nelcp777 said:

Mkilpatrick74 said:

Can u imagine being one of the attorney's for his estate amd having to actually read thru that entire document Dixon submitted? I couldn't do it lol

I agree. I have to sporadically read thru them. Kinda feel bad a little for the attorneys. I wonder if Dixon is on the org, he mentioned something to the effect of the doubting of Prince's signature in the supporting exhibits. I did question that here in the discussion. Interesting dude.

I thought the same thing.

Mkilpatrick74 said:

Anyone know if Estabon is appealing his request for DNA test? I saw where his attorneys withdrew amd wondering if new counsel has come forward. I may be in the minority but this is the only one I have felt like deserves the testing. He was adopted and told by judge no. I've followed him on FB for a while now and hope he can workout something so he can bring closure to this issue in his life one way or another.

I heard Estabon is looking for new counsel to take over his case.

I think his filings are still sealed. If they have been unsealed, I havent seen a Notice of Appeal.

O.....M.....G !!! The spiritual wife is back.........I kid you not

Mkilpatrick74 said:

Dear God, Dixon will not go away. 66 pages of total nonsense. I've got a headache. Says he and Tyka knew all along that P was dying. Ughhhhh!!!!

Hello?

zenarose said:

O.....M.....G !!! The spiritual wife is back.........I kid you not

She is jealous of all the attention the frivilous litigators are getting and wants to be declared one also.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

zenarose said:

O.....M.....G !!! The spiritual wife is back.........I kid you not

She is jealous of all the attention the frivilous litigators are getting and wants to be declared one also.

You slay me Wait until she starts filing that she's getting spiritual messages from him about how to proceed.

zenarose said:

O.....M.....G !!! The spiritual wife is back.........I kid you not

If she didn't add that picture to her paperwork she can get lost too.

[img:$uid]http://i1378.ph.../img:$uid]

For those frivolous folks.....

No, I want to see that picture first, though.

morningsong said:

No, I want to see that picture first, though.

LOL did you notice that she couldn't get all her 000,000,000's on one line??

zenarose said:

morningsong said:

No, I want to see that picture first, though.

LOL did you notice that she couldn't get all her 000,000,000's on one line??

Wait. I forgot. Is she the $750 billion woman? Dammit that's a lot of annoyance just for one picture I guess. There's a handful making claims with numbers that have a whole lotta zeroes trailing behind them.

morningsong said:

zenarose said:

LOL did you notice that she couldn't get all her 000,000,000's on one line??

Wait. I forgot. Is she the $750 billion woman? Dammit that's a lot of annoyance just for one picture I guess. There's a handful making claims with numbers that have a whole lotta zeroes trailing behind them.

$3 million is what she is wanting!!

zenarose said:

morningsong said:

Wait. I forgot. Is she the $750 billion woman? Dammit that's a lot of annoyance just for one picture I guess. There's a handful making claims with numbers that have a whole lotta zeroes trailing behind them.

$3 million is what she is wanting!!

Ok, that's not too far off the deep end, I remember her crazy writing though. She is nutty, but from the sound of it she did have some previous contact with Prince, nothing worth making a claim about but maybe something that'll make a nice story if she could focus.



Ooops, and extra letter slip.

[Edited 10/17/16 16:04pm]

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Mkilpatrick74 said:

morningsong said:

Ok, that's not too far off the deep end, I remember her crazy writing though. She is nutty, but from the sound of it she did have some previous contact with Prince, nothing worth making a claim about but maybe something that'll make a nice story if she could focus.



Ooops, and extra letter slip.

[Edited 10/17/16 16:04pm]

For real?? I haven't read her docs yet. What connection does she have to him or what is it that she is saying that makes u feel she really knew him? Figure you could give me a quick summary so I do not have to subject myself to her crazies and end up with another headache tonight. Lol! That was too funny when u said if she would just focus. Not sure that is possible for she and some or these loonies. 😀😀

She says P promised her marriage in 1980?

She attached as an Exhibit a photo of P and allegedly her and some child that P is holding.

She is not alleging the child is his.

I am sure once Claire sees the photo she will allege the child is P and hers.

[Edited 10/17/16 19:36pm]

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

An interesting opinon, see http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-14-16.pdf

Any comments?

Mkilpatrick74 said:

udo said:

An interesting opinon, see http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-14-16.pdf

Any comments?

