The judge laid it all out in the docs all the who's and why's and everything, the 5 kids have been ruled on (out), the secret marriage has been ruled on (out until proper evidence has been submitted), all claims regarding John L. not being his father have rulings(I got tired of reading that one), by the way all John's kids are getting DNA test. The 2 claiming Prince adopted them have been ruled on (out until proper evidence has been submitted). The guy about the $1billion is appealing so that'll take a minute. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I thought P's siblings has already taken a DNA test? I really hope there's no surprises with the results.
The Court is satisfied that Brianna Nelson and V.N. have made a prima facie showing that they are potential heirs of the Decedent. Therefore, the Court will order the genetic testing of Brianna Nelson, V.N., John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson. Would you let me wash your hair? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
by the way all John's kids are getting DNA test. Seems like a good idea, even just for a baseline & comparison. Can't believe the $1billion crazy is still in the mix! Thank you so much.
Hey, hey, mama, said the way you move
Gonna make you sweat, gonna make you groove | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nelcp777 said:
Thanks for clearing that up. I didn't mean to put false information out, not my intentions. /// I wonder what happened to 6 & 7? Maybe a clerical error | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If you change child to claimants for genetic testing then you see that 6 & 7 are VN and Brianna. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
morningsong said:
If you change child to claimants for genetic testing then you see that 6 & 7 are VN and Brianna. --/ So that means no child heirs unless something was taken care of in a trust. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mumio already stated it was 7 heir claimants not 7 heir children, so the 5 claimants that were possible children have been dismissed, that leaves 2 possible heir claimants; VN and Brianna. Everything else is part of somebody else's rumor. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The media is going to be so sad that there are no secret children. Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
morningsong said:
Judge is definitely leaving the door open for future possible heirs, specifically those claiming to be child/children. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is an amended Order because the Judge left some people out of the first order which was filed July 29, 2016. The chart I previously prepared is at work so I cant give you the names right now but I was able to ascertain the names of the 5 individuals in the Judge's original order of July 29, 2016. That leaves 2 others of the original 7 claimants he previously discussed in a prior Order. I originally assumed 6, and 7 were Duane's daughter and granddaughter. But I know for a fact Tony was not one of the 5 claimants I identified. So I am assuming the Judge will rule separately as to the ones who took DNA testing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well if there are 7 children, nobody is being specific about who these children are. I've counted 7 claimants who were supposed to take the DNA test. 2 of those did not have one because the were adopted. 3 did and have been dismissed as far as I can see. And the other 2 are pending which are Duane's heirs. If there's something different, break it down. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
http://www.startribune.com/seven-prince-properties-including-caribbean-villa-can-now-be-sold/389933291/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
When Bremer last week requested permission to sell 16 of Prince's properties, it caused alarm that Paisley Park would be sold. But the special administrator was quick to offer assurances that Prince's home and recording studio would not be put on the market. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I didnt see anything about 3 alleged children taking DNA test or are you talking about Duane's relatives along with Carlin? I didnt see anyone that was dismissed because of DNA testing. Shoot, I wish I brought my chart home! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why not sell content of vault .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
http://www.hotpress.com/Prince/news/Exclusive-Extract-From-Princes-New-Biography/17935945.html?new_layout=1&page_no=1&show_comments=1 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're right not through DNA testing. Child 1 was dismissed because they didn't have enough evidence showing they were adopted. As CHILD l is not able to meet the clear and convincing standard for proving that he is an heir of the Decedent, the Court determines as a matter of law that CHILD 1 is not an heir of the Decedent’s estate. If CHILD 1 is able to provide further proof of the adoption, the Court may reconsider this Order.
Child 4 & 5 mothers didn't submit affidavits stating a relationship with Prince. Further, neither CHILD 4 nor CHILD 5 have provided an affidavit from their mother indicating that the mother had a sexual relationship with the Decedent which resulted in their birth. They have, instead, relied on speculation or third-party conjecture as a basis for their claims. http://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/CIOMediaLibrary/Documents/Amended-Order-Re-Genetic-Testing-Protocol-and-Heirship-Claims-Following-the-June-27,-2016-hearing-and-Judgment.pdf More stuff got posted. 1. The Special Administrator’s Motion to Dismiss the claims Of Rodney Dixon shall be heard based upon the written record alone, and shall be considered taken under advisement as of August 5,2016. 2. The hearing time reserved for oral arguments on September 7, 2016 shall be cancelled. So I guess this means this goes away?
[Edited 8/11/16 18:45pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Morningstar you're becoming quite the legal eagle in understanding these confusing pleadings! Rodney Dixon didnt request an in person, oral hearing (which the Judge was going to allow) so now the Judge will rule based upon the memorandum and documents Rodney filed, and the Bremer Trust response.
I found this paragraph interesting the other day when the Judge ruled in part the following: The Court, like the Special Administrator, is also mindful of the fact that the law does not foreclose the possibility of other heirs being identified in the future, including new claimants seeking to be determined the child of the Decedent.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
morningsong said:
Well if there are 7 children, nobody is being specific about who these children are. I've counted 7 claimants who were supposed to take the DNA test. 2 of those did not have one because the were adopted. 3 did and have been dismissed as far as I can see. And the other 2 are pending which are Duane's heirs. If there's something different, break it down. I just reviewed the Interim order re: Estate Administration Following the Court's July 28, 2016 order filed today. Remember the Judge ordered any one tied to John L. Nelson's bloodline to have the DNA test. Tyka, John R. , Norrine, Sharon, Brianna and the minor VN. The first paragraph of this form states that one or more of those tested do not qualify as heirs under Minnesota law. So I think it is Duane's relatives (Brianna and VN.). It seems that Bremer does not want to continue to allow the Excluded Parties ( the July 28 exclusions) or tested Parties that are not related to Prince be privy to certain confidential information. So it looks like the heirs are back to what Tyka originally stated in her first affidavit. Any thoughts from you guys? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
morningsong said:
You're right not through DNA testing. Child 1 was dismissed because they didn't have enough evidence showing they were adopted. As CHILD l is not able to meet the clear and convincing standard for proving that he is an heir of the Decedent, the Court determines as a matter of law that CHILD 1 is not an heir of the Decedent’s estate. If CHILD 1 is able to provide further proof of the adoption, the Court may reconsider this Order.
Child 4 & 5 mothers didn't submit affidavits stating a relationship with Prince. 1. The Special Administrator’s Motion to Dismiss the claims Of Rodney Dixon shall be heard based upon the written record alone, and shall be considered taken under advisement as of August 5,2016. 2. The hearing time reserved for oral arguments on September 7, 2016 shall be cancelled. So I guess this means this goes away?
[Edited 8/11/16 18:45pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The other siblings don't have houses that were owned by Prince. Kirk's house and Larry's house are on the list to be sold. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He may want to buy one of the houses that are on the list to be sold. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said: Morningstar you're becoming quite the legal eagle in understanding these confusing pleadings! Rodney Dixon didnt request an in person, oral hearing (which the Judge was going to allow) so now the Judge will rule based upon the memorandum and documents Rodney filed, and the Bremer Trust response.
I found this paragraph interesting the other day when the Judge ruled in part the following: The Court, like the Special Administrator, is also mindful of the fact that the law does not foreclose the possibility of other heirs being identified in the future, including new claimants seeking to be determined the child of the Decedent.
Looks liks Rodney's brother filed the papers he was supposed to too late, so they'r ruling on what they have. I see that all the sealed files become unsealed 20 days after this ruling. I guess people are allowed to file whatever they want for as long as they want but if they don't have supporting proof they won't get far. Most of these are basically people not having supporting paperwork done. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is a post from the guy that shite 'newspaper' claimed was Prince's son (the one Dr. Funkenberry tweeted about being bombshell news) Anthony Steadman / Snow:
https://www.facebook.com/...d=29407974
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LuxLove said: This is a post from the guy that shite 'newspaper' claimed was Prince's son (the one Dr. Funkenberry tweeted about being bombshell news) Anthony Steadman / Snow:
https://www.facebook.com/...d=29407974
// Maybe people need to think that court docs are public info. All of the people who claimed to be children are going to have their names known to the public in 20 days. All of the claims were bogus from the very begining. Does anyone think that some women would have a baby by a millionaire and not say anything about paternity for 20-30 years? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IchBinKunst said:
He may want to buy one of the houses that are on the list to be sold. --// He should place a bid like everyone else. Holding up the listing of all of the properties is foolish. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. Typically American to my Dutch ears. Does the procedure really take 20 days? Any appeal after the test results are in? Or will the list of heirs be (almost) final by then? Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
udo said:
. Typically American to my Dutch ears. Does the procedure really take 20 days? Any appeal after the test results are in? Or will the list of heirs be (almost) final by then? --// No, the testing has been conducted already and some people did not even get a test. All of the people making claims who failed DNA test or had their claims denied outright so their names will be made public within 20 days. Some names are out already. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just Crossed the AP:
Everybody's lookin 4 the ladder, it's in the garage | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |