jtfolden said:

Bria is not gonna drive no Van ..... but Nicole would.....

I seriously feel like Prince has been robbed of the #1 spot
and no! I don't have anything to back my opinion up.
It jus seems strange that he was ahead then on the last minute he's #2.
Like somebody (they) didn't want him to once again prove that u can be very successful without the gatekeepers
[Edited 4/9/09 4:47am]

strutboy said:

Well?

JayJai said:

#2 is still successful. Especially considering the circumstances of the album release.

ButterscotchPimp said:

yeah, so, what is actually the deal here?

And next week it will be ?????

Shawnt26 said:

OK..I meant at the #1 spot

also I asked (can't remember if it's this thread or another) if Keith Urban would've been this successful if he took the road Prince took.

He is #2 based on sales right? Well for a person that only sold the CD out of Target stores, I think that says a lot...about his music, fans, etc.

eye can honestly say that prince's new CD's are a breathe of fresh air..when eye listen 2 it over and over again it shows me how incredible of an artist,musician,composer and genius prince really is..he is number one with out charts because there is no artist out there that can compete with this man....genius is the only way to describe him...

baebgrl said:

- Yes, and basically without promotion, MTV videos, payola, etc. Only 3 nights on Leno and the Target store display, right?

And it seems most european fans couldnt buy the CD yet, since Target doesnt deliver to other countries.
[Edited 4/9/09 9:11am]

ButterscotchPimp said:

Aw hell naw, it don't work like that. :::runs in and snatches P torch from BP::: You're on probation for now.

the funny thing is that Keith Urban has NC2U on his Celebrity Playlist on iTunes this week.

And yes, I agree that it's a rather impressive feat for a triple album (ok yes it was only $11.98) to reach that high on the charts and sell that much with very little promotion.
[Edited 4/9/09 9:44am]

Next week it will fall right off the table.

Ifsixwuz9 said:

HA!!!


okay, fair enough. i get a probationary torch. or a match.

ButterscotchPimp said:

Just out of curiosity are you including Lotus and MPLSound together in your review? Or were you just referring to Lotus on its own?

japanrocks said:

The Lion's share I would say

Rock on Prince

Holy shit!!!
Good news!!!
Prince is #1 on the Target chart!!!

Thanks to my parents' genes, I simply do not grow facial hair. I never have, unless you count microscopic stubble in the same ranks as a full beard. It certainly makes me a little jealous, especially when there are groups around promoting goodwill and happiness through the growth of a beard. So imagine my surprise when I found out that facial hair has had a much more troubled history than I first imagined.

Coming in many shapes, sizes and colors, the beard is a prominent feature on most men who do not shave (and the occasional woman - though let's not go there). Today, pogonotrophy is normally accepted in society; but in the past, growing a beard could cause quite a few problems. Sprouting your manly facial hair could get you taxed, be a sign of rebellion against the church - or could even get you killed.

At the least, removal of facial hair can be painful. Archaeologists have found evidence that men started to shave off their beards as early as 100,000 BC. However, the the first razors discovered by archaeologists date back to 30,000 BC, and were made of flint. Thus, before then shaving was a painful ordeal. One who wanted a bare face would use two sea shells to grip their hair, then pull; a method which sounds even more distressing than getting a bikini wax.

Beards were in the vogue in Greek society, where a healthy beard was a sign of wisdom and knowledge. But then Alexander the Great came along and changed all that, for the sake of the military. He forced his soldiers to shave for fear that an enemy could use a man's beard to his disadvantage in close combat. He thought that the enemy would grab it during hand-to-hand struggles, though I would be more worried about the pain of someone ripping my beard off. In contrast, the slaves, who were normally made to shave, were then ordered to grow out their stubble. Far be it for slaves to be equally fashionable as their masters.

The beard eventually came back into fashion, but a few rulers objected to their presence. In 1698, Peter I of Russia commanded his courtiers and officials to cut off their beards. To add insult to injury, he would sometimes personally shave the beards of his noblemen. Those wishing to keep their beards had to pay a tax - 100 rubles each year - as well as carry around a medal proclaiming that "beards are a ridiculous ornament." A similar taxation was passed by England's Henry VIII in 1535 - who, hypocritically, continued to grow a beard of his own. It's good to be the king.

Henry VIII and his beardLuckily for English clergymen, priests already kept their faces clean-shaven as a sign of their celibacy. So, when the protestant reformation began in the 16th century, protestant priests would grow their beards out in protest of the old ways. In this case, size mattered; the greater the beard, the greater the protest. This move was well-timed with the reign of Elizabeth I, who decided to tax beards again in the same vein as Henry VIII - either for her dislike of beards, or for money. A government's got to generate revenue somehow, right?

The growing (or cutting) of a beard has had some important symbolic references in the past. Roman boys would not remove any facial hair until they had reached adulthood, then would shave as an offering to the gods. More towards the East, one punishment for crimes was to have one's beard removed in public. In America, an Amish man will keep a clean-shaven face until he has married, after which he will grow a beard which he will keep forever. In the Chatti, a German tribe, a man was not allowed to shave until he had killed an enemy!

In modern times, many police and military forces prohibit beards for one important reason that came up during World War I. In order to get a clean seal on a gas mask, you must have a clean face, so soldiers made sure to shave. They may or may not have been worried about the pulling of beards during hand-to-hand combat, as Alexander the Great was. Regardless, in a choice between shaving my beard and dying a horrible death via biochemical warfare, I'd go with the one that involves staying alive.

Of course, I cannot grow a beard, and maybe I should be grateful for that. Given the colorful history of beards, I may be better off without one.

ohh it was so close, darn...
Prince never gets what he deseves, people who aren't his fans don't give him any attention

diiinnnooo said:

Amen. Though, I think we're referring to entirely different things...

diiinnnooo said:

Funny the way that works, innit?

nubrownsoul said:

Okay, I'm confused. What does this have to do with Prince's CD not debuting at #1 on the Soundscan chart????

audience1 said:

Detroit Free Press reports a Number 1 in Detroit, too.

NuPwr319 said:

It's a big label conspiracy. I'm too lazy to read this entire thread, but does anyone know how Billboard and Hits were so off?

BanishedBrian said:

Sure you would! :cough: torrent :cough: :cough:

strutboy said:

So where's the confirmation, aye?

dartluv5 said:

I would think his major tour days are over . . .

So what??? He's still at the top of MY LIST and thats all that counts in my mind. And besides, #2 is still fantastic seeing how he isnt signed to a major label and didnt do any guerilla marketing of his latest album and can still get 160,000 + fans to buy his (and Bria's ) album!