laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said:

---Exactly, the whole rational is bonkers.

I'm not so sure. I'm assuming Bremer answers this back and I'm curious how they'll approach it.

Regardless of how Bremer responds it will be denied by the Judge.

The handwriting is on the wall.

Their only hope is in the Court of Appeals and it is unlikely they will win.

In other news, this week we will find out if ex2 files an appeal on the divorce case.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

What a mess ...

Hey Morningsong how are you today? I have been keeping a constant watch to see any activity in

court but so far nothing. We have 3 more days to go before we hear about divorce unseal right??

There's been some activity but nothing related to the divorce paperwork.

Does it appear that Brianna Nelson, and V.N. add another legal person?

See the 12 september documents at http://www.mncourts.gov/I...elson.aspx

udo said:

Does it appear that Brianna Nelson, and V.N. add another legal person?

See the 12 september documents at http://www.mncourts.gov/I...elson.aspx

Yes.

There is a another claim filed on 9/7 that I guess I overlooked.

It's by the organization that had booked PP for May 14th, and due

P's passing was not able to hold their event there.

zenarose said:

There is a another claim filed on 9/7 that I guess I overlooked.

It's by the organization that had booked PP for May 14th, and due

P's passing was not able to hold their event there.

What if there is no contract, but only an oral agreement? And if there is a contract, isn't a death an act of God and so negates any agreement? It seems poor form to sue the estate rather than rescheduling it for later. Did they pay to hold it there or was it donated space (my guess)? Without knowing more, it looks opportunistic and disrespectful.

Here is the link to the report when it occurred.

http://www.startribune.com/paisley-park-event-cancellation-distresses-mixed-blood-ticket-holders/378527695/

deerpath said:

zenarose said:

There is a another claim filed on 9/7 that I guess I overlooked.

It's by the organization that had booked PP for May 14th, and due

P's passing was not able to hold their event there.

What if there is no contract, but only an oral agreement? And if there is a contract, isn't a death an act of God and so negates any agreement? It seems poor form to sue the estate rather than rescheduling it for later. Did they pay to hold it there or was it donated space (my guess)? Without knowing more, it looks opportunistic and disrespectful.

I don't think that is necessarily a fair statement, tbh...I run a small organisation myself and funds are tight...If we'd booked an event and spent our hard-fought funds on printing / sending invitations, putting a deposit down on catering, etc etc, I'd feel sad about the proprietor's death, of course - but I'd still be wanting - NEEDING - to get back the costs incurred, just so I could reorganise things for another time / place.
.

Unfortunately, awkard as it may be, business doesn't really allow for sentiment, especially when those businesses are living hand to mouth themselves!

dang. this isn't goin to help efforts to make the estate solvent:

from: http://kstp.com/news/mixe...398/?cat=1

more at link

XxAxX said:

dang. this isn't goin to help efforts to make the estate solvent:

from: http://kstp.com/news/mixe...398/?cat=1

Mixed Blood Theatre Files Nearly $350,000 Claim against Prince Estate

more at link

Yes - I remember this event being booked and their being told (by PP) that it would still go ahead - until they were told it wouldn't...I can imagine they did incur some considerable costs, made worse by the very late cancellation.

Dibblekins said:

XxAxX said:

dang. this isn't goin to help efforts to make the estate solvent:

from: http://kstp.com/news/mixe...398/?cat=1

Mixed Blood Theatre Files Nearly $350,000 Claim against Prince Estate

more at link

Yes - I remember this event being booked and their being told (by PP) that it would still go ahead - until they were told it wouldn't...I can imagine they did incur some considerable costs, made worse by the very late cancellation.

I remember this too, iirc, they were offered another location but they didn't want it.

zenarose said:

Hey Morningsong how are you today? I have been keeping a constant watch to see any activity in

court but so far nothing. We have 3 more days to go before we hear about divorce unseal right??

Doing well, and yourself?


I haven't looked to see if they did file, if they haven't they sure are waiting until the last minute. I may be able to look later on this evening.

morningsong said:

zenarose said:

Hey Morningsong how are you today? I have been keeping a constant watch to see any activity in

court but so far nothing. We have 3 more days to go before we hear about divorce unseal right??

Doing well, and yourself?


I haven't looked to see if they did file, if they haven't they sure are waiting until the last minute. I may be able to look later on this evening.

There wasn't anything added as of just a few moments ago. So tomorrow is another day!!

zenarose said:

morningsong said:

Doing well, and yourself?


I haven't looked to see if they did file, if they haven't they sure are waiting until the last minute. I may be able to look later on this evening.

There wasn't anything added as of just a few moments ago. So tomorrow is another day!!

Was the telephone motion hearing scheduled for 10/6/2016 already listed? If not, there's one there now.

XxAxX said:

Dibblekins said:

laurarichardson said:

Dibblekins said:

I don't think that is necessarily a fair statement, tbh...I run a small organisation myself and funds are tight...If we'd booked an event and spent our hard-fought funds on printing / sending invitations, putting a deposit down on catering, etc etc, I'd feel sad about the proprietor's death, of course - but I'd still be wanting - NEEDING - to get back the costs incurred, just so I could reorganise things for another time / place.
.

Unfortunately, awkard as it may be, business doesn't really allow for sentiment, especially when those businesses are living hand to mouth themselves!

-/Almost all contracts have clause "for acts of god" knowing Prince it might have been a handshake deal. Because people file claims it does not they are going to win.

You are right, and there is nothing to indicate in the claim that a contract was signed.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PRINCE_ESTATE_GALA_CANCELED?SITE=WNYC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

The Associated Press is also reporting about Mixed Blood Theatre suing the estate for $350,000 for the cancelled event at Paisley Park.

http://www.startribune.com/mixed-blood-theatre-files-350-000-claim-on-prince-s-estate/393166631/

The Minneapolis Star Tribune is also reporting about the Mixed Blood Theatre suit, and the article delves more deeply into other claims against the estate as well as the sealed vs. public record issue.

http://www.startribune.com/mixed-blood-theatre-files-350-000-claim-on-prince-s-estate/393166631/

The Minneapolis Star Tribune is also reporting about the Mixed Blood Theatre suit, and the article delves more deeply into other claims against the estate as well as the sealed vs. public record issue.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

bilbolives said:

The Judge issued a Protection Order today without hearing.

No indication who requested and received a Protection Order or why one was issued.

Just doesnt make sense.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The Judge issued a Protection Order today without hearing.

No indication who requested and received a Protection Order or why one was issued.

Just doesnt make sense.

Reckon it's part of Bremer "business"?? Didn't the judge seal all that

a few weeks ago??