independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate - Part 4
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 33 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 10/05/16 6:46pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

morningsong said:

195,000? One Hundred and Ninety-five Thousand people claiming to be family? Geesh. No wonder.

Poor Judge. Poor family.

Tyka is being sarcastic. There were not 195,00 claims. In fact, it was probably less than 40. Mostly from relatives from Ps Louisiana heritage.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 10/05/16 7:01pm

morningsong

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

195,000? One Hundred and Ninety-five Thousand people claiming to be family? Geesh. No wonder.

Poor Judge. Poor family.

Tyka is being sarcastic. There were not 195,00 claims. In fact, it was probably less than 40. Mostly from relatives from Ps Louisiana heritage.



Oh. That was one of those flippant numbers of what it felt like. Because seriously, the filing clerk would need a serious vaca after that. Wrist would be hurtin' badly keying in all that.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 10/05/16 7:09pm

zenarose

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Tyka is being sarcastic. There were not 195,00 claims. In fact, it was probably less than 40. Mostly from relatives from Ps Louisiana heritage.



Oh. That was one of those flippant numbers of what it felt like. Because seriously, the filing clerk would need a serious vaca after that. Wrist would be hurtin' badly keying in all that.

She didn't say anything about "children". So maybe that means DNA tests were all negative. hmmm

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 10/05/16 7:12pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

zenarose said:

morningsong said:



Oh. That was one of those flippant numbers of what it felt like. Because seriously, the filing clerk would need a serious vaca after that. Wrist would be hurtin' badly keying in all that.

She didn't say anything about "children". So maybe that means DNA tests were all negative. hmmm

The Judge still hasnt ruled on any DNA tests.

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 10/05/16 7:15pm

zenarose

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

zenarose said:

She didn't say anything about "children". So maybe that means DNA tests were all negative. hmmm

The Judge still hasnt ruled on any DNA tests.

lol

DANG!!! after the past 3 days of crap I was lookin' for a little rainbow!! rainbo cry

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 10/05/16 7:23pm

morningsong

zenarose said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The Judge still hasnt ruled on any DNA tests.

lol

DANG!!! after the past 3 days of crap I was lookin' for a little rainbow!! rainbo cry



You're still waiting for the long lost child?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 10/05/16 7:33pm

zenarose

morningsong said:

zenarose said:

DANG!!! after the past 3 days of crap I was lookin' for a little rainbow!! rainbo cry



You're still waiting for the long lost child?

HECK NO!!! LOL Just want to know that I'm right on this one. I believe that he took care if bidnez 'bout 1997......... lol lol lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 10/05/16 8:05pm

PennyPurple

avatar

roxy831 said:

PennyPurple said:

Tyka said some interesting things in this interview.

http://www.etonline.com/news/199690_exclusive_prince_estate_will_sister_tyka_nelson_interview/

And she knew this was coming...his departure sad sad

I know. Really sad.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 10/05/16 9:06pm

Highonpurple

roxy831 said:

PennyPurple said:

Tyka said some interesting things in this interview.

http://www.etonline.com/news/199690_exclusive_prince_estate_will_sister_tyka_nelson_interview/

And she knew this was coming...his departure sad sad

WELCOME HOME CLASS, FOOL, WHO'S SINGING WE ITS YOU

JAJAJAJA

[Edited 10/5/16 21:11pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 10/05/16 10:36pm

morningsong

I think I found it. I don't speak legalese so I may have paraphrased it incorrectly but i don't think I was off that much.


If it is an applicant’s intent that persons claiming to be the descendants of John L. Nelson
and one of the other alleged fathers would all be deemed heirs to the Estate, the Court would need
to find that the Decedent had a presumptive and genetic father (John L. Nelson) and a second,
biological father. The Court first finds that to declare the Decedent has two fathers would be
intellectually unsatisfying. Secondly, the term biological father, or something similar to it, is not
defined in the Probate Code. There is no such person. The Court acknowledges that the Minnesota and Wisconsin
Probate Code is not entirely consistent with reference to the terms father, parent, genetic father or
genetic parent. However, Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1—201 and 524.2-103 regarding definitions and
intestate succession reference a father or parent in singular terms.
If, however, it is the applicant’s intent to establish that a person other than John L. Nelson
is the Decedent’s father, to the exclusion of all other alleged fathers including John L. Nelson, the
necessary result is that John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson would not
inherit from the Estate. This places this proceeding directly in line with Jot/2am, which requires
that a presumption of paternity (that John L. Nelson is the father of the Decedent, John Nelson,
Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson) may be rebutted only by a person who met the
standing and timeliness standards of the Minnesota Paternity Act in Minn. Stat. §257.57.
John L. Nelson is the father listed on the Decedent’s birth certificate and the Decedent was
born during the marriage of John L. Nelson and Mattie Della (Shaw). John L. Nelson is the
presumptive father of the Decedent. Minn. Stat. § 257.55 (2015). Pursuant to the Minnesota
Probate Code, if the father-child relationship is established under the presumption of paternity
under chapter 257, "genetic father" means only the man for whom that relationship is established.
See Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1 ~201 (22), 524.2-1 16 and 524.2—117. Therefore, John L. Nelson is also the
genetic father of the Decedent. The Decedent was adjudicated the child of John L. Nelson and
Mattie Della (Shaw) in their divorce decree. The Decedent was adjudicated an interested person
in the Estate of John L. Nelson as an heir and served as Personal Representative of the Estate of
John L. Nelson. John L. Nelson is the presumptive father, the genetic father and the adjudicated
father of the Decedent.
As John L. Nelson is the presumed, genetic and adjudicated father of the Decedent and, as
the applicants have neither met the standing or timeliness requirements to rebut the presumption
of paternity, the Court determines that Loyal James Gresham, Jr., Loya Wilson, Loyal James
Gresham III, Darcell Johnston, Orrine Gresham, Paul Leonard Newman, Regina Sorenson,
Haywood Nelson, Sr., Roskco Motes, Alfred Jackson, Sr. and Venita Jackson-Leverette are not,
as a matter of law, intestate heirs of the Decedent.




Amended-Order-Re-Genetic-Testing-Protocol-and-Heirship-Claims-Following-the-June-27,-2016-hearing-and-Judgment.pdf
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 10/05/16 11:04pm

Highonpurple

morningsong said:

I think I found it. I don't speak legalese so I may have paraphrased it incorrectly but i don't think I was off that much.
If it is an applicant’s intent that persons claiming to be the descendants of John L. Nelson and one of the other alleged fathers would all be deemed heirs to the Estate, the Court would need to find that the Decedent had a presumptive and genetic father (John L. Nelson) and a second, biological father. The Court first finds that to declare the Decedent has two fathers would be intellectually unsatisfying. Secondly, the term biological father, or something similar to it, is not defined in the Probate Code. There is no such person. The Court acknowledges that the Minnesota and Wisconsin Probate Code is not entirely consistent with reference to the terms father, parent, genetic father or genetic parent. However, Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1—201 and 524.2-103 regarding definitions and intestate succession reference a father or parent in singular terms. If, however, it is the applicant’s intent to establish that a person other than John L. Nelson is the Decedent’s father, to the exclusion of all other alleged fathers including John L. Nelson, the necessary result is that John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson would not inherit from the Estate. This places this proceeding directly in line with Jot/2am, which requires that a presumption of paternity (that John L. Nelson is the father of the Decedent, John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson) may be rebutted only by a person who met the standing and timeliness standards of the Minnesota Paternity Act in Minn. Stat. §257.57. John L. Nelson is the father listed on the Decedent’s birth certificate and the Decedent was born during the marriage of John L. Nelson and Mattie Della (Shaw). John L. Nelson is the presumptive father of the Decedent. Minn. Stat. § 257.55 (2015). Pursuant to the Minnesota Probate Code, if the father-child relationship is established under the presumption of paternity under chapter 257, "genetic father" means only the man for whom that relationship is established. See Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1 ~201 (22), 524.2-1 16 and 524.2—117. Therefore, John L. Nelson is also the genetic father of the Decedent. The Decedent was adjudicated the child of John L. Nelson and Mattie Della (Shaw) in their divorce decree. The Decedent was adjudicated an interested person in the Estate of John L. Nelson as an heir and served as Personal Representative of the Estate of John L. Nelson. John L. Nelson is the presumptive father, the genetic father and the adjudicated father of the Decedent. As John L. Nelson is the presumed, genetic and adjudicated father of the Decedent and, as the applicants have neither met the standing or timeliness requirements to rebut the presumption of paternity, the Court determines that Loyal James Gresham, Jr., Loya Wilson, Loyal James Gresham III, Darcell Johnston, Orrine Gresham, Paul Leonard Newman, Regina Sorenson, Haywood Nelson, Sr., Roskco Motes, Alfred Jackson, Sr. and Venita Jackson-Leverette are not, as a matter of law, intestate heirs of the Decedent.
Amended-Order-Re-Genetic-Testing-Protocol-and-Heirship-Claims-Following-the-June-27,-2016-hearing-and-Judgment.pdf

I WONDER HOW WELL PRINCE FANS TRULY NEW PRINCE I NEVER MET HIM EXCEPT IN CONCERT AND GOT AS CLOSE AS 10 FEET. BUT EVER CONSIDERED HE MIGHT B THE SECOND COMING AND IN THIS CASE THE BLACK MESSIAH DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE WITH ALL ITS PROPHECIES. FURTHERMORE PRINCE WAS PERFECT WITH FLAWS AND DONT YOU THINK THE ESTATE SHOULD B FOR ALL THE FANS. COULD THIS B US & DO YOU BELIEVE WITH CONVICTION IN GOD OR JUST ANOTHER FAKE

WE SHALL C. EVEN AFTER DEATH HE RULES FROM HIS GRAVE. HALLE-LULLA

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 10/06/16 8:41am

morningsong

Highonpurple said:



morningsong said:


I think I found it. I don't speak legalese so I may have paraphrased it incorrectly but i don't think I was off that much.
If it is an applicant’s intent that persons claiming to be the descendants of John L. Nelson and one of the other alleged fathers would all be deemed heirs to the Estate, the Court would need to find that the Decedent had a presumptive and genetic father (John L. Nelson) and a second, biological father. The Court first finds that to declare the Decedent has two fathers would be intellectually unsatisfying. Secondly, the term biological father, or something similar to it, is not defined in the Probate Code. There is no such person. The Court acknowledges that the Minnesota and Wisconsin Probate Code is not entirely consistent with reference to the terms father, parent, genetic father or genetic parent. However, Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1—201 and 524.2-103 regarding definitions and intestate succession reference a father or parent in singular terms. If, however, it is the applicant’s intent to establish that a person other than John L. Nelson is the Decedent’s father, to the exclusion of all other alleged fathers including John L. Nelson, the necessary result is that John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson would not inherit from the Estate. This places this proceeding directly in line with Jot/2am, which requires that a presumption of paternity (that John L. Nelson is the father of the Decedent, John Nelson, Norrine Nelson, Sharon Nelson and Tyka Nelson) may be rebutted only by a person who met the standing and timeliness standards of the Minnesota Paternity Act in Minn. Stat. §257.57. John L. Nelson is the father listed on the Decedent’s birth certificate and the Decedent was born during the marriage of John L. Nelson and Mattie Della (Shaw). John L. Nelson is the presumptive father of the Decedent. Minn. Stat. § 257.55 (2015). Pursuant to the Minnesota Probate Code, if the father-child relationship is established under the presumption of paternity under chapter 257, "genetic father" means only the man for whom that relationship is established. See Minn. Stat. §§ 524.1 ~201 (22), 524.2-1 16 and 524.2—117. Therefore, John L. Nelson is also the genetic father of the Decedent. The Decedent was adjudicated the child of John L. Nelson and Mattie Della (Shaw) in their divorce decree. The Decedent was adjudicated an interested person in the Estate of John L. Nelson as an heir and served as Personal Representative of the Estate of John L. Nelson. John L. Nelson is the presumptive father, the genetic father and the adjudicated father of the Decedent. As John L. Nelson is the presumed, genetic and adjudicated father of the Decedent and, as the applicants have neither met the standing or timeliness requirements to rebut the presumption of paternity, the Court determines that Loyal James Gresham, Jr., Loya Wilson, Loyal James Gresham III, Darcell Johnston, Orrine Gresham, Paul Leonard Newman, Regina Sorenson, Haywood Nelson, Sr., Roskco Motes, Alfred Jackson, Sr. and Venita Jackson-Leverette are not, as a matter of law, intestate heirs of the Decedent.

