laurarichardson said:

I was referring to your statement wich said: "She knew what she was getting into." That doesn't excuse his behaviour!

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Menes said:

You seem to think that you have figured out what sort of standards I have. I forgive you for such a fantastical claim because, you see, you are allowed to let your mind wander all over the place with reckless emotional abandonment. It's ok . It's not your fault and all is well with me and you.

Just because I didn't respond to you does not equate to, I have double standards. How do you know what my feelings are about Manuela and Prince? Or about Prince himself? When did you and I ever discuss this? Have you read thru all of my posts to make such a claim? You wouldn't be able to when focusing is not an attribute. I understand that. I would hope that your past would teach you a thing or two about emotional outburst that would lead you to making claims that suit your emotional state.

Hopefully you will be able to gain some relief in the form of humor when you are in this forum. Anything other than that and you are destined to repeat a perpetual self absorbed sob story. You can have all the cheerleaders you want ,but in the end, you, live with you, and they will never change that. Enjoy the forum for what it is, not what you want to make it.


Furthermore, you, focusing on you, is far more beneficial than what standards you deem applicable in a forum .

You're MUCH too harsh Menes...you need to dial it back, even I'm offended, and I'm pretty chill with all the BS here.

For the record, I mean no ill will. I was making a statement to someone else about getting into trouble and being on probation. I was personally attacked and thought nothing of it. But then, the personal attack continued for something as simple as my comment about Mayte peddling puss across the water. In my defense (and all of my previous post) , I have not been kind to anyone who has wanted to make money by using Prince's name , or his death, as the catalyst for self- profit.

I may have veered off course with my comments about the puss business, but if you read it carefully, the point of the post was to warn the person to investigate all matters concerning Laura's and Mulefunk's potential book for themselves and not take my word for it. It was an impulsive post because there have been several reports on other platforms of heavy collaborative efforts concerning the mansuscripts.

To avoid further thread confusion, I will try my best to focus on the subject at hand and place unrelated comments in the appropiate thread.

ThatWhiteDude said:

laurarichardson said:

Please come back when you know what is going on. I have not typed one thing that is not true. Marriages fail it happens. You move on with your life. You do not live vicauriously threw your spouse fo for 20 years on.

Most parents are not sending their 17.5 half year old daughter off to hang out with a 30 something year old man.

They sought him out for a reason. He was not innocent he knew what he was doing and he did run around on her the whole entire time by Mayte's own admission and her parents ran around on each other so thought it was normal. Do you think that is good parenting?

One minute her mom is on Real Houswives dissing Prince and now she is on Facebook wearing a symbol shirt. If you are a terrible parent you will have a terriable child.

[Edited 10/30/17 11:56am]

I was referring to your statement wich said: "She knew what she was getting into." That doesn't excuse his behaviour!

I never said it did excuse his behavior. My point she knew when they were dating he was seeing Nona and Carmen. Why marry a cheater and then decide that being married to a cheater is okay because your parents did it and then be upset for 20 years about it.

Not one lick of common sense was used and people keep falling for her pity party while she tries to get a check out if.

laurarichardson said:

Ever thought of the fact that she was young and maybe naiv and that he used this against her by saying: "No I don't date Carmen, she got a crush on me, that's all." And she didn't even complain about it.

precioux said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

ffs I didn't misinterpret TWD's reply... I wasn't attempting a serious reply, rather a rhetorical flourish based on their sig! See now I know you're making stuff up. Get a clue, bc you didn't understand the joke. Funny you think you're smart but you still didn't get it

So you don't mind the bitch label? despite apparently not mocking people with disabilities (it's pretty obvious to me u were mocking TWD with the 'literally' remark). You can try and weasel your way out of it but the post is there. So anyway, what you're really saying is you self-identify as a bitch - albeit with politically correct limits. Bully for you! Maybe that explains your obsession with 'meds'. No normal woman, not medicated, would want to be called a bitch.

Re: bolded

Look in the mirror sweetheart re: your rhetoric on"option 2" needing to implement your "pet theory" of P's imaginary terminal illness. See the irnony there???


Ciao!

Ahh but you're the reductionist halfwit who doesn't understand nuance, rhetoric, or subjective vs objective. Keep on cutting out that feedback loop, like only people on meds can.

Glib doesn't equal smart jsuk? You can't be both

ThatWhiteDude said:

laurarichardson said:

I never said it did excuse his behavior. My point she knew when they were dating he was seeing Nona and Carmen. Why marry a cheater and then decide that being married to a cheater is okay because your parents did it and then be upset for 20 years about it.

Not one lick of common sense was used and people keep falling for her pity party while she tries to get a check out if.

Ever thought of the fact that she was young and maybe naiv and that he used this against her by saying: "No I don't date Carmen, she got a crush on me, that's all." And she didn't even complain about it.

No, everyone that was involved in these polyarmous realationships with him have said he was clear about how he was allowed to date whomever he wanted but they could not.

Mayte admitted that she knew about his other women and she sure in hell did not think he was playing Chutes and Ladders with those women.

Sheila E even spoke about the 'others" and "The Harem"

I wish orgers would stop putting their heads in the sand.

fortuneandserendipity said:

precioux said:

Re: bolded

Look in the mirror sweetheart re: your rhetoric on"option 2" needing to implement your "pet theory" of P's imaginary terminal illness. See the irnony there???


Ciao!

Ahh but you're the reductionist halfwit who doesn't understand nuance, rhetoric, or subjective vs objective. Keep on cutting out that feedback loop, like only people on meds can.

Glib doesn't equal smart jsuk? You can't be both

How about not being able to comprehend facts? Do you think ignoring the laws that have been discussed on this board a million times is smart?

You believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. You know they are screaming right now about their disbursements. They would have no money to get the ME to do anything but follow the letter of the law.

laurarichardson said:

The relationship with Carmen was over when he married Mayte and according to Mayte he only cheated when he met Manuela, at least she didn't mention any other woman. I think it's pretty harsh to put the blame only on her and excuse his behaviour by saying : "They knew what they signed up to." nope, that's not how it works! Just because Prince did it this way doesn't mean Mayte has to take it.
[Edited 10/30/17 12:29pm]

ThatWhiteDude said:

laurarichardson said:

No, everyone that was involved in these polyarmous realationships with him have said he was clear about how he was allowed to date whomever he wanted but they could not.

Mayte admitted that she knew about his other women and she sure in hell did not think he was playing Chutes and Ladders with those women.

Sheila E even spoke about the 'others" and "The Harem"

I wish orgers would stop putting their heads in the sand.

The relationship with Carmen was over when he married Mayte and according to Mayte he only cheated when he met Manuela, at least she didn't mention any other woman. I think it's pretty harsh to put the blame only on her and excuse his behaviour by saying : "They knew what they signed up to." nope, that's not how it works! Just because Prince did it this way doesn't mean Mayte has to take it. [Edited 10/30/17 12:29pm]

But he was cheating the whole time he was dating her. Sorry but that is a problem and Mayte has said he cheated with a few women while they were married. Mikkie White one of the back up singers who worked with him and who was around after Mayte was gone said he had other women hanging around when he would send M2 back to Toronto.

He ran around on everybody.

fortuneandserendipity said:

You, my dear are the definition of rhetoric insanity ...poor thing.

Bless you

Menes said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

You're MUCH too harsh Menes...you need to dial it back, even I'm offended, and I'm pretty chill with all the BS here.

For the record, I mean no ill will. I was making a statement to someone else about getting into trouble and being on probation. I was personally attacked and thought nothing of it. But then, the personal attack continued for something as simple as my comment about Mayte peddling puss across the water. In my defense (and all of my previous post) , I have not been kind to anyone who has wanted to make money by using Prince's name , or his death, as the catalyst for self- profit.

I may have veered off course with my comments about the puss business, but if you read it carefully, the point of the post was to warn the person to investigate all matters concerning Laura's and Mulefunk's potential book for themselves and not take my word for it. It was an impulsive post because there have been several reports on other platforms of heavy collaborative efforts concerning the mansuscripts.

To avoid further thread confusion, I will try my best to focus on the subject at hand and place unrelated comments in the appropiate thread.

I sure hope LR gets a good and thorough editor because if she uses my intellectual product (aka stealing...which she has been doing for a while here) which I have posted on the Org. I'll sue her. Full stop.

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Menes said:

For the record, I mean no ill will. I was making a statement to someone else about getting into trouble and being on probation. I was personally attacked and thought nothing of it. But then, the personal attack continued for something as simple as my comment about Mayte peddling puss across the water. In my defense (and all of my previous post) , I have not been kind to anyone who has wanted to make money by using Prince's name , or his death, as the catalyst for self- profit.

I may have veered off course with my comments about the puss business, but if you read it carefully, the point of the post was to warn the person to investigate all matters concerning Laura's and Mulefunk's potential book for themselves and not take my word for it. It was an impulsive post because there have been several reports on other platforms of heavy collaborative efforts concerning the mansuscripts.

To avoid further thread confusion, I will try my best to focus on the subject at hand and place unrelated comments in the appropiate thread.

I sure hope LR gets a good and thorough editor because if she uses my intellectual product (aka stealing...which she has been doing for a while here) which I have posted on the Org. I'll sue her. Full stop.

I have no book plans in the works. It is unfortunate that some of you are out of the loop. Many of the thinks that are coming to light have been discussed via org notes, e-mails and Facebook groups for months.

None of us need to write a book. The truth is going to come out and it appears it will be done by his sister so you doubting Thomas's need to get ready.

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

Ahh but you're the reductionist halfwit who doesn't understand nuance, rhetoric, or subjective vs objective. Keep on cutting out that feedback loop, like only people on meds can.

Glib doesn't equal smart jsuk? You can't be both

How about not being able to comprehend facts? Do you think ignoring the laws that have been discussed on this board a million times is smart?

You believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. You know they are screaming right now about their disbursements. They would have no money to get the ME to do anything but follow the letter of the law.

I've spent ages analysing it, and I increasingly believe it was suicide the more I learn.

So i get faintly annoyed with the line... 'the Medical Examiner's verdict is black-or-white, absolutely unequivocal, 100% objective, 0% subjective, A.I. android error free, never-known-to-be-wrong, correct! It's not reality, the way the world really is. Earlier on thread, someone posted how frequently verdicts are changed.

I do not believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. I've never posited that a likely scenario. Please stop misalleging. It gets tiresome.

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

Ahh but you're the reductionist halfwit who doesn't understand nuance, rhetoric, or subjective vs objective. Keep on cutting out that feedback loop, like only people on meds can.

Glib doesn't equal smart jsuk? You can't be both

How about not being able to comprehend facts? Do you think ignoring the laws that have been discussed on this board a million times is smart?

You believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. You know they are screaming right now about their disbursements. They would have no money to get the ME to do anything but follow the letter of the law.

Bam!

F&S wins the Darwin award for the year

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:

How about not being able to comprehend facts? Do you think ignoring the laws that have been discussed on this board a million times is smart?

You believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. You know they are screaming right now about their disbursements. They would have no money to get the ME to do anything but follow the letter of the law.

I've spent ages analysing it, and I increasingly believe it was suicide the more I learn.

So i get faintly annoyed with the line... 'the Medical Examiner's verdict is black-or-white, absolutely unequivocal, 100% objective, 0% subjective, A.I. android error free, never-known-to-be-wrong, correct! It's not reality, the way the world really is. Earlier on thread, someone posted how frequently verdicts are changed.

I do not believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. I've never posited that a likely scenario. Please stop misalleging. It gets tiresome.

A while back you implied it was listed as accidental by persuasion of the family. How else do you persuade someone other then using money? If Prince committed suicide which I now do believe is a strong possibility the ME could not put that on the death certificate because she does not have the evidence it would not be to save face it would be because their is no proof.

I think he planned it this way. It does not change the fact that whomever he got the drugs from committed an illgal act and know other cause of death would change the police investigation.

precioux said:

I think you don't know what the Darwin Award is, it's a thing you say when people kick themselves out of life out of stupidity.
[Edited 10/30/17 12:55pm]
[Edited 10/30/17 12:56pm]

laurarichardson said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

I sure hope LR gets a good and thorough editor because if she uses my intellectual product (aka stealing...which she has been doing for a while here) which I have posted on the Org. I'll sue her. Full stop.

I have no book plans in the works. It is unfortunate that some of you are out of the loop. Many of the thinks that are coming to light have been discussed via org notes, e-mails and Facebook groups for months.

None of us need to write a book. The truth is going to come out and it appears it will be done by his sister so you doubting Thomas's need to get ready.

Are you saying that the millions that she already stands to inherit isn't enough? You don't see the greed coming right thru them nostrils? Why would you trust that book to be completely factual?

precioux said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

Ahh but you're the reductionist halfwit who doesn't understand nuance, rhetoric, or subjective vs objective. Keep on cutting out that feedback loop, like only people on meds can.

Glib doesn't equal smart jsuk? You can't be both

You, my dear are the definition of rhetoric insanity ...poor thing. Bless you

That was just meaningless. If only you weren't so conceited. You put the 'Con' in conceited

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:

How about not being able to comprehend facts? Do you think ignoring the laws that have been discussed on this board a million times is smart?

You believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. You know they are screaming right now about their disbursements. They would have no money to get the ME to do anything but follow the letter of the law.

I've spent ages analysing it, and I increasingly believe it was suicide the more I learn.

So i get faintly annoyed with the line... 'the Medical Examiner's verdict is black-or-white, absolutely unequivocal, 100% objective, 0% subjective, A.I. android error free, never-known-to-be-wrong, correct! It's not reality, the way the world really is. Earlier on thread, someone posted how frequently verdicts are changed.

I do not believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. I've never posited that a likely scenario. Please stop misalleging. It gets tiresome.

Wow! we finally agree on something....

But here's the thing-

1.According to the guidelines of what an ME has to report in the state of MN, Prince's death would have been deemed "accidental" irregardless. PLEASE READ MENES ARTICLES
ON SAID SUBJECT.It explains this subject in detail as to the why/why not

2. No matter if P had a terminal illness or not, it was NOT A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR.PERIOD!

3. Do I think there was a terminal illness-YES, but it still does not mandate being recorded as "a contributing factor" on part 2.

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

I've spent ages analysing it, and I increasingly believe it was suicide the more I learn.

So i get faintly annoyed with the line... 'the Medical Examiner's verdict is black-or-white, absolutely unequivocal, 100% objective, 0% subjective, A.I. android error free, never-known-to-be-wrong, correct! It's not reality, the way the world really is. Earlier on thread, someone posted how frequently verdicts are changed.

I do not believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. I've never posited that a likely scenario. Please stop misalleging. It gets tiresome.

A while back you implied it was listed as accidental by persuasion of the family. How else do you persuade someone other then using money? If Prince committed suicide which I now do believe is a strong possibility the ME could not put that on the death certificate because she does not have the evidence it would not be to save face it would be because their is no proof.

I think he planned it this way. It does not change the fact that whomever he got the drugs from committed an illgal act and know other cause of death would change the police investigation.

Where are you getting this rubbish Stop confusing me with somebody else!

fortuneandserendipity said:

precioux said:

fortuneandserendipity said: You, my dear are the definition of rhetoric insanity ...poor thing. Bless you

That was just meaningless. If only you weren't so conceited. You put the 'Con' in conceited

LOL! how is trying to get something through your thick skull conceited???? Shouldn't that be the other way around for the one who is blatantly stuck on stupid?

ThatWhiteDude said:

precioux said:

Bam!

F&S wins the Darwin award for the year

I think you don't know what the Darwin Award is, it's a thing you say when people kick themselves out of life out of stupidity. [Edited 10/30/17 12:55pm] [Edited 10/30/17 12:56pm]

Which is exactly what F&S is doing in this forum, soooo....if the shoe fits

precioux said:

Nope, it's not

precioux said:

fortuneandserendipity said:

I've spent ages analysing it, and I increasingly believe it was suicide the more I learn.

So i get faintly annoyed with the line... 'the Medical Examiner's verdict is black-or-white, absolutely unequivocal, 100% objective, 0% subjective, A.I. android error free, never-known-to-be-wrong, correct! It's not reality, the way the world really is. Earlier on thread, someone posted how frequently verdicts are changed.

I do not believe the ME is in on some conspiracy with the poor ass Nelson sibs. I've never posited that a likely scenario. Please stop misalleging. It gets tiresome.

Wow! we finally agree on something....

But here's the thing-

1.According to the guidelines of what an ME has to report in the state of MN, Prince's death would have been deemed "accidental" irregardless. PLEASE READ MENES ARTICLES
ON SAID SUBJECT.It explains this subject in detail as to the why/why not

2. No matter if P had a terminal illness or not, it was NOT A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR.PERIOD!

3. Do I think there was a terminal illness-YES, but it still does not mandate being recorded as "a contributing factor" on part 2.

I've been saying it's suicide for well over a year now lol. You mustn't have been reading all the threads.

OK Menes is now the EXPERT (not ISLWJAG) on the subject of the jurisdiction of that EXPERT executor of law - the state of MN, whose legal executors are (of course) all EXPERTS. If a hundred suicide notes were found around Paisley Park, that wouldn't have been enough. No wonder P killed himself (that's just a rhetorical flourish in case anyone's offended).

No,idiot.

Menes POSTED the guidelines that an ME has to adhere to.(which you continuously ignore)

ISLIJAG has argued your insane rhetoric in a court of law several times as stated.

L-e-a-r-n t-o r-e-a-d

fortuneandserendipity said:

precioux said:

Wow! we finally agree on something....

But here's the thing-

1.According to the guidelines of what an ME has to report in the state of MN, Prince's death would have been deemed "accidental" irregardless. PLEASE READ MENES ARTICLES
ON SAID SUBJECT.It explains this subject in detail as to the why/why not

2. No matter if P had a terminal illness or not, it was NOT A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR.PERIOD!

3. Do I think there was a terminal illness-YES, but it still does not mandate being recorded as "a contributing factor" on part 2.

I've been saying it's suicide for well over a year now lol. You mustn't have been reading all the threads.

OK Menes is now the EXPERT (not ISLWJAG) on the subject of the jurisdiction of that EXPERT executor of law - the state of MN, whose legal executors are (of course) all EXPERTS. If a hundred suicide notes were found around Paisley Park, that wouldn't have been enough. No wonder P killed himself (that's just a rhetorical flourish in case anyone's offended).

precioux said:

No,idiot.

Menes POSTED the guidelines that an ME has to adhere to.(which you continuously ignore)

ISLIJAG has argued your insane rhetoric in a court of law several times as stated.

L-e-a-r-n t-o r-e-a-d

fortuneandserendipity said:

I've been saying it's suicide for well over a year now lol. You mustn't have been reading all the threads.

OK Menes is now the EXPERT (not ISLWJAG) on the subject of the jurisdiction of that EXPERT executor of law - the state of MN, whose legal executors are (of course) all EXPERTS. If a hundred suicide notes were found around Paisley Park, that wouldn't have been enough. No wonder P killed himself (that's just a rhetorical flourish in case anyone's offended).

1) Do you understand sarcasm?

2) And is this you?

[Edited 10/30/17 13:36pm]

LMMFAO! No, it's yo mama!

can't you see the resemblence in the mirror???

fortuneandserendipity said:

precioux said:

No,idiot.

Menes POSTED the guidelines that an ME has to adhere to.(which you continuously ignore)

ISLIJAG has argued your insane rhetoric in a court of law several times as stated.

L-e-a-r-n t-o r-e-a-d

1) Do you understand sarcasm?

2) And is this you?

[Edited 10/30/17 13:36pm]

Seee?? THIS is the type of posts you are KNOWN for. Your stupid and annoying pictures that only you find humor in. And you wonder WHY no one takes you seriously? SMDH!

Showing your is your forte....or were you squatting over a mirror here?

fortuneandserendipity said:

precioux said:

No,idiot.

Menes POSTED the guidelines that an ME has to adhere to.(which you continuously ignore)

ISLIJAG has argued your insane rhetoric in a court of law several times as stated.

L-e-a-r-n t-o r-e-a-d

1) Do you understand sarcasm?

2) And is this you?

[Edited 10/30/17 13:36pm]

Menes said:

laurarichardson said:

I have no book plans in the works. It is unfortunate that some of you are out of the loop. Many of the thinks that are coming to light have been discussed via org notes, e-mails and Facebook groups for months.

None of us need to write a book. The truth is going to come out and it appears it will be done by his sister so you doubting Thomas's need to get ready.

Are you saying that the millions that she already stands to inherit isn't enough? You don't see the greed coming right thru them nostrils? Why would you trust that book to be completely factual?

Tyka and the half-sibs are the LAST people I would turn to for factual information about Prince's health, last days, sexuality, addiction.' Only the (wo)man knows'...Kirk, where are you when we need you?

fortuneandserendipity said:

soprecious said:

fortuneandserendipity said: O-M-G! Are you illiterate??? Did you not see where I stated "terminal disease"- not "underlying illness", which is what you alluded to me saying?? And for the thousandth time...no, it would not be included in part 2 as a contributing factor BECAUSE Prince did not directly or indirectly die of any disease, he died of an OD- PERIOD.End of story! It matters not what fentanyl is prescribed for or it's use in palliative care BECAUSE THIS DRUG WAS NOT MEDICALLY PRECRIBED/Administered to him-It was an illicit pill, no matter what his reasoning for taking it whether knowingly or not. The ME DOES know why that amount was in his bloodstream because dozens of other illicit pills with the same makeup were tested. Furthermore, if you read the excerpts from what Menes posted in regards to how an ME comes to a conclusion of accidental or suicide, you would know that no matter what, this would've been ruled an accident, even if the ME were a frickin clairvoyant. Are you seriously that stuck on stupid? [Edited 10/29/17 17:37pm]

Now you're just being bitchy over semantics. A few posters equivocate over language and I wanted to be sure your bitchy self wasn't conflating the two terms 'terminal illness' and 'underlying illness' misleadingly.

Are you a practicing Medical Examiner from the state of Minnesota? Or are you just upset you're not her offical spokesperson

Bc I think with your statement on 'no possible chance of suicide verdict' you've demonstrated my point for me. Facts don't matter here. If the universe says something different - that's irrelevant. What matters is accepting 'expert' opinion as kosher, regardless of ambiguity. If you genuinely believe there is no ambiguity re ME's 'absolutely unfalsifiable' conclusions l o l, then i suggest you solicit another 'expert' opinion from a shrink.

hope you had fun replacing my name in a post. you've been reported