kmama07 said:

kmama07 said:

This is not my quote... Although I did post previously (either beginning of this thread or in part 10) questioning whether or not it was noted if he had aspirated.

Apologies! I obviously need to proof read before sending as well. Been off for about three weeks due to medical issue and trying to get caught up. I DO agree he had vomit. I Don't know why Vomit was not cleaned from elevator, or the tested vomit was not noted with any significant finding, if noted at all. I have not gone back to read documents in the last three weeks although had done several times before signing off. I'll continue to lurk so as not to jump in on ongoing conversation I haven't caught up on. I am not a troll.

no, you;re not a troll, and I hope you are recovering well. You can sift through the last couple of pages and see where we're digiing and finding. We are trying to post where we are finding things.xo

PennyPurple said:

Pg.141 of the IR actually says they found 2 latent fingerprints, 3 latent palm prints, and a DNA mixture of 3 or more individuals on the tissue containing the 15 pills from the jewelry box.

precioux said:

Thank you. I am doing well.
Never been a shit starter or conspiracy theorist here. Just want to get to the truth like everyone here. And I second Penny's emotion: someone needs to be slapped hard for shoddy investigation.

Camileyun said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

does that mean 3 different individuals had their hands on the pills? If so, was the DNA matched to anyone who worked for Prince? Or anyone who flew infrom CA to visit on occasion?

I didn't see that they said ( and the people around him surely did not submit to DNA tests.) I wonder if the LE touched the tissue without gloves. If anyone had gone to court for Ps death, defense lawyers would have had a field day going after the LEs missteps and incompetence.

No they wore gloves and made note everytime they changed their gloves.

Lovejunky said:

precioux said:

source? I've read it 3 times today, and it stated airway by the interviewee...at least you're not denying it any longer

Ive never denied what Is there for all to read in black and white

but Ill never support assumptions being presented as fact !!!!!

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

kmama07 said:

precioux said:

no, you;re not a troll, and I hope you are recovering well. You can sift through the last couple of pages and see where we're digiing and finding. We are trying to post where we are finding things.xo

Thank you. I am doing well. Never been a shit starter or conspiracy theorist here. Just want to get to the truth like everyone here. And I second Penny's emotion: someone needs to be slapped hard for shoddy investigation.

+1

precioux said:

Maybe P splashed his warm milk in the elevator once- but why wouldn't they just identify that in the report? It's not rocket science!

PennyPurple said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

I really want to go to Minneapolis just to give them a slap. This is NOT how you do your job.

Well the fingerprints should've been taken during the autopsy.

I mean really, when my dad died, the funeral home had his fingerprints because I ordered a necklace with his fingerprint on it, from them.

You are correct.

And what a sweet idea for a necklace

Camileyun said:

precioux said:

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

Maybe P splashed his warm milk in the elevator once- but why wouldn't they just identify that in the report? It's not rocket science!

you're not getting it. the 'splash' was fresh-'as in' found when P was still there lying dead. This was documented by the investigator with ME by his side.

precioux said:

Lovejunky said:

Ive never denied what Is there for all to read in black and white

but Ill never support assumptions being presented as fact !!!!!

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

precioux said:

I thought they said it was dried.

Lovejunky said:

precioux said:

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lovejunky: I agree with the bolded...especially given that parts of PP looked like a pigsty...someone else could have thrown up a day or two before and who can prove that it all would have evaporated?

But I strongly disagree with the 'stupid' comment: Precioux is one super smart contributor...deal with it. And an apology would be cool...

Holy sh*t someone needs to calm down

Lovejunky said:

precioux said:

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW, Miss 'Road Scholar'- it's 'narcotics', not 'narcotices'

[Edited 7/16/18 18:20pm]

Camileyun said:

precioux said:

you're not getting it. the 'splash' was fresh-'as in' found when P was still there lying dead. This was documented by the investigator with ME by his side.

I thought they said it was dried.

No, it was documented as 'wet'

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Lovejunky said:

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lovejunky: I agree with the bolded...especially given that parts of PP looked like a pigsty...someone else could have thrown up a day or two before and who can prove that it all would have evaporated?

But I strongly disagree with the 'stupid' comment: Precioux is one super smart contributor...deal with it. And an apology would be cool...

Just asking

Up to her to confirm or deny

and for the record

I dont give a flying FUCK about being COOL

Lovejunky said:

precioux said:

I simply asked for a source- can you not do that as everyone else here doing their part of investigating is posting? What assumption is that? The FACT that P had vomit in his 'airway' ( as documented) and the FACT that the investigator thought the 'wet' stuff on the elevator wall needed to be tested? What is your point exactly? My point is that IF it was vomit, it DOESN'T make SENSE that there was no trace of narcotics found during the testing-capiche?

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why the insult, Lovejunky?

