independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > bad chronic pain since when??
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 34 of 38 « First<29303132333435363738>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #990 posted 10/27/17 5:23am

precioux

MMJas said:



precioux said:


Sweetheart, I am not the one with difficulty in the comprehension department. Go on blissfully ignorant. I care not. Btw..."tut tut"? Wth is that? (Your attempt at an orgnote) Touché fortuneandserendipity said:



Hi, Precioux. biggrin




Hey!!! wave
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #991 posted 10/27/17 5:46am

TheEnglishGent

avatar

laurarichardson said:

It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.

Is she? When? Where? eek

RIP sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #992 posted 10/27/17 6:07am

laurarichardso
n

TheEnglishGent said:

laurarichardson said:

It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.

Is she? When? Where? eek

She said she is going to write a book and explain more but suspect we will get more before the book comes out.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #993 posted 10/27/17 6:09am

mnfriend

She is not telling all (IMO)
Article in daily mail says P called her while she was at McDonalds 3 years ago from an unlisted # (what, why say that?)
he only called to say
I have finished my job here on Earth
or something like that 1 sentence
that’s how she ‘knew’
That’s all she says,
and that she is still using drugs and or alcohol to numb pain.
Seriously.

ETA: article was only her promoting O2.
[Edited 10/27/17 6:10am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #994 posted 10/27/17 6:11am

mnfriend

laurarichardson said:



TheEnglishGent said:




laurarichardson said:



It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.







Is she? When? Where? eek



She said she is going to write a book and explain more but suspect we will get more before the book comes out.




Oh okay she did say book?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #995 posted 10/27/17 7:20am

laurarichardso
n

mnfriend said:

She is not telling all (IMO) Article in daily mail says P called her while she was at McDonalds 3 years ago from an unlisted # (what, why say that?) he only called to say I have finished my job here on Earth or something like that 1 sentence that’s how she ‘knew’ That’s all she says, and that she is still using drugs and or alcohol to numb pain. Seriously. ETA: article was only her promoting O2. [Edited 10/27/17 6:10am]

Did you see the longer interview. See goes into more detail. Prince sent her a pic and a song. Once she saw the pic and listed to the song she knew he was going to die. You realize she worked for Prince and I am sure they had a follow on conversation after that. She said she jumped the gun and told family members he was going to die but did not realize at the time that it would be a few years later.

This is an awful lot of detail and you need to watch the full interview and not just read what the Daily Mail cherry picked.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #996 posted 10/27/17 8:21am

TheEnglishGent

avatar

laurarichardson said:

mnfriend said:

She is not telling all (IMO) Article in daily mail says P called her while she was at McDonalds 3 years ago from an unlisted # (what, why say that?) he only called to say I have finished my job here on Earth or something like that 1 sentence that’s how she ‘knew’ That’s all she says, and that she is still using drugs and or alcohol to numb pain. Seriously. ETA: article was only her promoting O2. [Edited 10/27/17 6:10am]

Did you see the longer interview. See goes into more detail. Prince sent her a pic and a song. Once she saw the pic and listed to the song she knew he was going to die. You realize she worked for Prince and I am sure they had a follow on conversation after that. She said she jumped the gun and told family members he was going to die but did not realize at the time that it would be a few years later.

This is an awful lot of detail and you need to watch the full interview and not just read what the Daily Mail cherry picked.

Where did you find the longer interview? I can only find 30-50 second clips.

RIP sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #997 posted 10/27/17 8:39am

laurarichardso
n

TheEnglishGent said:

laurarichardson said:

Did you see the longer interview. See goes into more detail. Prince sent her a pic and a song. Once she saw the pic and listed to the song she knew he was going to die. You realize she worked for Prince and I am sure they had a follow on conversation after that. She said she jumped the gun and told family members he was going to die but did not realize at the time that it would be a few years later.

This is an awful lot of detail and you need to watch the full interview and not just read what the Daily Mail cherry picked.

Where did you find the longer interview? I can only find 30-50 second clips.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/prog...s/b099vzcp

Full interview is here, after the 2 hour mark. Around 2hr8mins.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #998 posted 10/27/17 10:08am

Dibblekins

She also appeared on Wednesday's The One Show on BBC1 - here is the transcript of the key part re his passing:
.

Interviewer: It's been said you had an inkling he would pass away before he did. Is that true?
.

Tyka: I didn't have an inkling; he told me...I was at McDonalds...and he called...(I took the phone) out (because it was) important....I started walking and he told me; I didn't think nothing of it...About two weeks later...he sent a picture and a song and told me to email it to a couple people. I did and then I put that picture up on my computer screen because it was a pretty picture - and about a week later, I looked up and said, 'awww, snap'. I put together his words, and that picture, and said, 'he's dying'.

.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #999 posted 10/27/17 10:48am

Bodhitheblackd
og

Dibblekins said:

She also appeared on Wednesday's The One Show on BBC1 - here is the transcript of the key part re his passing:
.

Interviewer: It's been said you had an inkling he would pass away before he did. Is that true?
.

Tyka: I didn't have an inkling; he told me...I was at McDonalds...and he called...(I took the phone) out (because it was) important....I started walking and he told me; I didn't think nothing of it...About two weeks later...he sent a picture and a song and told me to email it to a couple people. I did and then I put that picture up on my computer screen because it was a pretty picture - and about a week later, I looked up and said, 'awww, snap'. I put together his words, and that picture, and said, 'he's dying'.

.

can anyone find the picture and a clue to what song she's referencing? this is turning into 'Finding Purple Waldo'...exhausting.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1000 posted 10/27/17 11:12am

purplefam99

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Dibblekins said:

She also appeared on Wednesday's The One Show on BBC1 - here is the transcript of the key part re his passing:
.

Interviewer: It's been said you had an inkling he would pass away before he did. Is that true?
.

Tyka: I didn't have an inkling; he told me...I was at McDonalds...and he called...(I took the phone) out (because it was) important....I started walking and he told me; I didn't think nothing of it...About two weeks later...he sent a picture and a song and told me to email it to a couple people. I did and then I put that picture up on my computer screen because it was a pretty picture - and about a week later, I looked up and said, 'awww, snap'. I put together his words, and that picture, and said, 'he's dying'.

.

can anyone find the picture and a clue to what song she's referencing? this is turning into 'Finding Purple Waldo'...exhausting.

i was figuring it was a new song just for andre.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1001 posted 10/27/17 3:17pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

Dibblekins said:

She also appeared on Wednesday's The One Show on BBC1 - here is the transcript of the key part re his passing:
.

Interviewer: It's been said you had an inkling he would pass away before he did. Is that true?
.

Tyka: I didn't have an inkling; he told me...I was at McDonalds...and he called...(I took the phone) out (because it was) important....I started walking and he told me; I didn't think nothing of it...About two weeks later...he sent a picture and a song and told me to email it to a couple people. I did and then I put that picture up on my computer screen because it was a pretty picture - and about a week later, I looked up and said, 'awww, snap'. I put together his words, and that picture, and said, 'he's dying'.

.


The strangest part of all... "I didn't think nothing of it". confuse

[Edited 10/27/17 16:37pm]

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1002 posted 10/27/17 3:46pm

PennyPurple

avatar

Bodhitheblackdog said:

can anyone find the picture and a clue to what song she's referencing? this is turning into 'Finding Purple Waldo'...exhausting.

I'm wondering if it was a childhood picture of Prince, Andre and Andre's sister.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1003 posted 10/27/17 4:17pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

I understand everything you've said. I just don't agree with you. And I don't think you get what I'm driving at. I'm saying if the ME doesn't include terminal illness on the first page, then she's misleading...

Your argument is, her practice is in accordance with the law. If you think that Minnesotan law has been applied correctly, that's your opinion. What might actually make more sense is if the 'family' had a word, and the ME complied with their and maybe P's wishes. Because your argument makes fuck all sense to me...


Namely, Prince was dying from terminal illness, but his taking of opiates had nothing to do with that terminal illness whatsoever l o l


Do you see the problem with your argument now?

biggrin

You are so clueless. You cannot handle the fact that you have been wrong from almost the minute you showed up on this board.

Terminal illness would not be included on the short report because he did not die from a terminal illness. Plain and simple. The ME is not misleading anyone she put on the short report exactly what killed him.

It is not an opinion the ME followed the law and stop thinking the Nelson family who did not have enough pocket change to bury him ( which is not anyone's business) would be able to get a Medical Examiner to lie on the report. eek

It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.

Get off of the drug addict angle and let it go. He was taking pain meds because he was in fucking pain from illness. My guess is joint pain and whatever else was killing him. What are you going to say when we find out what he was ill from that it is all still being made up.

I'm clueless now?! lol Says the person who talks in rambling non-sequiturs! barely if ever coherent! If only your own posts made sense. You shouldn't drop out of school, bc it reflects in your I.Q.


Maybe you're not aware, fentanyl is often given to people in palliative care. Let's assume P had terminal illness....(I don't believe he did)


ME recognises terminal condition but decides to exclude it from mention. By doing so, ME is going off working assumption P was taking fentanyl IN SPITE OF terminal illness.

I'm saying the likelier working assumption, imo, is P was taking fentanyl BECAUSE OF terminal illness. It's worthy of inclusion on the form, bc if he hadn't been terminally ill, why the OD on fentanyl? The number 1 drug used for people with terminal illnesses remember is fentanyl.


So just like with accidental OD vs suicide theory, ME has no proof. She's not clairvoyant. And neither am I. Assuming P had terminal illness then, the ME is making a working assumption it had nothing to do with his fentanyl use. Get your head around that, bc she is not Nostradamus! The ME is not a mindreader. And neither are you laura.


Experts get things wrong- including medical examiners- and are duly corrected at later date. Links were provided in another orger's posts recently
, which if you had bothered to read, you would realise by now.


Love how you keep accusing me of going down the drug addict angle. And how you misinterpreted 'what might actually make more sense' remark. Proof once again, you're not paying attention. So this post may be for the benefit of others.

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1004 posted 10/28/17 4:46am

laurarichardso
n

fortuneandserendipity said:



laurarichardson said:




fortuneandserendipity said:



I understand everything you've said. I just don't agree with you. And I don't think you get what I'm driving at. I'm saying if the ME doesn't include terminal illness on the first page, then she's misleading...

Your argument is, her practice is in accordance with the law. If you think that Minnesotan law has been applied correctly, that's your opinion. What might actually make more sense is if the 'family' had a word, and the ME complied with their and maybe P's wishes. Because your argument makes fuck all sense to me...



Namely, Prince was dying from terminal illness, but his taking of opiates had nothing to do with that terminal illness whatsoever l o l



Do you see the problem with your argument now?


biggrin



You are so clueless. You cannot handle the fact that you have been wrong from almost the minute you showed up on this board.



Terminal illness would not be included on the short report because he did not die from a terminal illness. Plain and simple. The ME is not misleading anyone she put on the short report exactly what killed him.



It is not an opinion the ME followed the law and stop thinking the Nelson family who did not have enough pocket change to bury him ( which is not anyone's business) would be able to get a Medical Examiner to lie on the report. eek



It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.



Get off of the drug addict angle and let it go. He was taking pain meds because he was in fucking pain from illness. My guess is joint pain and whatever else was killing him. What are you going to say when we find out what he was ill from that it is all still being made up.





I'm clueless now?! lol Says the person who talks in rambling non-sequiturs! barely if ever coherent! If only your own posts made sense. You shouldn't drop out of school, bc it reflects in your I.Q.



Maybe you're not aware, fentanyl is often given to people in palliative care. Let's assume P had terminal illness....(I don't believe he did)



ME recognises terminal condition but decides to exclude it from mention. By doing so, ME is going off working assumption P was taking fentanyl IN SPITE OF terminal illness.

I'm saying the likelier working assumption, imo, is P was taking fentanyl BECAUSE OF terminal illness. It's worthy of inclusion on the form, bc if he hadn't been terminally ill, why the OD on fentanyl? The number 1 drug used for people with terminal illnesses remember is fentanyl.



So just like with accidental OD vs suicide theory, ME has no proof. She's not clairvoyant. And neither am I. Assuming P had terminal illness then, the ME is making a working assumption it had nothing to do with his fentanyl use. Get your head around that, bc she is not Nostradamus! The ME is not a mindreader. And neither are you laura.



Experts get things wrong- including medical examiners- and are duly corrected at later date. Links were provided in another orger's posts recently
, which if you had bothered to read, you would realise by now.


Love how you keep accusing me of going down the drug addict angle. And how you misinterpreted 'what might actually make more sense' remark. Proof once again, you're not paying attention. So this post may be for the benefit of others.


—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1005 posted 10/28/17 5:08am

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:



laurarichardson said:




fortuneandserendipity said:



I understand everything you've said. I just don't agree with you. And I don't think you get what I'm driving at. I'm saying if the ME doesn't include terminal illness on the first page, then she's misleading...

Your argument is, her practice is in accordance with the law. If you think that Minnesotan law has been applied correctly, that's your opinion. What might actually make more sense is if the 'family' had a word, and the ME complied with their and maybe P's wishes. Because your argument makes fuck all sense to me...



Namely, Prince was dying from terminal illness, but his taking of opiates had nothing to do with that terminal illness whatsoever l o l



Do you see the problem with your argument now?


biggrin



You are so clueless. You cannot handle the fact that you have been wrong from almost the minute you showed up on this board.



Terminal illness would not be included on the short report because he did not die from a terminal illness. Plain and simple. The ME is not misleading anyone she put on the short report exactly what killed him.



It is not an opinion the ME followed the law and stop thinking the Nelson family who did not have enough pocket change to bury him ( which is not anyone's business) would be able to get a Medical Examiner to lie on the report. eek



It would not matter anyway because Tyka is now telling or going to be telling all so what would be the point of getting the ME to change anything.



Get off of the drug addict angle and let it go. He was taking pain meds because he was in fucking pain from illness. My guess is joint pain and whatever else was killing him. What are you going to say when we find out what he was ill from that it is all still being made up.





I'm clueless now?! lol Says the person who talks in rambling non-sequiturs! barely if ever coherent! If only your own posts made sense. You shouldn't drop out of school, bc it reflects in your I.Q.



Maybe you're not aware, fentanyl is often given to people in palliative care. Let's assume P had terminal illness....(I don't believe he did)



ME recognises terminal condition but decides to exclude it from mention. By doing so, ME is going off working assumption P was taking fentanyl IN SPITE OF terminal illness.

I'm saying the likelier working assumption, imo, is P was taking fentanyl BECAUSE OF terminal illness. It's worthy of inclusion on the form, bc if he hadn't been terminally ill, why the OD on fentanyl? The number 1 drug used for people with terminal illnesses remember is fentanyl.



So just like with accidental OD vs suicide theory, ME has no proof. She's not clairvoyant. And neither am I. Assuming P had terminal illness then, the ME is making a working assumption it had nothing to do with his fentanyl use. Get your head around that, bc she is not Nostradamus! The ME is not a mindreader. And neither are you laura.



Experts get things wrong- including medical examiners- and are duly corrected at later date. Links were provided in another orger's posts recently
, which if you had bothered to read, you would realise by now.


Love how you keep accusing me of going down the drug addict angle. And how you misinterpreted 'what might actually make more sense' remark. Proof once again, you're not paying attention. So this post may be for the benefit of others.


—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.

