independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Discuss Everything MJ - Part 6
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 25 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 11/19/09 10:36am

dag

avatar

JackieBlue said:

dag said:


Poor Mickey. You can feel his pain.

As for the Janet interview, it´s hard to judge what she said about Mike cause she didn´t get into detail. I hate when peole touch on a subject like that. They should either get in detail and say exactly what happen and not just touch the subject. For me, it would have been better if she avoided talking about it completely. Well, hopefully, the police investigation reveals more.


This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

Exactly, it´s very easy to twist their statements then. It´s what LMP used to do as well and then she was complaining that she didn´t mean it that way. lolI hated it so much.

And I hate the way these TV channles operate. I mean I saw a preview of this interview and then I was watching the whole thing on youtube and I was over a second part out of six and I haven´t learn anything new that wasn´t shown in the preview. They keep on repeating things thousands of times adding few seconds here and there and consider it a "new show".
[Edited 11/19/09 10:38am]
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 11/19/09 10:44am

JackieBlue

avatar

dag said:

JackieBlue said:



This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

Exactly, it´s very easy to twist their statements then. It´s what LMP used to do as well and then she was complaining that she didn´t mean it that way. lolI hated it so much.

And I hate the way these TV channles operate. I mean I saw a preview of this interview and then I was watching the whole thing on youtube and I was over a second part out of six and I haven´t learn anything new that wasn´t shown in the preview. They keep on repeating things thousands of times adding few seconds here and there and consider it a "new show".
[Edited 11/19/09 10:38am]


lol Between previews and being a fan, rarely do these interviews reveal new stuff. Sometimes I think editorial pieces are better but then once you get past what they're wearing and what their home looks like it's the same ole information. I guess it's for the average audience who doesn't know most of the details.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 11/19/09 10:54am

bboy87

avatar

JackieBlue said:

dag said:


Poor Mickey. You can feel his pain.

As for the Janet interview, it´s hard to judge what she said about Mike cause she didn´t get into detail. I hate when peole touch on a subject like that. They should either get in detail and say exactly what happen and not just touch the subject. For me, it would have been better if she avoided talking about it completely. Well, hopefully, the police investigation reveals more.


This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

Michael always had problems with grammar lol

Yet I'm still hating on the lyrics because I wish I wrote them lol
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 11/19/09 11:01am

MOL

Post from KOP forum:
"I won't deny it, I'm really upset with her [Janet]. She's always been loyal to Michael and now she threw her loyalty out of the window. Just because she thinks Michael might have had a drug problem, doesn't mean he had one. That was her interpretation. How can she make such claim when it was in mid May that she's seen him for the first time in years? At the same time she contradicts herself. Why hasn't she mentioned that she was among those who wanted him to do a reunion tour with the brothers? She even said on Ellen (I think it was on her show) she was working on persuading him. I guess he wasn't much of a drug addict to her then. From all the family members, Janet was the least one I ever expected to stab Michael in the back. This is @#$%ed up. I'm PISSED!!!!!"
[Edited 11/19/09 11:08am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 11/19/09 11:08am

JackieBlue

avatar

Stab Michael in the back? WTF?
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 11/19/09 11:08am

JackieBlue

avatar

bboy87 said:

JackieBlue said:



This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

Michael always had problems with grammar lol

Yet I'm still hating on the lyrics because I wish I wrote them lol


Those lyrics are so telling. I wish we could hear the song.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 11/19/09 11:09am

MOL

JackieBlue said:

Stab Michael in the back? WTF?

I didn't write that. But, yes, thar's a bit ignorant.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 11/19/09 11:09am

bboy87

avatar

JackieBlue said:

Stab Michael in the back? WTF?

I know...




I don't think she stabbed him in the back, I just think she could've gone more into detail....
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 11/19/09 11:11am

Timmy84

That's a lie at her stabbing MJ in the back, please.

Yeah I wished she went more into detail but that's ok, I still like the interview.

Who mad? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 11/19/09 11:17am

JackieBlue

avatar

MOL said:

JackieBlue said:

Stab Michael in the back? WTF?

I didn't write that. But, yes, thar's a bit ignorant.


Oh, I saw it wasn't from you but that part stood out strong.

disbelief
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 11/19/09 11:18am

sag10

avatar

MOL said:

Look, after the trial and during the trial, the family got the opportunity of doing it good, and doing it right. During Michael stay in Bahrein, Jermaine recomended him to go there, and he went with him. His family visited in many occasions. He was weak then, his will weaker, and easier to persuade, but where was the intervention?
After him coming back in the US - his ties with his family didn't severed, they visited him, and he visited them....

They even talked about doing the J5 concert all the time with Michael, trying to persuade him....

There were talks about the Jacksons 5 reunion, many many talks - even Janet, before the talks with AEG, and even after Michael signed with them, said that she WOULD BE PLEASED to OPEN the brothers concerts.


Now, if Michael would have been that ill, that addicted, that frail - WHY MAKE SUCH BUSINESS PLANS? Why, when he was in Bahrein, Jermaine and the Prince wanted to release albums with him? Why were they planing that J5 reunion, trying to persuade Michael to give in? Why making plans for touring, for reuniting, for collaborations? Even Janet was agreeing, last year. Where were the REAL CONCERNS, the real INTERVENTION?
[Edited 11/19/09 4:50am]
[Edited 11/19/09 4:53am]


Yea, why did Jermaine take him to Bahrein? That sheik of Arabic ended up suing Michael.. Jermaine didn't help Michael he made more of a mess. Not to mention Tohme Tohme..
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 11/19/09 11:21am

sag10

avatar

dag said:

JackieBlue said:



This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

Exactly, it´s very easy to twist their statements then. It´s what LMP used to do as well and then she was complaining that she didn´t mean it that way. lolI hated it so much.

And I hate the way these TV channles operate. I mean I saw a preview of this interview and then I was watching the whole thing on youtube and I was over a second part out of six and I haven´t learn anything new that wasn´t shown in the preview. They keep on repeating things thousands of times adding few seconds here and there and consider it a "new show".
[Edited 11/19/09 10:38am]


The interview was at best ok.. I was quite bored actually.

Janet is very beautiful, no doubt.
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect, it means you've decided to look beyond the imperfections... unknown
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 11/19/09 11:22am

MOL

Timmy84 said:

That's a lie at her stabbing MJ in the back, please.

Yeah I wished she went more into detail but that's ok, I still like the interview.

Who mad? lol

Janet could have said that Michael had abused prescripted drugs in '93 and '03. She implied that he died because of a drug addiction. Besides, she said she THOUGHT he was in denial. However, here's a person who had seen her brother once (May 14) in 3/4 years. Here's a person who had been trying to convince her brother to do a reunion tour with the other members of the J5. If he was so addicted, then why did she hound him to do that reunion tour? Why, instead of talking about that tour, didn't she try to talk about the addiction? It seems to me that Janet is trying to make the family look good at the eyes of the general public: "We, as family did everyhting we could but he shut us down. It's not our fault. We did everything we could".

BTW, she also defended Joe. How convenient. And, in calling Michael a drug addict, she is making Murray and Joe immune. One won't go to jail, the other will be able to challenge the will nby claiming "undue influence".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 11/19/09 11:23am

MOL

sag10 said:

MOL said:

Look, after the trial and during the trial, the family got the opportunity of doing it good, and doing it right. During Michael stay in Bahrein, Jermaine recomended him to go there, and he went with him. His family visited in many occasions. He was weak then, his will weaker, and easier to persuade, but where was the intervention?
After him coming back in the US - his ties with his family didn't severed, they visited him, and he visited them....

They even talked about doing the J5 concert all the time with Michael, trying to persuade him....

There were talks about the Jacksons 5 reunion, many many talks - even Janet, before the talks with AEG, and even after Michael signed with them, said that she WOULD BE PLEASED to OPEN the brothers concerts.


Now, if Michael would have been that ill, that addicted, that frail - WHY MAKE SUCH BUSINESS PLANS? Why, when he was in Bahrein, Jermaine and the Prince wanted to release albums with him? Why were they planing that J5 reunion, trying to persuade Michael to give in? Why making plans for touring, for reuniting, for collaborations? Even Janet was agreeing, last year. Where were the REAL CONCERNS, the real INTERVENTION?
[Edited 11/19/09 4:50am]
[Edited 11/19/09 4:53am]


Yea, why did Jermaine take him to Bahrein? That sheik of Arabic ended up suing Michael.. Jermaine didn't help Michael he made more of a mess. Not to mention Tohme Tohme..

Jermaine received a Rolls Royce from the prince in order to persuade Michael.
[Edited 11/19/09 11:24am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 11/19/09 11:28am

MOL

Those family interventions included Joe outside, for hours, at Mike's place on the hills yappin about money.

Janet working his nerves to go on some reunion tour working the talk show circuits as well.

The lovely meeting with Leonard Rowe at the Beverly Hills Hotel with threats to sue from All Good Entertainment.

The same show Jermaine milked Larry King for what it's worth during the trial and way before his death. Everybody is waiting for Michael but everybody has amnesia about This Is It. (Oh the memories of Jackson Family Honors)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 11/19/09 11:39am

babybugz

avatar

These fans I swear..... neutral
[Edited 11/19/09 11:40am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 11/19/09 11:40am

carlcranshaw

avatar

It seems like a Catch 22.

MJ probably took the drugs because he felt nobody in his family loved him.

And when his family came with "We're here to save you and we you want you tour with the brothers." There you go.

His Mom was in on it too. Why do you think he gravitated towards Diana Ross and later Liz?

This is off the cuff but perhaps MJ read that Liz had friendships With Montgomery Clift and James Dean and Roddy McDowell and he felt like he should befriend her for unconditional acceptance of who he really was.
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 11/19/09 12:04pm

bboy87

avatar

carlcranshaw said:

It seems like a Catch 22.

MJ probably took the drugs because he felt nobody in his family loved him.

And when his family came with "We're here to save you and we you want you tour with the brothers." There you go.

His Mom was in on it too. Why do you think he gravitated towards Diana Ross and later Liz?

This is off the cuff but perhaps MJ read that Liz had friendships With Montgomery Clift and James Dean and Roddy McDowell and he felt like he should befriend her for unconditional acceptance of who he really was.

I believe the medication was for the pain he was dealing with and as years went by, he became dependant on them

I've always felt he became friends with Liz because she shared the same experiences that he had. He always gravitated towards other child stars:

Liz Taylor
George "Spanky" McFarland
Emannuel Lewis
Donny Osmond
Brooke Shields
Shirley Temple

They had been through the same things
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 11/19/09 12:17pm

bboy87

avatar

http://www.contactmusic.c...es_1122406

RAHMAN OFFERS JACKSON STUDIES

Oscar winner A.R. RAHMAN is giving MICHAEL JACKSON fans the chance to study the King of Pop at his music conservatory.

The Slumdog Millionaire composer was working with Jackson when the pop star died in June (09) and now he's honouring his friend by offering devotees a course on the singer's music at the KM Music Conservatory in Kodambakkam, Tamil.

And insider Rajan Zed reveals Rahman himself will reportedly give the inaugural lecture on Jackson.

Rahman is developing an album of new tunes in memory of Jackson, which will feature musicians from all over the world.

Rahman is the founder and principal of the KM Music Conservatory
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 11/19/09 12:26pm

MOL

babybugz said:

These fans I swear..... neutral
[Edited 11/19/09 11:40am]

Yet, you are incapable of counter-argumenting me. You know that I've just posted facts.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 11/19/09 12:30pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

dag said:

mimi07 said:


eek

Poor Mickey. You can feel his pain.

As for the Janet interview, it´s hard to judge what she said about Mike cause she didn´t get into detail. I hate when peole touch on a subject like that. They should either get in detail and say exactly what happen and not just touch the subject. For me, it would have been better if she avoided talking about it completely. Well, hopefully, the police investigation reveals more.



Interesting lyrics ..isn't?

Despite his death, people still obsessed with his personal life....disbelief
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 11/19/09 12:34pm

babybugz

avatar

MOL said:

babybugz said:

These fans I swear..... neutral
[Edited 11/19/09 11:40am]

Yet, you are incapable of counter-argumenting me. You know that I've just posted facts.

I don't know what you posted I didn't even read it lmfao it could have been B.S for all I know , my comment is reference to someone that said janet wasn't being loyal.I think alot of the fans need to open their eyes on some things and stop thinking all of the jacksons are evil etc.That's HIS family , they need to get a life.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 11/19/09 12:35pm

carlcranshaw

avatar

bboy87 said:

I've always felt he became friends with Liz because she shared the same experiences that he had. He always gravitated towards other child stars:

Liz Taylor
George "Spanky" McFarland
Emannuel Lewis
Donny Osmond
Brooke Shields
Shirley Temple

They had been through the same things[/quote]

That is true too. Also the guy who played "Oliver".

I think the Pepsi accident left him in pain but the family always pulling on him left him with an empty feeling. I know he loved them dearly but there was that underlying thing of him being used.

[Edited 11/19/09 12:36pm]
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 11/19/09 12:37pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

sag10 said:

MOL said:

Look, after the trial and during the trial, the family got the opportunity of doing it good, and doing it right. During Michael stay in Bahrein, Jermaine recomended him to go there, and he went with him. His family visited in many occasions. He was weak then, his will weaker, and easier to persuade, but where was the intervention?
After him coming back in the US - his ties with his family didn't severed, they visited him, and he visited them....

They even talked about doing the J5 concert all the time with Michael, trying to persuade him....

There were talks about the Jacksons 5 reunion, many many talks - even Janet, before the talks with AEG, and even after Michael signed with them, said that she WOULD BE PLEASED to OPEN the brothers concerts.


Now, if Michael would have been that ill, that addicted, that frail - WHY MAKE SUCH BUSINESS PLANS? Why, when he was in Bahrein, Jermaine and the Prince wanted to release albums with him? Why were they planing that J5 reunion, trying to persuade Michael to give in? Why making plans for touring, for reuniting, for collaborations? Even Janet was agreeing, last year. Where were the REAL CONCERNS, the real INTERVENTION?
[Edited 11/19/09 4:50am]
[Edited 11/19/09 4:53am]


Yea, why did Jermaine take him to Bahrein? That sheik of Arabic ended up suing Michael.. Jermaine didn't help Michael he made more of a mess. Not to mention Tohme Tohme..


Let's be honest here.....

The sheik was more than wonderful to MJ, when Mj was acquitted after the trial he needed some space and rest, the sheik gave MJ a home and everything you could imagine...it was a great hospitality....

They did an agreement and Mj wasn't capable to fulfill it, Im glad that this one ended peacefully…tho..
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 11/19/09 12:44pm

bboy87

avatar

http://www.jackson5abc.co...?newsid=51

Russ Terrana's "Message to Michael"

By Yoann, 13/11/2009



Engineer Russ Terrana’s “Message To Michael” On The Release Of The New Jackson 5 Album!

By Joe Klein

All of us at New Media Creative are very excited for our good friend RUSS TERRANA, the legendary Motown Records sound recording engineer who recorded and mixed no less than 92 NUMBER ONE RECORDS during his illustrious and decades-long career!

Yesterday marked the release of the first “new” JACKSON 5 album in decades! The album, called I WANT YOU BACK! UNRELEASED MASTERS is a collection of a dozen previously unreleased tracks recorded by The J5 back in their early years at Motown Records (1969-1970) at the same time they were recording their early smash hits at the label. The entire album was mixed down by Russ in this past September

Russ mixed all of the early Jackson 5 hits while still working for Motown in their Detroit studios. The first Motown Jackson 5 tracks were recorded in Detroit in the summer of 1969, with producer BOBBY TAYLOR. At that time, BERRY GORDY began to migrate Motown to Hollywood (where they ultimately totally relocated by 1972.) He moved his hot new “boy band” out to L.A. and finished recording the first Jackson 5 album in a small studio in the West Hollywood area of L.A. Taylor produced a few more songs, and a new production team, dubbed THE CORPORATION by Berry Gordy, which was comprised of Gordy, FREDDIE PERRIN, DEKE RICHARDS and ALPHONZO MIZELL, produced the final two songs for the album, one of which was the #1 smash I WANT YOU BACK, which propelled the group to instant stardom after its release.

Gordy was not happy with the original mixes of the album made in L.A. and sent the tapes back to Detroit to have his resident “mix-master” Russ remix the the album

Berry loved Russ’ new mixes and released them as the debut Jackson 5 album, DIANA ROSS PRESENTS THE JACKSON 5 in December of 1969. The album quickly rocketed up the charts, hitting #1 on the R&B charts and #5 on the pop charts in the months to follow. The only single from that first album, I WANT YOU BACK, was itself a #1 smash that set the tone for a string of #1 hit singles and albums to follow (all of which were also mixed by Russ) and, the rest is, as they say “music history!”

Early this year, just as the celebration of Motown’s Fiftieth Anniversary had begun” and preparations for the fortieth anniversary of the first Jackson 5 releases were getting underway, Universal Music Enterprises started searching the Motown vaults and unearthed a stash of old Michael Jackson and Jackson 5 master tapes with the hopes of unearthing a few hidden gems to release this year.

They company hit pay dirt in the spring and started reviewing the newly-found masters to determine which were good candidates for a release late this year. Then came the sudden, tragic death of Michael in late in June which, naturally gave the “lost tracks” new historical significance.

HARRY WEINGER, vice president of A&R for UNIVERSAL MUSIC ENTERPRISES, the company responsible for the creation and packaging of the Motown Records catalog of hits, passed along this information to me last month. “I started looking through J5 and MJ Motown masters earlier this year in anticipation of the J5’s 40th anniversary. Obviously, when we heard the news of Michael’s death, what was there got a bigger spotlight.”

In August, Weinger contacted Russ and asked him he would be interested in mixing eleven newly discovered J5 tracks from 1970. It took Russ all of a few seconds to reply and, within a couple of weeks, the digital files of eleven old Jackson 5 multi-track masters were delivered to Russ. Russ then proceeded to meticulously mix down the old recordings in a state-of-the art digital recording facility located in Scots Valley, California called ROCKER STUDIOS, owned by his good friend, RICK VIERRA.

It took Russ and Rick about a month to complete the eleven mixes, finishing the project at the end of September. Working with my partner Brett Bumeter, I first released the story online online about this exciting new release in mid-September, and UME made the “official “ announcement about the new three weeks later.

In a blog story we posted last month, Russ described the project as one of the most rewarding experiences of his professional life, and was moved by the process of mixing the tracks. “It really was a labor of love,” he remarked in the article.

The tracks sound great! Russ managed to capture and perfectly emulate the sounds he first molded and blended decades ago that sold tens of millions of singles and albums for the label. Listening to the just-released J5 tracks is, as Russ himself described the mixing process, is “like stepping back in a time machine.”

The new J5 album, like all the projects Russ touched during his amazing career, is nothing short of a masterpiece, particularly from the standpoint of its impeccable vintage substance—and sound. It’s definitely worth a listen, and a purchase to complete any collection of early Jackson family classics!

I managed to reach Russ on the phone just as the album was becoming available yesterday and asked him about how he felt on this day of the release of the new Jackson 5 album

“It’s about time!” he quipped. “Seriously Joe, this really is exciting. I can’t remember the last time I was this excited about the release of an album I have mixed!”

I asked Russ if there were any other thoughts or feeling he’d like to share about the project.

