Jackson’s mom may file wrongful death suit
Attorney says the main name that has been mentioned is Dr. Conrad Murray

LOS ANGELES - An attorney for Michael Jackson's mother says she is considering a wrongful death lawsuit because of the circumstances surrounding her son's demise, and that the singer's personal physician is a likely target.

The idea is still nascent and Dr. Conrad Murray is the main name that's been mentioned, attorney Burt Levitch said Monday, following a court hearing where a judge approved a merchandising deal that will benefit the King of Pop's estate.

"The possibility of a wrongful death action has been floated," Levitch said. "In that regard, no decision has been finalized ... Dr. Murray's name has been floated because he is under investigation."

Authorities investigating Jackson's June 25 death have been focusing on Murray, who they believe administered a powerful anesthetic to the pop singer the day he died. Levitch wouldn't say whether concert promoter AEG might also be a defendant.

"It's fairly obvious from press accounts that AEG had a very active role in Michael's life for the last six months," Levitch said. "They paid for his home and for Dr. Conrad Murray."

"It would be inappropriate to speculate on any potential litigation," said AEG spokesman Michael Roth.

Miranda Sevcik, a publicist for Murray attorney Edward Chernoff, said she had seen the press conference with Levitch, but that doesn't mean a lawsuit "is imminent."

"Whether or not the Jackson family decides to proceed with a civil suit is up to them," she said in an email.

Earlier in the day, a judge signed off on a deal that would soon bring official Michael Jackson merchandise to store shelves, but the fate of a proposed tour of the “King of Pop's” memorabilia remained in limbo after the singer's mother expressed renewed concerns.

Attorneys for Katherine Jackson withdrew their objections to an agreement with merchandiser Bravado to bring everything from Jackson trading cards, apparel and cell phone themes to consumers.

But her objections remain a roadblock to a deal that would put some of her son's prized items on display later this year. That tour was intended to coincide with the release of a major movie featuring his final rehearsals for a series of London shows.

Levitch said Mrs. Jackson's primary objection is that it was not open to competitive bidding by companies other than AEG. He also said he believed the deal that was negotiated, which would provide a 50-50 split between AEG and the estate, was insufficient.

He also said that Mrs. Jackson has recently reasserted her desire to either be named a co-executor or have a member of the family, designated by her, as an executor. Jackson's will named longtime attorney John Branca and music executive John McClain as the sole executors of his estate, with Katherine Jackson, the singer's children and unnamed charities as beneficiaries.

"No one has reflected on what it takes to nurture an estate and no one is a better position than Katherine Jackson or her designees to do that," Levitch said. "Rather than trying to derail this estate, we would like to take our place at the table."

Howard Weitzman, an attorney for Branca and McClain, said outside court: "I'm not sure why the objections are being made" but said Mrs. Jackson certainly has the right to make them.

"Katherine Jackson is a beneficiary. She's entitled to object to deals that may impact her and the children," Weitzman said.

Attorneys for AEG and the current administrators of Jackson's estate wanted the memorabilia tour approved Monday, but Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff instead scheduled an evidentiary hearing for Friday to determine if the deal represented the best arrangement for Jackson's estate.

The deal is expected to generate up to $6 million for the estate, said Weitzman. One of the concessions Katherine Jackson is apparently seeking is the authority to sign off on the deal.

Beckloff said he was inclined to reject that argument, but wasn't sure that he could grant the estate's administrators approval to enter into the deal without hearing more information.

AEG attorney Kathy Jorrie stressed outside court that the clock is ticking on the deal and it must be approved on Friday to remain viable. The exhibit, would be organized by Arts and Exhibitors International, an AEG owned company which has also staged such traveling shows as the King Tut exhibit and the exhibit of Princess Diana's possessions.

"We think it's the best deal the co-special administrators could negotiate," Jorrie said outside of court. "We don't believe the objections by Katherine Jackson are meritorious."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/...rtainment/
[Edited 8/17/09 20:21pm]

http://www.radaronline.co...s-attorney

BREAKING NEWS: Michael Jackson Estate Hearing – “We Have A Dilemma” Says Attorney

Posted on Aug 17, 2009 @ 06:30PM

Can’t we all just get along? is the question Judge Mitchell Beckloff may soon be posing to the opposing sides in the Michael Jackson estate hearing going on Monday afternoon in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

The hearing began at 2:30 PM PDT, and very pressing, according to attorney Howard Weitzman who represents the Special Administrators for Michael’s estate -- the singer’s longtime associates and friends John Branca and John McClain -- is the approval of their pending deal with AEG. While the attorney appointed to represent the interests of Michael’s kids has agreed to the deal, Katherine Jackson has not.

“We have a dilemma,” Weitzman told Judge Beckloff. “One beneficiary doesn’t object and the other beneficiary does. We have a five to six million dollar deal for the estate that may never be recovered because of timing issues. We need court wisdom to overcome this hurdle.”

To which Katherine’s attorney Burt Levitch countered, “We have a real problem with the AEG deal.”

Judge Beckloff himself has already suggested some impatience with the many objections coming from the Katherine Jackson camp. He’s set a September 9 hearing for Mrs. Jackson’s “safe harbor” hearing regarding the appointment of Branca and McClain as the Special Administrators of her son’s estate.

One piece of business was settled however. All sides agreed to an agreement with Bravado, the licensing company handling all MJ memorabilia.

Can a man get any sexier than that?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeVt9UEUh-8[youtube]

MJ was the family's principal meal ticket. A role that he was assigned at a very young age. The clan is still regarding him as such although he's no longer alive. Makes me wonder what the Jackson brothers did with their royalty checks. To paraphase his former mananger Frank DiLeo, "Are these the people you want managing your estate?" Certainly not.

Speaking of craziness and greed, I hope La Toya's crazy ass has submitted the computer hard drives containing tracks she took from the MJ's rental home to the executors.

MJ was the family's principal meal ticket. A role that he was assigned at a very young age. The clan is still regarding him as such although he's no longer alive. Makes me wonder what the Jackson brothers did with their royalty checks. To paraphase his former mananger Frank DiLeo, "Are these the people you want managing your estate?" Certainly not.

Speaking of craziness and greed, I hope La Toya's crazy ass has submitted the computer hard drives containing tracks she took from the MJ's rental home to the executors.

its been confirmed that he will be buried on his bday on the 29th august in a private section of forest lawn open only to family and private visitors

Copycat said:

What I am amaze about is at one time the Jacksons were probably one of the most famous groups in the world. Before Michael went solo they had sold millions of records and on the latter albums, i.e Destiny and Triumph they wrote alot of the stuff themselves therefore their royalty checks must be quite big. Their tours gross millions, therefore with careful planning I see no reason why they can't be financially comfortable, Jermaine more so. His career was no way as successful as MJ but he had some success as a solo artist, he has produced others therefore and he always had his own niche therefore him more than the other brothers shouldn't be so financially dire straits that his younger brother ended up indirectly supporting his kids and ex-wife.
[Edited 8/18/09 11:10am]

people can make fun of mj's shopping sprees all they want but the bottom line is he busted his ass for that money, making world tours, he can spend it anyway he wants to..at least he worked for it
[Edited 8/18/09 10:44am]

Murray speaks for the first time. A**hole.

Copycat said:

What I am amaze about is at one time the Jacksons were probably one of the most famous groups in the world. Before Michael went solo they had sold millions of records and on the latter albums, i.e Destiny and Triumph they wrote alot of the stuff themselves therefore their royalty checks must be quite big. Their tours gross millions, therefore with careful planning I see no reason why they can't be financially comfortable, Jermaine more so. His career was no way as successful as MJ but he had some success as a solo artist, he has produced others therefore and he always had his own niche therefore him more than the other brothers shouldn't be so financially dire straits that his younger brother ended up indirectly supporting his kids and ex-wife.
[Edited 8/18/09 11:10am]

Murray speaks for the first time. A**hole.

Why are fans blaming Dr.Murray for MJ's death?

trueiopian said:

Because the timeline (as fucked up as it is) suggests criminal negligence. Then again, we're getting info from tabloids and "sources" so who really knows?

Timmy84 said:

I'm sure there are other doctors that enabled drugs to MJ as well. I just don't understand why fans are going on rants about how Dr. Murray killed MJ. When in actuality MJ killed himself.
[Edited 8/18/09 12:04pm]