. Interesting to see which youtubers/podcasters are more than happy to have him on their show and those that want absolutely nothing to do with him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just came back on to Twitter to say anything Neal wrote abt 2007 is false. I can’t speak for the whole of it, but most definitely can tell you on many accounts how erroneous the Sonny Lister story is besides the story of Sonny Lister. [sic]
I'm inclined to believe Ruth, who worked for Prince 24/7 for seven years, over Neal. The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sonny Liston, not Lister | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fragglerock said:
. Interesting to see which youtubers/podcasters are more than happy to have him on their show and those that want absolutely nothing to do with him. Gullible podcasters on YouTube and FB are already salivating to interview him with soft questions and indulge these lies for views and increase membership. I want to see someone in Prince's camp call Karlen out for these claims and make him defend it. 3121 #1 THIS YEAR | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sonny Liston should be fairly well-known to most; the fact she misspelled his name indicates to me she likely does know who he is and is missing the context.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ruth is very reliable. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Really, I'm normal. A little highly-strung, maybe. But normal. But so much has been written about me and people never know what's right and what's wrong. I'd rather let them stay confused." [2004] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You should be angry too if you are a Prince fan. Claiming that Prince loathed Miles Davis and Spike Lee ain't cool. Not Prince's words, or Eric's, Miles' or Spike's. And then there is the rest of the book. [Edited 10/10/20 21:37pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't think Prince wrote that to endorse Neal Karlen. He stayed focused on his music -- that's why he had 40+ albums, hits for other artists, a lifetime of special performances, and a Vault like the Garden of Eden. He also did film, and was a pioneer in online streaming and artist's rights. . In 2006 - PRINCE, MUSIC LEGEND AND INTERNET VISIONARY, TO RECEIVE WEBBY LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD AT THE 10TH ANNUAL WEBBY AWARDS
https://www.webbyawards.c...ent-award/ The first major artist to release an entire album – 1997’s Crystal Ball – exclusively on the Web, Prince’s leadership online has transformed the entertainment industry and reshaped the relationship between artist and fan. Long before MySpace and iTunes, Prince used the Web in new ways to distribute music, premiere videos, and build his relationship with his fans. His groundbreaking web site, NPG Music Club (www.npgmusicclub.com) boasts more than seven full-length CDs of music that are unavailable anywhere else. “Besides being a musical genius, Prince is a visionary who recognized early on that the web would completely change how we experience music,” said Tiffany Shlain, founder of The Webby Awards. “For more than a decade, he has tapped the power of the Web to forge a deeper connection with his fans and push the boundaries of technology and art.”
[Edited 10/10/20 21:57pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Margot said:
I think it was sympathetic though wide-ranging. He sometimes liked Prince, sometimes questioned him, was at times pissed etc. That's how life is... I appreciate that someone dove in deeper and was not tip-toeing as most do. Thank you. It seems that way. Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
simm0061 said:
I agree. I didn't feel that he was painting a negative picture of Prince at all. Maybe someone who isn't familar with the ways of Prince might get that impression. However, I did get the impression that John Nelson was a complete narcassistic asshole. This, if true, sheds a lot of light on why Prince had so many bad fallings out with his father over the years.
If anything, I thought the book painted P in a sympthetic light and is probably the first book to point out how forgiving Prince could actually be. Thank you. It had it pendulum swings but yes sympathetic too. Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OperatingThetan said: simm0061 said: Does anyone else find it "interesting" that Karlen's recordings (i.e. his receipts) of these confessions and revelations were all destroyed in the apt fire, and yet the recodings of things that were published years ago (e.g. old news), maraculously survived? He's a con artist. I work in publishing and for example, know someone who alleged to have John Lennon's diaries in his possession, which were then destroyed and 'rewritten' by him from memory, with no evidence the original material ever existed. This book was published and sold well. The author's previous experience was working for Playboy... Need I say more? You don't think he has or had recordings of Prince? Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
simm0061 said:
According to Neal, Muhammad Ali told Prince that his one regret in life was that he went over board in his shit talk to Sonny Liston and that Sonny didn't deserve that. He ask Prince to appologize to Sonny (at his grave) if he ever got the chance. Why Ali couldn't do this himself, I don't know. So, during his stint in Vegas, P (with Neal in tow) visited Liston's grave and did just that. The following day, Neal says P called him and wanted to visited the grave again. They did, but this time P ordered Neal to stay by the car and P walked up and placed an envelope on Liston's grave. Neal thinks that the envelope contained a song for Liston (Liston once said that "somone should compose a song for boxers, it would be just a guitar, a trumpet, and a bell.") Neal thinks P composed the "song for boxers" that Sonny wanted. It's a great story. Is it Bs? The part about Neal being there probably is! [Edited 10/10/20 11:18am] I found it odd that Prince was supossedly writing music when he can't read it. Also had me scratching my head about his music teacher and the scales book. Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just finished it. I've been reading prince biographies since the 80s. While I wouldn't quite call this I biography, it's more of a memoir of Neil's relationship with friends and a postmortem attempt at understanding who he was. The book is doomed to be hated by certain types of fans because it doesn't always paint a pretty picture, or flat out contradicts what they think they know about him. The thing that people are posting here getting mad because Neil believed that prince disliked Miles Davis as a person is a good example of that. I would remind folks that this is Neil's book and covers Neil's experience with prince, and is different than what prince presented to the public or to other people. I don't think Neil tells a single lie in this book, and he's very open about what he doesn't know.
Neil has done a real service in telling the truth about what he knew about this extraordinary musician. The narrative of who Prince was gets fleshed out in a more human way. I believe this is one of the most unique books about prince, and will be one of the most important for historians.
I grew up in Minneapolis, and i'm also very appreciative of the picture of Minnesota and it's stifling culture that Neil paints. I don't think I have ever seen or read such an accurate portrayal of this anywhere, and it's actually very important to Prince's story.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Margot said:
The peripheral stuff like the Rabbi, Sonny Liston etc are likely questionable but I think Neal has deep insight into Prince's 'psychology', ie., he talks about Prince's belief in Kayfabe, (the need to be in character all of the time), his need to be cool and in control (Basketball & Cool), his eventual belief that he was the character, (Prince), his need to compartmentalize, his early adult narcissism (till age 40+). . But doesn’t he lose all credibility with the fiction/lies/‘peripheral stuff’ . Unless there’s a disclaimer telling the reader - some of this is completely made up | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said: Just finished it. I've been reading prince biographies since the 80s. While I wouldn't quite call this I biography, it's more of a memoir of Neil's relationship with friends and a postmortem attempt at understanding who he was. The book is doomed to be hated by certain types of fans because it doesn't always paint a pretty picture, or flat out contradicts what they think they know about him. The thing that people are posting here getting mad because Neil believed that prince disliked Miles Davis as a person is a good example of that. I would remind folks that this is Neil's book and covers Neil's experience with prince, and is different than what prince presented to the public or to other people. I don't think Neil tells a single lie in this book, and he's very open about what he doesn't know.
Neil has done a real service in telling the truth about what he knew about this extraordinary musician. The narrative of who Prince was gets fleshed out in a more human way. I believe this is one of the most unique books about prince, and will be one of the most important for historians.
I grew up in Minneapolis, and i'm also very appreciative of the picture of Minnesota and it's stifling culture that Neil paints. I don't think I have ever seen or read such an accurate portrayal of this anywhere, and it's actually very important to Prince's story.
.... There's actually no evidence that Neal had any special relationship with Prince. He wrote a few articles, possibly did the Dawn project, and himself claimed he didn't want to be Prince's bobo, so he insulted him and distanced himself. His interviews with CJ in April 2016 speak for themselves. There is plenty of evidence that Prince admired and was in the same room with Miles Davis. Prince felt unstifled enough to perform in his underwear and record albums like Dirty Mind. A successful black icon in what Neal once called the whitest state in America. How are the rest of Minnesota's successful businessmen and CEOs represented, I wonder. My guess is that they are not being chastized for not hugging staff when they break up with a girlfriend. Apprarently Prince not crying on Alan Leeds' shoulder when he broke up with Kim Basinger scarred him for life. [Edited 10/11/20 2:32am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Interesting that Neal mentions nothing about Dorothy Parker being a social activist. . https://essaypride.com/ex/dorothy-parker-arrangement-in-black-and-white-992d6#:~:text=Dorothy%20Parker%27s%20%22Arrangement%20in%20Black%20and%20White%22%20is,main%20character%2C%20the%20woman%20with%20pink%20velvet%20poppies. . Dorothy Parker's "Arrangement in Black and White" is set during a dinner party for the host's friend, Walter Williams, an African American musician. Though the party is celebrated in his name, most of the conversation takes place between the host and the main character, the woman with pink velvet poppies. From the conversation, the audience can deduce that though this woman admires Walter Williams's musical talent, she is unable to let go of the racist sentiment against his African American heritage. The author adds a flavor of sophisticated cynicism as she makes this point clear by having the main characters ironically make frequent references concerning how "untroubled" she is about the color of his skin. This argument is further emphasized when she greets Walter Williams; her body language and topic choice gives her predicament away. [Edited 10/11/20 2:45am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 10/11/20 2:48am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Your comment is as hollow as the book. He claims Judith Hill said that Prince's final words before he 'nodding off' were "I'm tired. I think God is calling me home." . Have you read Judith's police investigation report? Because I have... and this statement is nowhere. And this is just one easily fact checkable item.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 10/11/20 3:02am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JudasLChrist said:
But it looks like that’s been disproved with the ‘last phone call’ and Sonny Liston stories | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You claim that Neal has done a service by telling the truth -- he has not told the truth. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am quoting from the book... perhaps you should read it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |