independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Pharrell Williams Responds To Controversy Over Native American Headdress
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 6 123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/07/14 11:10am

Beautifulstarr
123

avatar

Pharrell Williams Responds To Controversy Over Native American Headdress

Pharrell Williams Responds to Controversy Over Native American Headdress

06/05/2014 at 10:15 AM EDT

Pharrell Williams in Native American Headdress: Singer Responds to Controversy
Pharrell Williams on the cover of Elle U.K.

The singer and producer has incited a slew of angry Tweets and online criticism after he was photographed wearing a Native American headdress on the cover of U.K.'sElle.

A post on the magazine's website states that the "Happy" singer "has never looked so good," but some are outraged over what they call the misappropriation of Native American culture.

Interestingly, in 2012 Williams told Oprahmagazine in South Africa that his family tree included Native American lineage.

But the Grammy winner, 41 – who's better known for wearing an enormous vintage Vivienne Westwood hat – released a statement on Wednesday in response to the controversy.

"I respect and honor every kind of race, background and culture," he said, according to the New York Daily News. "I am genuinely sorry."


http://www.people.com/article/pharrell-williams-native-american-headdress-statement

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/07/14 11:42am

SoulAlive

This is so silly.Nowadays,every little thing becomes a big "controversy" and a group of people become offended bored Pharrell wore a Indian headdress on a magazine cover...wow!! Is this really worth making a big deal over?!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/07/14 1:13pm

getfunked

avatar

SoulAlive, the issue is that he's appropriating an aspect of a culture for fashion. Basically reducing it to an accessory. It is an issue because ignoring it is the same as condoning it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/07/14 1:24pm

SoulAlive

getfunked said:

SoulAlive, the issue is that he's appropriating an aspect of a culture for fashion. Basically reducing it to an accessory. It is an issue because ignoring it is the same as condoning it.

It was for a magazine photo shoot.He wasn't trying to offend anyone,or pretend that he's Indian.People are too uptight these days...always complaining about something bored

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/07/14 1:39pm

getfunked

avatar

None of what you said discounts that it's still appropriation for fashion. And it's not just 'being uptight and complaining', it's about people who are asking for respect for their culture, for it not to be treated as a gag. Maybe you should look into the whole issue going on with the Washington Redskins football team at the moment.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/07/14 1:45pm

SoulAlive

on Halloween,people wear costumes...is that offensive too? rolleyes

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/07/14 1:49pm

getfunked

avatar

Yes, if the outfit is appropriating an aspect of a culture then it is offensive. Have a read: http://www.cbc.ca/news/ab...-1.2667315

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/07/14 2:03pm

SeventeenDayze

He has a new album out and is more or less touring.....ever consider that this is a publicity stunt?

Trolls be gone!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/07/14 2:13pm

Beautifulstarr
123

avatar

There's an Native American writer from the HuffPost who has given a more detailed breakdown as to why is this offensive that Pharrell is doing to some Natives. Here's the link. I think it is interesting.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gyasi-/pharell-williams-headdresses_b_5449926.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/07/14 2:23pm

Beautifulstarr
123

avatar

getfunked said:

None of what you said discounts that it's still appropriation for fashion. And it's not just 'being uptight and complaining', it's about people who are asking for respect for their culture, for it not to be treated as a gag. Maybe you should look into the whole issue going on with the Washington Redskins football team at the moment.

The owner refused to change the name, but I digress.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/07/14 2:33pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

SoulAlive said:

on Halloween,people wear costumes...is that offensive too? rolleyes

You must forgot that CBS had issued an apology to Native Americans a few years ago for this performance on The Grammys after complaints and a threat to boycott the network, which was not long after Janet Jackson's Superbowl controversy. The Superbowl was also on CBS.

[Edited 6/7/14 14:34pm]

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/07/14 4:10pm

Shawy89

avatar

This is bullcrap. Report websites are so itching for a field day whenever a magazine cover comes out.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/07/14 4:26pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

I understand the issue at hand that Native American's are taking with this. I really do. However, I don't see that Pharrell was trying to disrepect their heritage and culture based on what I see from that picture. Mind you, I haven't seen the rest of the article nor photo shoot...as of yet.

With that being said...I've seen Pharrell Williams in a whole lot of different headdress and I've never seen him wearing anything that ever suited him so well. It is my hope and wish that this "controversy" can become a teaching and learning moment that educates us all on the heritage and culture of Native Americans that's been sorely lacking in our public discourse, for far too long.

[Edited 6/7/14 16:26pm]

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/07/14 5:01pm

beatz01

Gawd.The U.S. and all that hyped up political correctness.That "Native American Headdress" has been part of children costumes since like, what..70 years or longer ?!

And suddenly it's supposed to be inappropriate ?

Because he is no native american ? But if he had just a little tiny drop of native blood in him then it suddenly would be ok ? How big or small has that drop to be then in order for him to get approval to wear that headdress ?

People need to learn to get over "race" as a concept.They should also get over the idea that a certain "culture" exclusively belongs to a certain "race".

Really, it's 2014.C'mon.

.

[Edited 6/7/14 17:04pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/07/14 5:44pm

getfunked

avatar

Shawy89 said:

This is bullcrap. Report websites are so itching for a field day whenever a magazine cover comes out.

Doesn't discount the issue one bit.

beatz01 said:

Gawd.The U.S. and all that hyped up political correctness.That "Native American Headdress" has been part of children costumes since like, what..70 years or longer ?!

And suddenly it's supposed to be inappropriate ?

Because he is no native american ? But if he had just a little tiny drop of native blood in him then it suddenly would be ok ? How big or small has that drop to be then in order for him to get approval to wear that headdress ?

People need to learn to get over "race" as a concept.They should also get over the idea that a certain "culture" exclusively belongs to a certain "race".

Really, it's 2014.C'mon.

.

[Edited 6/7/14 17:04pm]



Not sure what you're trying to "say" by writing "words" like "this". Maybe you should educate yourself on the Native American culture before making such ignorant remarks. It doesn't matter wether he has Native American heritage or not because the war bonnet is meant to be worn only during ceremony. You have google at your disposal. Really, it's 2014. C'mon.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/07/14 6:00pm

SeventeenDayze

getfunked said:

Shawy89 said:

This is bullcrap. Report websites are so itching for a field day whenever a magazine cover comes out.

Doesn't discount the issue one bit.

beatz01 said:

Gawd.The U.S. and all that hyped up political correctness.That "Native American Headdress" has been part of children costumes since like, what..70 years or longer ?!

And suddenly it's supposed to be inappropriate ?

Because he is no native american ? But if he had just a little tiny drop of native blood in him then it suddenly would be ok ? How big or small has that drop to be then in order for him to get approval to wear that headdress ?

People need to learn to get over "race" as a concept.They should also get over the idea that a certain "culture" exclusively belongs to a certain "race".

Really, it's 2014.C'mon.

.

[Edited 6/7/14 17:04pm]



Not sure what you're trying to "say" by writing "words" like "this". Maybe you should educate yourself on the Native American culture before making such ignorant remarks. It doesn't matter wether he has Native American heritage or not because the war bonnet is meant to be worn only during ceremony. You have google at your disposal. Really, it's 2014. C'mon.

This kinda of reminds me of Johnny Depp making headlines when The Long Ranger movie was released and Johnny Depp was letting anyone and everyone know that he has Native American heritage....

Trolls be gone!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/07/14 6:55pm

aardvark15

Fingers crossed he's joining The Village People

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/07/14 9:48pm

SoulAlive

getfunked said:

Yes, if the outfit is appropriating an aspect of a culture then it is offensive. Have a read: http://www.cbc.ca/news/ab...-1.2667315



And yet,on Halloween,a person could put on a headdress and it's no big deal.People need to stop being so sensitive.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/08/14 7:13am

babynoz

Elle Cover = stupid, shallow, vapid and pointless. Doesn't anybody have a little imagination and creativity anymore?

When I saw the cover my first thought was "is there a point"? If not then why do it?

I thought maybe it was a story about him having an obsession with headgear or something....then at least it would have made sense.

Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 06/08/14 3:37pm

thesoulbrother

avatar

I don't know... maybe it's just me and I don't see what the problem is. We've all have gotten so PC nowadays and I don't get it. Everything is a controversy and I say it time and time again: We get pissed about the wrong things! Everyone wants to forgive Justin Bieber for saying the N-word but Paula Deen's career was ruined. It's like people pick and choose what to be upset over. The man wore an Indian head piece. What was so controversial about that? And hell, Felipe Rose has made an entire career dressed as an Indian and no one ever called him out for that! Granted, he says he's Indian but Pharrell could've said the same thing. Goodness.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 06/08/14 4:31pm

scorp84

People have to pick their battles wisely. This is Not one of them...

I can't lie. When I saw Miley Cyrus gyrating in that Jordan jersey, I (along with my childhood self) was quite offended. That's just plain wrong.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 06/08/14 4:43pm

getxxxx

avatar

scorp84 said:

People have to pick their battles wisely. This is Not one of them...

Agree 100% he is not the first artist to rock the head gear and wont be the last... Jay Kay from Jamiroquai is always wearing them and not a peep from Native Americans. Goes to get my head gear and dare someone to say something about it to me.

[Edited 6/8/14 16:45pm]

Nick Ashford was someone I greatly admired, had the honor of knowing, and was the real-life inspiration for Cowboy Curtis' hair. RIP Nick. - Pee Wee Herman
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 06/08/14 4:47pm

thisisreece

getxxxx said:

scorp84 said:

People have to pick their battles wisely. This is Not one of them...

Agree 100% he is not the first artist to rock the head gear and wont be the last... Jay Kay from Jamiroquai is always wearing them and not a peep from Native Americans. Goes to get my head gear and dare someone to say something about it to me.

[Edited 6/8/14 16:45pm]

yeahthat

Hundalasiliah!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 06/08/14 4:54pm

getxxxx

avatar

Nick Ashford was someone I greatly admired, had the honor of knowing, and was the real-life inspiration for Cowboy Curtis' hair. RIP Nick. - Pee Wee Herman
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 06/08/14 7:04pm

babynoz

scorp84 said:

People have to pick their battles wisely. This is Not one of them... I can't lie. When I saw Miley Cyrus gyrating in that Jordan jersey, I (along with my childhood self) was quite offended. That's just plain wrong.


That was heap big funny... lol

I don't find it particularly offensive, just silly. I can't figure out why somebody thought it was a good idea.

Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 06/08/14 7:14pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

Native Americans Upset With OutKast

Today

By Indian Country Today commentary
updated 2/14/2004 4:52:56 PM
.

Oneida Nation Homelands - Hip hoppers OutKast insulted American Indians with their show-ending performance on the Grammy broadcast Sunday night, and CBS allowed it. Both share culpability for a production number that reinforced stereotypes and undermined all of the good work being done in the entertainment industry to embrace and promote diversity and unify all people through music.

.

"The Oneida Indian Nation believes that music has the power to unite people and celebrate the diversity that is the strength of America," said Chuck Fougnier, Wolf Clan Representative to the Nation’s Men’s Council and chairman of the Nation’s charitable foundation. "Performances like OutKast’s during Sunday’s Grammy broadcast undermine the entertainment industry’s dedication to diversity and use racial stereotypes in a hurtful way."

.

At the end of the program, OutKast performed their hit "Hey Ya" against a backdrop of a futuristic Indian teepee. Singer Andre "3000" Benjamin came out in a headdress accompanied by scantily-clad dancers with feathers in their hair. These may have been costumes to OutKast and the producers of the show, but to American Indians they were the latest in a long line of insults, caricatures drawn from history.

.

CBS required Justin Timberlake to once again apologize for his role in the Super Bowl halftime show that ended in singer Janet Jackson exposing a breast. The network even installed a five-minute broadcast delay to ensure against anything similar happening during the Grammy broadcast. Yet, CBS had no problem with a production number that lampooned American Indians.

.

"One would hope that OutKast would be sensitive to the racial concerns of others," said Fougnier. "But we absolutely expect CBS to be aware and to act to ensure such hurtful images are not broadcast."

.

Ironically, the Oneida Nation sponsored a major Grammy-related event before the broadcast. The Oneida Indian Nation Foundation raised $10,000 for Oneness, a music industry organization promoting diversity

.

CBS apologizes for OutKast performance

Some saw Indian-themed number as racist

Monday, February 16, 2004 - CNN

.

LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) --CBS television issued a new round of apologies, this time for any offense taken at the American Indian-motif Grammy Awards performance by the hip-hop group OutKast that some Native Americans have condemned as racist.

.

The San Francisco-based Native American Cultural Center posted a notice on its Web site last week calling for a boycott of CBS, OutKast's label Arista Records, and the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, which sponsors the Grammys.

.

"It was the most disgusting set of racial stereotypes aimed at American Indians that I have ever seen on TV," NACC board member Sean Freitas said in the online statement. "It was on par with white people dancing sexually in black face, or yarmulkes ... I am shocked and outraged."

NACC Chair Andrew Brother Elk said he has lodged a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission over the telecast, which he branded as "racist TV programming."

.

A little more than two weeks ago, CBS came under fire from the FCC for the breast-baring Super Bowl halftime performance by Janet Jackson on the Viacom Inc.-owned network.

"We are very sorry if anyone was offended," CBS spokeswoman Nancy Carr said when asked about the NACC boycott. She declined to comment further.

.

The performance in question came near the end of the Grammy telecast last Sunday night, as OutKast singer Andre "3000" Benjamin, dressed as a Native American, led a show-stopping dance number built around the hit song "Hey Ya!"

.

The piece opened with the sound of drums and smoke wafting from a teepee-shaped structure before a group of female dancers emerged to bump and grind in skimpy, fringed costumes, braided hair and feathered headdresses. They were accompanied on stage by members of a university marching band.

.

Benjamin told reporters backstage afterward that the number was meant as an American Indian-inspired performance.

.

OutKast went home with three Grammys that night, including the coveted prize of best album for its hit double-CD release "Speakerboxxx/The Love Below."

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 06/08/14 7:19pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 06/08/14 8:04pm

Arbwyth

avatar

Beautifulstarr123 said:

There's an Native American writer from the HuffPost who has given a more detailed breakdown as to why is this offensive that Pharrell is doing to some Natives. Here's the link. I think it is interesting.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gyasi-/pharell-williams-headdresses_b_5449926.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

.

Since it's looking like nobody on here is actually going to go to that link, I'll quote one of the most important parts:

.

"Native people utilize headdresses as one of our highest honors, reserved for those select few people who did something so valorous and special -- oftentimes in battle, fighting off genocide -- that we must identify them by putting pieces of the soaring eagle on their head.

.

It is reserved for those special individuals. Exclusively.

.

It's not simply a matter of being "Native" either. It's not that simple. MOST Natives will never earn the right to wear a headdress."


The fact that it appears nobody else on this thread is aware of this is an example of exactly WHY it's problematic to cheapen the headdress in the way pop culture has. And no, it's not appropriate to wear it as a Halloween costume, either. The problem isn't PC culture, as some here with no knowledge of American Indian culture are claiming. The "problem" is that in the Internet era, there's no excuse for not educating yourselves when these issues come up. The other problem is that people are now apparently too lazy to offer basic respect to other human beings; that's usually the real issue when people complain about everything being PC -- it's just that those individuals find it too inconvenient to offer basic respect to other human beings. Because that's what this is about. Basic respect. If you were raised to be respectful, to not be rude, well, this is simply an extension of that.

[Edited 6/8/14 20:05pm]

And I see all of your creations as one perfect complex
No one less beautiful
Or more special than the next
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 06/08/14 8:09pm

Beautifulstarr
123

avatar

babynoz said:

scorp84 said:

People have to pick their battles wisely. This is Not one of them... I can't lie. When I saw Miley Cyrus gyrating in that Jordan jersey, I (along with my childhood self) was quite offended. That's just plain wrong.


That was heap big funny... lol

I don't find it particularly offensive, just silly. I can't figure out why somebody thought it was a good idea.

The look on Will Smith and family's face was priceless lol

I think sometimes when someone portray something that they're not, they become the butt of the joke, as long as they're not mocking some tramatic event, such as genocide or slavery. However, I guess that most of the Natives decided that enough is enough of mocking something that is sacred to their culture, because to wear a headdress, it means the highest honor, something not every Native American can wear.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 06/08/14 8:15pm

Beautifulstarr
123

avatar

Arbwyth said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

There's an Native American writer from the HuffPost who has given a more detailed breakdown as to why is this offensive that Pharrell is doing to some Natives. Here's the link. I think it is interesting.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gyasi-/pharell-williams-headdresses_b_5449926.html?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&ir=Black+Voices

.

Since it's looking like nobody on here is actually going to go to that link, I'll quote one of the most important parts:

.

"Native people utilize headdresses as one of our highest honors, reserved for those select few people who did something so valorous and special -- oftentimes in battle, fighting off genocide -- that we must identify them by putting pieces of the soaring eagle on their head.

.

It is reserved for those special individuals. Exclusively.

.

It's not simply a matter of being "Native" either. It's not that simple. MOST Natives will never earn the right to wear a headdress."


The fact that it appears nobody else on this thread is aware of this is an example of exactly WHY it's problematic to cheapen the headdress in the way pop culture has. And no, it's not appropriate to wear it as a Halloween costume, either. The problem isn't PC culture, as some here with no knowledge of American Indian culture are claiming. The "problem" is that in the Internet era, there's no excuse for not educating yourselves when these issues come up. The other problem is that people are now apparently too lazy to offer basic respect to other human beings; that's usually the real issue when people complain about everything being PC -- it's just that those individuals find it too inconvenient to offer basic respect to other human beings. Because that's what this is about. Basic respect. If you were raised to be respectful, to not be rude, well, this is simply an extension of that.

[Edited 6/8/14 20:05pm]

They say ignorance is bliss, but you're right: there's is no legitimate excuse to be ignorant, if I'm making sense here.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 6 123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Pharrell Williams Responds To Controversy Over Native American Headdress