Reply #1050 posted 10/03/16 10:22am
udo |
Excuse my ignorance but how much $$$ does Tyka have or how much did she receive recently?
I see five Pro Hac Vice postings that will allow someone to be her counsel. (30 september 2016 postings) Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1051 posted 10/03/16 10:55am
ISaidLifeIsJus tAGame |
udo said:
Excuse my ignorance but how much $$$ does Tyka have or how much did she receive recently?
I see five Pro Hac Vice postings that will allow someone to be her counsel. (30 september 2016 postings)
I dont know why she needs 5 out of state attorneys.
Tyka is not paying the attorneys up front.
They will get paid when the Estate is finalized or when money is distributed to heirs. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1052 posted 10/03/16 6:51pm
Reply #1053 posted 10/03/16 6:58pm
laurarichardso n |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
udo said:
Excuse my ignorance but how much $$$ does Tyka have or how much did she receive recently?
I see five Pro Hac Vice postings that will allow someone to be her counsel. (30 september 2016 postings)
I dont know why she needs 5 out of state attorneys. Tyka is not paying the attorneys up front. They will get paid when the Estate is finalized or when money is distributed to heirs. -/ I wonder if Prince had assets in other states. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1054 posted 10/03/16 7:54pm
ISaidLifeIsJus tAGame |
The Judge has shortened the "discovery" process.
There will be an evidentiary hearing on November 30, 2016 regarding the girls claims.
The Judge has vacated the order that the siblings on John L Nelson's side take a DNA test since the girls admit they are not genetically related to John L.
The girls are moving forward on their claim of equitable adoption of Duane by John L. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1055 posted 10/03/16 9:32pm
zenarose |
The Estate has hit a little bump. The City Council did not approve re-zoning of PP. The CC tabled the application for 120 days. Due to be reheard Dec.23rd. It was a 3/2 vote. They need more info on the impact on the community. Pretty concerning. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1056 posted 10/03/16 9:34pm
ISaidLifeIsJus tAGame |
zenarose said:
The Estate has hit a little bump. The City Council did not approve re-zoning of PP. The CC tabled the application for 120 days. Due to be reheard Dec.23rd. It was a 3/2 vote. They need more info on the impact on the community. Pretty concerning.
Uh oh.
Did they say it puts the tours on hold? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1057 posted 10/03/16 9:36pm
Vee0319 |
The five attorneys are all with the same law firm which is one of the biggest firms in the country. Two of the attorneys' specialties are in Entertainment law. Another two attorneys specialties are in trusts, estates and fiduciary dispute resolution as well as wealth planning and preservation. The last attorney specializes in employment law and compliance with employment related statutes and regulations. Since Paisley Park will have employees they need an attorney to make sure they are complying with Minnesota labor laws. Also now that there are court of appeals claims, Tyka probably was advised to get more experienced attorneys. My guess is she contacted the law firm and they put together the best team of attorneys for the estate. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1058 posted 10/03/16 9:40pm
zenarose |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
zenarose said:
The Estate has hit a little bump. The City Council did not approve re-zoning of PP. The CC tabled the application for 120 days. Due to be reheard Dec.23rd. It was a 3/2 vote. They need more info on the impact on the community. Pretty concerning.
Uh oh.
Did they say it puts the tours on hold?
They didn't say other than it is tabled for 120 days. I hope they go ahead and open. Too many folks have gotten tickets and made plans!! |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1059 posted 10/03/16 9:48pm
ISaidLifeIsJus tAGame |
zenarose said:
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
Uh oh.
Did they say it puts the tours on hold?
They didn't say other than it is tabled for 120 days. I hope they go ahead and open. Too many folks have gotten tickets and made plans!!
If re-zoning wasnt approved, I dont see how they can go forward. They dont have the proper permits? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1060 posted 10/03/16 9:56pm
zenarose |
http://blog.thecurrent.org/2016/10/paisley-park-opening-may-be-delayed-chanhassen-city-council-tables-rezoning/
Here is a report I just found. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1061 posted 10/04/16 4:41am
PennyPurple |
zenarose said:
The Estate has hit a little bump. The City Council did not approve re-zoning of PP. The CC tabled the application for 120 days. Due to be reheard Dec.23rd. It was a 3/2 vote. They need more info on the impact on the community. Pretty concerning.
That's a bunch of bull. Didn't they already give the go ahead and several things at PP were changed around due to their recommendations? How frustrating for the Estate. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1062 posted 10/04/16 5:56am
laurarichardso n |
zenarose said:
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
Uh oh.
Did they say it puts the tours on hold?
They didn't say other than it is tabled for 120 days. I hope they go ahead and open. Too many folks have gotten tickets and made plans!!
That is in the middle of the winter. How many people will be showing up them. They want this to die and it will. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1063 posted 10/04/16 5:59am
laurarichardso n |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
The Judge has shortened the "discovery" process.
There will be an evidentiary hearing on November 30, 2016 regarding the girls claims.
The Judge has vacated the order that the siblings on John L Nelson's side take a DNA test since the girls admit they are not genetically related to John L.
The girls are moving forward on their claim of equitable adoption of Duane by John L.
---
Those chicks are smoking crack if they think they are getting anything. What sort of precedent would it set that any ding dong that was friendly with a family can be an hire?
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1064 posted 10/04/16 8:02am
zenarose |
If anyone has the time, they should view the video of the City Council meeting last night and the emails that they received. The first part of the meeting is a bit boring but when the new PP onsite Mgr speaks it gets interesting. They (from my take) want to get people in, guide the tour, push them out the door. They say the tour is XX time, no one is allowed to "hang around" after the tour has concluded (no longer that 20 min.) as they will be pushing folks to leave the property. You can also see that there are some points they are well prepared for and others they are not. There is also information shared that the property adjacent to PP (2 tracks) does not belong to P, it belongs to LOVE4ONEANOTHER a non profit organization. The Rep from Graceland stated that he had spent many hours speaking to MR.KJ as to what P wanted for PP. Then there are the folks that spoke from the community. There were few people that even though they did not want a wall built, only PUSHED the idea that one is needed by opening their mouths. You could tell that the Mayor was truly put out by the decision to table this matter. Really yall need to listen and watch if you have the time. This does not seem as though it was executed for excellence on anyone's part. Maybe Bremer made a huge mistake in putting Graceland folks in charge.
http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?nid=243 [Edited 10/4/16 8:04am] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1065 posted 10/04/16 8:58am
zenarose |
10/10/2016 - Goes into affect
http://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/CIOMediaLibrary/Documents/Order-for-New-Case-Volume.pdf |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1066 posted 10/04/16 9:17am
ISaidLifeIsJus tAGame |
zenarose said:
If anyone has the time, they should view the video of the City Council meeting last night and the emails that they received. The first part of the meeting is a bit boring but when the new PP onsite Mgr speaks it gets interesting. They (from my take) want to get people in, guide the tour, push them out the door. They say the tour is XX time, no one is allowed to "hang around" after the tour has concluded (no longer that 20 min.) as they will be pushing folks to leave the property. You can also see that there are some points they are well prepared for and others they are not. There is also information shared that the property adjacent to PP (2 tracks) does not belong to P, it belongs to LOVE4ONEANOTHER a non profit organization. The Rep from Graceland stated that he had spent many hours speaking to MR.KJ as to what P wanted for PP. Then there are the folks that spoke from the community. There were few people that even though they did not want a wall built, only PUSHED the idea that one is needed by opening their mouths. You could tell that the Mayor was truly put out by the decision to table this matter. Really yall need to listen and watch if you have the time. This does not seem as though it was executed for excellence on anyone's part. Maybe Bremer made a huge mistake in putting Graceland folks in charge.
http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?nid=243
[Edited 10/4/16 8:04am]
Talking to Kirky? WTF?
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1067 posted 10/04/16 9:29am
morningsong |
zenarose said: The Estate has hit a little bump. The City Council did not approve re-zoning of PP. The CC tabled the application for 120 days. Due to be reheard Dec.23rd. It was a 3/2 vote. They need more info on the impact on the community. Pretty concerning. Wait? 2 days before Christmas? That's some serious game playing right there. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1068 posted 10/04/16 9:31am
zenarose |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
zenarose said:
If anyone has the time, they should view the video of the City Council meeting last night and the emails that they received. The first part of the meeting is a bit boring but when the new PP onsite Mgr speaks it gets interesting. They (from my take) want to get people in, guide the tour, push them out the door. They say the tour is XX time, no one is allowed to "hang around" after the tour has concluded (no longer that 20 min.) as they will be pushing folks to leave the property. You can also see that there are some points they are well prepared for and others they are not. There is also information shared that the property adjacent to PP (2 tracks) does not belong to P, it belongs to LOVE4ONEANOTHER a non profit organization. The Rep from Graceland stated that he had spent many hours speaking to MR.KJ as to what P wanted for PP. Then there are the folks that spoke from the community. There were few people that even though they did not want a wall built, only PUSHED the idea that one is needed by opening their mouths. You could tell that the Mayor was truly put out by the decision to table this matter. Really yall need to listen and watch if you have the time. This does not seem as though it was executed for excellence on anyone's part. Maybe Bremer made a huge mistake in putting Graceland folks in charge.
http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?nid=243
[Edited 10/4/16 8:04am]
Talking to Kirky? WTF?
YES !!! You know (in my best southern drawl) he's just simply Mr. IMSOWONDERFUL...... |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1069 posted 10/04/16 9:51am
Reply #1070 posted 10/04/16 11:46am
morningsong |
So this is becoming overwhelming?
ORDER
1. Effective October 10, 2016, a new case volume will be added to this matter. The new case volume will be assigned the same court file number of 10-PR—16-46. The new case volume will include the case record, including all filings, case events and financial information, beginning October 10, 2016.
2. Effective October 10, 2016, the original case volume will be renumbered to 10-PR-16- 46A. This volume will contain the case record, including all case events, filings and financial information, from the date of filing through October 9, 2016.
3. Filers will continue to use court file number 10-PR-16-46 for filing and serving in this matter. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1071 posted 10/04/16 1:16pm
nelcp777 |
morningsong said:
So this is becoming overwhelming?
ORDER
1. Effective October 10, 2016, a new case volume will be added to this matter. The new case volume will be assigned the same court file number of 10-PR—16-46. The new case volume will include the case record, including all filings, case events and financial information, beginning October 10, 2016.
2. Effective October 10, 2016, the original case volume will be renumbered to 10-PR-16- 46A. This volume will contain the case record, including all case events, filings and financial information, from the date of filing through October 9, 2016.
3. Filers will continue to use court file number 10-PR-16-46 for filing and serving in this matter.
I am trying to be opptimistic, hopefully once the Briana, VN and Simons issue is resolved, things will go quickly and smoothly.
If not, we may see more new volumes opened to deal with the onslaught.
Not too mention, the appeals that have been filed recently. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.