This is all starting to make sense to me.

1. ASPIRO and Tidal have not countersued, but rather, is delaying the proceedings by inserting new filings thereby forcing the court to address technicalities about the "real parties of interest", and the allowance of claim under Minnesota Pobate Code.

2. As in, we made a deal with Prince, ( who is deceased) and that Bremer lack the credentials to sue. This procedural delay is why Tidal is still streaming from the catalog until there is a cease and desist order.

2. In November, Bremer asked Universal Music Group to begin negotiating with Apple, Spotify, and other streaming services prior to the Grammys next month (February).

3. In November, Roc Nation filed a "Peition of Roc Nation LLC for allowance of claim and additional relief seeking a TRO and alleged that the administrator of Prince's estate did not have the authority to shop the artist's songs to competing streaming services.

4. Bremer Trust is asserting that the exclusive streaming was only for 90 days and only for the final album "HIT n RUN". However, Tidal subsequently hosted 15 of the artist's LP's

5. Despite the new filings, ASPIRO nor ROC Nation have filed a countersuit against Bremer ( there is none in the court records) nor have they proivided Bremer with any supporting documents to substantiate the claims there are oral and written agreements in place. Good luck getting Prince to confrim that he said X.

6. The "allowance of claim" (mentioned of above) and its interpretation, seems to be the the argument that both sides are seeking guidance from the court under Minnesota Probate Code.

7. Below is a link for the details to include emails between the parties. Of note, Bremer had been asking TIdal/Roc nation for any documents related to any contrafts between NPG/Prince and Tidal from since May. The goods start @ around page 9 on down. (II ARGUMENT)

STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY... COURT ...

Continuation... I forgot to add Roc nations response to Bremer's law suit in my pervious report... That should bring us all up to speed until the next filing.

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR Roc...dicial ...

Menes said:

Continuation... I forgot to add Roc nations response to Bremer's law suit in my pervious report... That should bring us all up to speed until the next filing.

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR Roc...dicial ...

Thanks Menes.

That Limited Objection filed by Roc Nation was so wordy even I couldnt understand it.

I had to go pour a glass of wine hoping that would help me understand the words.

It didnt help.

I think Roc Nation's defense is to file wordy documents that dont make sense which will leave their opponent dazed and confused.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

Continuation... I forgot to add Roc nations response to Bremer's law suit in my pervious report... That should bring us all up to speed until the next filing.

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR Roc...dicial ...

Thanks Menes.

That Limited Objection filed by Roc Nation was so wordy even I couldnt understand it.

I had to go pour a glass of wine hoping that would help me understand the words.

It didnt help.

I think Roc Nation's defense is to file wordy documents that dont make sense which will leave their opponent dazed and confused.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

Continuation... I forgot to add Roc nations response to Bremer's law suit in my pervious report... That should bring us all up to speed until the next filing.

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR Roc...dicial ...

Thanks Menes.

That Limited Objection filed by Roc Nation was so wordy even I couldnt understand it.

I had to go pour a glass of wine hoping that would help me understand the words.

It didnt help.

I think Roc Nation's defense is to file wordy documents that dont make sense which will leave their opponent dazed and confused.

So, I keep reading on this thread about Londell Mcmillan's involvement and who he supports in this matter. Please advise. There are additional docs.

Menes said:

Menes said:

Menes said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Thanks Menes.

That Limited Objection filed by Roc Nation was so wordy even I couldnt understand it.

I had to go pour a glass of wine hoping that would help me understand the words.

It didnt help.

I think Roc Nation's defense is to file wordy documents that dont make sense which will leave their opponent dazed and confused.

So, I keep reading on this thread about Londell Mcmillan's involvement and who he supports in this matter. Please advise. There are additional docs.

Im confused as to what you mean about who Londell supports.

laurarichardson said:

rogifan said:

Londell really needs to shut it. First, Prince probably wouldn't have been happy but I doubt he could have done anything about it. Second, if a Prince song had been sung at an Obama event I doubt Londell would be complaining about it. So it's not that PR was played at a political event but that it was played at a political event for someone who's politics Londell doesn't agree with. Big difference. I can't wait for this big mouth to no longer be involved with the Estate.

--As a entertainment lawyer he should know that you cannot stop a song from being covered. You can stop it from being recorded and sold but that is about it. He also been asked by Tkya and Omarr to stop the damm tweeting but he keeps doing it anyway. Dude is a first rate asshole.

Yep, and Prince knew that too. So did Chaka Khan, Chaka didn't want that, Chaka mad.

You must of been on twitter because it just popped up.Im wondering whats going to happen with this .

What happened to the curiosities thread? Who killed that?

Menes said:

rogifan said:

zenarose said:

Menes said:

What happened to the curiosities thread? Who killed that?

Unknown. It was gone without a trace last night.

Did someone mention drugs or something? There was a lot of info on that thread. Hopefully someone saved it.

Menes said:

zenarose said:

Menes said:

Did someone mention drugs or something? There was a lot of info on that thread. Hopefully someone saved it.

I didn't see it if it did. I checked in and it was gone.

Hey Zena! I know you saved it, right? I need something from that.

http://prince.org/msg/7/426657 Are u talking about this.

[Edited 1/23/17 11:08am]

[Edited 1/23/17 11:10am]

laurarichardson said:

precioux said:

In regards to the curiosity thread---- Yes, I was on there reading the thread last night, and the last post was all about P and drugs. The poster apologized at the end of the post in italics at the end and stated "Sorry, I know we're not supposed to talk about P and Rx medicine/pills"....then within literally 1 minute, the thread was deleted. I'm not going to say who the poster was, because I know they will get backlash. They know who they are.Peace and Love

[Edited 1/23/17 11:08am]

[Edited 1/23/17 11:10am]

OMG, it is gone!!

precioux said:

In regards to the curiosity thread---- Yes, I was on there reading the thread last night, and the last post was all about P and drugs. The poster apologized at the end of the post in italics at the end and stated "Sorry, I know we're not supposed to talk about P and Rx medicine/pills"....then within literally 1 minute, the thread was deleted. I'm not going to say who the poster was, because I know they will get backlash. They know who they are.Peace and Love

[Edited 1/23/17 11:08am]

[Edited 1/23/17 11:10am]

It's not clear to me why the poster's post just couldnt be deleted, perhaps issue a stern warning , or suspend priveledges for a day or so. There are so many ways to deal with that without having to delete hundreds of thoughts and ideas on that thread. I can't imagine why a person would post something just to get an entire thread removed. If they apologized, why such a harsh reaction? Makes no sense. Deleting the entire thread( which contained a wealth of information besides discussions about "X") ,seems quite broad and intentional. 'Till April then.

rogifan said:

Menes said:

Menes said:

laurarichardson said:

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

So, I keep reading on this thread about Londell Mcmillan's involvement and who he supports in this matter. Please advise. There are additional docs.

Im confused as to what you mean about who Londell supports.

I was referencing the things that were stated about his getting involved with Prince's estate, copyrights, future shows/concerts etc. Not sure if it's seen as a good thing of not?

rogifan said: