Timmy84 said:

Oh I fully know LOL I love just winding him up he's such a cliche LOL

kremlinshadow said:

Timmy84 said:

i think it is. the dress and body give it away that it is her.

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

You got a point, lol. I mean I did hear it was Tatiana, lol. I just heard like two other stories.

kremlinshadow said:

1983

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

I agree. He was a nice looking guy back then.Even Bad era was great.

And when I saw this photo, the day the O2 shows were announced. I felt like Barfing honestly.

suga10 said:

i love the off the wall and thriller era...i like the bad era as well. But in 1982/83, damn that man was

OTW and Thriller era are my favorites. The Bad look was over the top for me but even that Human Nature poster had me questioning his look. Little did I know it would only get worse from there.

cdcgold said:

O.K. SO WHY ARE ALL OF THEIR EARS AND EYES AND LIPS THE SAME IDENTICLE SHAPE

Evvy said:

LOL. Yal are too much.

JackieBlue said:

how old are you if you don't mind me asking?

Timmy84 said:

$50 million is about 31 pounds in London.

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

Old enough.

JackieBlue said:

give me a clue

musicjunky318 said:

Ah I see, thanks.

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

JackieBlue said:

You know I'll find out

bboy87 said:

JackieBlue said:

I already called the private investigator

http://new.music.yahoo.co...--61989443

yahoo news
Michael Jackson 'angry' at 50 London shows being booked

Yahoo! Music, Jun 2, 2009 2:00 pm PDT
Michael Jackson has hit out at his London O2 Arena gig bookers, saying he believed he only signed up to play 10 shows--not the 50 he is scheduled for--at the venue.
Speaking to fans outside the Los Angeles dance studio where he's rehearsing for the gigs, the singer admitted that he might not be physically well enough to complete all 50 shows, reports Britain's The Sun.

"I don't know how I'm going to do 50 shows," he said of the gigs, which kick off in July. "I'm not a big eater--I need to put some weight on."



The star then laid into the gig promoters, saying he only wanted to play 10 shows at the O2 Arena.

"I'm really angry with them booking me up to do 50 shows," he said. "I only wanted to do 10, and take the tour around the world to other cities, not 50 in one place.

"I went to bed knowing I sold 10 dates, and woke up to the news I was booked to do 50."

Michael Jackson has already postponed the start of the residency from July 8 to July 13, citing production issues.

For more on Michael Jackson, check out hi

He needs to stop with the veils, everybody has seen these kids already.

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

Iconic shit here.

kremlinshadow said:

Max Jax is the only MJ fan site I visit! They seem pretty reasonable over there. Big fans, but obviously some of them realize Mike isn't perfect and beyond any criticism!

Michael Jackson and the Jackson 5 during their Motown audition tape in Detroit (1968).



SHUT YO MOUTH!!

dreamfactory313 said:

Can't believe it's been 41 years already!

I hate that the issue of Michael's kid and whether they are biologically his or not is discussed everything pics come out of the kids without masks. There's a few things people should remember before they claim Michael's not the father.

The first, more obvious point is that their mother is white (Prince and Paris, that is). Debbie Rowe is the whitest woman ever. White skin, blonde hair, blue eyes, she'd fetch for half a mill in Nazi Germany. So it's not exactly like two black parents conceived two white kids. They're at least half white. That's assuming Debbie's full white and Michael full black. But he may not be 100% black.

Michael's father Joe was green eyes. That would suggest he's at least a little mixed. So there's probably some white genes in Michael and obviously a lot in Debbie. So it's not impossible or even improbable that if the two naturally conceived children they'd be white.

So when you factor in that but still doubt they are Michael's kids, just look at Prince. He looks a lot like Michael. Paris doesn't but it's clear she takes after Debbie. She looks exactly like Debbie, there's no trace of whoever the father is. So you've got one kid who looks like Michael, another who looks like Debbie. I'm pretty sure it's obvious who the parents are. Michael and Debbie.

As for Blanket, Michael was being a bit of bullshitter when he told Martin Bashir the mother was black. Obviously that little kid is too light skinned to have two black parents. Who knows when it comes to Blanket. I haven't even seen enough clear pictures of his face to see if he resembles Michael at all. But as for Prince and Paris, they are his kids.

Bottom line is, they are all his kids. Even if he didn't conceive them. He's their father. I'm sure all this debate about whether they are his kids or not is very hurtful to him. We're supposed to live in a progressive age where families come in all sorts. From the traditional nuclear family to the Hollywood family with adopted children from Africa and Vietnam. I don't care if Michael conceived those kids the traditional way, if he adopted them or if he created them in a lab. He's their father. End of story.

paisleypark4 said:

LOL it wasn't me, who thought that ones DNA gets changed, if one surgically alters his appearance! You're the fool!

DarlingDiana said:

I just wanted to throw in that I know people as light as Blanket if not lighter and not only are both parents black but both sets of grandparents are also black. Appearances can vary beyond our expectations.

As for them being his kids or not, I don’t have a clue and at this point it shouldn’t matter. All I know is Michael made sure he got what he wanted at all costs.

DarlingDiana said:

NONE OF THESE KIDS LOOK LIKE HIM. WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND.

MOST BLACK PEOPLE HAVE EUROPEON ANCENSTRY, SOME MORE VISIBLE THAN OTHERS, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE CHANCES OF HAVING THREE WHITE CHILDREN (IN A ROW) IS LIKELY NOR FREQUENT. IS THERE A CHANCE OF HAVING A REALLY LIGHT-SKINNED CHILD? SURE. BUT THESE KIDS ARE NOT LIGHT-SKINNED. THEY ARE WHITE. THEY GOT NO BLACK FEATURES AT ALL AND I'M NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO FALL FOR MICHAEL'S NONSENSE.

IF HE WANTS TO SAY THAT HE ADOPTED THESE KIDS THAT'S FINE. I COMMEND HIM FOR THAT IT'S A VERY HONORABLE THING. IT'S ANOTHER THING TO LIE AND SAY THEY'RE HIS BIOLOGICAL KIDS. AND THAN YOU QUESTION WHY PEOPLE GIVE HIM FLACK?

I'M A FAN OF MICHAEL, BUT I'M NOT NAIVE ENOUGH TO BELIEVE ANY AND EVERYTHING THAT FLIES OUT HIS MOUTH. I KNEW FROM THE BEGINNING THAT THIS WAS A VERY FUNNY SITUATION WHEN HE FIRST MARRIED DEBBIE FOR WHATEVER REASON.