At the moment I really don't like it!
But I bet in 10 years time I'll be eatting my words.. As usual Prince is probably way ahead of us! Shut up already, damn. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I like a couple of songs... but for the most part...
this album is best used as a booty crack mirror. Thats right... boooo teee crack! It ranks among the only Prince albums I truly do not like. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pepper7 said: At the moment I really don't like it!
But I bet in 10 years time I'll be eatting my words.. As usual Prince is probably way ahead of us! My thoughts exactly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pepper7 said: At the moment I really don't like it!
But I bet in 10 years time I'll be eatting my words.. As usual Prince is probably way ahead of us! It's been almost 10 years since it's release. If you don't like it now, you probably won't in another 10. But don't tell anyone here that. They're snarky when it comes to their TRC cds. hehehehe | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rainbow Children is awesome and refreshing
so what the deep voice is irritating, and people need to get over his JW association, he doesn't live 4 U, he may continue in it, he may leave later But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious Rainbow Children as a song is sexy (forget that voice which is only at the beginning and a touch at the end) it's a hot song Digital Garden as an instrumental Everywhere musically is wonderful The Sensual Everafter Mellow 1+1+1 = 3 the Everlasting Now She Loves Me 4 Me Last December What is so unlistenable about these songs... NOTHING [Edited 5/1/09 8:45am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eaglebear4839 said: Accujack said: No song on this album would be in my top 50, yet the album is one of my favorites. I very rarely pick a random song, and listen to it. I have to be in the right mood, but typically listen to the album in full. Ya'll must be too hip for the room then. And I don't mean this in a cool cat kinda way. Ya'll must be them three-minute hipsters that the radio is geared towards these days. You show me which radio station would play one cut off this album!! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious It doesn't really make you a bigot if you're turned-off by stuff like this: "Like a thief in the night, my lord come and strike Leave nothing but ashes to the left, dust to the right Holocaust aside, many lived and died But when all truth is told, Would u rather be dead or be sold?" "The Wise One who understood the law that was handed down from God long ago reflected the true meaning to his woman every day. And she surrendered her discerning of it into his care and keeping She trusted he would lead in the right way. Her children in subjection to her, and she in subjection to the Wise One. All is in subjection to God." "See we're living in a system that the devil designed And suffering from this devil's most heinous crime He's tried to keep us from the reason we were born That is to be the living truth in human form" "Stay with me baby But let me tell you how it's gonna be There's a theocratic order. There's a theocratic order now. This is how it's gonna be If u wanna be with me Ain't no room for disagree 1+1+1 is 3" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This album is not and never will be Lovesexy. The only people who will get somethnig from this spiritually are the already converted. Lovesexy was my best friend's favorite Prince album and she is an antheist that would cook live children in a church to show how much she rejects god There is no point of commonality within most of the lyrics.
That said, contrast this between Rave Un2 The Joy Fantastic and Musicology which came before and after. If people can't see the musical brilliance based on that alone, they simply are dead 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TBeatty716 said: OldFriends4Sale said: But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious It doesn't really make you a bigot if you're turned-off by stuff like this: "Like a thief in the night, my lord come and strike Leave nothing but ashes to the left, dust to the right Holocaust aside, many lived and died But when all truth is told, Would u rather be dead or be sold?" "The Wise One who understood the law that was handed down from God long ago reflected the true meaning to his woman every day. And she surrendered her discerning of it into his care and keeping She trusted he would lead in the right way. Her children in subjection to her, and she in subjection to the Wise One. All is in subjection to God." "See we're living in a system that the devil designed And suffering from this devil's most heinous crime He's tried to keep us from the reason we were born That is to be the living truth in human form" "Stay with me baby But let me tell you how it's gonna be There's a theocratic order. There's a theocratic order now. This is how it's gonna be If u wanna be with me Ain't no room for disagree 1+1+1 is 3" I'll say that if Prince never professed a JW connection, I don't think people would have a problem with the album Stuff like this isn't to far from what Prince has written before And I'll give U this one song, what about Everywhere, Rainbow Children, Digital Garden, She Loves Me For Me, Mellow Again I think people are being narrow minded and bigoted | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's his best album of the past decade. "last december", "family name", "everlasting now",,at least it had a live vibe and was a creative album. there was none of those plastic sounding songs.. Lotusflow3r is his best album since TRC. BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vivid? comeon... "1999", "dirty mind", "sign o' the times", "purple Rain"... are heads above TRC BOB4theFUNK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I let a college kid listen to Everywhere and pointed out the musical breakdown at 1:51 and told him that the live playning is why I loved that album so much more than the Lotus project. He went That's not studio?! NOPE! Live baby! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's a great album. Love the guitar work scattered.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: I'll say that if Prince never professed a JW connection, I don't think people would have a problem with the album Stuff like this isn't to far from what Prince has written before And I'll give U this one song, what about Everywhere, Rainbow Children, Digital Garden, She Loves Me For Me, Mellow Again I think people are being narrow minded and bigoted I didn't quote just one song. The lyrics I posted were from 4 different songs; one of which you claim isn't religious. Also, I said earlier that I feel some of his best music deals with spirituality, I just disagree with the beliefs he has. People can disagree with his beliefs without being narrow minded bigots. Maybe the narrow-mindedness & bigotry lies in advocating theocracy, vengeful divine wrath, and the subjection of women! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rusty1 said: vivid? comeon... "1999", "dirty mind", "sign o' the times", "purple Rain"... are heads above TRC
As a huge fan of For U - Lovesexy, I don't think comparing these albums with TRC is what's needed. I don't think there is a comparison, I appreciate that album for what it is musically and I think it's heads above Come Emmancipation, Rave and many over post Diamonds and Pearls albums | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
First listen.....I was like HUH!?????What is with that VOICE!!???
Second listen I placed head phones on to really take it in. Third and forward listening sessions just made me appreciate his ability to create something like that.....The music is just Sick! This album made me appreciate art(musically) even more. Prince is ahead of his time and as a fan I take from him the moving forward and inject that into my own life. Some people here are a bit too rigid in their exceptance of what he puts out. Me personally I'm enjoying the ride! This is most definately a love/hate album no doubt...however you can't deny him for putting out what he wants....it's just a powerful thing to act on it and he does it well. "A Man Can't Ride Your Back Unless It's Bent" MLK 4/3/68 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: Rainbow Children is awesome and refreshing
so what the deep voice is irritating, and people need to get over his JW association, he doesn't live 4 U, he may continue in it, he may leave later But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious Rainbow Children as a song is sexy (forget that voice which is only at the beginning and a touch at the end) it's a hot song Digital Garden as an instrumental Everywhere musically is wonderful The Sensual Everafter Mellow 1+1+1 = 3 the Everlasting Now She Loves Me 4 Me Last December What is so unlistenable about these songs... NOTHING How far can you get your snoot up Prince's chocolate starfish anyway? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TBeatty716 said: OldFriends4Sale said: I'll say that if Prince never professed a JW connection, I don't think people would have a problem with the album Stuff like this isn't to far from what Prince has written before And I'll give U this one song, what about Everywhere, Rainbow Children, Digital Garden, She Loves Me For Me, Mellow Again I think people are being narrow minded and bigoted I didn't quote just one song. The lyrics I posted were from 4 different songs; one of which you claim isn't religious. Also, I said earlier that I feel some of his best music deals with spirituality, I just disagree with the beliefs he has. People can disagree with his beliefs without being narrow minded bigots. Maybe the narrow-mindedness & bigotry lies in advocating theocracy, vengeful divine wrath, and the subjection of women! I didn't claim anything wasn't religious, I know this is his JW acceptance album I said I don't see it as all that 'preachy' I'm mean Sexuality can be seen as preachy too so can God the Dance Electric, I had someone tell me the Cross was preachy, I don't want you to take this as a direct challenge to you, I'm talking about over all opinions I've heard that had no real substance to it. Some people just get offended at the idea of religion, and they take that offense to this album not because it isn't good musically(because it's layered and diverse instrumentally and it's very good) but it's the religious association. And they say "nothing on this album is good" "this album spouts his JW beliefs" Does Rainbow Children really do that? Especially since Prince has combined Egyptology Christian & Jehovah's Witness ideas Digital Garden(instrumental) is superb, I love he guitar works especially Everywhere just feels good: I Wish U Heaven Mellow or She Loves Me 4 Me mix very well with Tangerine, Strollin, Ballad of Dorothy Parker Last December for the most part I still don't get lyrically, but I also still don't get Glam Slam lyrically. But musically I can listen to both over and over The Sensual Everafter(another instrumental) I can set in a playlist with Alexa de Paris, and God the Love them I'm not a big fan of Family Name or Willing 2 Do the Work(because it sounds too much like James Brown) I think people preconceived ideas about this album, taints how they hear it. As an album I'm listening for the music 1st off, then how it's actually sung(not the actual lyrics) "But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious " | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: OldFriends4Sale said: Rainbow Children is awesome and refreshing
so what the deep voice is irritating, and people need to get over his JW association, he doesn't live 4 U, he may continue in it, he may leave later But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious Rainbow Children as a song is sexy (forget that voice which is only at the beginning and a touch at the end) it's a hot song Digital Garden as an instrumental Everywhere musically is wonderful The Sensual Everafter Mellow 1+1+1 = 3 the Everlasting Now She Loves Me 4 Me Last December What is so unlistenable about these songs... NOTHING How far can you get your snoot up Prince's chocolate starfish anyway? What? Look I don't like a lot of Prince's music after Diamonds and Pearls from that album up until Planet Earth I'm really picky I like a song here and there Just because I really like the Rainbow Children and have some real critique other than "I don't like the voice, he's too preachy" doesn't mean whatever tha is your saying If you can give me a substantial reasonable reason you don't like it I'll listen. But the responses that sound like "I don't like it cause I just don't" don't work for me I don't care 4 that deep voice either, but I got over it ernestsewell wrote:I hate it from front to back. Absolutely loathe it. I'd rather listen to Graffiti Bridge backwards, than TRC at all. [Edited 5/1/09 10:43am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: TBeatty716 said: I didn't quote just one song. The lyrics I posted were from 4 different songs; one of which you claim isn't religious. Also, I said earlier that I feel some of his best music deals with spirituality, I just disagree with the beliefs he has. People can disagree with his beliefs without being narrow minded bigots. Maybe the narrow-mindedness & bigotry lies in advocating theocracy, vengeful divine wrath, and the subjection of women! I didn't claim anything wasn't religious, I know this is his JW acceptance album I said I don't see it as all that 'preachy' I'm mean Sexuality can be seen as preachy too so can God the Dance Electric, I had someone tell me the Cross was preachy, I don't want you to take this as a direct challenge to you, I'm talking about over all opinions I've heard that had no real substance to it. Some people just get offended at the idea of religion, and they take that offense to this album not because it isn't good musically(because it's layered and diverse instrumentally and it's very good) but it's the religious association. And they say "nothing on this album is good" "this album spouts his JW beliefs" Does Rainbow Children really do that? Especially since Prince has combined Egyptology Christian & Jehovah's Witness ideas Digital Garden(instrumental) is superb, I love he guitar works especially Everywhere just feels good: I Wish U Heaven Mellow or She Loves Me 4 Me mix very well with Tangerine, Strollin, Ballad of Dorothy Parker Last December for the most part I still don't get lyrically, but I also still don't get Glam Slam lyrically. But musically I can listen to both over and over The Sensual Everafter(another instrumental) I can set in a playlist with Alexa de Paris, and God the Love them I'm not a big fan of Family Name or Willing 2 Do the Work(because it sounds too much like James Brown) I think people preconceived ideas about this album, taints how they hear it. As an album I'm listening for the music 1st off, then how it's actually sung(not the actual lyrics) "But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious " I think in this instance offense of completely and totally warranted. You can't compare his approach on those old songs to this album. The preachiness is overt in places and veiled in others. For me I am willing to forgive and overlook all of that because musically it is so brilliant and for the fact that it's not total assholery. It just feels like the real deal and I can't hate it for that. The new stuff I despise for the simple fact you can tell his heart isn't truly in it. 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: snip
Listen, you can like the album. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. The thread was started not in defense of TRC, but rather a big, hearty "WTF?" I remember downloading it from NPGMC and just thinking it was ridiculous. Musically, it's very different from what we've heard from Prince to that point. It was very organic, very smooth, jazzy, yes. I get that. Musically it is unique, and we hadn't heard anything as "off track" as that since ATWIAD or Lovesexy. It's not JUST the deep voice. I can deal with the voice. He's used it before. It's not even the story telling. He's done that before. It's the racism, the "this is what you should believe and ignore everything you've ever heard in your life because I am Prince, and I said so" arrogance on every other track. He's sure of himself, as he should be, but there's an old saying about there's two things you don't mess with people on: Their money and their religion. When you're singing about flying on the wings of the New Translation (Bible) and talking about the Banished ones (who are those that don't believe like HE does)....it's offensive. Yeah, I have the right to not listen, and that's what I do. When TRC was brought up a month or so ago, I thought...okay, let me try ONE MORE TIME to hear this record. I played it. I cranked it up in my headphones. I felt like I was having my teeth scrapped with a butter knife. The funkiness of "1+1+1=3" or "Everlasting Now" is just lost with his vapid lyrics on religion. "Family Name" is ridiculous to no end. Yeah, I get the slave name thing. I'm not black, but I get the idea of being violated in some way like that. I get it. He ditched his 'slave' name for years, and then took it back when he felt he was 'free', then still bitches about 'the system' holding him down (ie: SoundScan, etc). I'm a born-again Christian. And a gay one at that. It's a very unique view to have, being raised Independent Baptist (which made Southern Baptists look like heathens), listening to Prince, growing up into my own, yet stripping the traditions of belief off, and keeping the core beliefs close. Then you have someone like PRince, who you've admired since 1979 come along and start talking about "you can cut that how you want, but it's THE TRUTH". Yes well, it's the truth to PRINCE, not the absolute truth of the world. Yet he's just arrogant enough to think so, and write a ridiculous album stating as much. It's not "I believe this, I want to share", it's hitting the fan/listener over the head with it. For someone who preached, PREACHED, about freedom, he did a 180 and tried to yoke everyone to his beliefs. Now he's a pale shadow of the person he once was. THOSE is my issues with TRC. No doubt, you might disagree. So while there are those others who will say my mind isn't open to things: you're dead wrong. To those who simply disagree w/ liking or disliking it, that's fine. I'm not making it personal against those who like it. I just don't.I'm cool with that. This my two cents, and you have yours. Which means, in the end, we break even, and it's a draw. No harm, no foul. [Edited 5/1/09 10:57am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: OldFriends4Sale said: I didn't claim anything wasn't religious, I know this is his JW acceptance album I said I don't see it as all that 'preachy' I'm mean Sexuality can be seen as preachy too so can God the Dance Electric, I had someone tell me the Cross was preachy, I don't want you to take this as a direct challenge to you, I'm talking about over all opinions I've heard that had no real substance to it. Some people just get offended at the idea of religion, and they take that offense to this album not because it isn't good musically(because it's layered and diverse instrumentally and it's very good) but it's the religious association. And they say "nothing on this album is good" "this album spouts his JW beliefs" Does Rainbow Children really do that? Especially since Prince has combined Egyptology Christian & Jehovah's Witness ideas Digital Garden is superb, I love he guitar works especially Everywhere just feels good: I Wish U Heaven Mellow or She Loves Me 4 Me mix very well with Tangerine, Strollin, Ballad of Dorothy Parker Last December for the most part I still don't get lyrically, but I also still don't get Glam Slam lyrically. But musically I can listen to both over and over The Sensual Everafter(another instrumental) I can set in a playlist with Alexa de Paris, and God the Love them I'm not a big fan of Family Name or Willing 2 Do the Work(because it sounds too much like James Brown) I think people preconceived ideas about this album, taints how they hear it. As an album I'm listening for the music 1st off, then how it's actually sung(not the actual lyrics) "But those who get upse over the 'religious' references that aren't all that preachy are bigots. Sorry, but Prince as always talked about stuff like this, he is just more defined with the JW and the few songs on the album that really expessed it aren't all that obvious " I think in this instance offense of completely and totally warranted. You can't compare his approach on those old songs to this album. The preachiness is overt in places and veiled in others. For me I am willing to forgive and overlook all of that because musically it is so brilliant and for the fact that it's not total assholery. It just feels like the real deal and I can't hate it for that. The new stuff I despise for the simple fact you can tell his heart isn't truly in it. Who is your real father? The everlasting one The one who came from nothing And yet from this one, everything comes The one who commands your momma With the simple phrase, "I am" And every time that she obeys She gives birth 2 the Son of Man Who is this? Reproduction of the new breed leader - stand up, organize I didn't understand your first sentence. I'm not comparing those songs, I'm saying when I'm at my computer with my headphones on wanting to listen to Prince music and I create a playlist it's easy for me to fit those songs near each other And I'm not denying that it's his most overtly religious album But Digital Garden, Everywhere, She Loves Me 4 Me, Mellow, Muse 2 the Pharoah, the Sensual Everafter aren't all that overt Musically the ones I listed previously 2 me are superb, not comparing the album to Purple Rain or Diamonds & Pearls. I'm just saying as a fan of Prince, Prince's music and talent, I'm coming to the table listening to the music, it was always his music 1st that caught my attention, then how it's sung (I still can't get with his rappish voice) And I think that's why I agree with U that I can and have forgiven the JW overtness, because the music is on it. I just don't think many of the "fans" can do that, because they want to be offended. I can listen to a song and not hear the lyrics, I focus more on how the lyrics are sung though. There are about 2 songs that I never listen too Family Name and Willing 2 Do the Work JW biblically I don't even know how the Rainbow Children & the Banished Ones idea connects so I can't say that's all that preachy because I don't know what it means There's a place I want 2 go Where the milk and honey flow Without God it wasn't there Now I feel it everywhere F-f-f-feel it Feel it, feel it, can't U feel it? When I was lost and couldn't see my way I used 2 follow what everybody say Now I know that it's written in the heart Now I'm ready, I'm ready 2 start Without God it wasn't there Now I feel it everywhere We were always meant 2 be In paradise eternally Before the truth, I did not, I did not care (Before the truth I did not care) Now I feel it everywhere Feel it, feel it everywhere Fell it, feel it (Feel it) Can U feel it, feel it? This mighty good feeling everywhere, oh Oh, we got so much work 2 do everywhere | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: OldFriends4Sale said: snip
Listen, you can like the album. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. The thread was started not in defense of TRC, but rather a big, hearty "WTF?" I remember downloading it from NPGMC and just thinking it was ridiculous. Musically, it's very different from what we've heard from Prince to that point. It was very organic, very smooth, jazzy, yes. I get that. Musically it is unique, and we hadn't heard anything as "off track" as that since ATWIAD or Lovesexy. It's not JUST the deep voice. I can deal with the voice. He's used it before. It's not even the story telling. He's done that before. It's the racism, the "this is what you should believe and ignore everything you've ever heard in your life because I am Prince, and I said so" arrogance on every other track. He's sure of himself, as he should be, but there's an old saying about there's two things you don't mess with people on: Their money and their religion. When you're singing about flying on the wings of the New Translation (Bible) and talking about the Banished ones (who are those that don't believe like HE does)....it's offensive. Yeah, I have the right to not listen, and that's what I do. When TRC was brought up a month or so ago, I thought...okay, let me try ONE MORE TIME to hear this record. I played it. I cranked it up in my headphones. I felt like I was having my teeth scrapped with a butter knife. The funkiness of "1+1+1=3" or "Everlasting Now" is just lost with his vapid lyrics on religion. "Family Name" is ridiculous to no end. Yeah, I get the slave name thing. I'm not black, but I get the idea of being violated in some way like that. I get it. He ditched his 'slave' name for years, and then took it back when he felt he was 'free', then still bitches about 'the system' holding him down (ie: SoundScan, etc). I'm a born-again Christian. And a gay one at that. It's a very unique view to have, being raised Independent Baptist (which made Southern Baptists look like heathens), listening to Prince, growing up into my own, yet stripping the traditions of belief off, and keeping the core beliefs close. Then you have someone like PRince, who you've admired since 1979 come along and start talking about "you can cut that how you want, but it's THE TRUTH". Yes well, it's the truth to PRINCE, not the absolute truth of the world. Yet he's just arrogant enough to think so, and write a ridiculous album stating as much. It's not "I believe this, I want to share", it's hitting the fan/listener over the head with it. For someone who preached, PREACHED, about freedom, he did a 180 and tried to yoke everyone to his beliefs. Now he's a pale shadow of the person he once was. THOSE is my issues with TRC. No doubt, you might disagree. So while there are those others who will say my mind isn't open to things: you're dead wrong. To those who simply disagree w/ liking or disliking it, that's fine. I'm not making it personal against those who like it. I just don't.I'm cool with that. This my two cents, and you have yours. Which means, in the end, we break even, and it's a draw. No harm, no foul. [Edited 5/1/09 10:57am] Now that's what I like, a 'reasonable reason' But a lot of other people really haven't thought it out of why they do or don't And I've heard that it's too pro black (no good example from the people I've heard that from) can you give me examples of the racism in this album? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OldFriends4Sale said: Now that's what I like, a 'reasonable reason'
But a lot of other people really haven't thought it out of why they do or don't And I've heard that it's too pro black (no good example from the people I've heard that from) can you give me examples of the racism in this album? "pro black" isn't what I meant. I don't care if something is pro black. James Brown was singing "I'm Black And I'm Proud" decades ago. Sly was singing "Don't Call Me Nigger, Whitey" decades ago. I don't want black artists to be "more white" to suit me. I may look white, but it's a birth mark. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: OldFriends4Sale said: Now that's what I like, a 'reasonable reason'
But a lot of other people really haven't thought it out of why they do or don't And I've heard that it's too pro black (no good example from the people I've heard that from) can you give me examples of the racism in this album? "pro black" isn't what I meant. I don't care if something is pro black. James Brown was singing "I'm Black And I'm Proud" decades ago. Sly was singing "Don't Call Me Nigger, Whitey" decades ago. I don't want black artists to be "more white" to suit me. I may look white, but it's a birth mark. lol No I'm not saying you said it's pro black, others have said it But in your post you said "It's the racism..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[/quote]
I bought this in vinyl just to have this artwork! I wish I could get this in a poster. "A Man Can't Ride Your Back Unless It's Bent" MLK 4/3/68 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Rainbow Children was the first Prince CD that I was scared to buy. I had heard so many differing reports about the CD from the Celebration in June that year up until it came out and I had never heard so many different and opposing opinions about 1 CD, let alone a Prince CD. I didn't know what to expect. I just knew that I had to go into it with an open mind. After hearing it the 1st time that night, I thought, "Man this CD is weird but cool" and I hadn't felt that way about a Prince CD since Lovesexy, which took over 10 years for me to love. I kept on playing it and I realized that it was a great album. It's not my absolute favorite as there are other before and since that I love more but it's in my top 15 Prince CD's. I've always looked at TRC as a story not to be taken literally or personally. Funny thing for me is that it took 2 years after the CD came out for me to see the JW stuff in there but it still didn't take away from it being a "story" in my eyes, even if there were thing in there that I agreed & disagreed with. The Darth Vader/Bob George voice never bothered me either. I saw him as a Narrator of the story.
One thing I got to add is that I have to be in the mood to listen to this CD. There are only 1 or 2 songs I can listen to on there own but it's so much beter to hear it in one shot. I get the full effect with it. I always knew after hearing it that the CD was going to have a love/hate thing going on and boy oh boy did it ever. No other Prince CD has gotten the response of both extremes in such a big way before or since. That right there is a major accomplishment. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PEJ said: stanleylieber said: it's not the preaching per se, it's the content of the preaching. 'lovesexy's' lyrical content doesn't offend me.
I like the preaching cuz to me it ain't preaching its just telling it how he sees it. BTW I am not by any means a JW not even if he came to my front door. and that's the bottom line right there ..because one's spirtial plane doesn't mesh with another's then the whole "preaching" aspect comes 2 it. i find it funny that some will say the "preaching" on lovesexy they don't mind but on TRC they do. contridictions r abundant. and 4 the record..I LOVE THIS ALBUM from beginning 2 end man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I really enjoy this album's musicality. The deep voice is amusing to me and totally 'Prince universe'. I like the way he's telling a story about Mani's 'ascension' to his throne and his sort of explanation for why he was with her '1+1+1 is 3' & 'She loves me for me'. I like the weirdness and jazziness, the romance and religion, the refreshing and silliness (Wedding Feast). It all fits together for a nice experience. I must add that Last December is both beautiful and badass!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: The Rainbow Children was the first Prince CD that I was scared to buy. I had heard so many differing reports about the CD from the Celebration in June that year up until it came out and I had never heard so many different and opposing opinions about 1 CD, let alone a Prince CD. I didn't know what to expect. I just knew that I had to go into it with an open mind. After hearing it the 1st time that night, I thought, "Man this CD is weird but cool" and I hadn't felt that way about a Prince CD since Lovesexy, which took over 10 years for me to love. I kept on playing it and I realized that it was a great album. It's not my absolute favorite as there are other before and since that I love more but it's in my top 15 Prince CD's. I've always looked at TRC as a story not to be taken literally or personally. Funny thing for me is that it took 2 years after the CD came out for me to see the JW stuff in there but it still didn't take away from it being a "story" in my eyes, even if there were thing in there that I agreed & disagreed with. The Darth Vader/Bob George voice never bothered me either. I saw him as a Narrator of the story.
One thing I got to add is that I have to be in the mood to listen to this CD. There are only 1 or 2 songs I can listen to on there own but it's so much beter to hear it in one shot. I get the full effect with it. I always knew after hearing it that the CD was going to have a love/hate thing going on and boy oh boy did it ever. No other Prince CD has gotten the response of both extremes in such a big way before or since. That right there is a major accomplishment. Are you surprised it's my favorite of the Decade?! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |