independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Let's Talk All Things Michael Jackson - Part 3.1
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 9 of 31 « First<5678910111213>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #240 posted 06/05/09 8:02am

paisleypark4

avatar

suga10 said:

There have always been rumors over the years about this dude being his son.

eek






Thats the way his kids should have looked like
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #241 posted 06/05/09 8:08am

paisleypark4

avatar

bboy87 said:

JackieBlue said:



shhh



I already called the private investigator evillol



falloff

falloff
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #242 posted 06/05/09 8:19am

NaughtyKitty

avatar

So now that his kid's faces have been exposed very clearly (not really the first time either) I wonder if they'll stop wearing the masks and veils in public or if they'll still wear them. It'd be pretty pointless IMO to keep having them cover their faces when now the whole world has seen what they look like.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #243 posted 06/05/09 8:31am

musicjunky318

avatar

paisleypark4 said:

suga10 said:

There have always been rumors over the years about this dude being his son.

eek






Thats the way his kids should have looked like


Because it's believable. His "kids" are not.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #244 posted 06/05/09 9:32am

Serena

NaughtyKitty said:

So now that his kid's faces have been exposed very clearly (not really the first time either) I wonder if they'll stop wearing the masks and veils in public or if they'll still wear them. It'd be pretty pointless IMO to keep having them cover their faces when now the whole world has seen what they look like.


Yeah, I wonder if it's their preference or MJ's. If it's theirs, fine, since they never asked for any of the crazy attention and the masks may offer a type of barrier for them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #245 posted 06/05/09 10:47am

whatsgoingon

avatar

musicjunky318 said:

paisleypark4 said:




Thats the way his kids should have looked like


Because it's believable. His "kids" are not.

If MJ had a mixed race child like Evan, another that looks like Blanket and a third child with blonde, frizzy hair and light eyes with recognisable black features than I can say that they are all his children. But Prince and Paris are like any other white kid, there is nothing black about those children. At the very most their biological father is probably Latino ie Italian, spanish etc.

In the case of Blanket he could be MJ child, but I wouldn't be surprise if his father looked something like Lourdes Dad.

In the case of Becker daughter her mother is actually mixed race and judging by the girls lips and the texture of her hair you could still see the blackness in her, even though she is genetically only 25% black, she still looks blacker than MJ's kids.
[Edited 6/5/09 11:00am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #246 posted 06/05/09 11:22am

suga10

And would have ever guess that this Quincy Jones Daughter?

Rashida Jones




Kiddada Jones (obviously looks like she went more on Quincy's genes)

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #247 posted 06/05/09 12:05pm

musicjunky318

avatar

whatsgoingon said:

musicjunky318 said:



Because it's believable. His "kids" are not.

If MJ had a mixed race child like Evan, another that looks like Blanket and a third child with blonde, frizzy hair and light eyes with recognisable black features than I can say that they are all his children. But Prince and Paris are like any other white kid, there is nothing black about those children. At the very most their biological father is probably Latino ie Italian, spanish etc.

In the case of Blanket he could be MJ child, but I wouldn't be surprise if his father looked something like Lourdes Dad.

In the case of Becker daughter her mother is actually mixed race and judging by the girls lips and the texture of her hair you could still see the blackness in her, even though she is genetically only 25% black, she still looks blacker than MJ's kids.
[Edited 6/5/09 11:00am]


Exactly, that's what I'm saying. If each came out a little different than I could agree too. But they aren't. They're all white, and that's including Blanket. He's just as white as the first two.
[Edited 6/5/09 12:06pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #248 posted 06/05/09 5:24pm

DakutiusMaximu
s

Don't know if anyone posted this yet or not. I'm not that big of an MJ fan to bother reading but this item from yahoo music news made me say WTF?

You mean to tell me that MJ is so out of control of his own career that this article is real? eek

Michael Jackson 'Angry' at 50 London Shows Being Booked

Michael Jackson has hit out at his London O2 Arena gig bookers, saying he believed he only signed up to play 10 shows--not the 50 he is scheduled for--at the venue.

Speaking to fans outside the Los Angeles dance studio where he's rehearsing for the gigs, the singer admitted that he might not be physically well enough to complete all 50 shows, reports Britain's The Sun.

"I don't know how I'm going to do 50 shows," he said of the gigs, which kick off in July. "I'm not a big eater--I need to put some weight on."

The star then laid into the gig promoters, saying he only wanted to play 10 shows at the O2 Arena.

"I'm really angry with them booking me up to do 50 shows," he said. "I only wanted to do 10, and take the tour around the world to other cities, not 50 in one place.

"I went to bed knowing I sold 10 dates, and woke up to the news I was booked to do 50."

Michael Jackson has already postponed the start of the residency from July 8 to July 13, citing production issues.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #249 posted 06/05/09 5:25pm

bboy87

avatar

DakutiusMaximus said:

Don't know if anyone posted this yet or not. I'm not that big of an MJ fan to bother reading but this item from yahoo music news made me say WTF?

You mean to tell me that MJ is so out of control of his own career that this article is real? eek

Michael Jackson 'Angry' at 50 London Shows Being Booked

Michael Jackson has hit out at his London O2 Arena gig bookers, saying he believed he only signed up to play 10 shows--not the 50 he is scheduled for--at the venue.

Speaking to fans outside the Los Angeles dance studio where he's rehearsing for the gigs, the singer admitted that he might not be physically well enough to complete all 50 shows, reports Britain's The Sun.

"I don't know how I'm going to do 50 shows," he said of the gigs, which kick off in July. "I'm not a big eater--I need to put some weight on."

The star then laid into the gig promoters, saying he only wanted to play 10 shows at the O2 Arena.

"I'm really angry with them booking me up to do 50 shows," he said. "I only wanted to do 10, and take the tour around the world to other cities, not 50 in one place.

"I went to bed knowing I sold 10 dates, and woke up to the news I was booked to do 50."

Michael Jackson has already postponed the start of the residency from July 8 to July 13, citing production issues.

not true
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #250 posted 06/05/09 6:39pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

http://whoismichael.com/index.htm

a good site by a non fan.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #251 posted 06/05/09 8:34pm

ViintageJunkii
e

avatar

*Changing the subject* In "Moonwalker" when Mike performs "Man in The Mirror", are both performances from Wembley, and has the full version of both performances ever leaked? Also, were both those shows professionally taped? I know Mike tapes all of his shows
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #252 posted 06/05/09 8:51pm

bboy87

avatar

ViintageJunkiie said:

*Changing the subject* In "Moonwalker" when Mike performs "Man in The Mirror", are both performances from Wembley, and has the full version of both performances ever leaked? Also, were both those shows professionally taped? I know Mike tapes all of his shows

I don't think so. I think the clips of him performing the Bad outfit is from another show. The Way You Make Me Feel and Man In The Mirror weren't always performed during the second leg
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #253 posted 06/05/09 9:11pm

ViintageJunkii
e

avatar

bboy87 said:

ViintageJunkiie said:

*Changing the subject* In "Moonwalker" when Mike performs "Man in The Mirror", are both performances from Wembley, and has the full version of both performances ever leaked? Also, were both those shows professionally taped? I know Mike tapes all of his shows

I don't think so. I think the clips of him performing the Bad outfit is from another show. The Way You Make Me Feel and Man In The Mirror weren't always performed during the second leg


Oooh! So it was kinda like a hit and miss when it came to those 2 songs?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #254 posted 06/05/09 9:41pm

bboy87

avatar

ViintageJunkiie said:

bboy87 said:


I don't think so. I think the clips of him performing the Bad outfit is from another show. The Way You Make Me Feel and Man In The Mirror weren't always performed during the second leg


Oooh! So it was kinda like a hit and miss when it came to those 2 songs?

Yeah, sometimes they would do them both, sometimes they'd skip The Way You Make Me Feel, sometimes they would end the show with Bad
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #255 posted 06/05/09 9:47pm

DonRants

whatsgoingon said:

musicjunky318 said:



Because it's believable. His "kids" are not.

If MJ had a mixed race child like Evan, another that looks like Blanket and a third child with blonde, frizzy hair and light eyes with recognisable black features than I can say that they are all his children. But Prince and Paris are like any other white kid, there is nothing black about those children. At the very most their biological father is probably Latino ie Italian, spanish etc.

In the case of Blanket he could be MJ child, but I wouldn't be surprise if his father looked something like Lourdes Dad.

In the case of Becker daughter her mother is actually mixed race and judging by the girls lips and the texture of her hair you could still see the blackness in her, even though she is genetically only 25% black, she still looks blacker than MJ's kids.
[Edited 6/5/09 11:00am]



Wow I am amazed at all these posts about MJ kids and that they cannot possibly be his because they look white. Please read up on the mixed children of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. Several were so "white" that they simply moved away and adopted a white identity. This happened all over American at the end of slavery. The truth is "white racial purity" is a complete myth. The census of America from the end of slavery until the 1950's shows that many thousands ( as much as 20,000 per year) of mixed race people (considered black by Americas one drop rule), in order to get white privilege simply moved away from their home town or city, changed their name and passed as white. The census takers were able to detect this when they looked at the statistics of the nation as a whole. They noticed that the same of black people simply "disappeared" and whites "appeared" elsewhere in the country.
This notion that you can tell someone's "race" or parentage by looking at them is not always true. But don't take my word for it visit the website of "Race- Power of an Illusion":

http://www.newsreel.org/n...?tc=cn0149

http://www.newsreel.org/g...things.htm

Now am I suggesting these as MJ's kids, no. I do not know. And neither does anyone on these threads. The only people who know for sure are MJ, the mothers ,their doctors and their inner circle.

Edited for clarity.
[Edited 6/5/09 21:49pm]
[Edited 6/5/09 22:00pm]
To All the Haters on the Internet
No more Candy 4 U
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #256 posted 06/05/09 9:53pm

cdcgold



lol TOO CUTE!!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #257 posted 06/06/09 2:55am

NMuzakNSoul

cdcgold said:



lol TOO CUTE!!!!!


Great picture, never seen it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #258 posted 06/06/09 4:20am

seeingvoices12

avatar

I don't know about this but there are rumors that Mj is filmming a music video, changing the hairstyle does mean something in MJ's world.
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #259 posted 06/06/09 5:58am

BaileyWalker

Who saw last night on Showbiz Tonight the segement: Michael vs Whitney? basically they were comparing both comebacks and which one is going to be better.

Well, one of the people on there being interviewed said that he heard that Michael is only contracted for 15-20 minutes per concert eek

OMG if true how weak is this going to be! 15 MINUTES??? What the hell can you do in 15 minutes? Maybe 3 songs.. probably 2 because we all know he will stand still for 3 minutes and slowly take his sun glasses off lol eek

This is how I think the show will be - The blueprint to the 2001 msg shows. He will be watching other acts, magic shows, zoo animals - then like motown 25 & come out do the moonwalk and say good night.

I feel sorry for you fans that keep falling for this guy's hussle.It's allot of work being a Michael Jackson fan. If this is true about the contract for only 20 minutes thats just wrong!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #260 posted 06/06/09 6:41am

PatrickS77

avatar

BaileyWalker said:

This is how I think the show will be - The blueprint to the 2001 msg shows. He will be watching other acts, magic shows, zoo animals - then like motown 25 & come out do the moonwalk and say good night.

Wow! Do you seriously believe that?? neutral nuts
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #261 posted 06/06/09 7:03am

cdcgold

does anybody know how to do that morph thing like what was donein this picture of blanket



[Edited 6/6/09 7:54am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #262 posted 06/06/09 7:58am

whatsgoingon

avatar

cdcgold said:

does anybody know how to do that morph thing like what was donein this picture of blanket




You are obviously convinced they are MJ biological children and that's cool, but if Prince looks like MJ it's how he looks now, nothing like his natural self.


This looks completely different from this:


[Edited 6/6/09 7:59am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #263 posted 06/06/09 8:09am

marnifrances

avatar

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

http://whoismichael.com/index.htm

a good site by a non fan.


Very very interesting site. Thanks for this smile
www.maximum-jackson.com
The Michael Jackson Fan Forum
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #264 posted 06/06/09 3:05pm

cdcgold

whatsgoingon said:

cdcgold said:

does anybody know how to do that morph thing like what was donein this picture of blanket




You are obviously convinced they are MJ biological children and that's cool, but if Prince looks like MJ it's how he looks now, nothing like his natural self.


This looks completely different from this:


[Edited 6/6/09 7:59am]



not to me and only people like you would say prince looks like michael NOW that is a boldfaced lie but thats the excuse people usually come up with when they don't want to admit a resemblance to the real mj
[Edited 6/6/09 15:08pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #265 posted 06/06/09 3:28pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

cdcgold said:

whatsgoingon said:


You are obviously convinced they are MJ biological children and that's cool, but if Prince looks like MJ it's how he looks now, nothing like his natural self.


This looks completely different from this:


[Edited 6/6/09 7:59am]



not to me and only people like you would say prince looks like michael NOW that is a boldfaced lie but thats the excuse people usually come up with when they don't want to admit a resemblance to the real mj
[Edited 6/6/09 15:08pm]

I notice it is only fanatical fans that seem to see resemblance between MJ and his Prince, but then again it is also fanatical fans that believe he only had 2 nose jobs, so its hard to take their observations seriously.
[Edited 6/6/09 15:29pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #266 posted 06/06/09 3:49pm

cdcgold

whatsgoingon said:

cdcgold said:




not to me and only people like you would say prince looks like michael NOW that is a boldfaced lie but thats the excuse people usually come up with when they don't want to admit a resemblance to the real mj
[Edited 6/6/09 15:08pm]

I notice it is only fanatical fans that seem to see resemblance between MJ and his Prince, but then again it is also fanatical fans that believe he only had 2 nose jobs, so its hard to take their observations seriously.
[Edited 6/6/09 15:29pm]



whatever i call it when i see if i was fanatical i would claim to see a resemblance between paris and michael but i know there isn't. And if you read the comments on other sites alot of people who are not fans are commenting that prince looks like michael. even the people at mediatake who usually talk about michael like a dog admitted prince looks like him, while still insulting mj in the comments as well. people at tmz said said he looks like him(and they really hate michael) i even read blogs made by people who hate michaels guts and even they said prince looks like michael for example pink is the new blog. whoever writes the mj stories always talks crap about him but even they said prince looks like michael. so it's not just the fans honey.

http://www.pinkisthenewbl.../#comments

Okay, I have to admit … Jacko’s eldest son does look a lot like him. Without the mask, I can see how Prince Michael Joseph looks very much like Michael Jackson. Of course, he’s got Jacko’s old nose but the resemblance is striking. It also appears that Paris Michael looks a lot like her mother Debbie Rowe. I suppose it’s pretty safe to say that the kiddies (at least these two) are really his after all. I still contend that the Jackson kids live very odd and potentially scarring lives but, going by resemblance alone, it appears that the kids are Jacko’s and he is free to raise them as he wishes. Poor dears

even he said prince looks like mj and procedined to insult mj along the way. whoever wrote this is obviously not a fan so you can't say they are crazy.
[Edited 6/6/09 15:50pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #267 posted 06/07/09 5:41am

dag

avatar

whatsgoingon said:

BoOTyLiCioUs said:



like i said earlier, he should of married tatiana and have babies with her.


I bet if Michael had married someone like Brooke Shields back in the day, he would have had his own biological kids. The fact that he married a surrogate is so strange. People NEVER marry the surrogate mother and Debbie was definetly a surrogate, I mean the children didn't know her as their mother. There had to be a specific legal reason why he had to marry Debbie, something he probably wouldn't have to do if those children were biologically his.

Legal reasons? What about religious reasons? Don´t forget MJ´s still a Jehowah Witness. Just a question for a discussion.
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #268 posted 06/07/09 8:04am

whatsgoingon

avatar

dag said:

whatsgoingon said:



I bet if Michael had married someone like Brooke Shields back in the day, he would have had his own biological kids. The fact that he married a surrogate is so strange. People NEVER marry the surrogate mother and Debbie was definetly a surrogate, I mean the children didn't know her as their mother. There had to be a specific legal reason why he had to marry Debbie, something he probably wouldn't have to do if those children were biologically his.

Legal reasons? What about religious reasons? Don´t forget MJ´s still a Jehowah Witness. Just a question for a discussion.

Sorry, if that were the case they would have at least stay together to raise the children. The children would from the beginning at least know Debbie as their mother even if they did divorce. The mother would have still been active in their lives even if they live with the father. It was purely for legal reasons because they are not his biological children therefore the only way around him being seen as the legal father is through marriage. Don't forget with the child abuse allegations he would have found it difficult to adopt and so he would have to found another way around acquiring children that are not biologically his.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #269 posted 06/07/09 8:41am

Timmy84



I see some of y'all have carry that DNA bullshit to Michael's sticky. evillol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 9 of 31 « First<5678910111213>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Let's Talk All Things Michael Jackson - Part 3.1