Mkilpatrick74 said:

morningsong said:

T'was only a matter of time. But time is a trick...oh gawd.



Eh, I don't see it.

i know but the only thing stopping me and making me wonder is that the judge is being very picky now about who he lets have the test. You best dang have a way to prove some sort of involvement with Prince or you aren't getting the test.

If you go back in the court records the guy Carlin Williams (the guy in prison) also petitioned the courts to seal his DNA test as well. So this Anthony guy is not the only one to do this. It is just a formality for the courts. I am sorry but I don't believe this is Prince's son.

morningsong said:

Mkilpatrick74 said:

i know but the only thing stopping me and making me wonder is that the judge is being very picky now about who he lets have the test. You best dang have a way to prove some sort of involvement with Prince or you aren't getting the test.

Oh, I see the picture, I don't see the resemblance. He's ambiguous looking that's all I see. And he looks like a big-boned dude, that's suspicious right there.

Sorry but i had to troll her page and there is a picture of her at a wedding and she is the third one up on the right side of the photo. She looks a little coo coo to me js

CMSantos71 said:

Mkilpatrick74 said:

morningsong said: Are there any pics of mom?

I saw her fb, if it's hers, and by the profile pic she doesnt look tall. But its an old picture. She is carrying a blonde haired boy.

it looks like she has 2 facebook profiles. Look at the one with the woman holding the child. There is an older woman standing next to her. Search Sheila again and there is a profile picture of a tattoo with a star and circle around it. On that profile there is a photo of a wedding party and there is a woman on the right standing behind a man in a gray suit, she is in a blue t-shirt. Her name was tagged to that woman, she is the same women standing by that woman holding the little boy. Kinda weird if you ask me

The org is on it.

whatdoesitmatter said:

CMSantos71 said:

I saw her fb, if it's hers, and by the profile pic she doesnt look tall. But its an old picture. She is carrying a blonde haired boy.

it looks like she has 2 facebook profiles. Look at the one with the woman holding the child. There is an older woman standing next to her. Search Sheila again and there is a profile picture of a tattoo with a star and circle around it. On that profile there is a photo of a wedding party and there is a woman on the right standing behind a man in a gray suit, she is in a blue t-shirt. Her name was tagged to that woman, she is the same women standing by that woman holding the little boy. Kinda weird if you ask me

Yep. Actually I think all 3 profiles that come up under her name are hers. The owner of the photo she is tagged in is fb friends with all 3 profiles...yes it is weird.

This can't be the "client" the lawyers couldn't talk about until the courts ordered the information released. Maybe the information is related and part of the divorce information. So the client wasn't the girlfriend and child, but someone else.

Mrs. Steman seems not to have any contact with Prince given her FB post trying to reach her son. She couldn't be the "client". And obviously she never tried to reach Prince again.

Anthony has a rough patch ahead of him. If he is anything like his father, if Prince is his father, he could be overwhelmed by all this... he's already hiding. Bless his heart. Be gentle people. Be kind. If it turns out he is Prince's son, show your love for Prince and the rest of his family.

Off my box.

CMSantos71 said:

whatdoesitmatter said:

it looks like she has 2 facebook profiles. Look at the one with the woman holding the child. There is an older woman standing next to her. Search Sheila again and there is a profile picture of a tattoo with a star and circle around it. On that profile there is a photo of a wedding party and there is a woman on the right standing behind a man in a gray suit, she is in a blue t-shirt. Her name was tagged to that woman, she is the same women standing by that woman holding the little boy. Kinda weird if you ask me

Yep. Actually I think all 3 profiles that come up under her name are hers. The owner of the photo she is tagged in is fb friends with all 3 profiles...yes it is weird.

It does look like the same person has all three profiles. Too many cross connections to be coincidental.

morningsong said:

CMSantos71 said:

David Ganezer is saying Anthony looks just like Prince I don't know who's picture he is looking at but he does not look just like him.

David Ganezer

17 hrs · Santa Monica, CA ·

We just broke the big news story of the summer.

Court Documents Reveal Sp...lson's Son

Court documents reveal that the man who claims to be The Artist Formerly…

www.smobserved.com|By Santa Monica Observer

Like

Share

88

Comments

Natalia Lacerda Omg

Like · 1 · 13 hrs

David Ganezer Looks just like him, too

Like · 13 hrs

Puhlease every single claimant presented so far you've got a gaggle of people saying that person looks like Prince. Yet none of them look like each other. What would you expect somebody trying to make a buck to say?

How do these people think that they are going to get around the DNA test results?

tmo1965 said:

There arent that many people making claims as Prince's heirs. The Judge sealed all their Affidavits of Heirship. There were 7 claims made. I was able to identify 5 people, so I thought the two remaining were Duane's daughter and granddaughter.

However, it now appears that Anthony was #6 and the Judge permitted DNA testing. If this is true, there should be another individual with DNA test results coming back.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

There arent that many people making claims as Prince's heirs. The Judge sealed all their Affidavits of Heirship. There were 7 claims made. I was able to identify 5 people, so I thought the two remaining were Duane's daughter and granddaughter.

However, it now appears that Anthony was #6 and the Judge permitted DNA testing. If this is true, there should be another individual with DNA test results coming back.

But it looks like those 5 are still hanging in there if they're still petitioning to be included in all the transactions going on in this court case? I'm not crazy about all that.

I think u r on the nose (sorry, had to).

I read this long story "Robin" and her 2 girlfriends posted about "chasing Prince" in the 90s. She said they ended up at a party on a bus owned by Morris with Jerome, Morris, and others. No Prince.

And it seemed Prince liked one of the girls looks and supposedly she was asked back to a hotel. She ended up in Duane's room and was not happy at all. At the end, it seemed like they grew out of "chasing" and realized it might be dangerous. Who knows if it's true, tho.

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

There arent that many people making claims as Prince's heirs. The Judge sealed all their Affidavits of Heirship. There were 7 claims made. I was able to identify 5 people, so I thought the two remaining were Duane's daughter and granddaughter.

However, it now appears that Anthony was #6 and the Judge permitted DNA testing. If this is true, there should be another individual with DNA test results coming back.

But it looks like those 5 are still hanging in there if they're still petitioning to be included in all the transactions going on in this court case? I'm not crazy about all that.

The Judge dismissed the 5 out. It doesnt mean anything that they are notified of pleadings filed. Their cases are over. If they want to appeal the Judge's decision they have to appeal to a higher court. What you saw is a proposed Order. It has not been signed by the Judge. Bremer Trust is asking the Court for direction on how the Judge wants Bremer to handle the excluded parties.

deerpath said:

Anthony has a rough patch ahead of him. If he is anything like his father, if Prince is his father, he could be overwhelmed by all this... he's already hiding. Bless his heart. Be gentle people. Be kind. If it turns out he is Prince's son, show your love for Prince and the rest of his family.

Off my box.

Whether or not he's Prince's son, he's just a regular guy. These forums can feel private sometimes, but if you google his name, this discussion with all the comments about come up.

laurarichardson said:

nelcp777 said:

How many times do you think Dixon is going to appeal his claim? I saw that there is a motion to dismiss again. His last set of documents seemed shady and there was not a court ruling. I could be wrong, but it look like claims than an official court ruling.

This dude is interesting without being deragatory.

--- He made these claims before in the 90s and the case was thrown out. He does not appear to have anything in writing and how can he prove a verbal agreement? It is not degoratory to say this guy is probaly mentally imbalanced. No different then Claire Boyd or the women who was beating a drum in the Paisley Park parking lot. We need to stop being polically correct and maybe the Estate should start filing suits against these people to make them go away with their bogus claims.

This is the first time in my life I have been accused of being politically correct. Joking. I was trying to avoid any slanderous lawsuits.

He just again submited the same BS after the motion to dismiss. So, can the court order him to stop? I mean after a few times, it has to get old. I am asking more from a legal aspect.

Thanks in advance.

zoso1978 said:

I think u r on the nose (sorry, had to).

I read this long story "Robin" and her 2 girlfriends posted about "chasing Prince" in the 90s. She said they ended up at a party on a bus owned by Morris with Jerome, Morris, and others. No Prince.

And it seemed Prince liked one of the girls looks and supposedly she was asked back to a hotel. She ended up in Duane's room and was not happy at all. At the end, it seemed like they grew out of "chasing" and realized it might be dangerous. Who knows if it's true, tho.

Maybe Duane was sampling the bed action just like he was the test subject for the new hairdresser.

Vee0319 said:

The Santa Monica Observer, added an update to the article they released yesterday. The update states that Anthony Steman phoned them around noon today to state that he is not Prince's son. He better go ahead and see if Morris Day is his pops. [Edited 8/9/16 17:14pm]

Can Bremer use that to their benefit to deny him a chance of heirship?

Vee0319 said:

The Santa Monica Observer, added an update to the article they released yesterday. The update states that Anthony Steman phoned them around noon today to state that he is not Prince's son. He better go ahead and see if Morris Day is his pops. [Edited 8/9/16 17:14pm]

Wait is he the 90% guarenteed match person??

morningsong said:

Vee0319 said:

The Santa Monica Observer, added an update to the article they released yesterday. The update states that Anthony Steman phoned them around noon today to state that he is not Prince's son. He better go ahead and see if Morris Day is his pops. [Edited 8/9/16 17:14pm]

Wait is he the 90% guarenteed match person??

I wonder if the SMO knows the name of the match from the Heir Int'l group. Because it was allegedly 99%, which is as close as it ever gets (of course...where did they get the DNA from anyway).

teach49 said:

morningsong said:

Wait is he the 90% guarenteed match person??

I wonder if the SMO knows the name of the match from the Heir Int'l group. Because it was allegedly 99%, which is as close as it ever gets (of course...where did they get the DNA from anyway).

Oh is it 99%? And this Anthony guy isn't it?

nelcp777 said:

Vee0319 said:

The Santa Monica Observer, added an update to the article they released yesterday. The update states that Anthony Steman phoned them around noon today to state that he is not Prince's son. He better go ahead and see if Morris Day is his pops. [Edited 8/9/16 17:14pm]

Can Bremer use that to their benefit to deny him a chance of heirship?

No, not if his DNA is a match.

[Edited 8/9/16 17:29pm]

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

nelcp777 said:

Can Bremer use that to their benefit to deny him a chance of heirship?

No, nott if his DNA is a match.

What is it, in for a penny, in for a pound?

morningsong said:

nelcp777 said:

laurarichardson said:

nelcp777 said: --- He made these claims before in the 90s and the case was thrown out. He does not appear to have anything in writing and how can he prove a verbal agreement? It is not degoratory to say this guy is probaly mentally imbalanced. No different then Claire Boyd or the women who was beating a drum in the Paisley Park parking lot. We need to stop being polically correct and maybe the Estate should start filing suits against these people to make them go away with their bogus claims.

This is the first time in my life I have been accused of being politically correct. Joking. I was trying to avoid any slanderous lawsuits.

He just again submited the same BS after the motion to dismiss. So, can the court order him to stop? I mean after a few times, it has to get old. I am asking more from a legal aspect.

Thanks in advance.

The Judge hasnt ruled on Dixon's Claim yet so he can still file additional responses to Bremer's Motion.

Vee0319 said:

morningsong said:

Wait is he the 90% guarenteed match person??

I am not sure because the paper originally wrote the article August 1, they updated yesterday with Anthony Steman's info, then they added the new update today Stating that Anthony called and said he is not Prince's son. I guess if these Prince has a son stories are not picked up by a major media outlet, we should not hold our breath.

I wish someone would verify.

Anyway, I think this poor guy got harrassed enough, he had no idea what kind of hornet's nest he walked into.

morningsong said:

teach49 said:

I wonder if the SMO knows the name of the match from the Heir Int'l group. Because it was allegedly 99%, which is as close as it ever gets (of course...where did they get the DNA from anyway).

Oh is it 99%? And this Anthony guy isn't it?

They said it was 99% in the original article (they could have changed it). It's my understanding that 99% basically means a definitive match...unless you have a twin or something. But, I don't think they know if it's him or not. I doubt the Heir group would give up the name.

teach49 said:

morningsong said:

Oh is it 99%? And this Anthony guy isn't it?

They said it was 99% in the original article (they could have changed it). It's my understanding that 99% basically means a definitive match...unless you have a twin or something. But, I don't think they know if it's him or not. I doubt the Heir group would give up the name.

Oh, so this is most likely 2 separate things. See this is how stuff gets twisted around here. Now this Anthony guy gets mixed up in this supposedly 99% heir match. Next week people will be around here swearing that Anthony is the one but a week ago it was Estabon. It gets crazy.

Seems he commented on the article:

"Would have been nice if the update that says that he(me) is not the son wasn't buried halfway through the article, i have officially become click bait. Did the test, results were negative, so I'll go back to my life, you all have a wonderful day."

Well alright, that settles it for me. Doesn't seem like any other media outlet takes the SMO too seriously, so hopefully he isn't receiving too many calls.