independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Pills seized from Paisley Park contained illicit fentanyl, same drug that killed Prince
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 19 of 69 « First<151617181920212223>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #540 posted 08/21/16 8:13am

muleFunk

avatar

lwr001 said:

muleFunk said:

Speculating on this someone could have switched pills in Atlanta.

,,it could be he knew exatly what he was getting and used the mislabel for the ability to bypass TSA scrutiny etc...Peopel do just that all the time

Pills marked as hydrocodone that were seized from Paisley Park after Prince’s overdose death actually contained fentanyl, the powerful opioid that killed him, according to a source with knowledge of the investigation.

The musician, who weighed only 112 pounds at the time of his death April 21, had so much of the drug in his system, autopsy results later showed, that it would have killed anyone, regardless of size, the source said.

Prince did not possess a prescription for fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that has been described as 100 times more powerful than morphine, the source said.

Despite the finding, investigators still aren’t certain how the 57-year-old megastar ingested the fentanyl. However, they are leaning toward the theory that he took the pills not knowing they contained the drug.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #541 posted 08/21/16 8:13am

lwr001

Accidental in that he didnt swallow the whole lot of them yet had enough to kill ..

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #542 posted 08/21/16 8:14am

anangellooksdo
wn

NikkiED said:



LuxLove said:




nursev said:


and for you silly ass newbies who just joined in June shame on you cuz ain't a damn thing funny about death and grief.


What do you mean - 'newbies' here have been making fun of Prince dying or fans mourning? Must've missed that, but then I don't read everything. I know the org is very negative but didn't think it was that bad. From what I've seen & in my own experience the 'newbies' who joined post April did so because they were grieving & wanted to be around like minded people. Can't say the same for the 'old' fans who were hating on Prince constantly before he died. Shame it took his death for some to appreciate him. Anyway no one should be making fun of this situation- we're all in the same boat.



Thanks LuxLove, I'm a newbie to org but not to Prince, I officially joined because I wanted to be with other like minded people who felt the same way about him. I have been a fan since the early 80s and I was in shock when I heard the news, especially where he was found. I originally like most people accepted that maybe he accidentially overdosed because he was in so much pain with his hip, then my opinion changed again to thinking maybe he was terminally ill which would explain why he made peace was Morris and especially Madge. It feels as though we're in limbo and we can't move on and have closure until we know the full truth (I don't care if it's ugly) because for me it will never change how I felt about him and his music. confused



I think a part of him knew this pain issue was serious and he wanted to make amends and reach out to people. He was also simply maturing spiritually and softening around the edges. I think there was an acceptance about this in the middle of his wanting to live.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #543 posted 08/21/16 8:15am

lwr001

rogifan said:

lwr001 said:

which is fine , yet he did indeed know he was taking Vicodin, illegally, whcih if you take enough of those, same result,,,You cannot absolve him from his role in his own death

Again you're stating something unconfirmed as fact.

hydrocodone is vicodin ..so even the unmarked pills in your estimation where what , he didnt know? they were planted on him etc do tell

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #544 posted 08/21/16 8:16am

jumanji2016

leadline said:

jumanji2016 said:

lwr001 said: The top pic is NOT from the 2013 Grammys. I believe it is from the 2010 Grammys. He went natural with his hair in 2012.


no the top pic is from 2013 grammy's, feb 10th to be exact, he went natural further into 2013.

Ahh. OK. I think I got confused because he was natural on The View in 2012. I guess he may have had his hair pressed at the 2013 Grammys that made it appear that his hair was relaxed when it really wasn't.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #545 posted 08/21/16 8:19am

lwr001

jumanji2016 said:

leadline said:


no the top pic is from 2013 grammy's, feb 10th to be exact, he went natural further into 2013.

Ahh. OK. I think I got confused because he was natural on The View in 2012. I guess he may have had his hair pressed at the 2013 Grammys that made it appear that his hair was relaxed when it really wasn't.

thats from sept 2012, where he looks fine

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #546 posted 08/21/16 8:19am

teach49

lwr001 said:

Accidental in that he didnt swallow the whole lot of them yet had enough to kill ..

If the ST report is correct and the sources are from LE, then no, accidental in that he thought he was taking hydrocodone only, and that he did not know it was laced with so much fentanyl that it would kill him (or anyone for that matter).

This is what the whole federal investigation into fentanyl is about. While there may be some people who know what they're taking, a whole bunch die because they think they're taking something far less lethal.

If you want to blame him because he took a pain med at all, then fine, but I don't think LE is going to agree with you. This is serious and not entirely his fault.

[Edited 8/21/16 8:20am]

[Edited 8/21/16 8:21am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #547 posted 08/21/16 8:22am

rogifan

teach49 said:



rogifan said:


teach49 said:


That's assuming no one was with him as we've been told. If so, then you're right. But if this article is true, then it's a whole new ballgame.



We have assumed since the autopsy report that P took fentanyll on purpose. We have assumed he knew it. We have questioned how they knew it was self-administered and "accidental" (might he have done it on purpose?). If this article is true and he didn't know he was taking fentynal and that there was so much fentanyl in his system that it would have killed anyone of any size, then this narrative has just changed dramatically (and I'm not talking murder, but I am calling into question everything we've been told).




Do you have a link to the autopsy report. I wasn't aware one was released. I thought we only got the one pager from the medical examiner.

Yeah, it's the death certificate and it does say the cause of death is fentanyl toxicity...accidental and self-administered. I'll try to dig it up.



Some have wondered how they knew it was accidental, but if he thought he was taking something else, well, there you go.



Ok I've seen that. It's the full autopsy that hasn't been released. And Minnesota law treats the full report as confidential so it's unlikely it will ever be released to the public.

https://www.stlouiscounty...tions.aspx
Basic demographic information and the cause and manner of death are matters of public record under Minnesota law. The rest of the information is confidential and treated similarly to a medical record. This information is available only to immediate next-of-kin, legal representatives of the decedent's estate and treating physicians.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #548 posted 08/21/16 8:22am

lwr001

teach49 said:

lwr001 said:

Accidental in that he didnt swallow the whole lot of them yet had enough to kill ..

If the ST report is correct and the sources are from LE, then no, accidental in that he thought he was taking hydrocodone only, and that he did not know it was laced with so much fentanyl that it would kill him (or anyone for that matter).

This is what the whole federal investigation into fentanyl is about. While there may be some people who know what they're taking, a whole bunch die because they think they're taking something far less legal.

If you want to blame him because he took a pain med at all, then fine, but I don't think LE is going to agree with you. This is serious and not entirely his fault.

And, do we know for a fact he didn't have a prescription for vicodin? He did, in fact, pick up a prescription earlier in the day. I don't think we've ever been told what that was.

so, the script he got from walgreens was laced..if so, there would have been a recall, uproar etc that we surely woudld have heard about if Walgreens pharma was dishing out bootleg pills,,that would have been immediate..so once again, he ingested the vicodin on his own...

[Edited 8/21/16 8:23am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #549 posted 08/21/16 8:22am

bondno9

avatar

LOVESYMBOLNUMBER2 said:

prince was not on the street buying drugs, someone was buying them for him. if the medication in the bottle did not match the label there are 3 possabilities, prince put the fentanyl in the hydrocodone bottle to disguise it, the dealer who sold the drugs gave the wrong pills, (not sure on the price difference between fentanyl and hydrocodone, so financially this might not make sence for a drug dealer to do), or soembody else switched the pills on purpose, knowing how many pills prince would take thinking it was hydrocodone. could someone have been switching the pills on purpose for a while? and prince didn't even know he was taking fentanyl? could someone have purposefully got him addictided to fentanyl? i am not a conspiracy person at all, but as the vast majority of people here have felt that something was seruously wrong with the death story, and now this...the purple beast needs to rise up!! i am so mad!! we need to so something

No one fought for P was he was alive and sadly it looks as though no one is willing to fight for him even in death. It's like people just want to sweep it underneath the rug, but something ain't right!! IF LE has found a prescription for hydrocodone but not fentayl then obviously pills were switched without his knowledge?!?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #550 posted 08/21/16 8:24am

rogifan

lwr001 said:



rogifan said:


lwr001 said:




which is fine , yet he did indeed know he was taking Vicodin, illegally, whcih if you take enough of those, same result,,,You cannot absolve him from his role in his own death



Again you're stating something unconfirmed as fact.



hydrocodone is vicodin ..so even the unmarked pills in your estimation where what , he didnt know? they were planted on him etc do tell


Again this Star Tribune report is from unnamed sources. I don't deal in unnamed sources.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #551 posted 08/21/16 8:26am

teach49

lwr001 said:

teach49 said:

If the ST report is correct and the sources are from LE, then no, accidental in that he thought he was taking hydrocodone only, and that he did not know it was laced with so much fentanyl that it would kill him (or anyone for that matter).

This is what the whole federal investigation into fentanyl is about. While there may be some people who know what they're taking, a whole bunch die because they think they're taking something far less legal.

If you want to blame him because he took a pain med at all, then fine, but I don't think LE is going to agree with you. This is serious and not entirely his fault.

And, do we know for a fact he didn't have a prescription for vicodin? He did, in fact, pick up a prescription earlier in the day. I don't think we've ever been told what that was.

so, the script he got from walgreens was laced..if so, there would have been a recall, uproar etc that we surely woudld have heard about if Walgreens pharma was dishing out bootleg pills,,that would have been immediate..so one again, he ingested the vicodin

Right, I just saw they were one and the same. We still don't know where he got the vicodin.

So, as far as you're concerned this report doesn't change anything if true? He took a pill he shouldn't have, died from it, and so he is to blame for his death.

I don't think anyone here is saying P didn't take a pill. They're saying we don't know where he got it and it was laced with something that would be much more likely to kill him than what he thought he was taking so others are responsible as well.

Hence, the investigation.

[Edited 8/21/16 8:33am]

[Edited 8/21/16 8:42am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #552 posted 08/21/16 8:29am

purplerabbitho
le

About the clothes, is if possible he had them on backwards all day long? After all,he wasnt feeling well. And apparently, in the Walgreen pictures he was wearing the same clothes as he died in. I know Prince was not the type to go out in clothes haphazardly thrown on. But he might have been withdrawing and therefore didn't care that he was wearing clothes he may have found on the floor etc. His clothes were all black, flowing, and nearly non-descript. It would be easy to wear that stuff backwards and people hardly notice.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #553 posted 08/21/16 8:30am

Mkilpatrick74

CalhounSq said:

Well, this is fucking me up all over again... Is this what it's gonna be like?? Every few months, hearts breaking all over again?? FUCK bheart


.
[Edited 8/20/16 21:33pm]


That's how I feel right now
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #554 posted 08/21/16 8:34am

jumanji2016

purplerabbithole said:

About the clothes, is if possible he had them on backwards all day long? After all,he wasnt feeling well. And apparently, in the Walgreen pictures he was wearing the same clothes as he died in. I know Prince was not the type to go out in clothes haphazardly thrown on. But he might have been withdrawing and therefore didn't care that he was wearing clothes he may have found on the floor etc. His clothes were all black, flowing, and nearly non-descript. It would be easy to wear that stuff backwards and people hardly notice.

I keep thinking that his clothes were backwards after his appointment. I feel like he probably took his clothes off to be examined and treated with the fluids from Schulenberg. He had on a jacket when he was out and about, so that would make him not notice that they were backwards even more.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #555 posted 08/21/16 8:36am

Aerogram

avatar

OKAY FOLKS

All those saying: "I have a feeling that", "what was in Kirk's bag?" or "So telling his clothes were on backward..", or that are checking Prince's lunar chart for clues, or that are otherwise acting like they are in CSI Minneapolis, take a seat and breath through your nose for an hour or two.

All others, please carry on, and thank you for being a rock of reason and logic.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #556 posted 08/21/16 8:38am

Mkilpatrick74

purplerabbithole said:



leadline said:




strawberrylova123 said:


Lidocaine is for heart arrhythmia and Alprazolam is for anxiety....i dont know what to believe anymore.


Sounds like a dangerous cocktail made by someone with bad intentions, because nobody would knowingly, or, consciously take all of this stuff at once unless they really wanted to hurt themselves. And we all know Prince did not roll that way.



Who said he took them all at once? It could have just been remmants of those drugs when he took them earlier. Lidocaine is a local that goes on the skin, Alprazolam is taken by a lot of people. Maybe there was some percocet from the earlier overdose still in his system. I am not sure how this drug stuff works however.



Maybe this article is BS to some extent. After all, they don't name the source.




Everyone needs to look up the lifespan of these drugs before they assume he took them at once. I'm with u on this, those others could be traces from an earlier dose. Most benzos are detectable in urine for 30 days and opiates are there between 4-5 days. That's by urine. I would imagine it's detectable a lot longer via blood testing or hair samples
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #557 posted 08/21/16 8:38am

MD431Madcat

avatar

Nothing nice to say.. confused

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #558 posted 08/21/16 8:39am

muleFunk

avatar

I highly doubt whatever he got a Walgreens was the hydrocodone/fentenyl.

That article said what he took could have killed any person.

Now my thinking again is that if he was taking this earlier he should have died earlier...........

What happened other than someone put the pills there? He was meeting with specialists in opiate withdrawal and rehabbing that day? Did someone not want that to happen?

Pure speculation here but this is a game changer in my thought process.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #559 posted 08/21/16 8:41am

Mkilpatrick74

rogifan said:

purplerabbithole said:

This article is depressing as hell if it is true. For one thing, he was clueless as to the strength of the pills he was given. My theory is that someone got him the supposed hydrocodone illegally because no legit doctor would give it to him legally. He thought it was hydrocodone but it was instead fentanyl. When he realized he had taken something else, he threw on his clothes and just didn't make it to a phone or help quick enough.



The article indicated that counterfit drugs were sometimes fentanyl instead of what they were labeled as. I don't think the person who got the drug knew they were giving him the wrong stuff. But whoever obtained those drugs for him should face jail time (IMO).



Also sad (if it is true) is that he was on pills for localized pain (lidocaine [sic]) and anti-anxiety pills (alprazolam) apparently. Poor guy. NOt sure whether the anti-anxiety pills were for his withdrawal symptoms as a result of the Narcon or just something he was always on.



I know too many people (especially middle aged people) on pills like these. People need to find other ways to deal with anxiety and pain.



[Edited 8/20/16 19:34pm]



According to a Google search lidocaine can also be used to treat irregular heart beat. And I read that alprazolam can also be prescribed as a sleep aid. One thing Dr. Drew said after Prince's death is people don't normally overdose from a painkiller it usually happens when the painkiller is taken in conjunction with something else. And he specifically mentioned something like a sleep aid.


This is very true. I am not allowed any type of sleep aid like amitriptilyne or the one above bc I take time released morphine and oxycondone (break thru pain) which could kill me. I take a small dose of trazadone
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #560 posted 08/21/16 8:50am

Mkilpatrick74

EnDoRpHn said:



strawberrylova123 said:


anangellooksdown said:
Well I think lidocaine is mostly used for pain.

Lidocaine is the most important 1b Arrhthmiac drug, it's specifically used for cardiac ventricle. But it can aslo be used to numb pain.

There's no way it had anything to do with arrhythmia. Lidocaine is administered as an IV bolus for that purpose, i.e., typically by an EMT or ER MD/RN).

You can buy low-dosage lidocaine transdermal patches without a prescription.



If given by IV could have been during one of the hospital visits if his heart was acting up. Which I believe it's been mentioned he has had for a while. It would still be selected in the toxic screens bc it was not that long prior given to him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #561 posted 08/21/16 8:50am

LOVESYMBOLNUMB
ER2

the source did not say that the pills contained any hydrocodone, they may have, but the article says the pills in the hydrocodone bottle contained fentanyl and he did not have a prescription for fentanyl.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #562 posted 08/21/16 8:53am

teach49

muleFunk said:

I highly doubt whatever he got a Walgreens was the hydrocodone/fentenyl.

That article said what he took could have killed any person.

Now my thinking again is that if he was taking this earlier he should have died earlier...........

What happened other than someone put the pills there? He was meeting with specialists in opiate withdrawal and rehabbing that day? Did someone not want that to happen?

Pure speculation here but this is a game changer in my thought process.

I agree he didn't get it from Walgreens (I didn't realize that vicodin and hydrocodone were the same).

But, if this report is true, I do think it's a game changer from the narrative that he was addicted to opiates and had graduated to fentanyl and finally took too much. I've never understood how they so quickly said it was an accident if that were the case. If this story is true, now we know.

That the ME said it was an accident is consistent with this report. If true, they are saying he didn't know he was taking fentanyl.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #563 posted 08/21/16 8:55am

purplerabbitho
le

Exactly. His type of clothes being on backward would be hard to notice. We are making too much about his clothes. the scarier issues are the pills being in the wrong bottle and his being alone.

jumanji2016 said:

purplerabbithole said:

About the clothes, is if possible he had them on backwards all day long? After all,he wasnt feeling well. And apparently, in the Walgreen pictures he was wearing the same clothes as he died in. I know Prince was not the type to go out in clothes haphazardly thrown on. But he might have been withdrawing and therefore didn't care that he was wearing clothes he may have found on the floor etc. His clothes were all black, flowing, and nearly non-descript. It would be easy to wear that stuff backwards and people hardly notice.

I keep thinking that his clothes were backwards after his appointment. I feel like he probably took his clothes off to be examined and treated with the fluids from Schulenberg. He had on a jacket when he was out and about, so that would make him not notice that they were backwards even more.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #564 posted 08/21/16 9:00am

purplerabbitho
le

Mkilpatrick74 said:

purplerabbithole said:

Who said he took them all at once? It could have just been remmants of those drugs when he took them earlier. Lidocaine is a local that goes on the skin, Alprazolam is taken by a lot of people. Maybe there was some percocet from the earlier overdose still in his system. I am not sure how this drug stuff works however.

Maybe this article is BS to some extent. After all, they don't name the source.

Everyone needs to look up the lifespan of these drugs before they assume he took them at once. I'm with u on this, those others could be traces from an earlier dose. Most benzos are detectable in urine for 30 days and opiates are there between 4-5 days. That's by urine. I would imagine it's detectable a lot longer via blood testing or hair samples

Thank you. Prince had gone through a lot that week and he was a 57 year old man with aches and pains, a recent drug overdose and a likely sleeping disorder. there are going to be remnants of different drugs in his system even if they are no longer effective. NOthing unusual or conspiratoral there.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #565 posted 08/21/16 9:02am

Mkilpatrick74

Eileen said:

Sounds like this DEA alert...


https://www.dea.gov/divis...0116.shtml


Bingo! Now who the F gave him this shit!!!??? I pray they find rhem. I believe the police are leaking bits of information. They do that as part of the process when they are at a certain point or looking for something in particular or if an announcement of indictment is coming.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #566 posted 08/21/16 9:05am

manabean84

purplerabbithole said:

About the clothes, is if possible he had them on backwards all day long? After all,he wasnt feeling well. And apparently, in the Walgreen pictures he was wearing the same clothes as he died in. I know Prince was not the type to go out in clothes haphazardly thrown on. But he might have been withdrawing and therefore didn't care that he was wearing clothes he may have found on the floor etc. His clothes were all black, flowing, and nearly non-descript. It would be easy to wear that stuff backwards and people hardly notice.

I had my shirt on inside out for 3/4 of the day a few days ago. I had seen multiple people during that time period and nobody ever noticed, including me. I was tired when I put it on and wasn't just paying that much attention.

I'm not a human
I am a dove
I'm your conscious
I am love
All I really need is to know that
You believe
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #567 posted 08/21/16 9:07am

teach49

LOVESYMBOLNUMBER2 said:

the source did not say that the pills contained any hydrocodone, they may have, but the article says the pills in the hydrocodone bottle contained fentanyl and he did not have a prescription for fentanyl.

The article I read said the pills were marked. I don't interpret that to mean it was a bottle, although I guess it might have been.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #568 posted 08/21/16 9:11am

CooperC62057

avatar

Mkilpatrick74 said:

Eileen said:

Sounds like this DEA alert...


https://www.dea.gov/divis...0116.shtml


Bingo! Now who the F gave him this shit!!!??? I pray they find rhem. I believe the police are leaking bits of information. They do that as part of the process when they are at a certain point or looking for something in particular or if an announcement of indictment is coming.

Exactly. Thank God someone posted the link to a real legit article showing that this is happening. He may have known he was taking Vicodin but I don't believe for a minute he suspected it could contain fentanyl. That's where it makes his death a murder. He didn't OD on Vicodin.
"Remember when you told me that love was touching souls?" ☔️ A Case of You ☔️
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #569 posted 08/21/16 9:11am

1Sasha

How do the previous ER visits - I think Kirk told the authorities there were two for Prince himself over the past couple of years - tie into what ultimately happened? Maybe they don't. Of course, the information is confidential, but ... This time period would tie in with when his appearance started to change markedly.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 19 of 69 « First<151617181920212223>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Pills seized from Paisley Park contained illicit fentanyl, same drug that killed Prince