheaters, just saying you seem really out of touch a lot of the time.

I do not want to be in touch with what you are in touch and thankfully, what you are in touch with actually does represent a very small minority of the world.

Trust me - most of the people in the world are better than the lowest-common-denominator examples we get here on the org.

Or don't trust me. Your choice. But there sure is a better world out there than what you think there is.

RodeoSchro said:

JustErin said:

Or maybe you just live in your own out-of-touch-with-the-real-world bubble.

I mean, how would you know what others are doing anyway? You really think people would confide in you, with your holier than thou, you need Jesus attitude?

Not defending cheaters, just saying you seem really out of touch a lot of the time.

I do not want to be in touch with what you are in touch and thankfully, what you are in touch with actually does represent a very small minority of the world.

Trust me - most of the people in the world are better than the lowest-common-denominator examples we get here on the org.

Or don't trust me. Your choice. But there sure is a better world out there than what you think there is.

Doesn't the lowest common denominator refer to "most of the people in the world?"

All that you need to know is within this very comedic movie:

aardvark15 said:

All that you need to know is within this very comedic movie:

Oh man, so funny you posted this.

Last week I was at the guy I am seeing's place while he was at work and I was totally bored and decided to watch this on Netflix.

The part about cheating is soooo fucking true it's almost painful to watch. I made sure that that part was playing when my dude came home. His reaction to it told me everything I wanted to know. He didn't think it was funny, in fact he looked down right upset watching it.

NDRU said:

RodeoSchro said:

I do not want to be in touch with what you are in touch and thankfully, what you are in touch with actually does represent a very small minority of the world.

Trust me - most of the people in the world are better than the lowest-common-denominator examples we get here on the org.

Or don't trust me. Your choice. But there sure is a better world out there than what you think there is.

Doesn't the lowest common denominator refer to "most of the people in the world?"

i think i resemble that remark oh well

RodeoSchro said:

No, normal men do not consort with hookers. Losers do.

No, 85% of men have not cheated on their wives. If 85% of the guys you know have cheated on their wives, then you hang around an inordinate amount of scumbags.

Sure normal men consort with hookers.

If it's the world's oldest profession, surely it can't all be degenerates supporting them globally?

NDRU said:

RodeoSchro said:

I do not want to be in touch with what you are in touch and thankfully, what you are in touch with actually does represent a very small minority of the world.

Trust me - most of the people in the world are better than the lowest-common-denominator examples we get here on the org.

Or don't trust me. Your choice. But there sure is a better world out there than what you think there is.

Doesn't the lowest common denominator refer to "most of the people in the world?"

No, I'm talking about the extreme examples we get. For instance, the guy mentioned in the first post. He's part of a very small minority.

SUPRMAN said:

RodeoSchro said:

No, normal men do not consort with hookers. Losers do.

No, 85% of men have not cheated on their wives. If 85% of the guys you know have cheated on their wives, then you hang around an inordinate amount of scumbags.

Sure normal men consort with hookers.

If it's the world's oldest profession, surely it can't all be degenerates supporting them globally?

LOL, but just because it's the oldest profession doesn't mean it's the most frequented.

If a man has to hire someone for sex, that man is not normal. And he's certainly in the small, small minority.

RodeoSchro said:

SUPRMAN said:

Sure normal men consort with hookers.

If it's the world's oldest profession, surely it can't all be degenerates supporting them globally?

LOL, but just because it's the oldest profession doesn't mean it's the most frequented.

If a man has to hire someone for sex, that man is not normal. And he's certainly in the small, small minority.

I've never cavorted with hookers, nor have I cheated on any significant other in my life.

I will say that there are some men with financial means who do hook up with high class prostitutes not because they can't get any tail at home, but because they want some intimacy without any emotional baggage. Instead of trying to hook up with some hot babe with courtship only to be thwarted or delayed further, they would rather have the sure thing. Ironically, I read a story complied from a series of high class hookers who say that most of the men they serve as clients are actually looking for a "girlfriend" experience that they can't get at home, albeit with some kinks that they can fulfill from their sexual fantasies.

RodeoSchro said:

SUPRMAN said:

Sure normal men consort with hookers.

If it's the world's oldest profession, surely it can't all be degenerates supporting them globally?

LOL, but just because it's the oldest profession doesn't mean it's the most frequented.

If a man has to hire someone for sex, that man is not normal. And he's certainly in the small, small minority.

Not saying it's the most frequented but we do know it makes plenty of money. A WHOLE lot of somebody's are paying for sex.

Women pay for sex too. A bit more discreetly admittedly.

There are way too many men supporting these women and some women supporting men in a similar manner for it to be 'extreme' behavior.

728huey said:

RodeoSchro said:

LOL, but just because it's the oldest profession doesn't mean it's the most frequented.

If a man has to hire someone for sex, that man is not normal. And he's certainly in the small, small minority.

I've never cavorted with hookers, nor have I cheated on any significant other in my life.

I will say that there are some men with financial means who do hook up with high class prostitutes not because they can't get any tail at home, but because they want some intimacy without any emotional baggage. Instead of trying to hook up with some hot babe with courtship only to be thwarted or delayed further, they would rather have the sure thing. Ironically, I read a story complied from a series of high class hookers who say that most of the men they serve as clients are actually looking for a "girlfriend" experience that they can't get at home, albeit with some kinks that they can fulfill from their sexual fantasies.

Aka, interaction without nagging. Just have some fun.

lauralevesque said:

Hi, I'm new here; Sorry to start off on such a brazen topic, But.... anyway, here goes: I work with this really handsome guy, he's handsome, smart and makes good money. He flirts with me quiet a bit. It's really all quiet innocent. But a few weekends ago, my friends and I saw him out at a sports bar with this hot Britney Spears esq blonde. Her skirt was up to her va-jay jay and she was wearing high heels , something seemed a bit "off" with her. Well anyway, when he leaves the proprieter of the bar who my friends and I know, tell us that this girl is a prostitute who advertises herself on Craigslist and then meets the men almost nightly at this particular bar. Apparently it's her jumping off place. We went out this weekend and ran into him again, with the same girl. So my question is, do "normal" men employ hookers in this day and age? And why?

All types of men can buy sexual services from hookers/whores/hoes/escort girls, not just "normal" men.

why do women take on this profession

my woman-friends have a general consensus thought mentioned by most which sounds something like this .. when i wanna get fucked ill get it .. so, men arent the only ones in moods cmon now

RodeoSchro said:

SUPRMAN said:

Sure normal men consort with hookers.

If it's the world's oldest profession, surely it can't all be degenerates supporting them globally?

LOL, but just because it's the oldest profession doesn't mean it's the most frequented.

If a man has to hire someone for sex, that man is not normal. And he's certainly in the small, small minority.

Please define "normal".

I gaurantee there are men who enlist the services of hookers that are more "normal" than you are.

+ I know if I had the riches I would be Tiger Woods'ing up in this bitch!

85% of men can't afford having sex with hookers in today's economy.

novabrkr said:

85% of men can't afford having sex with hookers in today's economy.

The price of a hooker changes more than gas prices, just cause they are sluts doesn't mean their stupid. They know how to get customers

novabrkr said:

85% of men can't afford having sex with hookers in today's economy.

I know there are plenty of women around where I live that would do a guy for ten bucks!

As far as men cheating on their wives, I'm sure the figure is high, but 85% is a bit high dontcha think?

TotalANXiousNESS said:

novabrkr said:

85% of men can't afford having sex with hookers in today's economy.

I know there are plenty of women around where I live that would do a guy for ten bucks!

As far as men cheating on their wives, I'm sure the figure is high, but 85% is a bit high dontcha think?

I feel like whenever there are anonymous surveys it comes out somewhere at 40-60%. I'd need to look it up. Women are a smaller percentage, but it's closer than I would normally think.

CarrieMpls said:

TotalANXiousNESS said:

I know there are plenty of women around where I live that would do a guy for ten bucks!

As far as men cheating on their wives, I'm sure the figure is high, but 85% is a bit high dontcha think?

I feel like whenever there are anonymous surveys it comes out somewhere at 40-60%. I'd need to look it up. Women are a smaller percentage, but it's closer than I would normally think.

Oh yeah, women are cheaters too.

Ugh, I still don't like those numbers.