lowkey said:

the whole purpose of this recent smear campaign against janet is to make people think she is crazy, greedy,broke, and beats up orphans...it didnt take much for it to work with the mj fanbase because most of them already hate her.its funny how all it took was signing her name to a letter challenging the executors to make people feel she has mental problems.i kinda remember somebody else being attacked in the media and declared crazy,broke, a child molester and all kinda other shit.

no, all it took was her helping to spirit her niece and nephews' guardian off to az, leaving them w/o contact with her for over a week, and then allowing her brother to release said letter to third-rate tabloid website instead of going thru her lawyers with her family business - which she eventually did when the shit hit the fan and blew in her direction.

there would be no smear campaign b/c no one was checking for janet in the first place, since the media have never been nearly as interested in being in her business as they were in her brother's.

WaterInYourBath said:

kibbles said:

OMG THANK YOU!!! i was beginning to believe i was going crazy arguing with little m-effers.

'i, too, recall a time when the jacksons were seen as this kind of 'osmond family in sepia tone'.

that was the comment that started it all, and it wasn't even the point of my post! and yet, that's what these idiots have chosen to focus on? that? i never said i agreed with it. i never tried to say it was true. i went on to express far more arguments in the rest of the post, which no one has commented on, which in my mind were more worthy of commentary.

but no, it was water on the brain who chose to take exception to it, and the others started to pile on, which is odd b/c as you say, it was pretty common practice to reduce black performers to their white counterparts, if at all possible, and not give them their full props. telling the truth is now grounds for calling me a liar?

Nah, it's Water in your lungs, that's why you're drowning to death after being called-out on your stupidity.

And if anybody in here was born with hydrocephalus, it was clearly you and your aliases, loser.

no, i meant say water on the brain. and i stand by it, since you clearly have me confused with someone else. your "thinking" - and i use that term loosely - is all confused, waterlogged and such.

c'mon y'all it's time for a group hug.

now doesn't that feel better.

janet is probably at one of her dwellings having dinner or just chillin out with music. relax! renew! release!

now smile!

free2bfreeda said:

c'mon y'all it's time for a group hug.

now doesn't that feel better.

janet is probably at one of her dwellings having dinner or just chillin out with music. relax! renew! release!

now smile!

You got that right!

Damn, if MJ fans is your defintion of being of hatefu and nasty, then what the hell are Madonna's fans? Or Elvis fans or Beatles fans? At least most MJ fans have respect for what Janet did. Try mentioning Janet and her career and legacy to these other fanbases. Sad stuff.

Just this past weekned I was on a Madonna forum and someone had posted those old sunbathing photos of Janet and they were just laughing at her, and the state of her career, her fanbase, etc.

Just real hateful stuff. They are even doctoring photos of her working at Mcdonalds and her performing at food courts, etc.

So reading about Janet's fans anger at MJ fans is just sort of funny to me. I don't even think MJ fans rank in the top 15 when it comes to talking smack against Janet.

rdhull said:

kibbles said:

i think you, ass and dull

That is some grade A namecalling

you, ass, and dull..sounds like a conglomerate or some shit lol

ok I have no horse in this race of jackson lover or hater or whatever yall have created on this forum lol..

but kiblets, I will again reitierate for your lying make believe self..nobody ever called The Jackson 5 the black Osmonds..

and Im older than you and grew up in that era so kindly sit down somewhere and shut the fuck up when you do..soundin like a stupid mutherfucker each time you go off runnin around here following folks like Janet did J.J. on Good Times

oh you mean like calling me kibblesnbits or kiblets? you threw it out there first, granny.

i don't care if you're older than dirt. i recall the j5/osmond comparisons. moreover, i will post whenever and wherever i please, and will do so at my leisure, until the moderator tells me to shut up. now you kindly go fuck yourself. thanks for playing.

kibbles said:

WaterInYourBath said:

Nah, it's Water in your lungs, that's why you're drowning to death after being called-out on your stupidity.

And if anybody in here was born with hydrocephalus, it was clearly you and your aliases, loser.

no, i meant say water on the brain. and i stand by it, since you clearly have me confused with someone else. your "thinking" - and i use that term loosely - is all confused, waterlogged and such.

Wow, that's the best, unintelligible reply you could think of, since you obviously don't know what hydrocephalus is. All of these attempts at hardcore affronts with your different names, but you're still weak. ....

kibbles said:

rdhull said:

That is some grade A namecalling

you, ass, and dull..sounds like a conglomerate or some shit lol

ok I have no horse in this race of jackson lover or hater or whatever yall have created on this forum lol..

but kiblets, I will again reitierate for your lying make believe self..nobody ever called The Jackson 5 the black Osmonds..

and Im older than you and grew up in that era so kindly sit down somewhere and shut the fuck up when you do..soundin like a stupid mutherfucker each time you go off runnin around here following folks like Janet did J.J. on Good Times

oh you mean like calling me kibblesnbits or kiblets? you threw it out there first, granny.

i don't care if you're older than dirt. i recall the j5/osmond comparisons. moreover, i will post whenever and wherever i please, and will do so at my leisure, until the moderator tells me to shut up. now you kindly go fuck yourself. thanks for playing.

I was giving you props for the names...you seem quite angry. Probably sleep with your hands balled in a fist lol. Which still doesn't excuse your lies and distorted reality.

the black osmonds...lmao..rigggghtttt

mookie said:

Damn, if MJ fans is your defintion of being of hatefu and nasty, then what the hell are Madonna's fans? Or Elvis fans or Beatles fans? At least most MJ fans have respect for what Janet did. Try mentioning Janet and her career and legacy to these other fanbases. Sad stuff.

Just this past weekned I was on a Madonna forum and someone had posted those old sunbathing photos of Janet and they were just laughing at her, and the state of her career, her fanbase, etc.

Just real hateful stuff. They are even doctoring photos of her working at Mcdonalds and her performing at food courts, etc.

So reading about Janet's fans anger at MJ fans is just sort of funny to me. I don't even think MJ fans rank in the top 15 when it comes to talking smack against Janet.

Well, some of us don't feel like that. I love MJ, Janet, Prince, and Madonna. I saw Janet and Prince last year; this year, I'm seeing Madonna--and I've never seen her before. I like seeing my fav 80's music stars before they fade into history...

kibbles said:

rdhull said:

That is some grade A namecalling

you, ass, and dull..sounds like a conglomerate or some shit lol

ok I have no horse in this race of jackson lover or hater or whatever yall have created on this forum lol..

but kiblets, I will again reitierate for your lying make believe self..nobody ever called The Jackson 5 the black Osmonds..

and Im older than you and grew up in that era so kindly sit down somewhere and shut the fuck up when you do..soundin like a stupid mutherfucker each time you go off runnin around here following folks like Janet did J.J. on Good Times

oh you mean like calling me kibblesnbits or kiblets? you threw it out there first, granny.

i don't care if you're older than dirt. i recall the j5/osmond comparisons. moreover, i will post whenever and wherever i please, and will do so at my leisure, until the moderator tells me to shut up. now you kindly go fuck yourself. thanks for playing.

when verbal confrontations regress and sink into name calling the mods usually shut the thread down.

c'mon already.

mjscarousal said:

kibbles said:

OMG THANK YOU!!! i was beginning to believe i was going crazy arguing with little m-effers.

'i, too, recall a time when the jacksons were seen as this kind of 'osmond family in sepia tone'.

that was the comment that started it all, and it wasn't even the point of my post! and yet, that's what these idiots have chosen to focus on? that? i never said i agreed with it. i never tried to say it was true. i went on to express far more arguments in the rest of the post, which no one has commented on, which in my mind were more worthy of commentary.

but no, it was water on the brain who chose to take exception to it, and the others started to pile on, which is odd b/c as you say, it was pretty common practice to reduce black performers to their white counterparts, if at all possible, and not give them their full props. telling the truth is now grounds for calling me a liar?

They know that as well as we do but just persisted it anyway to just bully you because your a MJ fan...There just being nasty to you as well as MJ fans because they dont like Michael Jackson

They dont want mature conversation and instead just want to play games and be childish

Dont pay some of these posters no mind... there not worth the energy of going back and forth.

[Edited 8/21/12 19:20pm]

you're absolutely right.

mookie said:

Damn, if MJ fans is your defintion of being of hatefu and nasty, then what the hell are Madonna's fans? Or Elvis fans or Beatles fans? At least most MJ fans have respect for what Janet did. Try mentioning Janet and her career and legacy to these other fanbases. Sad stuff.

Just this past weekned I was on a Madonna forum and someone had posted those old sunbathing photos of Janet and they were just laughing at her, and the state of her career, her fanbase, etc.

Just real hateful stuff. They are even doctoring photos of her working at Mcdonalds and her performing at food courts, etc.

So reading about Janet's fans anger at MJ fans is just sort of funny to me. I don't even think MJ fans rank in the top 15 when it comes to talking smack against Janet.

Not even close.... them Madonna fans are nasty and even fans of other artists dont even acknowledge Janet as a real artist and think most of her success is because she is Michael Jacksons sister and some just even considered her as just that!

I disagree with that but that is how alot feel.

purplethunder3121 said:

kibbles said:

purple, to repeat one last time: i never said i believed that the osmonds were in any way comparable to the j5.

what i said was i had heard OTHERS, in the media, refer to the j5 as the black osmonds. it was obviously a long, long time ago when both groups were at their apex. even though the j5 were leagues above the osmonds, in the media, they weren't always given the same respect. that's all i was stating. i never said it was right or good or proper or that i agreed with it.

i'm not in the habit of lying for the sake of lying, esp. on such a ridiculous point as this. so what if i do remember that some people referred to the j5 as the black osmonds? what does that have to do with the topic of the thread, or the post that i was responding to? i admit i'm blindsided by the viciousness of this attack, b/c i would think if anyone's going to attack a point, there were other issues i raised which i would think would be more open for discussion. this just seems to be sooo overboard and crazy. but whatever.

Oh, no, I understood what you meant. I didn't think that you believed that mess about "black Osmonds" but you were just talking about others who did--and that is who I was referring to--not you, personally! If that wasn't clear in my post, I'm stating it now. My apologies if I wasn't clear.

thank you for understanding.

kibbles said:

purplethunder3121 said:

Oh, no, I understood what you meant. I didn't think that you believed that mess about "black Osmonds" but you were just talking about others who did--and that is who I was referring to--not you, personally! If that wasn't clear in my post, I'm stating it now. My apologies if I wasn't clear.

thank you for understanding.

You are welcome!

free2bfreeda said:

kibbles said:

oh you mean like calling me kibblesnbits or kiblets? you threw it out there first, granny.

i don't care if you're older than dirt. i recall the j5/osmond comparisons. moreover, i will post whenever and wherever i please, and will do so at my leisure, until the moderator tells me to shut up. now you kindly go fuck yourself. thanks for playing.

when verbal confrontations regress and sink into name calling the mods usually shut the thread down.

c'mon already.

wel, i didn't flame this poster and had no intention to, but if s/he insists on going there. . .

kibbles said:

free2bfreeda said:

when verbal confrontations regress and sink into name calling the mods usually shut the thread down.

c'mon already.

wel, i didn't flame this poster and had no intention to, but if s/he insists on going there. . .

you have anger issues

rdhull said:

kibbles said:

wel, i didn't flame this poster and had no intention to, but if s/he insists on going there. . .

you have anger issues

ummmm, no. not at all.

My entire life I have seen people divided about the Jacksons and reading about the Jacksons being divided long before now... What is it about this family that can divide people as much or more than with their own familieis...? I don't get it.

WaterInYourBath said:

kibbles said:

no, i meant say water on the brain. and i stand by it, since you clearly have me confused with someone else. your "thinking" - and i use that term loosely - is all confused, waterlogged and such.

Wow, that's the best, unintelligible reply you could think of, since you obviously don't know what hydrocephalus is. All of these attempts at hardcore affronts with your different names, but you're still weak. ....

what does it matter? i meant to say water on the brain, period. it's not required that i know anything else except how to type. there's nothing unintelligible about my post. you clearly understood it, right?

again, i've only ever had log in name, i've never posted under any alias. (hardcore affronts? wtf? )

rdhull said:

kibbles said:

wel, i didn't flame this poster and had no intention to, but if s/he insists on going there. . .

you have anger issues

purplethunder3121 said:

My entire life I have seen people divided about the Jacksons and reading about the Jacksons being divided long before now... What is it about this family that can divide people as much or more than with their own familieis...? I don't get it.

Who's divided? I dont get what the Jackson factions are. Is there a synopsis or a legend to read whose side to choose..if you HAVE to choose...or whatever?

mjscarousal said:

rdhull said:

you have anger issues

kibbles said:

WaterInYourBath said:

Wow, that's the best, unintelligible reply you could think of, since you obviously don't know what hydrocephalus is. All of these attempts at hardcore affronts with your different names, but you're still weak. ....

what does it matter? i meant to say water on the brain, period. it's not required that i know anything else except how to type. there's nothing unintelligible about my post. you clearly understood it, right?

again, i've only ever had log in name, i've never posted under any alias. (hardcore affronts? wtf? )

No, my IQ is not that low. Nothing you post makes any sense.

rdhull said:

purplethunder3121 said:

My entire life I have seen people divided about the Jacksons and reading about the Jacksons being divided long before now... What is it about this family that can divide people as much or more than with their own familieis...? I don't get it.

Who's divided? I dont get what the Jackson factions are. Is there a synopsis or a legend to read whose side to choose..if you HAVE to choose...or whatever?

I guess, rdhull, is that I'm saying I've heard so much about this kinda stuff about the Jackson family long before I ever got on the internet and I've been through similar stuff with my own family. So, I don't see why people are torn up about this stuff in the long run... No one has to choose anything...any side...just like they don't have to in a similar situation in their OWN lives. Ain't it supposed to be about the MUSIC for those of us who listen? Sorry, just a little fed up.

rdhull said:

mjscarousal said:

You laughing but Im talking about YOU

purplethunder3121 said:

rdhull said:

Who's divided? I dont get what the Jackson factions are. Is there a synopsis or a legend to read whose side to choose..if you HAVE to choose...or whatever?

I guess, rdhull, is that I'm saying I've heard so much about this kinda stuff about the Jackson family long before I ever got on the internet and I've been through similar stuff with my own family. So, I don't see why people are torn up about this stuff in the long run... No one has to choose anything...any side...just like they don't have to in a similar situation in their OWN lives. Ain't it supposed to be about the MUSIC for those of us who listen? Sorry, just a little fed up.

Thats what Im getting at. If you make a post or opinion then others start posting "oh you ___ fans are a crazed lot.." or "you just hate ____ so no wonder you say that"

these are grown adults mind you

mjscarousal said:

rdhull said:

You laughing but Im talking about YOU

I know. I cant think the gif and sentiment is stull funny even of pointed at me?

musicology54 said:

KCOOLMUZIQ said:

I nominate this thread to be shut down immediately..

And yet you get to post about will Smith, princes so called new "masterpieces", and calling Mike evil.

I deleted that statement. MJ was a special person. Didn't mean to call him that.

Where this thread is going...

purplethunder3121 said: