Love2tha9s said: I'm just curious does everyone here who hates Prince's recent music now because of the Jehovah's Witness stuff....did you also hate all of the GOD references he's had in it all the way back from at least Controversy on?? or do you just hate it now because he's put a specific lable on it??
He talked about GOD before, he talks about Religion now. His message before used be abstract and INCLUSIVE, so even an atheist like me could appreciate and tolerate it. NOW, he's semi-seperatist and overly orthodox. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: This response confirms my suspicions about some of the religious backlash around here. I have always had the feeling that some people found it easier to dismiss Prince's God/Biblical references as long as they could skip ahead to the next song about sex. That seems to have made it easier to dismiss or ignore his "religious take." Now that he has moved away from the sex talk and profanity (partly because he is older and more mature), it seems harder for people to dismiss "religious" Prince. Now that there is no more "glorious spin," some people really seem to have a problem. Is his religious take really "much more serious, preachy and reactionary"today or is it just that there is no sex to offset it? Speaking only for myself here, I don't think that's it. He still sings about sex. "Turn Me Loose" is all about butt sex, for example. Even on TRC, his major JW religious work, he sings about going down and eating out a woman. I don't think he's capable of not singing about sex. Throughout his career, whenever Prince has "cleaned up" his act, his take on cleaning up is always very risque. "Colonized Mind" is a great song musically. I absolutely love it. But as I said before, I'll ignore the lyrics because they kind of turn me off. My big problem with it is the idea that we need God to make our laws. Um, no. No, we don't. (The incessant complaining about the record industry is tiresome too, and I've never seen how the record industry problems he has have paralleled the problems of the entire world anyway, but that's another issue.) I'm glad you enjoy the religious views he expresses in this song; that's cool. There are many, many of his religious or spiritual songs that I love the lyrics to, though, and I have throughout the years. I'm sure there'll be more too, just not this particular one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rockability said: Seems pretty obvious to me that Prince "could have" hired some shills to hammer out posts of how much they "love" the new stuff.
HOWEVER, he forgot to write down the spelling of names like DYLAN AND JIMI. Come one, when someone tells me that the songs are classics because they are just as good or better than Jimmy and the lyrics are as good as dillon, I'm calling bullshit. And I'm saying that Dylan and Jimi should have aspired to reach Prince's level. Prince is a one of a kind special, gifted man. Thanks for the laughs, arguments and overall enjoyment for the last umpteen years. It's time for me to retire from Prince.org and engage in the real world...lol. Above all, I appreciated the talent Prince. You were one of a kind. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said:[quote] Love2tha9s said: I am not a religous person at all. I actually think that it has done more harm than good in many instances. Therefore, I consider myself a spiritual person whose faith grows as I grow older. However, I have always genuinely enjoyed Prince's music overall whether "dirty" or "clean." As a longtime fan, I appreciate and respect his maturation as an artist and man. I am not a member of an "organized" religion because it is not something that I believe in. However, I respect Prince's (and anyone else's) right to follow a religion and express his beliefs in his music. Afterall, isn't that what most real artists do - express their beliefs in their music? Anyway, I hope that some of you who detest the God/Biblical references today will respond to Love2tha9s' question, as it is a legitimate one. So you prefer an unorganized religion then. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: Decent music, kitschy lyrics. It's listenable, but I wouldn't return to it much.
theres just nae pleasin some cats iz there? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Revolution said: Prince is a one of a kind special, gifted man. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
weejimmy said: Lammastide said: Decent music, kitschy lyrics. It's listenable, but I wouldn't return to it much.
theres just nae pleasin some cats iz there? Not hating, just stating my personal impression. It's getting a decent response overall. I'm glad others are feeling it. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
4th day and my 5th listern/play.....better speakers ...volume a bit higher following the lyrics this time ...being objective...
Dam....wet myself again ...this track rocks ...sh*t ...ok Prince you win..your the MAN... Da, Da, Da....Emancipation....Free..don't think I ain't..! London 21 Nights...Clap your hands...you know the rest..
James Brown & Michael Jackson RIP, your music still lives with us! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This song is amazing. He did this song at the Charity show he had here in NYC in October and I couldn't make out the lyrics then but I knew it was deep just in the music. Hearing it again in studio form confirmed what I thought to be true. I'm not much for lyrics but the lyrics here are deep and a lot to digest and I'm down with that. Makes you think and the music is just incredible. Prince did the damn thing with this song. I mean look at all the people who are talking about this one song alone. It's struck a chord with us. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pald1 said: lezama said: I find a lot of Americans believe this, but I guess its because you are not taught about other political systems. The respresentational democracy in the US was groundbreaking for its time, but there are plenty of governmental structures in the world today that are far more progressive and democratic than what we have here. And thats to be expected. 200 years don't pass without people fine tuning political structures. I think this belief people have here that you have the best and its ok to live with its imperfections actually holds us back from improving it! And it most certainly can be improved. I'm not even sure what your point is....what other progressive political systems are you talking about? Fascism, Totalitariansm, Communism? These are the other political systems in opppsosition to democracy. Other progressive "governmental structures in the world," of which you speak, are still forms of democracy. Anyone will agree with you that it's imperfect but Toejam is totally correct when he/she says that its the "best political system humans have managed so far." [Edited 12/20/08 21:08pm] My point was twofold: 1) there are far more progressively "democratic" political models that have come into existence since the US established its political model and constitution in 1776 (I'm not ignoring the ammendments to it, but I talking at the level of the fundamental structure laid out in that founding document); and 2) that the biggest obstacle to the "best" isn't the worst, but settling for a sad mediocrity merely because its functional. People who don't recognize obstacles to growth don't grow. Thats my point. So, why criticize someone for believing something can be improved upon? And with regards to the rest of what you wrote. Fascism, Totalitariansm, and communism have nothing to do with this discussion. No two nations have the same model of democracy. No two! Not the US and Canada, not the US and the UK, not the US and Germany, not the US and Japan, nor any other two nations you can compare together. Songs that invoke revolution (change), whether they be by Dylan, Havens, Rage against the Machine, or whoever else should be recognized for what they are. They voice the discontent people feel, whether they be a minority or majority opinion, they're always something a country should address as opposed to ignore. Change it one more time.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The music and the vibe are cool, i dig that he has a point of view and is passionate about.
The difference between something like this and "The Rainbow Children" I couldn’t get past the corn-ball-ness and the silly pretentious cheese that was the RBC, this one I dig regardless of message….granted it sure helps that the message isn’t ignorant as TRC | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The best song of the lot. Almost a great song. Real nice guitar. Crazy lyrics that make no sense. Obviously he is dissing Barack Obama and his fans. All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
udo said: MelittaLove said: Colonized Mind
Upload The 2 party system The lesser of 2 dangers - Illusion of choice Download Their form of fascism Nothing really ever changes - U never had a voice If U look, U're sure gonna find Throughout mankind's history A Colonized Mind Just a small part of the lyrics but I do see a political protest against the facade that the American two-party system provides. (it has been a while for mr Prince!) The bankrupt capital is still dictating things over there. Will they notice? I think the comparison Prince makes to fascism is WAY out of line. The fascist regimes that have ruled countries have killed Millions of innocent people. Sure, there is a lot to complain about recent American politics (as there is in more countries in the world) but to compare it to fascism is inconsiderate... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eaglebear4839 said: dare I say a colonized mind is trying to tell us about the colonized mind?)
Pretty much nailed it right there. But I guess that sort of contradiction is part of what still makes him an intriguing artist. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eelco said: udo said: Just a small part of the lyrics but I do see a political protest against the facade that the American two-party system provides. (it has been a while for mr Prince!) The bankrupt capital is still dictating things over there. Will they notice? I think the comparison Prince makes to fascism is WAY out of line. The fascist regimes that have ruled countries have killed Millions of innocent people. Sure, there is a lot to complain about recent American politics (as there is in more countries in the world) but to compare it to fascism is inconsiderate... Hmmm, well if you start adding up the bodies in Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait... --spelling edit [Edited 12/21/08 12:12pm] perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
....1st upload-download...a group of the same kind of animals...plants...or one-celled organisms living and growing together...organisms live in colonies for their mutual benefit and especially their protection....mulicellular organisms may have evolved out of colonies of unicellar gelatinous envelope....
....2nd upload-download...any people or territory separated from BUT subject to a ruling power.... ....3rd upload-download...any group of individuals having similar interests..occupations..etc...usually living in a particular locality..community... ....4th upload-download...the aggregation of bacteria growing together as the decendants of a single cell... ....5th upload-download...microbiology-a visible growth of microorganisms...usually in a solid or semisolid nutrient medium..... ....if u look...u're sure to find... ...mzsexybaby ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MendesCity said: eaglebear4839 said: dare I say a colonized mind is trying to tell us about the colonized mind?)
Pretty much nailed it right there. But I guess that sort of contradiction is part of what still makes him an intriguing artist. It appears to me that Prince's mind is far from "colonized". The fact that he speaks his mind (even though some do not like what he has to say) and his views may not be "politically correct" is evidence. His choice of religion is really what irks some of you. The fact that you have no faith is proof of your colonization--without faith you're subject to lock-stepping. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince is a religious slave and here is his lecturing us. All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: eelco said: I think the comparison Prince makes to fascism is WAY out of line. The fascist regimes that have ruled countries have killed Millions of innocent people. Sure, there is a lot to complain about recent American politics (as there is in more countries in the world) but to compare it to fascism is inconsiderate... Hmmm, well if you start adding up the bodies in Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait... --spelling edit [Edited 12/21/08 12:12pm] of course.... I'm not saying the Us politics are/were perfect. They are far from. The point I was trying to make is that the facist totalitarian regimes of the world (Germany, Italy, Argentina, Chile to name a few) have SYSTEMATICALLY and PURPOSEDLY killed millions of jews, communists, homosexuals and political opponents. By making the comparison I get the feeling that he sort of downplays that aspect of fascism. Anyway, don't mean to start the whole 'Holocost Aside" and TRC debate again..... [Edited 12/21/08 12:31pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Twinkly1 said: MendesCity said: Pretty much nailed it right there. But I guess that sort of contradiction is part of what still makes him an intriguing artist. It appears to me that Prince's mind is far from "colonized". The fact that he speaks his mind (even though some do not like what he has to say) and his views may not be "politically correct" is evidence. His choice of religion is really what irks some of you. The fact that you have no faith is proof of your colonization--without faith you're subject to lock-stepping. Wow. I can't decide if the worst thing about that comment is the assumptions it makes, its judgmental nature, or its condescension. So I'll just stick with all three. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...we are all souls in an envelope of flesh....the spirit speaks and it is ur soul who has listened....that's the beauty of God's work...we were born to live together...i can not live without prince's music..because the isolation kills me...who says i don't love prince?....i respect his love...i want him in my life...if anyone listens...happiness...God please always take care of this love...i want to sing...i want to tell the world...i ask God to take care of my life...with devotion....
...mzsexybaby ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lezama said: pald1 said: I'm not even sure what your point is....what other progressive political systems are you talking about? Fascism, Totalitariansm, Communism? These are the other political systems in opppsosition to democracy. Other progressive "governmental structures in the world," of which you speak, are still forms of democracy. Anyone will agree with you that it's imperfect but Toejam is totally correct when he/she says that its the "best political system humans have managed so far." [Edited 12/20/08 21:08pm] My point was twofold: 1) there are far more progressively "democratic" political models that have come into existence since the US established its political model and constitution in 1776 (I'm not ignoring the ammendments to it, but I talking at the level of the fundamental structure laid out in that founding document); and 2) that the biggest obstacle to the "best" isn't the worst, but settling for a sad mediocrity merely because its functional. People who don't recognize obstacles to growth don't grow. Thats my point. So, why criticize someone for believing something can be improved upon? And with regards to the rest of what you wrote. Fascism, Totalitariansm, and communism have nothing to do with this discussion. No two nations have the same model of democracy. No two! Not the US and Canada, not the US and the UK, not the US and Germany, not the US and Japan, nor any other two nations you can compare together. Songs that invoke revolution (change), whether they be by Dylan, Havens, Rage against the Machine, or whoever else should be recognized for what they are. They voice the discontent people feel, whether they be a minority or majority opinion, they're always something a country should address as opposed to ignore. I think you just agreed with me, right? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: pald1 said: The question is far too vague to answer properly but what I would say is only the obvious...in the past, Prince was sincere towards his religious beliefs, yes, but also had a glorious spin that involved his own sexual themes and preocupations. Now, his religious take is much more serious, preachy and reactionary. Makes the music a little one-dimensional...no? This response confirms my suspicions about some of the religious backlash around here. I have always had the feeling that some people found it easier to dismiss Prince's God/Biblical references as long as they could skip ahead to the next song about sex. That seems to have made it easier to dismiss or ignore his "religious take." Now that he has moved away from the sex talk and profanity (partly because he is older and more mature), it seems harder for people to dismiss "religious" Prince. Now that there is no more "glorious spin," some people really seem to have a problem. Is his religious take really "much more serious, preachy and reactionary"today or is it just that there is no sex to offset it? So much of these reactions seem predicated upon an anti-JW sentiment. I wonder if Prince was a member of some other religion if the sentiment would be the same, because when you think about it most of his albums from the last three decades have had at least one overtly religious/spiritual-themed song on them and others with more subtle references just like the last few albums that he has released. Examples of religious-themed songs off past albums include, The Ladder, The Cross, Anna Stesia, Elephants and Flowers, Thunder, And God Created Woman, etc. I do not see how the lyrics are any more "serious or preachy"now than in the past, nor do I think the music is "one dimensional." Prince is doing what he always did it's just that now he is a JW and he has excluded the sex talk. Here are some lyrics for comparison: In the beginning, there was God He made the earth, and the heavens He gave us light to rule the day And another light to rule the night The Lord, thy God Made, He made the seas He made the fruit upon the trees When He saw, when He saw that it was good He made a man, made a man Only He could, only He could God made u God made me too He made us all Made us all equally --from God/1984 I know there is a devil because he talks so loud He makes U do things that your friends do, hang out with the crowd But my Lord he is so quiet when He calls your name When U hear it your heart will thunder U will want 2 hear it every day --from Eye No/1988 Love the One who is love The One who gives us the power The One who made everything Elephants and flowers The One who will listen when all others will not There will be peace for those who love God a lot --from Elephants and Flowers/1990 'Twas like thunder all thru the night And a promise to see jesus in the morning light Love say "Take my hand, it'll be alright C'mon save your soul tonight" --from Thunder/1991 When I was lost and couldn't c my way I used 2 follow what everybody say Now I know that it's written in the heart Now I'm ready, ready 2 start Without God it wasn't there Now I feel it Everywhere We were always meant 2 b In paradise eternally B4 the truth I did not care Now I feel it Everywhere --from Everywhere/2001 What is this new exaltation That I just can’t explain? What are these new inspirations That I can’t get out my brain? How am I gonna sleep with this feeling Rushing all through my veins? Get up, come on let’s do something Don’t you wanna go get saved? --from the Word/2006 If u look, u're sure gonna find Throughout mankind's history A Colonized Mind The one in power makes law Under which the colonized fall Without God, it's just the blind leading the blind --from Colonized Mind/2008 I don't have as much time as you to go into all of this but suffice to say that for me to come on a Prince fan site and have to explain, justify even, his take on the thematic relationship between sex and God is a good enough indicator of how far his music, fans, everything has spiralled over the last few years. To say "some people found it easier to dismiss Prince's God/Biblical references as long as they could skip ahead to the next song about sex" is a fantastic misunderstanding of the man's work. The combination of the two is EXACTLY what made him different and they were hardly ever seperable within the context of a song. When he writes songs now, either just about sex or just about God, it naturaly makes them one-dimesional and a shadow of the stuff he wrote in the past. It's as simple as that. To say, only, that people have a beef against his songs now because the songs are overtly-religious is intellectualiy naive. [Edited 12/21/08 13:26pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My favourite of the bunch. The mix makes it sound live. Yum Yum. Definately something of interest to people other than Prince fans i think. As equality grows, violence declines. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Electrostar said: My favourite of the bunch. The mix makes it sound live. Yum Yum. Definately something of interest to people other than Prince fans i think.
Totally agree, this is the only one that may appeal to non fams.(just edit out that "i want to talk about it" part at the beginging) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pald1 said: I don't have as much time as you to go into all of this but suffuce to say that for me to come on a Prince fan site and have to explain, justify even, his take on the thematic relationship between sex and God is a good enough indicator of how far his music, fans, everyhting has spiralled over the last few years. To say "some people found it easier to dismiss Prince's God/Biblical references as long as they could skip ahead to the next song about sex" is a fantastic musunderstanding of the man's work. This is EXACTLY what made him different and the two were never seperable within the context of a song. When he writes songs now, either just about sex or just about God, that is what makes them one-dimesional. It's as simple as that. To say, only, that people have a beef against his songs now becauee they (the people) are anti-religious is intellectualiy naive. I think that you do not have the time "to go into all of this" because there is nothing you can really say. Surely you have time to post and post and post about how "one-dimensional" Prince's current music is and how "intellectually naive" his fans are. I never said that some of the religious backlash was because people were simply "anti-religious," anti-JW, possibly but not anti-religious in general. I was speaking with regard to the dislike of Prince's religious-themed new music. Actually, if you were intellectually astute enough to comprehend my posts, you would see that I said that I am not a religious person. However, I do enjoy Prince's religious/God/spiritual-themed music, as it has ALWAYS existed. Contrary to some beliefs, for the most part his current music is not any more "religious" than before which I pointed out on earlier posts. The themes of a love of God, salvation, redemption, Creationism, everlasting life in Heaven, etc. are nothing new. Again, the only difference is that he has nixed the overtly sexual lyrics and has publicly acknowledged his JW affiliation. I am sorry, but you are completely wrong when you say that the two - sex and religion/God - were "never separable in the context of a song." That is, as you put it, a "fantastic misunderstanding" of the man’s work. He has had multiple songs that are solely God/religious themed and make no mention of sex just as he has had numerous sex-themed songs that make no mention of God. So, what are you talking about? I never said that you had to justify his "thematic relationship between sex and God" because I get it, I always have. I also get that he is no longer 25 or 30. He is a 50-year-old man who would sound ridiculous singing about sex like a man half his age. In contrast to people like Madonna and Mick Jagger, Prince is actually showing maturity - he no longer has to push the "sex" envelope. However, he can continue to sing about God as his faith and conviction grow. Like I said, I get it. I am sorry that you don't. However, all is fair in love, war and Prince music listening. You will have your beliefs and I will have mine. The only difference is that I like to base mine on fact. Now I see why I rarely post on this site any more. I love great conversation and opposing/challenging views/insights. However, I do not like irrational, unsupported opinions that resort to condescension. What's the point? perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eelco said: bellanoche said: Hmmm, well if you start adding up the bodies in Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait... --spelling edit [Edited 12/21/08 12:12pm] of course.... I'm not saying the Us politics are/were perfect. They are far from. The point I was trying to make is that the facist totalitarian regimes of the world (Germany, Italy, Argentina, Chile to name a few) have SYSTEMATICALLY and PURPOSEDLY killed millions of jews, communists, homosexuals and political opponents. By making the comparison I get the feeling that he sort of downplays that aspect of fascism. Anyway, don't mean to start the whole 'Holocost Aside" and TRC debate again..... [Edited 12/21/08 12:31pm] Yeah, I agree with you. I think it might be best to avoid this discussion because the USA has "SYSTEMATICALLY and PURPOSELY killed millions" along with obliterating entire cultures - mine in particular - along with LEGALLY oppressing and dehumanizing millions of its own inhabitants for centuries. I do not think that he is downplaying the effects of fascism in other countries. However, I do think he is pointing out that for far too long the effects of our own fascist regime have been downplayed. Just because we call our fascism democracy doesn't make its effects any less horrendous. But this is a discussion for Politics & Religion, so yeah let's just leave this one alone. (I was trying to find a handshake emoticon but could not so the peace sign will have to do. ) perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
great post ! Made me realise that prince has come a long way from the "one song''-speech where he stated "Ideas contrary to this goal should not be blamed or persecuted, just simply ignored..." (which is VERY humanistic in nature and a great , yet somewhat naive, statement)
Here we are 9 years later and Prince has sunk into condescension all the way. Gay bashing, using the term fascism in a very inapropriate manner, you name it. Nothing wrong in my opinion with religious themes in songs, His use in the past was actually thought provocative but nowadays it's condemning others all the way. Such a shame for a man who , I think, was (/ is?) actually very good at writing lyrics about different aspects of interpersonal relationships. That being said, I think musically all the songs are a lot better than anything from the 00's by Prince..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...the mind is expanding...new ideas are comming in...especially for the midwest..everyehere..religion vs science...where is the law?..God vs the big bang....isolation ....computer loves in blue.....general and personal feel to it....