“It really was a thrill to work on this album. Mixing those tracks stirred up so many memories and emotions about all the time I spent working with Michael and his brothers. It really was a rewarding experience I’ll never forget.”

Last night, Russ sent me an awesome and memorable photo he took at a Motown Records company picnic in the early seventies. It’s a photo of a beaming young MICHAEL JACKSON holding his baby niece, STACEE BROWN, the daughter of his oldest sister, MAUREEN REILETTE “REBBIE” JACKSON. This particular photo has never been published, and captures a rare moment with Michael and demonstrates just how much he always loved children, even as a young teenager himself!



Kudos to my long-time friend Russ Terrana for another job well done, and his own vital role in yet one more piece of pop music history……It’s great to see that those good old “ears” are still working great!

Next week, we’ll be posting an article that is an extensive and comprehensive look at the career, accomplishments and techniques of the humble genius with more number one records to his credit than any other sound engineer in music history. It’s a story you won’t want to miss!

Russ added one last comment at the end of our phone call yesterday, a heartfelt message from one of the people so responsible for the creation of the early Jackson 5 and Michael Jackson solo hits. “This one’s from me to Michael, and, now, for the world.”

Well said,old friend!





Source : newmediacreative.com / MJJVault.us
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 11/19/09 12:50pm

bboy87

avatar

carlcranshaw said:

bboy87 said:

I've always felt he became friends with Liz because she shared the same experiences that he had. He always gravitated towards other child stars:

Liz Taylor
George "Spanky" McFarland
Emannuel Lewis
Donny Osmond
Brooke Shields
Shirley Temple

They had been through the same things


That is true too. Also the guy who played "Oliver".

I think the Pepsi accident left him in pain but the family always pulling on him left him with an empty feeling. I know he loved them dearly but there was that underlying thing of him being used.

[Edited 11/19/09 12:36pm]
[/quote]

Have you read Rabbi Schumley's book?

If you ignore the guy's commentary and simply read Michael's comments, it's really insightful.

-He says he couldn't really trust alot of people because he knew they could turn on him
-He felt he was stunted emotionally. He felt like he hadn't really matured as a person because he was so sheltered
-His relationships didn't really work out because he found it hard to trust (Loved Lisa Marie but she wanted more time, regretted not being intimate with Brooke Shields)

I can send you a pdf of the book with Schumley's commentary removed smile
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 11/19/09 12:55pm

MOL

seeingvoices12 said:

sag10 said:



Yea, why did Jermaine take him to Bahrein? That sheik of Arabic ended up suing Michael.. Jermaine didn't help Michael he made more of a mess. Not to mention Tohme Tohme..


Let's be honest here.....

The sheik was more than wonderful to MJ, when Mj was acquitted after the trial he needed some space and rest, the sheik gave MJ a home and everything you could imagine...it was a great hospitality....

They did an agreement and Mj wasn't capable to fulfill it, Im glad that this one ended peacefully…tho..

That's true.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 11/19/09 12:56pm

carlcranshaw

avatar

I can send you a pdf of the book with Schumley's commentary removed smile[/quote]

OK. carlcranshaw2006@aol.com
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 11/19/09 12:56pm

dag

avatar

JackieBlue said:

dag said:


Poor Mickey. You can feel his pain.

As for the Janet interview, it´s hard to judge what she said about Mike cause she didn´t get into detail. I hate when peole touch on a subject like that. They should either get in detail and say exactly what happen and not just touch the subject. For me, it would have been better if she avoided talking about it completely. Well, hopefully, the police investigation reveals more.


This drives me crazy. I'd rather people say nothing than a few tidbits here and there but I knew the interview would be that way.

"can coon Mexico" touched sigh

What´s that? Is that a city in Mexico?
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 11/19/09 12:57pm

bboy87

avatar

carlcranshaw said:

I can send you a pdf of the book with Schumley's commentary removed smile


OK. carlcranshaw2006@aol.com[/quote]
I could orgnote it to you lol
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 25 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Discuss Everything MJ - Part 6