It is an interesting opinion. I also think Bremer's approach is very interesting. I am paraphasing, but Bremer said in essence that Duane (and his offspring) can not receive inheritance from both his biological father and John L. Basically, you can only claim one, not both.

nelcp777 said:

udo said:

An interesting opinon, see http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-14-16.pdf

Any comments?

It is an interesting opinion. I also think Bremer's approach is very interesting. I am paraphasing, but Bremer said in essence that Duane (and his offspring) can not receive inheritance from both his biological father and John L. Basically, you can only claim one, not both.

.

The opinion mentions a P1, P2, P3 case, doesn't that apply here?

udo said:

An interesting opinon, see http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-14-16.pdf

Any comments?

So does this mean that Duane's daughters will probably get part of the estate? That's the way it sounds to me anyway.

dupe

[Edited 10/18/16 7:35am]

nelcp777 said:

udo said:

An interesting opinon, see http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-14-16.pdf

Any comments?

It is an interesting opinion. I also think Bremer's approach is very interesting. I am paraphasing, but Bremer said in essence that Duane (and his offspring) can not receive inheritance from both his biological father and John L. Basically, you can only claim one, not both.

Well they would claim John L. for sure, wouldn't they?

Did John Nelson have a will? And do I understand correctly that Duane was excluded from inheriting from John Nelson? If there was a will, then maybe John didn't include him. If there wasn't a will, then how can you inherit from the son when you could not inherit from the father of the son?

Another question, did John Nelson sign Duane's birth certificate? (But Prince did not sign the BC of Ms. Garcia's child, correct? Or did that change? )

If Duane was found ineligible to inherit from John Nelson, how can he inherit from Nelson's son? Seems like one solution would be for Vivian's children to agree to set up a trust fund for Duane's daughter and granddaughter so the case moves forward faster. Duane was their brother.

I don't know about Duane's love child, but think that too would be up to Duane's family to decide. A thought anyway.

[Edited 10/18/16 8:30am]

deerpath said:

Prince's siblings (the Heirs) just filed a great arguement to Briana and VN's claim. The asked the Court to dismiss the claim due to the fact that biological, adoption or alternative relationship (like alternative reproduction) has not and can not be met for Duane. In addition, just because John L behaved, which the Heirs are saying he did not, that John L was his father.

The Heirs arguement address almost every issue. Very interesting read. It appears the Sibilings are united in this fight. The ask the Court to dismiss the claim even because Duane's offspring have admitted no biological ties to John L. Also, just because Prince treated Duane like a brother, that relationship is not determining in heirship. John L is the determinaiton.

After reading the Heirs arguement, they presented a strong case. They even said that if Brianna and VN's claim is approved, then it will open the flood gates on claims that people were treated like a son or daughter even though there was no biological or adoptive legal process.

laurarichardson said:

deerpath said:

Did John Nelson have a will? And do I understand correctly that Duane was excluded from inheriting from John Nelson? If there was a will, then maybe John didn't include him. If there wasn't a will, then how can you inherit from the son when you could not inherit from the father of the son?

Another question, did John Nelson sign Duane's birth certificate? (But Prince did not sign the BC of Ms. Garcia's child, correct? Or did that change? )

If Duane was found ineligible to inherit from John Nelson, how can he inherit from Nelson's son? Seems like one solution would be for Vivian's children to agree to set up a trust fund for Duane's daughter and granddaughter so the case moves forward faster. Duane was their brother.

I don't know about Duane's love child, but think that too would be up to Duane's family to decide. A thought anyway.

[Edited 10/18/16 8:30am]

-- John Nelson had a will and Duane was not included and the sibs made sure to let the court know he was not related to John. John never adopted Duane so I don't see how the girls could inherit anything from Prince as the have no legal or blood tie to him.

According to the Heirs arguemnet that was filed today, John L's will was never signed, it was only a draft. They are arguing that since it was only a draft, it has no legal bearing since it was not witnessed or signed.

The Heirs are also arguing that there is no biological or adoptive legal procedure to John L. They are saying behaviour alone is not legal standing. Plus, Brianna and VN have already admitted there is not any biological or adoptive procedures in their submissions and claims.

All of these stupid loopholes and legalities. If Duane was not related to Prince in any way then his kids don't deserve and shouldn't get ish! Why does our legal system make stuff so freaking complicated?!