There was not a glass, or a milk carton, or any type of drink found in the elevator, he was the only one in there, so what do you suggest it was? It was still wet. Can you show us in the paperwork where it was not classified as vomit?

precioux said:

Lovejunky said:

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stupid? LOL! you haven't even cited one source, though I've asked you twice. you love to keep your head up your ass with all this 'peace and love' BS...why don't you get out of the fucking way and let the adults continue researching. I'm guessing the detective thought it 'wasn't vomit' either. And by the way, why don't YOU go back and cite exactly where and when this was tested? One source says it failed to test, yet in another source there is a result. Come on, sweetie- do your part instead of acting like a GD 3 year old! Get with the program, or is your head too far up your ass to understand everything that is being questioned?

BTW, Miss 'Road Scholar'- it's 'narcotics', not 'narcotices'

Ill do exactly as I PLEASE

whenever I want

Cant compete with your level of Bitch Honey

Lovejunky said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Lovejunky: I agree with the bolded...especially given that parts of PP looked like a pigsty...someone else could have thrown up a day or two before and who can prove that it all would have evaporated?

But I strongly disagree with the 'stupid' comment: Precioux is one super smart contributor...deal with it. And an apology would be cool...

Just asking

Up to her to confirm or deny

and for the record

I dont give a flying FUCK about being COOL

What do you want me to confirm? When you are incapable of citing even one thing asked?

Heads up...your is showing, and it's not very becoming

Camileyun said:

precioux said:

you're not getting it. the 'splash' was fresh-'as in' found when P was still there lying dead. This was documented by the investigator with ME by his side.

I thought they said it was dried.

When the detective 1st noticed it, it was wet, he made a mental note to swab it but forgot on 4/25 it was dry when they swabbed it.

Lovejunky said:

precioux said:

Stupid? LOL! you haven't even cited one source, though I've asked you twice. you love to keep your head up your ass with all this 'peace and love' BS...why don't you get out of the fucking way and let the adults continue researching. I'm guessing the detective thought it 'wasn't vomit' either. And by the way, why don't YOU go back and cite exactly where and when this was tested? One source says it failed to test, yet in another source there is a result. Come on, sweetie- do your part instead of acting like a GD 3 year old! Get with the program, or is your head too far up your ass to understand everything that is being questioned?

BTW, Miss 'Road Scholar'- it's 'narcotics', not 'narcotices'

Ill do exactly as I PLEASE

whenever I want

Cant compete with your level of Bitch Honey

eat your out, sweetie

you're right, you can't compete- best observation you've made all day

BACK ON TOPIC

PennyPurple said:

Gotcha...I see that now. Thanks.

precioux said:

PennyPurple said:

Lovejunky said:

[Snip - luv4u]

There WAS no trace of narcotices present in said FLUIDS

then GOOD SENSE suggests that FLUID Probably was NOT Ps VOMIT

THAT.IS.MY.POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why the insult, Lovejunky?

There was not a glass, or a milk carton, or any type of drink found in the elevator, he was the only one in there, so what do you suggest it was? It was still wet. Can you show us in the paperwork where it was not classified as vomit?

No..

I cant show you on the Paper work where it WAS NOT Classed as Princes VOMIT

Just as neither YOU or anyone else can confrim that it WAS !

It could have actually been Kirk,s

Maybe he got such a shock on finding Ps body that he leaned against the wall and chucked...

WE just do not KNOW

Investigation was sloppy all around

Pg. 64
"I received records that showed Prince's medical emergency on 4-21-2016. The paramedics checked a box on their form that showed Prince had vomit in his airway and his eyes were closed."
"The narrative history on the paramedics record reads...Pt. has vomit in mouth..."

Camileyun said:

Pg. 64 "I received records that showed Prince's medical emergency on 4-21-2016. The paramedics checked a box on their form that showed Prince had vomit in his airway and his eyes were closed." "The narrative history on the paramedics record reads...Pt. has vomit in mouth..."

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.

PennyPurple said:

Bodhitheblackdog said:

does that mean 3 different individuals had their hands on the pills? If so, was the DNA matched to anyone who worked for Prince? Or anyone who flew infrom CA to visit on occasion?

They didn't collect DNA from anybody but Prince, and during the autopsy they failed to get P's fingerprints.

They could've gotten a warrant for KJ's, Meron's (etc) DNA just like they got warrants for everything else. No? Even if they didn't get a warrant, as soon as KJ or Meron would've put anything out to the trash, (from either their home /hotel)- DNA could've been collected from those items and used against tests/findings=fair game

PennyPurple said:

You're welcome. It gets confusing with all the different Detectives giving their own versions of the same event, but you had it down!

Camileyun said:

Pg. 64 "I received records that showed Prince's medical emergency on 4-21-2016. The paramedics checked a box on their form that showed Prince had vomit in his airway and his eyes were closed." "The narrative history on the paramedics record reads...Pt. has vomit in mouth..."

HELLO!!! Dng!Ding!Ding! Great work Camileyum!!!!!

Camileyun said:

Pg. 64 "I received records that showed Prince's medical emergency on 4-21-2016. The paramedics checked a box on their form that showed Prince had vomit in his airway and his eyes were closed." "The narrative history on the paramedics record reads...Pt. has vomit in mouth..."

Thanks for CITING in black and white the FACTS