...mzsexybaby ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: pald1 said: I don't have as much time as you to go into all of this but suffuce to say that for me to come on a Prince fan site and have to explain, justify even, his take on the thematic relationship between sex and God is a good enough indicator of how far his music, fans, everyhting has spiralled over the last few years. To say "some people found it easier to dismiss Prince's God/Biblical references as long as they could skip ahead to the next song about sex" is a fantastic musunderstanding of the man's work. This is EXACTLY what made him different and the two were never seperable within the context of a song. When he writes songs now, either just about sex or just about God, that is what makes them one-dimesional. It's as simple as that. To say, only, that people have a beef against his songs now becauee they (the people) are anti-religious is intellectualiy naive. I think that you do not have the time "to go into all of this" because there is nothing you can really say. Surely you have time to post and post and post about how "one-dimensional" Prince's current music is and how "intellectually naive" his fans are. I never said that some of the religious backlash was because people were simply "anti-religious," anti-JW, possibly but not anti-religious in general. I was speaking with regard to the dislike of Prince's religious-themed new music. Actually, if you were intellectually astute enough to comprehend my posts, you would see that I said that I am not a religious person. However, I do enjoy Prince's religious/God/spiritual-themed music, as it has ALWAYS existed. Contrary to some beliefs, for the most part his current music is not any more "religious" than before which I pointed out on earlier posts. The themes of a love of God, salvation, redemption, Creationism, everlasting life in Heaven, etc. are nothing new. Again, the only difference is that he has nixed the overtly sexual lyrics and has publicly acknowledged his JW affiliation. I am sorry, but you are completely wrong when you say that the two - sex and religion/God - were "never separable in the context of a song." That is, as you put it, a "fantastic misunderstanding" of the man’s work. He has had multiple songs that are solely God/religious themed and make no mention of sex just as he has had numerous sex-themed songs that make no mention of God. So, what are you talking about? I never said that you had to justify his "thematic relationship between sex and God" because I get it, I always have. I also get that he is no longer 25 or 30. He is a 50-year-old man who would sound ridiculous singing about sex like a man half his age. In contrast to people like Madonna and Mick Jagger, Prince is actually showing maturity - he no longer has to push the "sex" envelope. However, he can continue to sing about God as his faith and conviction grow. Like I said, I get it. I am sorry that you don't. However, all is fair in love, war and Prince music listening. You will have your beliefs and I will have mine. The only difference is that I like to base mine on fact. Now I see why I rarely post on this site any more. I love great conversation and opposing/challenging views/insights. However, I do not like irrational, unsupported opinions that resort to condescension. What's the point? You spend quite a lot of time about what you don't say and precious little concerning what you do....I love the bit about 'showing maturity.' Why is it a given that, as we grow older, things that get watered down is a sign of 'maturity.' If that's the case, give me irresponsible, immature Prince any day. In any event, I'm still not sure what your real point is because you obfuscate it behind so many bland denials..."your not religious but..." etc. I have no idea what any of this means...My ability to comprehend, or your general incoherence? What's the point? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |