there wouldn't be all this other BS going on if everything was in the LLC. his estate would not be in probate at all would it?not according to the stuff u guys have posted. so it's safe to assume he left some things out. this BS about naming heirs is what's got me cranky. that seems to be what's holding things up. i'm hoping and praying that comes to resolution by years end. Prince #MUSICIANICONLEGEND | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, the possibilty is there, I agree. I just get the vibe Prince was looking more long term and controlling what he had fought so long to get, his masters and work. Pure speculation. Dixon does sound like trouble. But, I think he may have bitten of more than he can chew this time. He may face legal actions just like Claire if they do not stop. If Dixon is from Cali, he could have done some research since the LLC was on the news. If he had connections to Prince's team, I would imagine Dixon would have better "exhibits" than what he has used for his claim. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The only things locked in Probate are the properties listed to be sold and whatever liquid assest he had. We still have not seen a final accounting so we do not know how liquid he was.
The only problem I see is the Duane Spawn as they are holding things up. It is not that hard to sell property, total liablitites and assests and pay bills.
Also remember his family members live in some of those homes so they will have to buy them from the estate which better than having them in the LLC. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Dixon is going to get into a tremendous amout of trouble. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If Prince is the sole owner of the LLC it would go into Probate. You dont really believe Prince would give ownership of all his material to someone else, do you? If he had shareholders it would depend on what the Operating Agreement terms were as to whether they would get dividends and/or earnings. It would also depend on the Operating Agreement as to what would go into Probate upon his death.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree with you. Dixon could have gotten the documents he attached as exhibits through the "discovery" process from Bremer Trust. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Could the homes not be part of their % of the estate? The fair market value of the homes could be used as a percentage. Instead of receiving cash, the homes value offset the cash to be received? Duane's offspring is the major setback/hurdle. Personally, I think the Simon's claim should be dismissed due to the late filing. Sounds cold, but come on, it is friggin' Prince. Ignorance is not an excuse to law. If Duane's offspring are ruled heirs, that will lower the % of distribution, but also can create more trouble down the road. If they do not agree with the decisions of the music, PP, etc, that tie the estate up longer in the system. More money. More time. I think the siblings should be looking into a contigency plan just in case they are ruled heirs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Okay but we don't know if he is the sole owner and you can structure the LLC so shareholders are silent members.
See the info below. Could it be that the LLC is manager-operated. With Pheadra and Prince having been the managers? Could others be treated like the kids desribed in the article below. -- LLCs give you control An LLC is incredibly flexible. You can structure the ownership, the management, and the profit allocations pretty much however you want by specifying these things in the company’s operating agreement. Your LLC can be either member-managed, where all partners share equal control of the day-to-day affairs, or manager-managed, where one or a few people (who don’t make up 100 percent of the partners) make managerial decisions. LLCs for estate planning are commonly manager-managed LLCs, with the parents taking the role of managing partners and the kids as nonmanaging (silent) partners. This way, as the LLC is transferred to the children, the parents can still manage the assets even if they no longer own the LLC. Basically anything goes, as long as you set up the LLC’s operating agreement accordingly. You can have different types (classes) of membership, where some partners have more voting rights than the others. You can restrict the transfer of ownership so your kids can’t sell their shares in the family estate. You can describe in detail how you want the succession to go after you pass away, and you can name the successor managers. You can even distribute the profits and losses however you want, meaning they don’t have to be distributed according to the membership percentages.
If he was the sole owner of the LLC why was the Purple rain house pulled from the sale. Remember the LLC owns the Purple Rain house Why is Paisley Park and some of the commercial properties not being sold? Who owns the deed to Paisley Park and the commercial properties?
Why is Prince listed as an employee to the LLC? Why is no owner listed on the Ca and Mn state websites? Could a trust have been set up to run the LLC? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
As I told you before, if you are the owner of the LLC you are also an employee of the LLC. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
****Warning, the statement below is not for the sensitive****
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
As Administrators doesn't Bremer have the control to keep or sell properties of their choosing?
Everyone had a fit (family too) over PP so they pulled it. When they realized that the purple house
was a property owned, I'm betting they thought historical site? Maybe it doesn't have anything to do
with the LLC?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OMG surely they can't be serious. Who is doing this?? The family?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Could the homes not be part of their % of the estate? The fair market value of the homes could be used as a percentage. Instead of receiving cash, the homes value offset the cash to be received?
I would not be surprised if something like this is not being worked out for the sibs. It is Real Estate is can be worked out. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RE: Reply #222
WOW.... JUST.... WOW [Edited 10/11/16 12:50pm] [Edited 10/11/16 12:50pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Purple Rain house is owned by the LLC it depends on how the LLC was set up. My understanding if Prince was the sole owner the LLC would be a part of the Estate however you can set up the LLC to transfer ownership and you can have manager/partners and silent shareholders. Loads of ways for the LLC to not be a part of the estate.
The only thing that would seal it for me if the properties that are not being sold are found to be owned by the LLC and I still wonder what Londell role is in this. He literally showed up the day P died. What is Phedra and Van Jones role. Why is Van on the list to receive doc concerning the case.
[Edited 10/11/16 12:52pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some of this stuff was on other auction sites before P died. I belive the guitar and acetape are from Owen Hunsey.
The awards could belong to members of his band or anyone that worked on the records. Some of the stuff is junk and did not move on E-Bay. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It was explained to me that Van still represents OB in some capacity. I have not found a withdrawal from him in my research. OB has pulled in more Lawyers though. So it stands to reason that he would still be on the mailing list. [Edited 10/11/16 12:58pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And I have asked if you if any docs are showing him as the sole owner? You can also have ownership transfered upon death depending on how things are set up.
No owner is listed on the state websites. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Listen....Prince would not start an LLC unless he was the owner. This is the only reason why you would start an LLC. The only reason. You dont start an LLC unless you are the owner. Phaedra is not an attorney. Londell was appointed by the Court as an expert. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:
Listen....Prince would not start an LLC unless he was the owner. This is the only reason why you would start an LLC. The only reason. You dont start an LLC unless you are the owner. Phaedra is not an attorney. Londell was appointed by the Court as an expert. -- Then why was he listed as an employee? I never said he did not have any ownership at all. I said no owner is listed on the state websites. I said what proof do we have that he is the sole owner? Have you seen any docs that list him as the sole owner? I know you are familar with the various ways these LLC can be set up to avoid probate. I feel like you think Prince and the people around him were to dumb to figure this out. We know Phreda is not a lawyer what is your point in bringing that up? She is listed as the manager and these LLC can be manager/member owned and operated. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I owned a business several years ago. We had to start a company in our name and for tax purposes and protection we were advised by an Attorney to set it up as an LLC. I was the Store Manager and had several employees. I was listed as an employee (MGR) and so was my x-husband (emp). So Phaedra is the Manger of the LLC. (an employee) P was employed also I'm guessing at least as a songwriter (?) But you can own the company and still be shown as an employee. Does that make sense? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes. I own an S Corp, and when I did it full time, I was listed as an employee. I was the only one who owned shares, though others were listed as officers.
As I remember it, the IRS doesn't like owners taking out too much in dividends. If you need money to live, you take out the salary you need and the dividends are extra. I don't know if I'm making sense at all since it's been over 10 years now, but only taking dividends when you actually work for the corporation is not kosher...or is a red flag for an audit or something. So, it makes sense that he's an employee. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
zenarose said:
I owned a business several years ago. We had to start a company in our name and for tax purposes and protection we were advised by an Attorney to set it up as an LLC. I was the Store Manager and had several employees. I was listed as an employee (MGR) and so was my x-husband (emp). So Phaedra is the Manger of the LLC. (an employee) P was employed also I'm guessing at least as a songwriter (?) But you can own the company and still be shown as an employee. Does that make sense? Yes it does make sense and he could have had silent/minority shareholders in the LLC and not have been the sole owner. He could have had provisions to have the ownership pass on to a trust upon his death or down to the shareholders. If he had shares in the LLC those would be a part of the estate if he was not sole owner the LLC would not be a part of the estate. We just don't know. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teach49 said:
Yes. I own an S Corp, and when I did it full time, I was listed as an employee. I was the only one who owned shares, though others were listed as officers.
As I remember it, the IRS doesn't like owners taking out too much in dividends. If you need money to live, you take out the salary you need and the dividends are extra. I don't know if I'm making sense at all since it's been over 10 years now, but only taking dividends when you actually work for the corporation is not kosher...or is a red flag for an audit or something. So, it makes sense that he's an employee. -It would also make it good for his taxes and probate if he was not sole owner. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Right.I took a monthly draw. I'm not really well versed even now. Thank goodness I had a great Lawyer!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I didn't go back and read evey post of this thread, so forgive me if this is a repeat. The below links allow you to search for businesses in Minnesota and California. Enter NPG Music and select Limited Liability Corporation (if necessary) The results give you very basic information. You can order documents, but I'm not sure what info would be included. . https://mblsportal.sos.st...BeginsWith . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The registered office for the California document (foreign) is Capitol Lien. https://www.capitollien.com/services
No idea if that is SOP or different. The domestic address is PP. Everything is due to renew in December. The California LLC were regsitered in 2014. The MN in 2015. He should have lived to move into this new phase of life...seems he was putting the framework in place, cultivating new talent perhaps to bring into NPG... "Hold on to your souls y'all. We got a long way to go. Thank you! We love y'all!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am inclined to believe that the LLC is not tied to Estate planning. I believe it was designed for Prince to manage his rights and control his assets. I get the vibe Prince was looking more long term, how he can manage his music with minimal overhead. He had learned the nature of the business and seemed to be heading into alternative methods of control and revenue. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |