independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince sues AGAIN!!!!!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 13 « First<2345678910>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 06/27/08 2:42pm

InsatiableCrea
m

avatar

psychodelicide said:



lol What Prince said when he learned that his songs were being covered illegally. lol


falloff
cream.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 06/27/08 2:45pm

psychodelicide

avatar

InsatiableCream said:

psychodelicide said:



lol What Prince said when he learned that his songs were being covered illegally. lol


falloff


lol
RIP, mom. I will forever miss and love you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 06/27/08 3:21pm

Xemplify

Anxiety said:

look, at the end of the day it comes down to this for me:

prince creates and sells a product for a living: his music. you can add in his films, his perfumes, his tamboroccas, whatever - but if we pare it down to the bare essentials, his speciality is music.

i am a consumer of prince's product, nothing more and nothing less. because i like whatever formula makes prince's music unique, i am a follower of whatever music he releases. i guess this makes me a "fan", but again, bare essentials: i am a consumer of a particular product, and i continue to purchase the product because i enjoy it.

because i enjoy all this music, it doesn't mean there's any "personal relationship" or "moral obligation" or anything else. prince makes something. i like it. i buy it. i own it and i enjoy it.

that's how it works for me.

now:

if prince somehow throws a wrench in his own machine and his product ain't what it used to be, or if he just up and quits producing his product, then i as a consumer may be enticed by other fans who have the ability to cash in on his market by way of tributes or other memorabilia.

if the quality of those products are satisfactory to me and they seem to be created in celebration of prince's legacy, i'm not going to have a problem giving my money and owning these products.

prince has to understand that just because he's packed up his toys and left the playground, he built most of the swings and slides and guess what? we're not about to leave the park yet. if other people wanna pick up the jump rope and push the merry go round, more power to 'em.

he's stuck with a legacy that tons of less successful people would kill for. he could either enjoy what he's created or be a sourpuss about it. i don't feel a bit sorry for him that other people want to celebrate his wonderful music. it would be absurd of anyone to feel pity for such nonsense.


Very well put.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 06/27/08 3:38pm

darlingfloor

avatar

I was a little sceptic about this album, but now I want it even more
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 06/27/08 4:38pm

violetblues

Just 10 years ago or so, he was in a bad financial situation, now he seems to have shored up that situation, and apparently on steadier ground.
Unless you guys were going to pay all those outstanding bills for him then stfu

Why shouldn’t look out for HIS financial interests, whether you think he has the right is immaterial, I’m sure he’s getting all the advice he needs from his lawyers.

I don’t blame him one bit for being so protective of his music and his legacy the way he wants. Its his income, it pays the bills and its his legacy, chill people its not always about you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 06/27/08 4:40pm

Anxiety

violetblues said:

Just 10 years ago or so, he was in a bad financial situation, now he seems to have shored up that situation, and apparently on steadier ground.
Unless you guys were going to pay all those outstanding bills for him then stfu

Why shouldn’t look out for HIS financial interests, whether you think he has the right is immaterial, I’m sure he’s getting all the advice he needs from his lawyers.

I don’t blame him one bit for being so protective of his music and his legacy the way he wants. Its his income, it pays the bills and its his legacy, chill people its not always about you.


i would really love to know how one norwegian tribute album is going to ruin prince's empire. i mean, come on now. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 06/27/08 5:00pm

violetblues

Anxiety said:

violetblues said:

Just 10 years ago or so, he was in a bad financial situation, now he seems to have shored up that situation, and apparently on steadier ground.
Unless you guys were going to pay all those outstanding bills for him then stfu

Why shouldn’t look out for HIS financial interests, whether you think he has the right is immaterial, I’m sure he’s getting all the advice he needs from his lawyers.

I don’t blame him one bit for being so protective of his music and his legacy the way he wants. Its his income, it pays the bills and its his legacy, chill people its not always about you.


i would really love to know how one norwegian tribute album is going to ruin prince's empire. i mean, come on now. lol


It's not about that, it about a man protecting his interests however HE sees fit, plain and simple.

lol, he sends a strong and clear signal on where he stands on his music.
[Edited 6/27/08 17:13pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 06/27/08 5:24pm

emesem

JERK OUT!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 06/27/08 5:25pm

dawntreader

avatar

i have listened to the snippets of the songs on the website of the record company, and there were only two or three that i really liked. quite a few are just plain utter crap, the rest are mediocre, it's really difficult to do a worthy cover i guess. i would not buy the album.
yes SIR!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 06/27/08 5:38pm

Anxiety

violetblues said:

Anxiety said:



i would really love to know how one norwegian tribute album is going to ruin prince's empire. i mean, come on now. lol


It's not about that, it about a man protecting his interests however HE sees fit, plain and simple.

lol, he sends a strong and clear signal on where he stands on his music.
[Edited 6/27/08 17:13pm]


yeah, he stands on people's necks while singing sly stone and santana covers with his glossy hypocrite lips. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 06/27/08 5:43pm

Copycat

I look forward to downloading Prince's next album off torrent sites because he had the audacity to threatened his own fans with legal action last November.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 06/27/08 5:47pm

violetblues

Anxiety said:

violetblues said:



It's not about that, it about a man protecting his interests however HE sees fit, plain and simple.

lol, he sends a strong and clear signal on where he stands on his music.
[Edited 6/27/08 17:13pm]


yeah, he stands on people's necks while singing sly stone and santana covers with his glossy hypocrite lips. lol


falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 06/27/08 6:12pm

colorblu

The music industry keep evolving, and Prince is at the forefront of the debate. I remember what i read after Bo Diddley's passing and it's about time musicians rights progress. twocents

"But like other black, midcentury music innovators, Mr. Diddley said he received neither the credit he deserved from the press or the public, nor financial compensation for his recordings. He remained bitter for the rest of his life about what he viewed as the exploitation of early rock 'n' rollers by record companies, promoters, and publishers."

"Elvis was not first; I was the first son of a gun out here, me and Chuck Berry. And I'm very sick of the lie," Mr. Diddley said in a 2005 interview with Rolling Stone magazine. "You know, we are over that black-and-white crap, and that was all the reason Elvis got the appreciation that he did. I'm the dude that he copied, and I'm not even mentioned. . . . I've been out here for 50 years, man, and I haven't ever seen a royalty check."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 06/27/08 6:24pm

Anxiety

colorblu said:

The music industry keep evolving, and Prince is at the forefront of the debate. I remember what i read after Bo Diddley's passing and it's about time musicians rights progress. twocents

"But like other black, midcentury music innovators, Mr. Diddley said he received neither the credit he deserved from the press or the public, nor financial compensation for his recordings. He remained bitter for the rest of his life about what he viewed as the exploitation of early rock 'n' rollers by record companies, promoters, and publishers."

"Elvis was not first; I was the first son of a gun out here, me and Chuck Berry. And I'm very sick of the lie," Mr. Diddley said in a 2005 interview with Rolling Stone magazine. "You know, we are over that black-and-white crap, and that was all the reason Elvis got the appreciation that he did. I'm the dude that he copied, and I'm not even mentioned. . . . I've been out here for 50 years, man, and I haven't ever seen a royalty check."


that's very poignant, but the person in charge of the tribute comp actually posted ON THIS THREAD and stated that he has gone through all the necessary steps to ensure prince is appropriately compensated. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 06/27/08 6:30pm

wonder505

Anxiety said:

colorblu said:

The music industry keep evolving, and Prince is at the forefront of the debate. I remember what i read after Bo Diddley's passing and it's about time musicians rights progress. twocents

"But like other black, midcentury music innovators, Mr. Diddley said he received neither the credit he deserved from the press or the public, nor financial compensation for his recordings. He remained bitter for the rest of his life about what he viewed as the exploitation of early rock 'n' rollers by record companies, promoters, and publishers."

"Elvis was not first; I was the first son of a gun out here, me and Chuck Berry. And I'm very sick of the lie," Mr. Diddley said in a 2005 interview with Rolling Stone magazine. "You know, we are over that black-and-white crap, and that was all the reason Elvis got the appreciation that he did. I'm the dude that he copied, and I'm not even mentioned. . . . I've been out here for 50 years, man, and I haven't ever seen a royalty check."


that's very poignant, but the person in charge of the tribute comp actually posted ON THIS THREAD and stated that he has gone through all the necessary steps to ensure prince is appropriately compensated. neutral


he also did not state what Prince's reasons were with the whole thing. unless i missed it somewhere. whether its a stupid reason or not i would like to know what went wrong or what happened.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 06/27/08 6:33pm

colorblu

Anxiety said:

colorblu said:

The music industry keep evolving, and Prince is at the forefront of the debate. I remember what i read after Bo Diddley's passing and it's about time musicians rights progress. twocents

"But like other black, midcentury music innovators, Mr. Diddley said he received neither the credit he deserved from the press or the public, nor financial compensation for his recordings. He remained bitter for the rest of his life about what he viewed as the exploitation of early rock 'n' rollers by record companies, promoters, and publishers."

"Elvis was not first; I was the first son of a gun out here, me and Chuck Berry. And I'm very sick of the lie," Mr. Diddley said in a 2005 interview with Rolling Stone magazine. "You know, we are over that black-and-white crap, and that was all the reason Elvis got the appreciation that he did. I'm the dude that he copied, and I'm not even mentioned. . . . I've been out here for 50 years, man, and I haven't ever seen a royalty check."


that's very poignant, but the person in charge of the tribute comp actually posted ON THIS THREAD and stated that he has gone through all the necessary steps to ensure prince is appropriately compensated. neutral


Okay, but maybe he's trying to perfect the system. There's still lots of shady areas in the music business. We love his innovative ideas when it comes to music, but not so much when it restricts what we hear or how it's done. Someone has to be the one to define this new territory and Prince isn't one to back down on something he believes in. I'm willing to give him the benefit of a doubt.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 06/27/08 6:41pm

Anxiety

colorblu said:

Anxiety said:



that's very poignant, but the person in charge of the tribute comp actually posted ON THIS THREAD and stated that he has gone through all the necessary steps to ensure prince is appropriately compensated. neutral


Okay, but maybe he's trying to perfect the system. There's still lots of shady areas in the music business. We love his innovative ideas when it comes to music, but not so much when it restricts what we hear or how it's done. Someone has to be the one to define this new territory and Prince isn't one to back down on something he believes in. I'm willing to give him the benefit of a doubt.


you know what? your signature line pretty much sums up my position on the matter. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 06/27/08 6:45pm

Rorywan

avatar

darlingfloor said:

I was a little sceptic about this album, but now I want it even more


Hey!
You know what, it is a very entertaining listen. Some good, some very good, some bad. But overall well worth a look.

Get it while you can, which now seems not very long!

smile
"My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 06/27/08 6:45pm

colorblu

Anxiety said:

colorblu said:



Okay, but maybe he's trying to perfect the system. There's still lots of shady areas in the music business. We love his innovative ideas when it comes to music, but not so much when it restricts what we hear or how it's done. Someone has to be the one to define this new territory and Prince isn't one to back down on something he believes in. I'm willing to give him the benefit of a doubt.


you know what? your signature line pretty much sums up my position on the matter. smile



woot! dancing jig guitar
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 06/27/08 7:05pm

Anxiety

Rorywan said:

darlingfloor said:

I was a little sceptic about this album, but now I want it even more


Hey!
You know what, it is a very entertaining listen. Some good, some very good, some bad. But overall well worth a look.

Get it while you can, which now seems not very long!

smile


i agree. it's 81 songs, so they can't all be winners, but i think there's plenty on the compilation to appeal to everyone. i think the imagination of some of these bands are pretty impressive, the way they cover prince songs in different musical genres. it doesn't always work, but at least the first time through it held my attention throughout...which ain't easy for a five disc set full of artists i've never heard of before.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 06/27/08 7:59pm

kimrachell

i listened to the short samples of each song.....some were good sounding from what i could listen....and others made me laugh.....in a good way...was funny to hear others take on his songs.....as long as he was going to get paid for the songs, i see no problem with it. i think it's an honor when someone does a trubute, why doesn't he see it that way? as long as he's getting his fee? confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 06/27/08 8:04pm

kimrachell

christerfalck said:

Hi
I'm Christer Falck, the person behind this album.
Let me comment some of your accusations:

1. Prince will have what is rightfully his when it comes to money. In Norway all cd's made have to be registered at TONO/NCB, and Prince will receive ca. 10% of all the money coming in automatically.

2. We have applied for using his covers. Our response from Universal Publishing was; As long as you're doing straight covers, no-one can stop you. We have done everything by the book.

3. We have had problems with disc 2, but we only sendt out 26 copies with error, and we sendt a new cd to everyone that ordered it. If there still is someone who haven't received the right disc2, please contact me at falck@ccrecords.com, and I'll send you a new one.

4. When it comes to profiting on this album it's absolutely impossible to earn anything. 180,- (NOK) is the PPD (Price per dealer) (ca. 30 dollars).
Minus average 20% discount, 25% roylty to the artist, 20% distribution fee, expencive artwork, mastering-costs for 81 tracks AND having paid 20 of the recordings (including the national symphony orchestra, gospelchoirs etc) it's NOT the money that was my goal here. Do the maths. I'm just a big fan.

Peace


i think it's cool that you are a fan and wanted to do a tribute, i think prince should feel good about that!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 06/27/08 9:36pm

pplrain

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

gyro34 said:

Defend your rights Prince. woot!



But they're not "his rights".
Did he ask Radiohead about "Creep"?

eek
[Edited 6/26/08 16:38pm]


Correct me if I am wrong, but Prince owns the rights to his songs and so they cannot be released without his expressed permission.
I believe they can be covered at a concert but cannot be distributed for sale as the intellectual property belongs to Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 06/27/08 9:49pm

pplrain

avatar

christerfalck said:

Hi
I'm Christer Falck, the person behind this album.
Let me comment some of your accusations:

1. Prince will have what is rightfully his when it comes to money. In Norway all cd's made have to be registered at TONO/NCB, and Prince will receive ca. 10% of all the money coming in automatically.

2. We have applied for using his covers. Our response from Universal Publishing was; As long as you're doing straight covers, no-one can stop you. We have done everything by the book.

3. We have had problems with disc 2, but we only sendt out 26 copies with error, and we sendt a new cd to everyone that ordered it. If there still is someone who haven't received the right disc2, please contact me at falck@ccrecords.com, and I'll send you a new one.

4. When it comes to profiting on this album it's absolutely impossible to earn anything. 180,- (NOK) is the PPD (Price per dealer) (ca. 30 dollars).
Minus average 20% discount, 25% roylty to the artist, 20% distribution fee, expencive artwork, mastering-costs for 81 tracks AND having paid 20 of the recordings (including the national symphony orchestra, gospelchoirs etc) it's NOT the money that was my goal here. Do the maths. I'm just a big fan.

Peace



So... hmmm let me get this straight.
A little known Norwegian company decided to do some covers by little known artists from worldly well known artist Prince. Said they were "fans of Prince" and the album was a 50 yrs tribute but obviously didn't know that Prince is viciously defensive of his own work? Hell, how can you be his fan and not know that releasing covers of his work will get him annoyed. He is Prince after all not MJ. confused

Yeah right! Sounds like they just wanted to get into the spot light and share some of the glory that Prince took years to work hard for.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 06/27/08 11:12pm

darlingfloor

avatar

Rorywan said:

darlingfloor said:

I was a little sceptic about this album, but now I want it even more


Hey!
You know what, it is a very entertaining listen. Some good, some very good, some bad. But overall well worth a look.

Get it while you can, which now seems not very long!

smile


I will, thanks!
And bout that sueing-reason, Prince seems to think he doesn't really need a reason. At least, I didn't see an official statement for the Croke-cancel, did you?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 06/27/08 11:53pm

ThreadBare

Anxiety said:

andymacfunky said:

The box set is great. Except that my disk 2 is has no music, and disk 3 has the music from disk 2. So I'm missing disk 3's music. Anyone else got the same problems? I was told I'd be sent another disk but I'm 'Still Waiting'


sounds like you got a wonky copy. mine is just fine. just keep buggin' em about it via email, i guess. you know what they say about the squeaky wheel...

Some folks still haven't received Crystal Ball.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 06/28/08 12:02am

whitesockedfun
k

avatar

[/quote]

Correct me if I am wrong, but Prince owns the rights to his songs and so they cannot be released without his expressed permission.
I believe they can be covered at a concert but cannot be distributed for sale as the intellectual property belongs to Prince.[/quote]

Like it has been stated before, you CAN record cover versions, as long as you pay a fee to the writer/composer of the songs, you do not need permission. So when Prince got/will get paid as was stated by the guy who produced the tribute, it is just a matter of Prince being an a**-hole once again.
Just like the white winged dove...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #177 posted 06/28/08 12:10am

Paris9748430

This thread is proof that people here are way too obsessed with Prince's day-to-day business operations!!!

Again, this is what happens when Prince isn't on tour, or putting out a new album. People have completely run out of shit to talk about!!!

I love the headline saying "Prince sues AGAIN"!!!!!

Who has he sued??? I've only heard about one actual lawsuit throughout this whole internet hullabaloo!!! There's a lawsuit that Prince brought about against The Pirate Bay. Which makes him just one of many musicians to sue The Pirate Bay!!!

People are acting like he's gonna come over to their houses and take all their music away!!!

Everybody needs to just chill!!!

And hope that Prince puts out an album soond, before everybody completely loses their minds!!!
JERKIN' EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #178 posted 06/28/08 2:21am

prb

avatar

Anxiety said:


prince has to understand that just because he's packed up his toys and left the playground, he built most of the swings and slides and guess what? we're not about to leave the park yet. if other people wanna pick up the jump rope and push the merry go round, more power to 'em.


clapping
love it!!
seems that i was busy doing something close to nothing, but different than the day before music beret
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #179 posted 06/28/08 4:30am

Serious

avatar

ThreadBare said:

Anxiety said:



sounds like you got a wonky copy. mine is just fine. just keep buggin' em about it via email, i guess. you know what they say about the squeaky wheel...

Some folks still haven't received Crystal Ball.

wave I did get a cease and desist letter that was addressed to my bf though at the time when I should have gotten Crystal Ball. I remember that he was away on vacation and at that time I lost my very last respect for Prince.
With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 13 « First<2345678910>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince sues AGAIN!!!!!