independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Right Now The Jackson Brothers On the Today Show
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 10 <12345678910>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 12/05/09 10:34am

mimi07

avatar

MOL said:

whatsgoingon said:



I so agree with this. I do believe if MJ remained closer to his family, professionally and emotionally, half of the crap that happened in the last 20 years of his life wouldn't have happened. MJ legendary status was sealed in the first 20 years of his career and for most of that time he was still part of the Jacksons, even when he was producing stuff like OTW and Thriller.

I don't believe that all his family were just out for his money, there was obvious love for him too. Having said that it is obvious that some members of his family ie, Daddy dearest, saw him as a cash cow and therefore I can understand why he distanced himself from his family. So many things became alot clearer after his death.


And what about this:

Michael wanted to do more solo albums. By 1980, after OTW, he wanted to record another solo album. He was young and fresh. He wasn't being attacked by the media yet and his superstar status didn't touch the sky. Critics didn't demand perfection from him, so he could concentrate 100% on his music. That's why he was prolific and made great music. He would've mantained an even healthier career without his brothers. To claim his brothers are the reason behind his success would be laughable if it wasn't so ridiculous. The family didn't even want him to go solo! Joe and Jermaine did everything they could to stop Thriller from being released. Remember Jermaine telling Michael that Thriller was a bunch of junk? Remember Joe's studio outbursts?

He lost his work ethic because he didn't have proper guidance at home. Because as he grew as an artist, his brothers' jealously and his father's greedyness increased, also grew. He lost his work ethic because he lost his love for the music businness. He was, by then, the biggest star the world had ever known and the media waited for him with forks and knifes. His family saw him as an object and Michael knew it. He was denial, but the fact is that he knew that even his own family didn't give two craps about him. Michael traumas hit him as was expected. He started seeing everyone's true colours and a battle inside his own head started.

Imagine the Jacksons didn't exist in Michae's life. He would have a loving family who wouldn't torture him all his life. He would eventually have a normal childhood and feel loved. His home life wouldn't be a circus (research about life with the Jacksons in Hayvenhurst) and he would be a down-to-earth person. There would be no scandals and, certainly, no early deaths. So, I totally disagree with you: Michael's career and personal life would be hailed as an example. But his family messed everything up. The man had traumas and was always sad. Did he traumatize himself? No. Is there a reason as to why he was always said? Yes. Imagine you had the Jacksons as a family. Imagine your family was your biggest enemy.



To sum up, Michael would have been BIGGER and BETTER without his crappy family.

There's a reason as to why he died first: because he was perceived as the family's object and he knew it. Put yourself in his place. In the MJ land truth is stranger than fiction and there's an undeniable fact: the guy's family certainly contribute to that stranger than fiction truth.


Michael to LMP: "I wonder what is it like to be loved by my family without them thinking in what they want me to do for them next."

Get why he died first? Because he was the object which was used by everybody without decency.



where do i even begin...

michael was memeber of a group. he was the most important member but he wasn't the entire group. they needed him more than he needed them but michael enjoyed performing he said himself he liked all the brother being together and when they started going off and getting married and stuff it hurt him. u make it seem like he was a prisoner.

michael did say joe tricked him into signing a contract and forced him to sign stuff when he was a young adult but where did u hear the stories about jermaine calling thriller trash? and joe in the studio? u need to specify ur sources when u make such claims. you seriously sound like a lunatic fan who thinks they're an insider...have u lived in the jackson house? when is the last time u talked to one of them?

and the heck do u mean michael lost his work ethic? michael learned from the best musicians in the studio and sorry to break it to u but without the jacksons michael wouldn't exist so keep dreaming about the perfect family he'd never have.

michael always said he never lost his love for music so idk where ur getting this info and the last time i checked basically everyone who has met michael has said he's very down to earth.

what is ur point with all this, no family is perfect and the fact that their lives are magnified doesn't help. we know there is alot of drama and it's hard to tell fact from fiction. i'm sure some family members are or did use him and pressured him and made him feel like an object and stuff but at the end of the day michael is their brother and they're the one with the bigger loss than you. there is no point bashing a grieving family.
[Edited 12/5/09 10:36am]
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 12/05/09 10:39am

bboy87

avatar

Michael started doing the "4 years between each album" because he chose to do it that way. He said he wanted every album to be like an event or an era and wanted each project to have it's own time
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 12/05/09 11:16am

MOL

Michael wanted to perform ALONE during the Off The Wall and Thriller eras. CBS record's president stated, many times, that Michael told him that he wanted to separate himself from his brothers. He no longer wanted to be part of the Jacksons...he wanted to be Michael Jackson, according to him. Michael didn't want to do the Victory Tour, but mama Katie begged him while the other Jacksons made his life a living hell.

Michael was, in fact, a prisioner of his family. Psychological pressure made him a prisioner. In fact, it's not that hard to see that the man was manipulated by everyone.

Read Latoya's first half of the book (the one which was written by her) and some questions will be answered.

Michael wouldn't exist without the Jacksons? That's a coward argument. So, we should all dismiss Joe Jackson's abusive behaviour, because he and Katherine "made" Michael?

"when is the last time u talked to one of them?"- I'm superior. I refuse to talk to a broke-amoral-women-beater-deadbeat-dad-sex-addict-greedy person.

MJ didn't lose his love for music, but he certainly lost his love for the music business, don't you think?
Down-to-earth? Come on! This is getting ridiculous. Have you ever seen Michael's face? Did you see him spending millions at some supermarket? Did you see what he did to his nose? The man said he liked sleeping with children, damnit! I love Michael, but he was NOT down-to-earth. He was humble, gentle, loving, kind and naive...but down-to-earth...!!!?

The family is highly dysfunctional. Period.
They are not even fighting for justice. They totally ignore the coroner's report and Michael's constant pain (due to lupus) and insomnia. They choose to just say he was popping pills. Why? They never mention. When? They also don't mention. They claim they tried an intervention? When? They don't mention. They make it seem that Michael died a junkie and spent his days in a dark room popping pills. They have been helping Conrad Murray! They refuse to acknowledge the coroner's report and choose to call him an addict.
[Edited 12/5/09 11:18am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 12/05/09 11:31am

MOL

Posts from KOP forum:

I personally do not feel that Michael hated his family but I think he had very conflicted feelings about his family and I think in large measure they saw and still see him as a money machine. I compare the jacksons with the kennedys. You do not see the kennedy family all over on television talking about any of the gossip or rumors that have surrounded their family for decades. The reason being is they know that all the media wants to do is tear them down. I do not understand why the Jacksons cannot abide by this rule. I am not saying they cannot promote their stuff but do not add to the negative image that the media wants to keep up about Michael. Nobody in his family has mentioned his illnesses or accidents which caused him pain and have ignored the coroner's report. The lapd is not ever going to arrest Murray because no one is demanding an arrest. They have enough evidence right now to arrest that man but they won't. I just wish the family could put the same energy they do in promoting their projects into putting Murray behind bars. Also, I am not against the whole family but some of them just seem to be helping the media and Murray's defense.

Excellent post.. Not one of them has mentioned MJ's pain, his 3rd degree burns, the media scrutinity, the trials the lawsuits etc.. If he was taking painkillers I can't say I blame him one bit. The man was constantly being tortured of course there was pain.. Not one of them has mentioned the shows and how he was rehearsing for them at all. Listening to his younger sister, one would think MJ had been at home for months and months popping pills in a dark room closedeyes.gif No one has ever cleared anything up or defended MJ at all. They are too focused on their careers and are not even fighting for MJ, instead they're giving Murray freedom and a defense to bat.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 12/05/09 12:53pm

thatruth

This is one of the reasons why I can't stand being around some Jackson fans, because they think they know every fuckin thing about Michael that they can talk bullshit about the family.

Listen, I sure that Michael had his beef with a few of the family members in the past, including his father, as well as creative differences which is totally understandable, but that's all I can say. To speculate that Michael wanted to be completely separated from his family and the family is dysfunctional, who the fuck are you and where do you get your info. If you say books from Jermaine's ex and Latoya, or Stacy Brown, I'm going to laugh in your face.

I don't know shit so I'm not going to get on here and act like I know the family and Michael so well that this and that happened while he was alive.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 12/05/09 1:01pm

MOL

thatruth said:

This is one of the reasons why I can't stand being around some Jackson fans, because they think they know every fuckin thing about Michael that they can talk bullshit about the family.

Listen, I sure that Michael had his beef with a few of the family members in the past, including his father, as well as creative differences which is totally understandable, but that's all I can say. To speculate that Michael wanted to be completely separated from his family and the family is dysfunctional, who the fuck are you and where do you get your info. If you say books from Jermaine's ex and Latoya, or Stacy Brown, I'm going to laugh in your face.

I don't know shit so I'm not going to get on here and act like I know the family and Michael so well that this and that happened while he was alive.


There are known facts: Jermaine refused to pay child support (court appearances 2007), Randy didn't know how many kids he had (court appearances 1994), Randy abused his wife (ended up going to jail for some months), Jermaine married Randy's ex, most of them filled for bankrupcy...

Just by reading this...don't you think it's impossible to deny that the family is dysfunctional? And I just used KNOWN FACTS.
[Edited 12/5/09 13:02pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 12/06/09 2:37am

Girl4both

avatar

smile
[Edited 12/6/09 2:38am]
I'm in the mood for love...simply because your near me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 12/06/09 2:38am

Girl4both

avatar

bboy87 said:

midiscover said:



lol

What does she look like?

This is her in '73 when she and Jackie first got married


she passed away in 1997 sad



I know that Jermaine has been married three times? and I know that Marlon is married, but I wonder why Jackie and Tito never got remarried? I know they divorced their wives (well their wives divorced them) and their wives are both deceased.
I'm in the mood for love...simply because your near me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 12/06/09 3:38am

Arnotts

thatruth said:

This is one of the reasons why I can't stand being around some Jackson fans, because they think they know every fuckin thing about Michael that they can talk bullshit about the family.

Listen, I sure that Michael had his beef with a few of the family members in the past, including his father, as well as creative differences which is totally understandable, but that's all I can say. To speculate that Michael wanted to be completely separated from his family and the family is dysfunctional, who the fuck are you and where do you get your info. If you say books from Jermaine's ex and Latoya, or Stacy Brown, I'm going to laugh in your face.

Actually even though I think MOL is a bit overzealous, Michael has repeated many things Latoya said in her book in those conversations with Glenda and Rabbi Shmuley, things that werent common knowledge or mentioned in public before, which is why I believe Latoyas book. And also the ex wife of Jermaines book has also got rare stories that coincide with Latoyas book, so I really think those two books in particular have much more truth to them than alot of fans are willing to believe.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 12/06/09 4:03am

whatsgoingon

avatar

MOL said:

Michael wanted to perform ALONE during the Off The Wall and Thriller eras. CBS record's president stated, many times, that Michael told him that he wanted to separate himself from his brothers. He no longer wanted to be part of the Jacksons...he wanted to be Michael Jackson, according to him. Michael didn't want to do the Victory Tour, but mama Katie begged him while the other Jacksons made his life a living hell.

Michael was, in fact, a prisioner of his family. Psychological pressure made him a prisioner. In fact, it's not that hard to see that the man was manipulated by everyone.

Read Latoya's first half of the book (the one which was written by her) and some questions will be answered.

Michael wouldn't exist without the Jacksons? That's a coward argument. So, we should all dismiss Joe Jackson's abusive behaviour, because he and Katherine "made" Michael?

"when is the last time u talked to one of them?"- I'm superior. I refuse to talk to a broke-amoral-women-beater-deadbeat-dad-sex-addict-greedy person.

MJ didn't lose his love for music, but he certainly lost his love for the music business, don't you think?
Down-to-earth? Come on! This is getting ridiculous. Have you ever seen Michael's face? Did you see him spending millions at some supermarket? Did you see what he did to his nose? The man said he liked sleeping with children, damnit! I love Michael, but he was NOT down-to-earth. He was humble, gentle, loving, kind and naive...but down-to-earth...!!!?

The family is highly dysfunctional. Period.
They are not even fighting for justice. They totally ignore the coroner's report and Michael's constant pain (due to lupus) and insomnia. They choose to just say he was popping pills. Why? They never mention. When? They also don't mention. They claim they tried an intervention? When? They don't mention. They make it seem that Michael died a junkie and spent his days in a dark room popping pills. They have been helping Conrad Murray! They refuse to acknowledge the coroner's report and choose to call him an addict.
[Edited 12/5/09 11:18am]


What are you smoking? I don't care for some of his family either, some of them certainly saw him as a cash cow but I ain't going to dismiss his whole family. MJ was at his most proactive whilst he was still with his brothers, the albums which he made between 78 to 82, solo and as part of the Jacksons, are arguably the best albums he ever did.

When he finally did go solo after Victory he became less active with his music, taking years to produced one album which was never quite up the standard of his previous work, imo. His family hurt him in many ways but at the same time they also probably inspired him and he did some of his very best work with them.

True, Jermaine should look after his own family & what Joe Jackson did to MJ and his brothers whilst children was unforgiveable but at the end of the day MJ legacy did not start with Thriller and end with Invincible. It started with him being part of a group with his brothers and without those early years I doubt there would have been such a legacy.

The family are dysfunctional and MJ was part of the dysfunction. MJ was accused of abusing little boys, twice and his own lifestyle didn't help matters. So if you are going to go on about Jermain and Randy crimes you might as well as talk about MJ's alleged crimes, which were far worse. You can quote Latoya's book all you want but this was the same Latoya who accused her brother of being pedo!!
[Edited 12/6/09 4:09am]
[Edited 12/6/09 4:20am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 12/06/09 5:08am

MOL



The family are dysfunctional and MJ was part of the dysfunction. MJ was accused of abusing little boys, twice and his own lifestyle didn't help matters. So if you are going to go on about Jermain and Randy crimes you might as well as talk about MJ's alleged crimes, which were far worse. You can quote Latoya's book all you want but this was the same Latoya who accused her brother of being pedo!!
[Edited 12/6/09 4:09am]
[Edited 12/6/09 4:20am]

But he was not a paedophile, so that's not a reasonable argument! Read the evidence. While the court ruled that the brothers were deadbeat dads, Michael was acquited. In fact, all he did was help the families who later accused him, something the brothers would never do, since they didn't even bother helping their own kids. Michael got in trouble because he was too naive and good to too many people while his brothers were totally amoral. Did you even know that Michael was the only family member who would ask his brothers' ex-wives how were theirs kids doing?
The brothers would NEVER help a kid with cancer! That's what Michael did all the time and guess what? He was unfairly accused of raping one of those kids. Guess why he was accused? Had he been a I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-anyone-but-me-sex-addict and he would never have gotten in trouble. Had Michael been an evil guy like papa and his brothers and he would have never got in trouble. But he preferred to do charity work and help needy kids around the world...needy kids with greedy papas and got in trouble. To even claim Michael is as horrible or worse than his brothers is ridiculous. He got in trouble because he was way too good to too many people, something that the brothers never were, are or will be.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 12/06/09 5:51am

MOL


You can quote Latoya's book all you want but this was the same Latoya who accused her brother of being pedo!!
[Edited 12/6/09 4:09am]
[Edited 12/6/09 4:20am]

Latoya's words about Joe coincide with Michael's and Margaret's. Latoya's words about Michael-the-nasty-pedo don't even coincide with Victoria's, Marlon daughter! Get why do I quote Latoya's words about big ole teddy bear Joe? They coincide with everyone's!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 12/06/09 6:38am

whatsgoingon

avatar

MOL said:



The family are dysfunctional and MJ was part of the dysfunction. MJ was accused of abusing little boys, twice and his own lifestyle didn't help matters. So if you are going to go on about Jermain and Randy crimes you might as well as talk about MJ's alleged crimes, which were far worse. You can quote Latoya's book all you want but this was the same Latoya who accused her brother of being pedo!!
[Edited 12/6/09 4:09am]
[Edited 12/6/09 4:20am]

But he was not a paedophile, so that's not a reasonable argument! Read the evidence. While the court ruled that the brothers were deadbeat dads, Michael was acquited. In fact, all he did was help the families who later accused him, something the brothers would never do, since they didn't even bother helping their own kids. Michael got in trouble because he was too naive and good to too many people while his brothers were totally amoral. Did you even know that Michael was the only family member who would ask his brothers' ex-wives how were theirs kids doing?
The brothers would NEVER help a kid with cancer! That's what Michael did all the time and guess what? He was unfairly accused of raping one of those kids. Guess why he was accused? Had he been a I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-anyone-but-me-sex-addict and he would never have gotten in trouble. Had Michael been an evil guy like papa and his brothers and he would have never got in trouble. But he preferred to do charity work and help needy kids around the world...needy kids with greedy papas and got in trouble. To even claim Michael is as horrible or worse than his brothers is ridiculous. He got in trouble because he was way too good to too many people, something that the brothers never were, are or will be.


That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 12/06/09 6:57am

Arnotts

whatsgoingon said:

MOL said:


But he was not a paedophile, so that's not a reasonable argument! Read the evidence. While the court ruled that the brothers were deadbeat dads, Michael was acquited. In fact, all he did was help the families who later accused him, something the brothers would never do, since they didn't even bother helping their own kids. Michael got in trouble because he was too naive and good to too many people while his brothers were totally amoral. Did you even know that Michael was the only family member who would ask his brothers' ex-wives how were theirs kids doing?
The brothers would NEVER help a kid with cancer! That's what Michael did all the time and guess what? He was unfairly accused of raping one of those kids. Guess why he was accused? Had he been a I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-anyone-but-me-sex-addict and he would never have gotten in trouble. Had Michael been an evil guy like papa and his brothers and he would have never got in trouble. But he preferred to do charity work and help needy kids around the world...needy kids with greedy papas and got in trouble. To even claim Michael is as horrible or worse than his brothers is ridiculous. He got in trouble because he was way too good to too many people, something that the brothers never were, are or will be.


That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.

I get the same vibe from Rebbie that I get from Katherine. Passive, over-religious, enabler type. But I'm definitley not blind to the fact the Michael added his own share to the family dysfunction, but I just think people tend to give passes to the more hidden, less controversial members of the family. Like people tend to believe Jermaine over Michael and Janet over Latoya (when I say that I mean people who dont know much about the family, the general public) because they come across as more 'sane'.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 12/06/09 7:07am

MOL

whatsgoingon said:

MOL said:


But he was not a paedophile, so that's not a reasonable argument! Read the evidence. While the court ruled that the brothers were deadbeat dads, Michael was acquited. In fact, all he did was help the families who later accused him, something the brothers would never do, since they didn't even bother helping their own kids. Michael got in trouble because he was too naive and good to too many people while his brothers were totally amoral. Did you even know that Michael was the only family member who would ask his brothers' ex-wives how were theirs kids doing?
The brothers would NEVER help a kid with cancer! That's what Michael did all the time and guess what? He was unfairly accused of raping one of those kids. Guess why he was accused? Had he been a I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-anyone-but-me-sex-addict and he would never have gotten in trouble. Had Michael been an evil guy like papa and his brothers and he would have never got in trouble. But he preferred to do charity work and help needy kids around the world...needy kids with greedy papas and got in trouble. To even claim Michael is as horrible or worse than his brothers is ridiculous. He got in trouble because he was way too good to too many people, something that the brothers never were, are or will be.


That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.
Still- and I never denied Michael was bizarre- Michael was A MUCH BETTER person than all his brothers put together, whether you want to admit it or not.
Besides, letting a non-related child sleep in his bed is a freaky, bizarre behaviour. HOWEVER, what do you prefer? A bizarre good person or a sex-addict-women-beater-deadbeat-dad-leeche person? That's what you refuse to acknowledge.
[Edited 12/6/09 7:10am]
[Edited 12/6/09 7:18am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 12/06/09 7:11am

MOL

Margaret claims that the only person in the family who cared about her and her children and who helped them was Michael. Doesn't this mean anything to you or will you continue with the freaky behaviour argument?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 12/06/09 7:14am

MOL

The funny thing is that everybody claims I am overzealous because I refuse to respect people like Joe, Jermaine, Tito and Randy who happen to don't have decency to even cater for their own children.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 12/06/09 7:25am

mimi07

avatar

whatsgoingon said:

MOL said:


But he was not a paedophile, so that's not a reasonable argument! Read the evidence. While the court ruled that the brothers were deadbeat dads, Michael was acquited. In fact, all he did was help the families who later accused him, something the brothers would never do, since they didn't even bother helping their own kids. Michael got in trouble because he was too naive and good to too many people while his brothers were totally amoral. Did you even know that Michael was the only family member who would ask his brothers' ex-wives how were theirs kids doing?
The brothers would NEVER help a kid with cancer! That's what Michael did all the time and guess what? He was unfairly accused of raping one of those kids. Guess why he was accused? Had he been a I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-anyone-but-me-sex-addict and he would never have gotten in trouble. Had Michael been an evil guy like papa and his brothers and he would have never got in trouble. But he preferred to do charity work and help needy kids around the world...needy kids with greedy papas and got in trouble. To even claim Michael is as horrible or worse than his brothers is ridiculous. He got in trouble because he was way too good to too many people, something that the brothers never were, are or will be.


That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.


it's only questionable when people have sex or other crap on their mind...but i know what u mean.

what family doesn't have issues confused
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 12/06/09 7:28am

mimi07

avatar

here are their upcoming appearences

'Larry King Live' December 7
'Jimmy Kimmel Live' December 8
'The Bonnie Hunt Show' December 10
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 12/06/09 7:36am

MOL

mimi07 said:

whatsgoingon said:



That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.


it's only questionable when people have sex or other crap on their mind...but i know what u mean.

what family doesn't have issues confused


Excatly. But, apparently, whatsgoingon didn't understand that yet. He/she is comparing an innocent yet bizarre action to Michael's brothers' amoral/monstruous behaviour.
[Edited 12/6/09 7:37am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 12/06/09 7:40am

Arnotts

MOL said:

The funny thing is that everybody claims I am overzealous because I refuse to respect people like Joe, Jermaine, Tito and Randy who happen to don't have decency to even cater for their own children.

You're overzealous because you dont actually know these people. I believe Margaret and Latoya myself as well but I cant get too angry or into an argument over it because I will never know for sure. I could understand if you were Margaret herself or someone else who has been directly targeted by them, but your just going on second hand information. Your hatred for them is just a bit too full on. And like I said alot of the information about them makes my skin crawl, but, again, I really don't know them. Not unless I have been spurned by them myself would I argue to the death of it
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 12/06/09 7:51am

mimi07

avatar

getting back to the topic of music


does anyone own this album or have some songs?

i ask beacuse i LOVE this album and i don't understand why it is so underrated, there is not one song i dislike and yet it didn't get good reviews and wasn't as big as it should have been.
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 12/06/09 7:58am

whatsgoingon

avatar

Arnotts said:

whatsgoingon said:



That's not the point, he may not have been a pedo, but his behaviour was deem questionable with young children, that's why so many people believed the accusations, something that overzealous fans like you can't bring yourself to admit. His brothers may not of gone out of their way to help a young cancer patient, but even if they did I doubt they would think it is ok to allow non- related children to sleep in their room let alone their bed.

As I said before Michael was also part of the dysfunction family. With the exception of probably Rebbie who had very little to do with showbiz they all seem to have their own big issues, some were just more prominent than others.

I get the same vibe from Rebbie that I get from Katherine. Passive, over-religious, enabler type. But I'm definitley not blind to the fact the Michael added his own share to the family dysfunction, but I just think people tend to give passes to the more hidden, less controversial members of the family. Like people tend to believe Jermaine over Michael and Janet over Latoya (when I say that I mean people who dont know much about the family, the general public) because they come across as more 'sane'.



MOL seems to be blaming the whole of MJ problems on his family. As if to say everyone else in the family dysfunction made MJ dysfunctional. When each of the the brothers and sisters to a certain extent had their own issues, just in very different ways. Probably all their issues stemed from the same source.

But inspite of all these issues I truely believe when MJ was still close to his brothers professionally they kept him down to earth. It can't be a coincidence the more MJ moved away from his family the more bizarre his behaviour became.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 12/06/09 9:09am

MOL

whatsgoingon said:

Arnotts said:


I get the same vibe from Rebbie that I get from Katherine. Passive, over-religious, enabler type. But I'm definitley not blind to the fact the Michael added his own share to the family dysfunction, but I just think people tend to give passes to the more hidden, less controversial members of the family. Like people tend to believe Jermaine over Michael and Janet over Latoya (when I say that I mean people who dont know much about the family, the general public) because they come across as more 'sane'.



MOL seems to be blaming the whole of MJ problems on his family. As if to say everyone else in the family dysfunction made MJ dysfunctional. When each of the the brothers and sisters to a certain extent had their own issues, just in very different ways. Probably all their issues stemed from the same source.

But inspite of all these issues I truely believe when MJ was still close to his brothers professionally they kept him down to earth. It can't be a coincidence the more MJ moved away from his family the more bizarre his behaviour became.


What you didn't understand yet is that it is not right to compare MJ's dysfunctionality to the brothers'. Comparing being bizarre to being a sex-addict-deadbeat-dad-women-beater-leech-amoral monster is unfair, don't you think? That's exactly what you are doing.
Michael had issues: he had no idea of what a normal life is about, while the brothers have no idea of how to be a decent person. It's very different in EVERY aspect. Being an evil guy contributes much more to a dysfunctional family than being bizarre.
How, exactly, did the brothers keep Michael down-to-earth if they weren't decent enough to pay child support? How exactly did the brothers keep Michael down-to-earth, when they had many girlfriends at the same time? How exactly did the brothers keep him down-to-earth when they were constantly fighting? How exactly did his family keep him down-to-earth when his father constantly cheated on his mother and tried to enslave him? How exactly did they keep him down-to-earth if his mother would pressure him all the time? How exactly did they keep him down-to-earth if he had to do what they wanted? Debarge called Hayvenhurst the "house of fear" and he was, probably, right.


Next thing you're going to say is that Joe is responsible for Thriller being the best selling album of all time, right?

These guys can't even defend their dead relative and you tell me they kept him down-to-earth. You are defending the undefendable.

I don't doubt they had feelings for Michael. I'm just questioning some of their motives. Ohhh an BTW, I don't believe for a second that Joseph felt something for Michael. Whether what he did and still does is unforgivable or not is up to each one of us. I, for one, think it is, in fact, unforgivable but each one has different values and morals.
[Edited 12/6/09 9:13am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 12/06/09 9:19am

JackieBlue

avatar

mimi07 said:

getting back to the topic of music


does anyone own this album or have some songs?

i ask beacuse i LOVE this album and i don't understand why it is so underrated, there is not one song i dislike and yet it didn't get good reviews and wasn't as big as it should have been.


Yup! I love this whole album. Aside from it including one of my all time fave Jackson songs--Show You the Way to Go--it has Blues Away! But overall I think it's great and I never skip a track. I don't recall how popular it was at the time but I think it's one of their better albums.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 12/06/09 9:19am

JackieBlue

avatar

mimi07 said:

here are their upcoming appearences

'Larry King Live' December 7
'Jimmy Kimmel Live' December 8
'The Bonnie Hunt Show' December 10



Setting the DVR! thumbs up!
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 12/06/09 9:21am

MOL

JackieBlue said:

mimi07 said:

getting back to the topic of music


does anyone own this album or have some songs?

i ask beacuse i LOVE this album and i don't understand why it is so underrated, there is not one song i dislike and yet it didn't get good reviews and wasn't as big as it should have been.


Yup! I love this whole album. Aside from it including one of my all time fave Jackson songs--Show You the Way to Go--it has Blues Away! But overall I think it's great and I never skip a track. I don't recall how popular it was at the time but I think it's one of their better albums.

I agree but...Triumph wins my heart!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 12/06/09 9:38am

BlackAdder7

milking/making money off their departed brother. as usual.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 12/06/09 9:42am

MOL

BlackAdder7 said:

milking/making money off their departed brother. as usual.

That's what they did their whole life. That's what they will continue to be doing.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 12/06/09 11:06am

whatsgoingon

avatar

MOL said:

whatsgoingon said:




MOL seems to be blaming the whole of MJ problems on his family. As if to say everyone else in the family dysfunction made MJ dysfunctional. When each of the the brothers and sisters to a certain extent had their own issues, just in very different ways. Probably all their issues stemed from the same source.

But inspite of all these issues I truely believe when MJ was still close to his brothers professionally they kept him down to earth. It can't be a coincidence the more MJ moved away from his family the more bizarre his behaviour became.


What you didn't understand yet is that it is not right to compare MJ's dysfunctionality to the brothers'. Comparing being bizarre to being a sex-addict-deadbeat-dad-women-beater-leech-amoral monster is unfair, don't you think? That's exactly what you are doing.
Michael had issues: he had no idea of what a normal life is about, while the brothers have no idea of how to be a decent person. It's very different in EVERY aspect. Being an evil guy contributes much more to a dysfunctional family than being bizarre.
How, exactly, did the brothers keep Michael down-to-earth if they weren't decent enough to pay child support? How exactly did the brothers keep Michael down-to-earth, when they had many girlfriends at the same time? How exactly did the brothers keep him down-to-earth when they were constantly fighting? How exactly did his family keep him down-to-earth when his father constantly cheated on his mother and tried to enslave him? How exactly did they keep him down-to-earth if his mother would pressure him all the time? How exactly did they keep him down-to-earth if he had to do what they wanted? Debarge called Hayvenhurst the "house of fear" and he was, probably, right.


Next thing you're going to say is that Joe is responsible for Thriller being the best selling album of all time, right?

These guys can't even defend their dead relative and you tell me they kept him down-to-earth. You are defending the undefendable.

I don't doubt they had feelings for Michael. I'm just questioning some of their motives. Ohhh an BTW, I don't believe for a second that Joseph felt something for Michael. Whether what he did and still does is unforgivable or not is up to each one of us. I, for one, think it is, in fact, unforgivable but each one has different values and morals.
[Edited 12/6/09 9:13am]


Being down to earth, meaning not being away with the fairies, which was basically what MJ was about in the last 15 to 20 years of his life. Mj became more bizarre the more he distance himself from his family. There is definetly a correlation between the two, imo.

The fact of the matter is MJ spent very little time making music once he completely went solo. He made just 4 albums in 20 years has a solo artist, because he was too busy being all bizarre and mystery. I understand why he distance himself from his family, especially from his father but overall it had an adverse effect on him in the long run.
[Edited 12/6/09 11:08am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 10 <12345678910>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Right Now The Jackson Brothers On the Today Show