independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince road blocks The Times next release!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 14 of 16 « First<78910111213141516>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #390 posted 09/16/11 7:42am

Militant

avatar

moderator

murph said:

Trickology said:

Because he doesn't want The Time to get attention for their project. He hates the fact that Morris Day continued the Time without him all these years. It's that simple because they grew out of Prince's vision but soon the group grew out of Prince's reach. In a sense I bet Prince sees it as his band w/out out his leadership at the helm. Having Terry and Jimmy back probably makes him angry as well. Just another jab in the eye. "Look we got em back for the reunion"

Prince is a dick for pulling this stunt....There's no other way to say it...But you are jumping into another world here...lol

Prince has allowed Morris to tour off the "Time" banner for decades...This is why him not allowing the Time to make a record with the Time name is so ass backwards....You already let the Time perform live with the name for years...Why not let them make an album?

it's not that simple. for one - in live shows, they are performing HIS material.

Here's an example setlist:

http://www.setlist.fm/set...09859.html

Out of all songs performed, only three weren't written by Prince - "Fishnet" and "Oak Tree", which were both Morris solo tracks, and "Skillet" from Pandemonium.

Business is business. Prince benefits from The Time's live performances because he gets performance royalties as the songwriter. There's mutual benefit there.

With a studio album that contains no involvement from Prince, there's no mutual benefit. So what, Prince is expected to just roll over and give up what he owns for no reason? That's crazy, and it would set a DANGEROUS precedent for all other people he's worked with in similar capacity.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #391 posted 09/16/11 8:22am

Serena

89F said:

Simple: The Time without Prince's leadership is not The Time. They're all damn fine musicians who can (supposedly) do it without him: good for them, and I genuinely wish them luck. I'll probably buy the new album.

But they're not The Time... The Time was Prince's music, Prince's style, Prince's humour - just executed (albeit brilliantly) by 7 other people.

yeahthat

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #392 posted 09/16/11 8:24am

Serena

SoulAlive said:

Graycap23 said:

Then I don't understand your comments regarding the group. It was Prince's thing start 2 finish.

Should he have created it in some else's image?

I think he should have given them more control.Imagine if you were Jam or Lewis and you had these amazing songs and ideas,but you were forced to stay quiet,take orders and not contribute to the music in any way.That's not a good situation.

I haven't seen them come up with any 'amazing songs' for the group yet on their own. There's some good, fun things, but not anything earth-shattering.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #393 posted 09/16/11 8:31am

SoulAlive

Serena said:

SoulAlive said:

I think he should have given them more control.Imagine if you were Jam or Lewis and you had these amazing songs and ideas,but you were forced to stay quiet,take orders and not contribute to the music in any way.That's not a good situation.

I haven't seen them come up with any 'amazing songs' for the group yet on their own. There's some good, fun things, but not anything earth-shattering.

True,but not everything that Prince produces these days is earth-shattering,either.But that's not really important.I think if you're a musician,it's a good feeling to do music on your own terms,your own way,without someone else calling all the shots.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #394 posted 09/16/11 8:31am

rdhull

avatar

Serena said:

SoulAlive said:

I think he should have given them more control.Imagine if you were Jam or Lewis and you had these amazing songs and ideas,but you were forced to stay quiet,take orders and not contribute to the music in any way.That's not a good situation.

I haven't seen them come up with any 'amazing songs' for the group yet on their own. There's some good, fun things, but not anything earth-shattering.

Jam n Lewis have..and to a lot of folks, Jesse has been awesome. Ill venture to finally admit and relaize I enjoyed a liot of Jesses 80's stuff more than Princes post Rain releases. I was into Can You Help me, I Want My Girl more than most of ATWIAD..more into Crazy, Baby Lets Kiss..than..Kiss, and most of Parade back then, Every Shade Of Love was hitting me more than Lovesexy. But in retropsect, Princes output is less dated and gets 90% more airplay since.

Jam n Lewis met Princes output wuth their vast songwriting and production for other artists in the 80's imo. Only thing that kind of gave Prince the edge was that Jam n Lewis kind of stuck with that Flyte Tyme signature sound whereas Prince expanded his sound moreso imo.

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #395 posted 09/16/11 8:37am

rdhull

avatar

Militant said:

murph said:

Prince is a dick for pulling this stunt....There's no other way to say it...But you are jumping into another world here...lol

Prince has allowed Morris to tour off the "Time" banner for decades...This is why him not allowing the Time to make a record with the Time name is so ass backwards....You already let the Time perform live with the name for years...Why not let them make an album?

it's not that simple. for one - in live shows, they are performing HIS material.

Here's an example setlist:

http://www.setlist.fm/set...09859.html

Out of all songs performed, only three weren't written by Prince - "Fishnet" and "Oak Tree", which were both Morris solo tracks, and "Skillet" from Pandemonium.

Business is business. Prince benefits from The Time's live performances because he gets performance royalties as the songwriter. There's mutual benefit there.

With a studio album that contains no involvement from Prince, there's no mutual benefit. So what, Prince is expected to just roll over and give up what he owns for no reason? That's crazy, and it would set a DANGEROUS precedent for all other people he's worked with in similar capacity.

This^^^^

Id be damned if I gave life to a group..told 'em how to talk AND WALK (see that lol), how to dress, and how to play certain songs live, how to keep in time, had them practice to death..AND admittedly say "yeah they were bad and kicked ouR azz i was afraid.." and have them try and say "we out and gonna take your creation and do it our way bye see ya.."..man fuck all that and yall know it. You guys cling to your dAMn atm cards, jalopy vehicles, smart phones etC. like yalls lives depend upon it but cry foul when Prince does the same with what is his in the first place.Pleaase gtfoohwtbs.

And one more notice regarding The Time "upstaging" Prince...Prince knowingly was setting himself up to be this harder to get into rock figure who was enigmatic and out there..while making The Time for folks to readily get into...he "wanted" it that way in some aspects regarding The Time being a hit and him being this struggling "artiste." Come on now.

or maybe he thought thwey were just going to be a carment elecktra/hoe of the year protegee that went nowhere?

I dont buy that

.

[Edited 9/16/11 8:43am]

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #396 posted 09/16/11 8:40am

MickyDolenz

avatar

Dsoul said:

Why tag a redundant "-ven" on the end of 7?

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #397 posted 09/16/11 9:49am

Yeshua4all

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #398 posted 09/16/11 9:52am

Graycap23

Yeshua4all said:

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

Seems some folks don't want 2 understand this basic FACT.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #399 posted 09/16/11 9:53am

rdhull

avatar

Yeshua4all said:

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

copy...print...save

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #400 posted 09/16/11 10:25am

sweething

didn't they release their album?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #401 posted 09/16/11 10:52am

murph

Militant said:

murph said:

Prince is a dick for pulling this stunt....There's no other way to say it...But you are jumping into another world here...lol

Prince has allowed Morris to tour off the "Time" banner for decades...This is why him not allowing the Time to make a record with the Time name is so ass backwards....You already let the Time perform live with the name for years...Why not let them make an album?

it's not that simple. for one - in live shows, they are performing HIS material.

Here's an example setlist:

http://www.setlist.fm/set...09859.html

Out of all songs performed, only three weren't written by Prince - "Fishnet" and "Oak Tree", which were both Morris solo tracks, and "Skillet" from Pandemonium.

Business is business. Prince benefits from The Time's live performances because he gets performance royalties as the songwriter. There's mutual benefit there.

With a studio album that contains no involvement from Prince, there's no mutual benefit. So what, Prince is expected to just roll over and give up what he owns for no reason? That's crazy, and it would set a DANGEROUS precedent for all other people he's worked with in similar capacity.

It's a dick move either way....No one is banging on any doors for a new Time album...In fact, the guys had even reached out to Prince to get involved in the album, yet he turned them down...

So yeah, I understand where you are coming from in terms of the business component...But it aint THAT serious....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #402 posted 09/16/11 11:13am

MickyDolenz

avatar

Yeshua4all said:

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

The Monkees still tour under that name and also released an album awhile back as "The Monkees". I think Rhino owns the name and not the group. So Prince can let the guys use "The Time" if he wants to.

[Edited 9/16/11 11:31am]

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #403 posted 09/16/11 11:22am

electricberet

avatar

As I recall, when the manager of fDeluxe came on here, he said that Prince had raised the possibility of reissuing the original album by The Family, but he (the fDeluxe manager) would insist that "all contracts were signed" before going forward:

http://prince.org/msg/5/359443

I can't say for sure, but I would guess that Prince's management and attorneys (if not Prince himself) would be happy to let The Time, The Family, etc., go out and tour under their original names if they all agreed in writing that Prince has the rights to all the music that was recorded under those names in the 1980s. But they don't want to do that for obvious reasons. In other words, I suspect this is all part of the negotiations over what happens to Prince's back catalog and the back catalog of the associated artists. Can't prove that, of course, because I'm not involved with those negotiations.

[Edited 9/16/11 11:23am]

The Census Bureau estimates that there are 2,518 American Indians and Alaska Natives currently living in the city of Long Beach.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #404 posted 09/16/11 11:40am

V10LETBLUES

At this point, with all the bullshit with The Family and The time, I hope Prince re-releases the albums with his own voice and bury the original recording for the collectors that have them.

The word opportunistic comes to mind especially for The Family. I just re-read that asses statement again from F-deluxe and sheer assholeness of it pisses me off.

Re-release them as Prince albums as The Time and The Family with none of their vocals or images and put end end to this mess.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #405 posted 09/16/11 11:44am

electricberet

avatar

V10LETBLUES said:

At this point, with all the bullshit with The Family and The time, I hope Prince re-releases the albums with his own voice and bury the original recording for the collectors that have them.

The word opportunistic comes to mind especially for The Family. I just re-read that asses statement again from F-deluxe and sheer assholeness of it pisses me off.

Re-release them as Prince albums as The Time and The Family with none of their vocals or images and put end end to this mess.

Hmmm... I'm not sure I want three or four albums of Prince singing over The Time backing tracks in his "Cloreen Baconskin" voice.

I think this stuff will be worked out eventually. There's a lot of posturing going on in the meantime.

The Census Bureau estimates that there are 2,518 American Indians and Alaska Natives currently living in the city of Long Beach.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #406 posted 09/16/11 12:11pm

V10LETBLUES

electricberet said:

V10LETBLUES said:

At this point, with all the bullshit with The Family and The time, I hope Prince re-releases the albums with his own voice and bury the original recording for the collectors that have them.

The word opportunistic comes to mind especially for The Family. I just re-read that asses statement again from F-deluxe and sheer assholeness of it pisses me off.

Re-release them as Prince albums as The Time and The Family with none of their vocals or images and put end end to this mess.

Hmmm... I'm not sure I want three or four albums of Prince singing over The Time backing tracks in his "Cloreen Baconskin" voice.

I think this stuff will be worked out eventually. There's a lot of posturing going on in the meantime.

I think A LOT of fans are curious to hear what the original songs sounded before being handed over for the addition of the various voices. Morris's swagger may be missed, but I do not think anyone will upset at the elimination of St. Pauls vocals.

[Edited 9/16/11 12:12pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #407 posted 09/16/11 12:13pm

electricberet

avatar

V10LETBLUES said:

electricberet said:

Hmmm... I'm not sure I want three or four albums of Prince singing over The Time backing tracks in his "Cloreen Baconskin" voice.

I think this stuff will be worked out eventually. There's a lot of posturing going on in the meantime.

I think A LOT of fans are curious to hear what the originals songs sounded before being handed over for the addition of the various voices. Morris's swagger may be missed, but I do not think anyone will upset at the elimination of St. Pauls vocals.

The original versions with Prince's vocals would be great bonus tracks to have on deluxe editions along with remasters of the released versions. Not that we're likely to ever see something like that.

We've all heard Prince sing "Nothing Compares 2 U." I prefer the original.

The Census Bureau estimates that there are 2,518 American Indians and Alaska Natives currently living in the city of Long Beach.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #408 posted 09/16/11 12:31pm

Serena

rdhull said:

Serena said:

I haven't seen them come up with any 'amazing songs' for the group yet on their own. There's some good, fun things, but not anything earth-shattering.

Jam n Lewis have..and to a lot of folks, Jesse has been awesome. Ill venture to finally admit and relaize I enjoyed a liot of Jesses 80's stuff more than Princes post Rain releases. I was into Can You Help me, I Want My Girl more than most of ATWIAD..more into Crazy, Baby Lets Kiss..than..Kiss, and most of Parade back then, Every Shade Of Love was hitting me more than Lovesexy. But in retropsect, Princes output is less dated and gets 90% more airplay since.

Jam n Lewis met Princes output wuth their vast songwriting and production for other artists in the 80's imo. Only thing that kind of gave Prince the edge was that Jam n Lewis kind of stuck with that Flyte Tyme signature sound whereas Prince expanded his sound moreso imo.

Hey RD! smile I get that, but I was talking about music they've done as The Time, not separate projects.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #409 posted 09/16/11 12:33pm

Serena

Graycap23 said:

Yeshua4all said:

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

Seems some folks don't want 2 understand this basic FACT.

I know and people keep ignoring that fact & just want to say that Prince is a jerk. disbelief

Like I said earlier, think Lucas would let an actor take the Star Wars franchise & do stuff on their own under that umbrella? lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #410 posted 09/16/11 12:36pm

Serena

murph said:

Militant said:

it's not that simple. for one - in live shows, they are performing HIS material.

Here's an example setlist:

http://www.setlist.fm/set...09859.html

Out of all songs performed, only three weren't written by Prince - "Fishnet" and "Oak Tree", which were both Morris solo tracks, and "Skillet" from Pandemonium.

Business is business. Prince benefits from The Time's live performances because he gets performance royalties as the songwriter. There's mutual benefit there.

With a studio album that contains no involvement from Prince, there's no mutual benefit. So what, Prince is expected to just roll over and give up what he owns for no reason? That's crazy, and it would set a DANGEROUS precedent for all other people he's worked with in similar capacity.

It's a dick move either way....No one is banging on any doors for a new Time album...In fact, the guys had even reached out to Prince to get involved in the album, yet he turned them down...

So yeah, I understand where you are coming from in terms of the business component...But it aint THAT serious....

It's isn't a dick move, it's a business move. Of course you don't think it's serious because it's not your product. Just because they wanted him to get involved and he didn't want to go there doesn't mean crap except that he chose not to do it for whatever reason(s).

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #411 posted 09/16/11 12:38pm

V10LETBLUES

Serena said:

Graycap23 said:

Seems some folks don't want 2 understand this basic FACT.

I know and people keep ignoring that fact & just want to say that Prince is a jerk. disbelief

Like I said earlier, think Lucas would let an actor take the Star Wars franchise & do stuff on their own under that umbrella? lol

The Lucas analogy is perfect. Sometimes it seems people have a quota of things to get upset about.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #412 posted 09/16/11 12:39pm

Serena

V10LETBLUES said:

electricberet said:

Hmmm... I'm not sure I want three or four albums of Prince singing over The Time backing tracks in his "Cloreen Baconskin" voice.

I think this stuff will be worked out eventually. There's a lot of posturing going on in the meantime.

I think A LOT of fans are curious to hear what the original songs sounded before being handed over for the addition of the various voices. Morris's swagger may be missed, but I do not think anyone will upset at the elimination of St. Pauls vocals.

[Edited 9/16/11 12:12pm]

I would LOVE to hear Prince's recordings of all this stuff and I agree on St.Paul's vocals, blah to me. I get a kick out of Prince playing characters, so I love stuff like Cloreen. It's not like Morris has a great voice either, it's more the character that's entertaining.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #413 posted 09/16/11 2:13pm

V10LETBLUES

Serena said:

V10LETBLUES said:

I think A LOT of fans are curious to hear what the original songs sounded before being handed over for the addition of the various voices. Morris's swagger may be missed, but I do not think anyone will upset at the elimination of St. Pauls vocals.

[Edited 9/16/11 12:12pm]

I would LOVE to hear Prince's recordings of all this stuff and I agree on St.Paul's vocals, blah to me. I get a kick out of Prince playing characters, so I love stuff like Cloreen. It's not like Morris has a great voice either, it's more the character that's entertaining.

You me and everyone else here.

I love that Prince is reclaiming his music in concert. People hear a lot of these great songs by the various "groups" he gave them to and have no idea that they are Prince songs in every sense of the word. I really hope that Prince reclaims them, re-issues the originals sans the tacked-on vocals by the various people over the time.

I think more people would be drawn in by a Prince album than by a The Family album or The Time album. It would be a great document to set things straight, and the die-hards would eat it up.

[Edited 9/16/11 14:14pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #414 posted 09/16/11 2:40pm

rdhull

avatar

Serena said:

rdhull said:

Jam n Lewis have..and to a lot of folks, Jesse has been awesome. Ill venture to finally admit and relaize I enjoyed a liot of Jesses 80's stuff more than Princes post Rain releases. I was into Can You Help me, I Want My Girl more than most of ATWIAD..more into Crazy, Baby Lets Kiss..than..Kiss, and most of Parade back then, Every Shade Of Love was hitting me more than Lovesexy. But in retropsect, Princes output is less dated and gets 90% more airplay since.

Jam n Lewis met Princes output wuth their vast songwriting and production for other artists in the 80's imo. Only thing that kind of gave Prince the edge was that Jam n Lewis kind of stuck with that Flyte Tyme signature sound whereas Prince expanded his sound moreso imo.

Hey RD! smile I get that, but I was talking about music they've done as The Time, not separate projects.

Oh! I hear ya. Whats up D? smile

.

[Edited 9/16/11 14:41pm]

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #415 posted 09/16/11 2:51pm

rdhull

avatar

Serena said:

Graycap23 said:

Seems some folks don't want 2 understand this basic FACT.

I know and people keep ignoring that fact & just want to say that Prince is a jerk. disbelief

Like I said earlier, think Lucas would let an actor take the Star Wars franchise & do stuff on their own under that umbrella? lol

preach that shit

copy , print, and save

church says amen

truth.com

teach the children like Marvyn said

co-sign

co-siggity

aka..I agree with what you just said

lol

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #416 posted 09/16/11 3:09pm

NDRU

avatar

It may just be business, Prince's point may be legitimate, but if the shoe was on the other foot, it's exactly the kind of thing Prince would complain about--CONtrol CONtracts etc the Time is just a band, why should Prince care if they do a new album? The more they work, it just boosts attention on the old material and puts $$$ into Prince's pockets
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #417 posted 09/16/11 3:12pm

rdhull

avatar

NDRU said:

It may just be business, Prince's point may be legitimate, but if the shoe was on the other foot, it's exactly the kind of thing Prince would complain about--CONtrol CONtracts etc the Time is just a band, why should Prince care if they do a new album? The more they work, it just boosts attention on the old material and puts $$$ into Prince's pockets

We are not talkig hypotheticals.

besides thats exactly what Prince DID do. He was caught up with WB and changed his gat damned name to a symbol and recorded under that lol

Prince was complaining about unfair contracts not simple everyday contracts

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #418 posted 09/16/11 3:17pm

NDRU

avatar

rdhull said:

NDRU said:

It may just be business, Prince's point may be legitimate, but if the shoe was on the other foot, it's exactly the kind of thing Prince would complain about--CONtrol CONtracts etc the Time is just a band, why should Prince care if they do a new album? The more they work, it just boosts attention on the old material and puts $$$ into Prince's pockets

We are not talkig hypotheticals.

besides thats exactly what Prince DID do. He was caught up with WB and changed his gat damned name to a symbol and recorded under that lol

Prince was complaining about unfair contracts not simple everyday contracts

good point, though still that would make him WB to the Time, and he seems to be as willing to be that as WB was to him

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #419 posted 09/16/11 3:34pm

Timmy84

Graycap23 said:

Yeshua4all said:

This is a legal issue. Prince would have to essentially sign the name and all rights thereof associated with the name. This would put in jeopardy the ownership status of existing material recorded under the name that Prince enjoys in perpetuity. I don't blame him one bit. There is no way I'd put that kind of loot and legacy in jeopardy.

Seems some folks don't want 2 understand this basic FACT.

Yeah plus Prince did create The Time in the first place.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 14 of 16 « First<78910111213141516>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince road blocks The Times next release!