KingSausage said:

KingSausage said:

Let's see his pancake recipe.

*

And his hoop handle...wait...can you inherit a hoop handle?...that's okay, I'll go with you. Yeah, let's see his pancake recipe.

kmama07 said:

ForeverPaisley said:

You know what? They do not HAVE to, no one is forcing them to. They kept quiet about it during Prince's living years. They could have carried on. They sure conveniently are crawling out now in lieu of that inheritance aren't they? I do not feel sorry for them. I feel sorry for Prince. He had a right to know.

why do so many people assume he wasn't told /didn't know? My feeling is he knew all along, took care of business and it has been the mother /child's decision to stay out of the limelight. Now that Prince is gone, why shouldn't ANY child of his step up as a claimant? And why is everyone feeling so sorry for Tyka? Prince had certainly taken care of her over the years and it isn't as if they had been extremely close on a consistent basis.

I would think he would have set up a trust if he knew he had a child. Trust do not have to be registered with the court however, I cannot figure out how this company in Santa Monica would have Prince's DNA sample from the lab in Ohio. Any DNA testing would have to be approved by the court.

The only thing that gives this any possiblity of being true is if this child have hair samples or something that could have been used and wanted to get an outside test to make themselves eligible for DNA testing by the court. Still not sure why any woman would not have let Prince know he had a child?

PurpleSpirit319 said:

kmama07 said:

ForeverPaisley said:

You know what? They do not HAVE to, no one is forcing them to. They kept quiet about it during Prince's living years. They could have carried on. They sure conveniently are crawling out now in lieu of that inheritance aren't they? I do not feel sorry for them. I feel sorry for Prince. He had a right to know.

why do so many people assume he wasn't told /didn't know? My feeling is he knew all along, took care of business and it has been the mother /child's decision to stay out of the limelight. Now that Prince is gone, why shouldn't ANY child of his step up as a claimant? And why is everyone feeling so sorry for Tyka? Prince had certainly taken care of her over the years and it isn't as if they had been extremely close on a consistent basis.

If Prince knew and was taking care of business as you say then do you honestly think he wouldnt have left his son with provisions after his death? Why would the mother and son need to make a claim?

Firstly theres no official word that this is his son and if it turns out that he is, I dont think Prince knew about him. Prince would not leave a child of his penniless. The man donated enough money to charity, you think he wouldnt have taken care of any offspring? There would have been no need to make a claim if Prince knew.

Santa Monica Observer is a free newspaper with a circulation of 20,000. If the story is true, why didn't the source take it to TMZ? That's where the money is.

It's worth bearing in mind that the same newspaper also reported that Prince died of AIDS, and that the U.S. Government would legalize marijuana on August 1st.

Mumio said:

kmama07 said:

why do so many people assume he wasn't told /didn't know? My feeling is he knew all along, took care of business and it has been the mother /child's decision to stay out of the limelight. Now that Prince is gone, why shouldn't ANY child of his step up as a claimant? And why is everyone feeling so sorry for Tyka? Prince had certainly taken care of her over the years and it isn't as if they had been extremely close on a consistent basis.

Agree with all you've said kmama07.

It's going to be interesting to see how this pans out.

[Edited 7/28/16 16:37pm]

I agree kmana07 and mumio. I also believe P had more than one child. And I believe he had a relationship with at least one of the children. Why is everyone having a hard time believing this? Lookit, everyone is losing their shit over the possibilty he left an heir could you imagine the scutiny the child would have gone through had it been revealed while P was alive?

poisonmouth said:

Santa Monica Observer is a free newspaper with a circulation of 20,000. If the story is true, why didn't the source take it to TMZ? That's where the money is.

It's worth bearing in mind that the same newspaper also reported that Prince died of AIDS, and that the U.S. Government would legalize marijuana on August 1st.

I guess you didn't read the entire thread before commenting, otherwise you'd have seen that this was already mentioned earlier?

Mumio said:

poisonmouth said:

Santa Monica Observer is a free newspaper with a circulation of 20,000. If the story is true, why didn't the source take it to TMZ? That's where the money is.

It's worth bearing in mind that the same newspaper also reported that Prince died of AIDS, and that the U.S. Government would legalize marijuana on August 1st.

I guess you didn't read the entire thread before commenting, otherwise you'd have seen that this was already mentioned earlier?

I felt it was worth reiterating.

poisonmouth said:

Mumio said:

I guess you didn't read the entire thread before commenting, otherwise you'd have seen that this was already mentioned earlier?

I felt it was worth reiterating.

We'll know soon enough Hopefully.

poisonmouth said:

Mumio said:

I guess you didn't read the entire thread before commenting, otherwise you'd have seen that this was already mentioned earlier?

I felt it was worth reiterating.

To be fair, I'm sure no one reads an entire thread before commenting when it's over five pages. Thanks for reiterating.

I reiterate that remark.

sonshine said:

This makes my head spin with questions. Why did the mother wait so long to tell him? Why didn't she ever tell P? Wow. Just wow. I actually love the idea of him having children out there, but I hate the idea they were never a part of each other's lives. I wonder if the other woman who claimed her son was Prince's ever filed a claim? He would be about 17 years old now and they also live in MN I believe. She could have just been bat - shit crazy tho too. She's the one who was always calling the carver county sheriff's office asking them to go to PP and give Prince a message from her Lol

.

BBM

See, that's the thing. A woman (supposedly) has a child by a very wealthy megastar and keeps it quiet? She raises the child in secret without financial help? He never meets the son and there's no child support or even a paternity lawsuit?

Either there was a very private paternity claim and a large monetary pay-out, or this is totally fake.

That's a beautiful young man...and having those "looks" might have been enough to convince him that he was P's son.

Heir Hunters goes looking for "heirs". Why wouldn't this "son" have come forward to the estate on his own?

How does this relate to this blind item...about being "cut off financially". If these two are linked, sounds like the "son" has been receiving payments all along.

https://groups.google.com...ov97gq0AEc

.

strawberrylova123 said:

Is this story even real...thats the question

Ikr...

laytonian said:

sonshine said:

This makes my head spin with questions. Why did the mother wait so long to tell him? Why didn't she ever tell P? Wow. Just wow. I actually love the idea of him having children out there, but I hate the idea they were never a part of each other's lives. I wonder if the other woman who claimed her son was Prince's ever filed a claim? He would be about 17 years old now and they also live in MN I believe. She could have just been bat - shit crazy tho too. She's the one who was always calling the carver county sheriff's office asking them to go to PP and give Prince a message from her Lol

.

BBM

See, that's the thing. A woman (supposedly) has a child by a very wealthy megastar and keeps it quiet? She raises the child in secret without financial help? He never meets the son and there's no child support or even a paternity lawsuit?

Either there was a very private paternity claim and a large monetary pay-out, or this is totally fake.

That's a beautiful young man...and having those "looks" might have been enough to convince him that he was P's son.

Heir Hunters goes looking for "heirs". Why wouldn't this "son" have come forward to the estate on his own?

How does this relate to this blind item...about being "cut off financially". If these two are linked, sounds like the "son" has been receiving payments all along.

https://groups.google.com...ov97gq0AEc

.

The reason is there is more than one child out there.

The one you are referring to above in the link obviously had DNA testing years ago and a Trust Agreement was set up. Part of the Trust Agreement without a doubt had a confidentiality clause that if you (mom and son) ever reveal this informtion the Trust is voided. Im sure the Trust stated they could not file a claim against P's estate. You will not see a claim of heirship filed by this child.

The article today is about another individual separate from the one above in the blind reveal.

[Edited 7/28/16 18:49pm]

BillieBalloon said:

kmama07 said:

ForeverPaisley said: why do so many people assume he wasn't told /didn't know? My feeling is he knew all along, took care of business and it has been the mother /child's decision to stay out of the limelight. Now that Prince is gone, why shouldn't ANY child of his step up as a claimant? And why is everyone feeling so sorry for Tyka? Prince had certainly taken care of her over the years and it isn't as if they had been extremely close on a consistent basis.

If Prince knew and was taking care of business as you say then do you honestly think he wouldnt have left his son with provisions after his death? Why would the mother and son need to make a claim?

Firstly theres no official word that this is his son and if it turns out that he is, I dont think Prince knew about him. Prince would not leave a child of his penniless. The man donated enough money to charity, you think he wouldnt have taken care of any offspring? There would have been no need to make a claim if Prince knew.

Yep! and why would he have been so upset over losing a child with Mayte (to the point of it breaking up their marriage) if he already had a child/children to begin with. Makes no sense.

ForeverPaisley said:

Is this the picture? I hadn't seen it until just now...

No - this is NOT the guy being mooted now as P's son.

.

This one - Carlin something - is in jail and the DNA did not match. His claim has been rejected.

.

The other one whose pics have been shown has also been rejected because he was legally adopted and therefore has no claim.

.

The one being mentioned in this article is the one we all heard about right at the outset (or at least I did). Heir Hunters spoke of him VERY early on, saying his story stacked up and that they were pretty convinced he was P's son. They also said he was very low-key and not interested in any publicity - which, it appears, he still isn't.

.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that P did know about him; that there was some sort of understanding / financial arrangement and that the documents mentioned that 'could have an effect on heirship' pertain to this arrangement.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

laytonian said:

.

BBM

See, that's the thing. A woman (supposedly) has a child by a very wealthy megastar and keeps it quiet? She raises the child in secret without financial help? He never meets the son and there's no child support or even a paternity lawsuit?

Either there was a very private paternity claim and a large monetary pay-out, or this is totally fake.

That's a beautiful young man...and having those "looks" might have been enough to convince him that he was P's son.

Heir Hunters goes looking for "heirs". Why wouldn't this "son" have come forward to the estate on his own?

How does this relate to this blind item...about being "cut off financially". If these two are linked, sounds like the "son" has been receiving payments all along.

https://groups.google.com...ov97gq0AEc

.

The reason is there is more than one child out there.

The one you are referring to above in the link obviously had DNA testing years ago and a Trust Agreement was set up. Part of the Trust Agreement without a doubt had a confidentiality clause that if you (mom and son) ever reveal this informtion the Trust is voided. Im sure the Trust stated they could not file a claim against P's estate. You will not see a claim of heirship filed by this child.

The article today is about another individual separate from the one above in the blind reveal.

[Edited 7/28/16 18:49pm]

That makes no sense, a child by law would be next in line to inherit after spouse. So who'd take a Trust over 100% or even 50% of the entire estate?

No - this is NOT the guy being mooted now as P's son.

.

This one - Carlin something - is in jail and the DNA did not match. His claim has been rejected.

.

The other one whose pics have been shown has also been rejected because he was legally adopted and therefore has no claim.

.

The one being mentioned in this article is the one we all heard about right at the outset (or at least I did). Heir Hunters spoke of him VERY early on, saying his story stacked up and that they were pretty convinced he was P's son. They also said he was very low-key and not interested in any publicity - which, it appears, he still isn't.

.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that P did know about him; that there was some sort of understanding / financial arrangement and that the documents mentioned that 'could have an effect on heirship' pertain to this arrangement.

The photo posted above is NOT Carlin.

The Judge has not rejected Estabon's (the adopted child) Affidavit of Heirship. Bremer Trust filed papers stating Estabon does not meet the requirements for DNA testing. The Judge has not ruled on that issue as of this date. It remains to be seen whether the Judge will permit DNA testing.for Estabon.

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The reason is there is more than one child out there.

The one you are referring to above in the link obviously had DNA testing years ago and a Trust Agreement was set up. Part of the Trust Agreement without a doubt had a confidentiality clause that if you (mom and son) ever reveal this informtion the Trust is voided. Im sure the Trust stated they could not file a claim against P's estate. You will not see a claim of heirship filed by this child.

The article today is about another individual separate from the one above in the blind reveal.

[Edited 7/28/16 18:49pm]

That makes no sense, a child by law would be next in line to inherit after spouse. So who'd take a Trust over 100% or even 50% of the entire estate?

Maybe because the Trust / financial arrangement has been paying the child / mother some form of maintenance all these years - and if they revealed anything, those payments would stop.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

No - this is NOT the guy being mooted now as P's son.

.

This one - Carlin something - is in jail and the DNA did not match. His claim has been rejected.

.

The other one whose pics have been shown has also been rejected because he was legally adopted and therefore has no claim.

.

The one being mentioned in this article is the one we all heard about right at the outset (or at least I did). Heir Hunters spoke of him VERY early on, saying his story stacked up and that they were pretty convinced he was P's son. They also said he was very low-key and not interested in any publicity - which, it appears, he still isn't.

.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that P did know about him; that there was some sort of understanding / financial arrangement and that the documents mentioned that 'could have an effect on heirship' pertain to this arrangement.

The photo posted above is NOT Carlin.

The Judge has not rejected Estabon's (the adopted child) Affidavit of Heirship. Bremer Trust filed papers stating Estabon does not meet the requirements for DNA testing. The Judge has not ruled on that issue as of this date. It remains to be seen whether the Judge will permit DNA testing.for Estabon.

I'm sure it is, you know...There was a whole thread devoted to him - and he looked very different from the front!

.

This article says that the pic. shown here is Carlin Williams..?
http://www.nairadays.com/tag/carlin-q-williams/

.

But, yes you're quite right about Estabon (the adopted one) - my apologies. It'll be interesting to hear what the judge has to say about it.

[Edited 7/28/16 19:00pm]

[Edited 7/28/16 19:06pm]

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The reason is there is more than one child out there.

The one you are referring to above in the link obviously had DNA testing years ago and a Trust Agreement was set up. Part of the Trust Agreement without a doubt had a confidentiality clause that if you (mom and son) ever reveal this informtion the Trust is voided. Im sure the Trust stated they could not file a claim against P's estate. You will not see a claim of heirship filed by this child.

The article today is about another individual separate from the one above in the blind reveal.

[Edited 7/28/16 18:49pm]

That makes no sense, a child by law would be next in line to inherit after spouse. So who'd take a Trust over 100% or even 50% of the entire estate?

Well, for one thing we dont know how much money was put into the Trust. Another reason is a young mom needing money to raise the child and not wanting it to go public, and remain on good terms with P. I think P had a relationship with the child in the blind link posted.

Mumio said:

It sounds like it's the one we heard about early on who is from the Midwest. Should be interesting to see if it's true.

Paternity Test Proves That Prince Rogers Nelson Left a Son.

Genetic testing verifies one unidentified man's claim to be the Purple Rain singer's illegitimate son.

July 28, 2016

An unidentified man in his 30s whose mother allegedly had several liaisons with Prince in the 1980s, has DNA showing Prince has a 99% probability of being his father.

Independent genetic testing at a Santa Monica lab, has verified that an unidentified man in his 30s whose mother allegedly had several liaisons with Prince in the 1980s, has DNA showing Prince has a 99% probability of being the man's father.

Prince Rogers Nelson died from a fentanyl overdose at his Paisley Park recording Minnesota home on April 21, 2016. He was 57. His staff found the singer dead in an elevator and called 911. He never married and died without a will. Prince left no children and no obvious heirs to his estimated net worth $300 million estate, other than one full sister, Tyka Nelson. So it was believed.

SMObserved.com has learned that genetic testing does in fact verify the authenticity of one claimant, to be the illegitimate child of the Purple Rain star. This child, a young man who is now an adult, is the son of Prince and a woman who, in the 1980's used to perform in the same clubs as the singer (though the mother was not a member of Prince's band).

The claimant, who never met his father, has negotiated with the Singer's estate and preserved his privacy (i.e., his mother desired anonymity) until today. However, if he wants to share in his estate, he will have to either settle his claim, or come forward with a legal filing in Court by the end of September.

Genetic testing has verified his claim, we have learned, so the Estate may ultimately settle with him. Since the Court must approve the settlement, the entire story will soon be public information whether or not the settlement is contested.

http://www.smobserved.com.../1680.html

[Edited 7/28/16 0:41am]

Is this offical or, offical offical?? How sad ... I always though he was waaay to smart and classy to let something like this happen.

Dibblekins said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The photo posted above is NOT Carlin.

The Judge has not rejected Estabon's (the adopted child) Affidavit of Heirship. Bremer Trust filed papers stating Estabon does not meet the requirements for DNA testing. The Judge has not ruled on that issue as of this date. It remains to be seen whether the Judge will permit DNA testing.for Estabon.

I'm sure it is, you know...There was a whole thread devoted to him - and he looked very different from the front!
.

This article says that the pic. shown here is Carlin Williams..?

http://www.nairadays.com/tag/carlin-q-williams/

.

But, yes you're quite right about Estabon (the adopted one) - my apologies. It'll be interesting to hear what the judge has to say about it.

[Edited 7/28/16 19:00pm]

[Edited 7/28/16 19:06pm]

.

It may say so, but it's obviously not. Look at Carlin Q Williams' images on Google. He looks nothing like that man....in ANY of his many mugshots. And don't forget that Williams' DNA did NOT match Prince's.

.

morningsong said:

laytonian said:

Dibblekins said:

I'm sure it is, you know...There was a whole thread devoted to him - and he looked very different from the front!
.

This article says that the pic. shown here is Carlin Williams..?

http://www.nairadays.com/tag/carlin-q-williams/

.

But, yes you're quite right about Estabon (the adopted one) - my apologies. It'll be interesting to hear what the judge has to say about it.

[Edited 7/28/16 19:00pm]

[Edited 7/28/16 19:06pm]

.

It may say so, but it's obviously not. Look at Carlin Q Williams' images on Google. He looks nothing like that man....in ANY of his many mugshots. And don't forget that Williams' DNA did NOT match Prince's.

.

Well, I do know that this lad in the profile pic was shown from the side for a reason...When he was pictured face-on, any resemblance to P was well and truly nullified, lol! As I say, there is / was a thread all about him. And I seem to recall any connection to Prince being ultimately denied.

.

I know DNA has shown no match to Williams - that was my point in my earlier post.

.

I don't think the guy about whom this thread is written has been revealed - there are certainly no pictures of which I'm aware.