fashion mag photoshopped and real photo: Faith Hill

really? this naturally beautiful woman is too fat and ugly to put on a magazine cover as is??!


[Edited 7/20/07 9:46am]

She looked fine in the top one.



What software do these guys use?

Imago said:

Imago said:

Imago said:

Wtf did they do to her arm?

JustErin said:

JustErin said:

And right next to her is an article on the "New Skinny Pills" that actually work. Pfft!

rushing07 said:

you might expect this from cosmo or something but redbook?
if i was faith i would be insulted that they felt they had to
"fix" her before allowing her image on the damn cover.

be a blood donor... the most wonderful gift


I was hoping to dress something like Prince. toned down a bit like Prince if he was just going to the zoo or the supermarket... casual Prince!

I think the spots on her left arm are so cute.. Why take 'em off..

And why did they add an arm in the backround and remove the one on her lap? WTF?

Mushanga said:

And why did they add an arm in the backround and remove the one on her lap? WTF?

be a blood donor... the most wonderful gift


I was hoping to dress something like Prince. toned down a bit like Prince if he was just going to the zoo or the supermarket... casual Prince!

Imago said:

rushing07 said:

Photoshop.

http://www.youtube.com/wa...cFlxSlOKNI

I've seen that one before and never noticed it was Photoshop

Some of the other links are fascinating.

Wow. Some of these people were already impossibly good looking.



And Faith hill's photoshopped arm is kind of gross.

they shoulda photoshopped in a better dress.

This is just further proof to me that I married the most beautiful woman in the world. She does not need to be photoshopped!

I've always felt that - taking nothing away from pretty women in entertainment - there are plenty of women in every city that are just as beautiful as any starlet.

"Guitar" on Leno is the greatest performance in the history of rock ' roll

Second Funkiest White Man in America

It sure is nice having adults running our government now

cborgman said:

madartista said:

madartista said:

Lammastide said:

cborgman said:

slimmed it to non-human proportions and emoved the elbow curves for some reason.

I hadn't quite realized that. Ugggh!

cborgman said:

Lammastide said:

I hadn't quite realized that. Ugggh!

the weird alien arm is what really gets me... who, aside from those pictures of holocaust victims, even has arms like that!?!? it's so bizarre that people think that is attractive.

Lammastide said:

cborgman said:

the weird alien arm is what really gets me... who, aside from those pictures of holocaust victims, even has arms like that!?!? it's so bizarre that people think that is attractive.

What's disturbing to me is that they do this for a magazine with a female audience. I could understand if this were somg girly mag for guys, but are they seriously trying to communicate to women that this is how an ideal woman looks?

Lammastide said:

cborgman said:

the weird alien arm is what really gets me... who, aside from those pictures of holocaust victims, even has arms like that!?!? it's so bizarre that people think that is attractive.

What's disturbing to me is that they do this for a magazine with a female audience. I could understand if this were somg girly mag for guys, but are they seriously trying to communicate to women that this is how an ideal woman looks?

evenstar3 said:

Lammastide said:

What's disturbing to me is that they do this for a magazine with a female audience. I could understand if this were somg girly mag for guys, but are they seriously trying to communicate to women that this is how an ideal woman looks?

of course. you can never be TOO thin, you know.

Yuck. A little airbrushing is maybe understandable, but making a thin woman look anorexic?

I wonder if maybe she was the who wanted to get rid of the "imperfections."

Mushanga said:

I think the spots on her left arm are so cute.. Why take 'em off..

And why did they add an arm in the backround and remove the one on her lap? WTF?

madartista said:

NDRU said:

Yuck. A little airbrushing is maybe understandable, but making a thin woman look anorexic?

I wonder if maybe she was the who wanted to get rid of the "imperfections."

Well that's every Picture you see these days, you don't really think Prince looks like the pictures we see do you?!

I basically think the media, especially in America can't present reality as it is without buffing it up or polishing it first. It's always been this way to some degree, but it's more obvious now because the technology is better but our senses still innately know what is real and what isn't... however... the line is blurring and sadly, I think a large amount of people accept far too much of what they see in the media as "real" and true to life.



.
[Edited 7/21/07 5:26am]