This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.
Author | Message |
THE OFFICIAL 3121 CD COVER!!! ![]() As posted by PP6 @ NPGMC secs ago...he also has this message: "Make sure u check out 2day's USA Today, Weekend Edition" " USA TODAY...Weekend Edition, LIFE Section...page 5E Get it!!" As posted by PP6 @ npgmc...somebody get me this newspaper!! Please? ![]() I like the cover...see what u think of it urself! ![]() [Edited 2/17/06 23:37pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
![]() Oh, and... first! ![]() U been bamboozled, hoodwinked, took. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
ugly, if you ask me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
it's ok.
![]() and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Really? Where has this been confirmed? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
![]() First impression: it's quite classy As one door closes, another opens... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
PP6 at NPGMC. U been bamboozled, hoodwinked, took. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I like it! I can imagine this looking really fine as a digipak. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
Well, there is a full page ad in today's USA TODAY (page 5e) with this very picture ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Cheers guys!
Not sure what I think... ![]() ![]() And it looks like he's humping a wall. ![]() [Edited 2/17/06 5:28am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
The best in years!!! I do like it!!! ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
MUCH better than mucousology. way to go, sam!
if the orange background were kind of a brushed foil, it would be HOTT. as is, it's really not bad at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I'm glad there's a bit of mystery to it. ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
wow... it's very very good!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Thank you! I love it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Anx said: MUCH better than mucousology. way to go, sam!
if the orange background were kind of a brushed foil, it would be HOTT. as is, it's really not bad at all. Right. I don't get why some say it's looks "cheap". Don't think so at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
eugnj420 said: onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
Well, there is a full page ad in today's USA TODAY (page 5e) with this very picture ![]() Scan? ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
It seems some people are confusing "Simple" with "Cheap." It's not my favorite cover, but it's a far cry better then Musicology, at least the foreground and background match... -->> This Space 4 Rent <<--
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
You know that those vines were from the wall @ Paisley right? ![]() Ahhhh the stupid shit I notice! I kinna like the new cover ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
ditto. and there's no wordart text there too, like on musicology. ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
that's what i would call GOOD.
it's pretty simple, and again, that's good...the best things often are with design... perhaps with "Prince" appearing on it as well somewhere could make it look a little more complete though? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I dig it! ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I think it's striking. I love it.
![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
yeah it's really growing on me now. i might even go so far as to say it looks kinda "phat"... for some reason that kinda dated word pops into my head even though this look is very NOW. it's PHAT circa 2006. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
laurarichardson said: javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. yes, because it still matters. and when 'solid' media becomes completely obsolete, cover art will still be relevant. something visual has ALWAYS been attached to albums and it always will be, even if it's a computer graphic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
ditto. and there's no wordart text there too, like on musicology. ![]() if only! musicology would have benefitted from some wordart text. i could have helped out with that, but noooo. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
laurarichardson said: javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. plenty of people, including myself aren't into downloading tracks compared to buying the whole shebang. artwork still matters. . [Edited 2/17/06 5:47am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.