Laura, you are very arrogant to think that everybody that has another assumption or opinion is wrong and that your Theorie is the gospel.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1006 posted 10/28/17 11:47am

fortuneandsere
ndipity

laurarichardson said:

—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


You need to look up the word 'fact'. Facts are unequivocal - they never change over time. ME's reports are often revised in light of new information. You think all 'expert' opinion is infallible and set in stone. The joke is on you, bc it shows how little you know in broader terms what goes on in the world.


You believe in both points below


1) P died of accidental OD from fentanyl. He didn't die from intentionally OD'ing on fentanyl.

Of this the ME is 100% certain.


2) (assuming P has terminal illness). His terminal illness in no way precipitated his fentanyl OD.

Of this the ME is 100% certain.


Facts are 100% indisputable. Good luck trying to argue that the ME was 100% certain. No Medical Examiner in these circumstances could be.

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1007 posted 10/28/17 12:01pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

laurarichardson said:

I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


Your 'additional info' is based on hearsay. It's conjecture at its worst.


For example, Andre Cymone was not informed by Tyka Nelson that P was close to death or terminally ill. He's been asked and in response didn't corroborate the story. So whatever Tyka may have said to him, it wasn't that. In fact, noone's gone on record saying they knew P was dying other than Tyka.


So it will be interesting to see how you 'take that info' and use it to verify your confirmation bias about P's 'terminal illness' hmmm Facts are facts remember. And all we've got at present is a cryptic conversation with brother which is light on facts.

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1008 posted 10/28/17 12:22pm

Bodhitheblackd
og

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:

I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


Your 'additional info' is based on hearsay. It's conjecture at its worst.


For example, Andre Cymone was not informed by Tyka Nelson that P was close to death or terminally ill. He's been asked and in response didn't corroborate the story. So whatever Tyka may have said to him, it wasn't that. In fact, noone's gone on record saying they knew P was dying other than Tyka.


So it will be interesting to see how you 'take that info' and use it to verify your confirmation bias about P's 'terminal illness' hmmm Facts are facts remember. And all we've got at present is a cryptic conversation with brother which is light on facts.

Hey, F&S: PREACH!!! You're HOT today.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1009 posted 10/28/17 12:26pm

MMJas

avatar

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:

—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


You need to look up the word 'fact'. Facts are unequivocal - they never change over time. ME's reports are often revised in light of new information. You think all 'expert' opinion is infallible and set in stone. The joke is on you, bc it shows how little you know in broader terms what goes on in the world.


You believe in both points below


1) P died of accidental OD from fentanyl. He didn't die from intentionally OD'ing on fentanyl.

Of this the ME is 100% certain.


2) (assuming P has terminal illness). His terminal illness in no way precipitated his fentanyl OD.

Of this the ME is 100% certain.


Facts are 100% indisputable. Good luck trying to argue that the ME was 100% certain. No Medical Examiner in these circumstances could be.

Agree, but how can the ME know that for certain? I mean that he did not OD intentionally? Because there was no suicide letter? Or was it because of how he was found, which could possibly lead her to realize he was in fact seeking help, desorientated, whatever on that elevator?
However, the dose was letal and it has been discussed before that there was no way he could have put on his clothes, even backwards, and rush to seek help after taking what he did...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1010 posted 10/28/17 12:55pm

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

MMJas said:



fortuneandserendipity said:




laurarichardson said:


—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


You need to look up the word 'fact'. Facts are unequivocal - they never change over time. ME's reports are often revised in light of new information. You think all 'expert' opinion is infallible and set in stone. The joke is on you, bc it shows how little you know in broader terms what goes on in the world.



You believe in both points below



1) P died of accidental OD from fentanyl. He didn't die from intentionally OD'ing on fentanyl.


Of this the ME is 100% certain.



2) (assuming P has terminal illness). His terminal illness in no way precipitated his fentanyl OD.


Of this the ME is 100% certain.



Facts are 100% indisputable. Good luck trying to argue that the ME was 100% certain. No Medical Examiner in these circumstances could be.




Agree, but how can the ME know that for certain? I mean that he did not OD intentionally? Because there was no suicide letter? Or was it because of how he was found, which could possibly lead her to realize he was in fact seeking help, desorientated, whatever on that elevator?
However, the dose was letal and it has been discussed before that there was no way he could have put on his clothes, even backwards, and rush to seek help after taking what he did...


Depends on his tolerance
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1011 posted 10/28/17 1:05pm

precioux

Bodhitheblackdog said:



fortuneandserendipity said:




laurarichardson said:


I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


Your 'additional info' is based on hearsay. It's conjecture at its worst.



For example, Andre Cymone was not informed by Tyka Nelson that P was close to death or terminally ill. He's been asked and in response didn't corroborate the story. So whatever Tyka may have said to him, it wasn't that. In fact, noone's gone on record saying they knew P was dying other than Tyka.



So it will be interesting to see how you 'take that info' and use it to verify your confirmation bias about P's 'terminal illness' hmmm Facts are facts remember. And all we've got at present is a cryptic conversation with brother which is light on facts.



Hey, F&S: PREACH!!! You're HOT today.





No, Bodi-F&S is delusional. It is not a fact,rather speculation that P had a terminal disease. And even if he did,it did not directly or indirectly cause his death. It's that simple. And regardless of what fentanyl is prescribed for, it is IRRELEVANT, as the fentanyl he ingested was part of a combination in an illicit pill with no medical ties to prince. Period.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1012 posted 10/28/17 2:10pm

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

precioux said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:



fortuneandserendipity said:




laurarichardson said:


I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.


Your 'additional info' is based on hearsay. It's conjecture at its worst.



For example, Andre Cymone was not informed by Tyka Nelson that P was close to death or terminally ill. He's been asked and in response didn't corroborate the story. So whatever Tyka may have said to him, it wasn't that. In fact, noone's gone on record saying they knew P was dying other than Tyka.



So it will be interesting to see how you 'take that info' and use it to verify your confirmation bias about P's 'terminal illness' hmmm Facts are facts remember. And all we've got at present is a cryptic conversation with brother which is light on facts.



Hey, F&S: PREACH!!! You're HOT today.





No, Bodi-F&S is delusional. It is not a fact,rather speculation that P had a terminal disease. And even if he did,it did not directly or indirectly cause his death. It's that simple. And regardless of what fentanyl is prescribed for, it is IRRELEVANT, as the fentanyl he ingested was part of a combination in an illicit pill with no medical ties to prince. Period.

But F&S didn't say that P had a terminal illnes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1013 posted 10/28/17 3:19pm

Menes

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

I'm clueless now?! lol Says the person who talks in rambling non-sequiturs! barely if ever coherent! If only your own posts made sense. You shouldn't drop out of school, bc it reflects in your I.Q.


Maybe you're not aware, fentanyl is often given to people in palliative care. Let's assume P had terminal illness....(I don't believe he did)


ME recognises terminal condition but decides to exclude it from mention. By doing so, ME is going off working assumption P was taking fentanyl IN SPITE OF terminal illness.

I'm saying the likelier working assumption, imo, is P was taking fentanyl BECAUSE OF terminal illness. It's worthy of inclusion on the form, bc if he hadn't been terminally ill, why the OD on fentanyl? The number 1 drug used for people with terminal illnesses remember is fentanyl.


So just like with accidental OD vs suicide theory, ME has no proof. She's not clairvoyant. And neither am I. Assuming P had terminal illness then, the ME is making a working assumption it had nothing to do with his fentanyl use. Get your head around that, bc she is not Nostradamus! The ME is not a mindreader. And neither are you laura.


Experts get things wrong- including medical examiners- and are duly corrected at later date. Links were provided in another orger's posts recently
, which if you had bothered to read, you would realise by now.


Love how you keep accusing me of going down the drug addict angle. And how you misinterpreted 'what might actually make more sense' remark. Proof once again, you're not paying attention. So this post may be for the benefit of others.

—The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.

But how is it that you have additional information about the situation and cannot/will not share with the fam> here? You are one of Prince's biggest supporters and I would've thought that you would want the truth out now...interesting. Are you writing a book too?

I hope this information that you have is in no way related to the chemtrail bullshit or murder because if it is, that would be grounds for dismissal.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1014 posted 10/28/17 3:29pm

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

Menes said:

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said: —The ME is not going off a assumption and did not make a mistake. She listed what he died from on the short report. If he had other issues it would be on the long report which we are not going to see. It does not matter because a terminal illness did not kill him. You can keep going on and on with your nonsense and insults but you are embarrassing yourself and need to go back to wherever you came from with your bullshit. You are wrong and have been from the beginning. I and a few others have additional info about this situation and we can take that info and use what Tyka said to actually see the stiuation for what it was and not the drug angle nonsense.

But how is it that you have additional information about the situation and cannot/will not share with the fam> here? You are one of Prince's biggest supporters and I would've thought that you would want the truth out now...interesting. Are you writing a book too?

I hope this information that you have is in no way related to the chemtrail bullshit or murder because if it is, that would be grounds for dismissal.

Oh my god I forgot about these conspiracy theories lol lol lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1015 posted 10/28/17 4:12pm

Bodhitheblackd
og

ThatWhiteDude said:

precioux said:
No, Bodi-F&S is delusional. It is not a fact,rather speculation that P had a terminal disease. And even if he did,it did not directly or indirectly cause his death. It's that simple. And regardless of what fentanyl is prescribed for, it is IRRELEVANT, as the fentanyl he ingested was part of a combination in an illicit pill with no medical ties to prince. Period.
But F&S didn't say that P had a terminal illnes

Thanks White Dude. At first Precioux had me thinkig I was confused but I carefully reviewed everything and F&S never said Prince had a terminal illness...so my cheering her on stands!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1016 posted 10/28/17 4:17pm

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

Bodhitheblackdog said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

precioux said: But F&S didn't say that P had a terminal illnes

Thanks White Dude. At first Precioux had me thinkig I was confused but I carefully reviewed everything and F&S never said Prince had a terminal illness...so my cheering her on stands!

You're welcome smile Yes, she's great! biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1017 posted 10/28/17 5:22pm

Menes

I'm having a bit of a brain freeze. The Autopsy report says : Time of death: 10:07 am on April 21, 2016. I assume the paramedics made that call on site.

Prince was found unresponsive at 09:43 am on April 21st, 2016. I assume by KJ and others.

How is it the ME was not able to quantify a better time of death? It can't be 10:07 am.

Did Prince OD that morning or the night before? Surely she/they would know that?

Maybe I missed something?



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1018 posted 10/28/17 5:43pm

Mumio

avatar

Menes said:

I'm having a bit of a brain freeze. The Autopsy report says : Time of death: 10:07 am on April 21, 2016. I assume the paramedics made that call on site.

Prince was found unresponsive at 09:43 am on April 21st, 2016. I assume by KJ and others.

How is it the ME was not able to quantify a better time of death? It can't be 10:07 am.

Did Prince OD that morning or the night before? Surely she/they would know that?

Maybe I missed something?




I don't know that it was ever official, but there was word out there that he could have passed up to 6 hours before he was found.

Welcome to "the org", Mumio…they can have you, but I'll have your love in the end nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1019 posted 10/28/17 5:55pm

PennyPurple

avatar

Menes said:

I'm having a bit of a brain freeze. The Autopsy report says : Time of death: 10:07 am on April 21, 2016. I assume the paramedics made that call on site.

Prince was found unresponsive at 09:43 am on April 21st, 2016. I assume by KJ and others.

How is it the ME was not able to quantify a better time of death? It can't be 10:07 am.

Did Prince OD that morning or the night before? Surely she/they would know that?

Maybe I missed something?



I think it's because they can't call an official time of death until an official gets there. Maybe the paramedics aren't qualified to call it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 34 of 38 « First<29303132333435363738>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > bad chronic pain since when??