I can't friggin wait!!!

can't wait

JoeTyler said:

Not impressed?

Kurse should be in this.

Ill take shit for this but I thought Thor was the best pre Avenger movie that they made.

lazycrockett said:

Ill take shit for this but I thought Thor was the best pre Avenger movie that they made.

It was!!!

I dig Asgard.. Love Odin and Heimdall.. The story was good, wasn't over the top. Nice introduction for Thor imo. I actually never heard of Thor before this movie, but he's my favorite now.

[Edited 4/23/13 11:26am]

Tokyo89 said:

JoeTyler said:

Not impressed?

more that I don't give a sh*t about Thor

I didn't even know a sequel was in the works

JoeTyler said:

Tokyo89 said:

Not impressed?

more that I don't give a sh*t about Thor

I didn't even know a sequel was in the works

So what was the point of commenting?

Great News!!! Kurse will be in the movie, played by Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje.

Meh. The first Thor was a hugely pleasant suprise, so I'll see this for sure, but the trailer is rather blah.

Thor's a piece of ass, though.

Tokyo89 said:

JoeTyler said:

more that I don't give a sh*t about Thor

I didn't even know a sequel was in the works

So what was the point of commenting?

freedom of speech

JoeTyler said:

Tokyo89 said:

So what was the point of commenting?

freedom of speech

cool, knock yourself out..

Tokyo89 said:

JoeTyler said:

freedom of speech

cool, knock yourself out..

already anxious about Thor 3 ??

should be cool

I have a bad feeling about this.

I hate it when sequels emphasize action over the storyline. In most cases, this means a very week plot.


On the other hand, one of the reasons I liked Spider-man 2 so much was, because of the story and character development. We connect with Spider-man even more in the sequel. The action sequences weren't amped up to outdo the previous movie.


I'm hoping they didn't just juice up Thor. I liked the original, though I didn't love it.


I'm more of a Tony Stark fan.

Tokyo89 said:

^^ very true. I prob wouldn't be into Iron Man if it wasn't for Tony Stark. But Thor was missing action imo

What Thor is missing is a good full frontal nudity scene, lawd.

At least they got rid of that damn trimmed look.

[Edited 4/23/13 21:39pm]

Just watched the trailer and I have to agree that its coming off way to EXPLOSION than the first, but I never saw a trailer of the first Thor.

Seeing who is directing this now Im not that excited cause I really liked Kenneth and his Shakespearean approach to the Thor myth.

imago said:

Tokyo89 said:

^^ very true. I prob wouldn't be into Iron Man if it wasn't for Tony Stark. But Thor was missing action imo

What Thor is missing is a good full frontal nudity scene, lawd.

Thor sucked to me BUT I like the guy who plays Loki, he can play sinister very well. I'm not big on the scruffy face of Thor and the best part of the movie for me was the hammer action. I don't think this guy can act, and he sure is no Robert Downey BUT I can see why he appeals to many women cuz that body if off the chain. This will be a Redbox for me.

If he does that out of the shower scene like he did in Thor (not quite a full-frontal, but still worthy), and that reaching for his hammer like he did in Avengers, I'm good, they can gladly have my little $8. That's terrible, I know, don't care.

Now I'm wondering if my love for Thor is purely sexual

lazycrockett said:

Ill take shit for this but I thought Thor was the best pre Avenger movie that they made.

I watched the first 5 mins or so of it... and I have one huge question!

Shouldn't THOR be the First Avenger?

Tokyo89 said:

Now I'm wondering if my love for Thor is purely sexual

Uh, yeah.

.

.

It's the voice that pulls it together. If he sounded all high-pitched and squealy, the entire image would fall apart.

He must workout like a beast for this role. Bet he's an absolute joy to live with during that time.

Why is this even taking place? The first was a shit-fest.

I so agree John but if there is a chance Natalie Portman is getting killed off, I am so there!!!