Amended-Order-Re-Genetic-Testing-Protocol-and-Heirship-Claims-Following-the-June-27,-2016-hearing-and-Judgment.pdf

I WONDER HOW WELL PRINCE FANS TRULY NEW PRINCE I NEVER MET HIM EXCEPT IN CONCERT AND GOT AS CLOSE AS 10 FEET. BUT EVER CONSIDERED HE MIGHT B THE SECOND COMING AND IN THIS CASE THE BLACK MESSIAH DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE WITH ALL ITS PROPHECIES. FURTHERMORE PRINCE WAS PERFECT WITH FLAWS AND DONT YOU THINK THE ESTATE SHOULD B FOR ALL THE FANS. COULD THIS B US & DO YOU BELIEVE WITH CONVICTION IN GOD OR JUST ANOTHER FAKE


WE SHALL C. EVEN AFTER DEATH HE RULES FROM HIS GRAVE. HALLE-LULLA




You are annoying.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 10/06/16 8:43am

Rev

avatar

Highonpurple said:

roxy831 said:

And she knew this was coming...his departure sad sad

WELCOME HOME CLASS, FOOL, WHO'S SINGING WE ITS YOU

JAJAJAJA

[Edited 10/5/16 21:11pm]

Are you high on purple?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 10/06/16 8:52am

Rev

avatar

In regards to Tyka's comments about knowing and not being surprised.

If Prince felt this was inevitable, why the hell didn't get his house in order.

Giving up half of his money to a government he felt was failing it's people.

Leaving his life's work / legacy in the hands of lawyers to sort through.

I don't assume any would have had the standing to tell Prince to get

his shit together, but I believed he we was smarter than this.

Sorry, just very frustrated with these people clawing for his fame and money.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 10/06/16 10:31am

roxy831

avatar

Highonpurple said:

roxy831 said:

And she knew this was coming...his departure sad sad

WELCOME HOME CLASS, FOOL, WHO'S SINGING WE ITS YOU

JAJAJAJA

[Edited 10/5/16 21:11pm]

Pardon???? eek

Welcome home class. We've come a long way. - RIP Prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 10/06/16 11:29am

endiadj

Rev said:

In regards to Tyka's comments about knowing and not being surprised.

If Prince felt this was inevitable, why the hell didn't get his house in order.

Giving up half of his money to a government he felt was failing it's people.

Leaving his life's work / legacy in the hands of lawyers to sort through.

I don't assume any would have had the standing to tell Prince to get

his shit together, but I believed he we was smarter than this.

Sorry, just very frustrated with these people clawing for his fame and money.

This is exactly why I have a hard time believing that he knew he was dying soon. Maybe he did and just didn't care? confused But, all of his money, his homes, property, PP, everything would be up in the air and he knew this and was okay with it? I find it hard to believe that he would be this careless with his legacy at stake. The fact that he didn't have a will at this point in his life to begin with is puzzling though.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 10/06/16 12:08pm

tmo1965

I thought the judge got rid of Rodney. He's back! He says he has power of attorney (or is he asking for power of attorney?), and he's asking to be the personal representative of the estate.

http://www.mncourts.gov/m...randum.pdf

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 10/06/16 12:10pm

morningsong

endiadj said:

Rev said:

In regards to Tyka's comments about knowing and not being surprised.

If Prince felt this was inevitable, why the hell didn't get his house in order.

Giving up half of his money to a government he felt was failing it's people.

Leaving his life's work / legacy in the hands of lawyers to sort through.

I don't assume any would have had the standing to tell Prince to get

his shit together, but I believed he we was smarter than this.

Sorry, just very frustrated with these people clawing for his fame and money.

This is exactly why I have a hard time believing that he knew he was dying soon. Maybe he did and just didn't care? confused But, all of his money, his homes, property, PP, everything would be up in the air and he knew this and was okay with it? I find it hard to believe that he would be this careless with his legacy at stake. The fact that he didn't have a will at this point in his life to begin with is puzzling though.




Everyone knows he's belief on contracts. So what so hard with not accepting he had no faith in a paper will. Wills can be contested and held up in court, just as this situation is happening here. I'm am sure he discussed with those who stand to benefit the most what he wanted done and left it in their hands to get it done as best as possible. Maybe he was okay with the tax situation, I don't think he shared his every thought and belief with his fans, but he did see a wee bit conservative with a whole lot of spiritualness, he paid his taxes for the most part maybe a missed step here and there, but nothing massive. While not having a will in this day and age for most people of wealth is bizarre, I don't find it some earth shattering event that's so hard to to possible.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 10/06/16 12:18pm

nelcp777

Dixon is back, with exhibits. I am not a lawyer and I have a short attention span. Dude is all over the place. Reminds me of the movie, Better Off Dead, with the newspaper delivery boy, "I want my $2."

So he and Prince made a deal for $1.00 at Glam Slam LA?

Interesting cat. I am curious if that is Prince's signature on the agreement.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 10/06/16 12:27pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

nelcp777 said:

Dixon is back, with exhibits. I am not a lawyer and I have a short attention span. Dude is all over the place. Reminds me of the movie, Better Off Dead, with the newspaper delivery boy, "I want my $2."

So he and Prince made a deal for $1.00 at Glam Slam LA?

Interesting cat. I am curious if that is Prince's signature on the agreement.

Doesnt look like P's signature to me.

Yes, he is all over the place and I have no time for his shenanigans.

Dixon is going to be declared a "frivilous litigator" soon.

loser chatterbox chatterbox

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 10/06/16 12:29pm

Highonpurple

roxy831 said:

Highonpurple said:

WELCOME HOME CLASS, FOOL, WHO'S SINGING WE ITS YOU

JAJAJAJA

[Edited 10/5/16 21:11pm]

Pardon???? eek

WITH ALL DUE RESPEECT TO YOU, LISTEN TO THE SONG ITS YOU NOT WE HE SINGS

PEACE

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 10/06/16 12:31pm

morningsong

Highonpurple said:

roxy831 said:

Pardon???? eek

WITH ALL DUE RESPEECT TO YOU, LISTEN TO THE SONG ITS YOU NOT WE HE SINGS

PEACE



Could you at least turn your capital button off? We see you.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 10/06/16 12:36pm

nelcp777

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

nelcp777 said:

Dixon is back, with exhibits. I am not a lawyer and I have a short attention span. Dude is all over the place. Reminds me of the movie, Better Off Dead, with the newspaper delivery boy, "I want my $2."

So he and Prince made a deal for $1.00 at Glam Slam LA?

Interesting cat. I am curious if that is Prince's signature on the agreement.

Doesnt look like P's signature to me.

Yes, he is all over the place and I have no time for his shenanigans.

Dixon is going to be declared a "frivilous litigator" soon.

loser chatterbox chatterbox

I tried to read the agreement. I do not see his name on their at all. I would imagine for this to be a binding agreement, both parties would have to sign the document. I read, sporatically, the document, and it seems as if it is more a transfer from Controversy Music and old publishing to NPG Music. Dixon is not in the agreement, but I could have missed his name.

The copyright office looks like NPG Music submited 965 titles for copyright registration. No mention of Dixon on the documents.

I am not sure how these exhibits show an agreement between him and Prince. The power of attorney seems like a scam.

My head is hurting from this.

Simon's deal is giving me a vibe of not legit. The BC does not list a father, unless I missed it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 10/06/16 1:12pm

zenarose

nelcp777 said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Doesnt look like P's signature to me.

Yes, he is all over the place and I have no time for his shenanigans.

Dixon is going to be declared a "frivilous litigator" soon.

loser chatterbox chatterbox

I tried to read the agreement. I do not see his name on their at all. I would imagine for this to be a binding agreement, both parties would have to sign the document. I read, sporatically, the document, and it seems as if it is more a transfer from Controversy Music and old publishing to NPG Music. Dixon is not in the agreement, but I could have missed his name.

The copyright office looks like NPG Music submited 965 titles for copyright registration. No mention of Dixon on the documents.

I am not sure how these exhibits show an agreement between him and Prince. The power of attorney seems like a scam.

My head is hurting from this.

Simon's deal is giving me a vibe of not legit. The BC does not list a father, unless I missed it.

This dude is just so full of it. The signature doesn't even looks close!!! We all need a pair of Muck boots!!! 53 pages!!! The Cory dude.... there is not a father listed unless I missed it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 10/06/16 1:52pm

Highonpurple

morningsong said:

Highonpurple said:

I WONDER HOW WELL PRINCE FANS TRULY NEW PRINCE I NEVER MET HIM EXCEPT IN CONCERT AND GOT AS CLOSE AS 10 FEET. BUT EVER CONSIDERED HE MIGHT B THE SECOND COMING AND IN THIS CASE THE BLACK MESSIAH DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE WITH ALL ITS PROPHECIES. FURTHERMORE PRINCE WAS PERFECT WITH FLAWS AND DONT YOU THINK THE ESTATE SHOULD B FOR ALL THE FANS. COULD THIS B US & DO YOU BELIEVE WITH CONVICTION IN GOD OR JUST ANOTHER FAKE

WE SHALL C. EVEN AFTER DEATH HE RULES FROM HIS GRAVE. HALLE-LULLA

You are annoying.

maybe anoited

we will C

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 10/06/16 1:54pm

tmo1965

zenarose said:

nelcp777 said:

I tried to read the agreement. I do not see his name on their at all. I would imagine for this to be a binding agreement, both parties would have to sign the document. I read, sporatically, the document, and it seems as if it is more a transfer from Controversy Music and old publishing to NPG Music. Dixon is not in the agreement, but I could have missed his name.

The copyright office looks like NPG Music submited 965 titles for copyright registration. No mention of Dixon on the documents.

I am not sure how these exhibits show an agreement between him and Prince. The power of attorney seems like a scam.

My head is hurting from this.

Simon's deal is giving me a vibe of not legit. The BC does not list a father, unless I missed it.

This dude is just so full of it. The signature doesn't even looks close!!! We all need a pair of Muck boots!!! 53 pages!!! The Cory dude.... there is not a father listed unless I missed it.

There is no father on Cory's birth certificate. I think that if Brianna, VN, and Cory are successful at being declared potential heirs, that at least Cory will be required to take a DNA test to prove that he is Duane's son before the declaration is made final.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 10/06/16 1:59pm

morningsong

Highonpurple said:

morningsong said:

Highonpurple said: You are annoying.

maybe anoited

we will C



Thank you that's much better.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 10/06/16 4:04pm

laurarichardso
n

Rev said:



In regards to Tyka's comments about knowing and not being surprised.



If Prince felt this was inevitable, why the hell didn't get his house in order.


Giving up half of his money to a government he felt was failing it's people.


Leaving his life's work / legacy in the hands of lawyers to sort through.


I don't assume any would have had the standing to tell Prince to get


his shit together, but I believed he we was smarter than this.



Sorry, just very frustrated with these people clawing for his fame and money.



--Even if he had a will he would have to pay estate taxes. He could have put some money in a trust we have no knowledge of that and we still don't know what that work product was. He had oddles of real estate worth about 50 million. It could be that he was planning on making a will and ran out of time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 10/06/16 4:06pm

laurarichardso
n

tmo1965 said:

I thought the judge got rid of Rodney. He's back! He says he has power of attorney (or is he asking for power of attorney?), and he's asking to be the personal representative of the estate.


http://www.mncourts.gov/m...randum.pdf


-/- Check out his website he is insane.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 10/06/16 4:28pm

Highonpurple

morningsong said:

Highonpurple said:

WITH ALL DUE RESPEECT TO YOU, LISTEN TO THE SONG ITS YOU NOT WE HE SINGS

PEACE



Could you at least turn your capital button off? We see you.

ok i submit feel better friend

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 33 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate - Part 4