independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Hypercritical of Prince?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/20/09 4:19pm

kewlschool

avatar

Hypercritical of Prince?

It seems very easy to criticize Prince for not doing this or doing that with his music. I would just like to remind everyone that it is about the music. Just as Van Gogh is just about his paintings. It seems to me that some Prince fans, if they could go back in time, would stand behind Van Gogh's shoulder and tell Van Gogh to paint "Starry Night" red for it will match their couch. omg
[Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm]
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/20/09 4:22pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/20/09 4:27pm

Tame

avatar

That is a nice paiting U are refering to. Prince is who He is and does as He does...and we love him 4 it. cool
"The Lion Sleeps Tonight...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/20/09 4:30pm

kewlschool

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???


This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work.
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/20/09 4:34pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

kewlschool said:

SquirrelMeat said:

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???


This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work.


But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw.

.
[Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm]
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/20/09 4:47pm

kewlschool

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

kewlschool said:



This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work.


But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw.

.
[Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm]


That is a worthy viewpoint for discussion, perhaps another posting would suit that topic. But, my post was addressing the Fan critics of Prince music wanting Prince to do this or that with his music. (ie typically postings: R&b or Rock or the 80's are better than the 90's stuff that marginalizes Prince's music. etc.)
[Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm]
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/20/09 4:55pm

JayJai

avatar

I would suggest that if there's anyone still confused about Prince and the way he operates after all these yrs...check out this thread: http://prince.org/msg/7/308612 lol
No particular reason for postin this here but oh well rolleyes
I swear the words "HATER" is wayyy over-rated...smh
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/20/09 4:59pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/20/09 5:04pm

PEJ

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:







lol lemme guess... an undercover "why all the fan hate thread"?
To Sir, with Love
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/20/09 7:13pm

ReginaCarman

SquirrelMeat said:

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???


He would or more! and u know it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/21/09 10:37pm

kewlschool

avatar

wildsign wildsign wildsign wildsign wildsign wildsign wildsign

hmmm
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/22/09 4:40am

datdude

the hypercritical tone of Prince on this site existed long b4 the Lotusflower site and its fee. I thought it was too high, i didn't pay it and i kept it moving. separate issues. but yes this site is. he can't win for losing. the number of insatiable, complaining, nostalgic, demanding, judgmental, ungrateful ppl on this site is alarming
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/25/09 12:01pm

kewlschool

avatar

Thanks for getting it Datdude. Money separate issue from Art issue.



wildsign
[Edited 5/25/09 12:02pm]
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/25/09 2:53pm

nurseV

SquirrelMeat said:

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???



that's cold neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/29/09 9:36pm

kewlschool

avatar

So cold
yeahthat
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/29/09 11:10pm

shh66

kewlschool said:

It seems very easy to criticize Prince for not doing this or doing that with his music. I would just like to remind everyone that it is about the music. Just as Van Gogh is just about his paintings. It seems to me that some Prince fans, if they could go back in time, would stand behind Van Gogh's shoulder and tell Van Gogh to paint "Starry Night" red for it will match their couch. omg
[Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm]



I love "Starry Night" jst the way it is....sorry, my f'n cat popped the letter that comes after "t" off my keyboard.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/30/09 12:11am

CherrieMoonKis
ses

avatar

In his words: Im Satisfied...
peace & wildsign
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/30/09 4:26am

Dayclear

SquirrelMeat said:

Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???

Maybe he should have, he wouldn't have died broke.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 05/30/09 5:23am

mzkqueen03

avatar

...all i can say instead is...
..oh yeah i'm loaded verbal rap-ability baby..i know u inspire me 2 poetry..so listen while i recite naughty-nothings..that'll WET ur ear-drums...I LIKE 2..i like 2..
...can i make sweet L-O-V-E 2 u baby?..
..JUST LIVING AND A L-O-V-En ...waiting 4 the moment..WHEN U GOT TIME 2 GIVE..and if i can get 2 L-O-V-E u....WHAT'S A TELEFONE BILL?..
..mzsexybaby'CLASSIC' sexy
..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 05/30/09 5:48am

japanrocks

perhaps this thread should be moved to the positivity, negativity, etc. sticky?

man, do people even read stuff before the just post random crap?
[Edited 5/30/09 5:48am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 05/30/09 5:55am

kenlacam

lock it down, yes? this thread is nonsense.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 05/30/09 6:01am

Marrk

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

kewlschool said:



This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work.


But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw.

.
[Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm]


That's fair enough, Prince should start busking. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 05/30/09 10:37am

kewlschool

avatar

japanrocks said:

perhaps this thread should be moved to the positivity, negativity, etc. sticky?

man, do people even read stuff before the just post random crap?
[Edited 5/30/09 5:48am]

----- eek This thread is not about why people hate or love on Prince.
This thread is about artistic choice and how some people would like to tell the painter how to paint his picture. You either like the picture or you don't. But are you hypercritical because it was a water scene and you wanted an abstract?
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 05/30/09 2:49pm

Brendan

avatar

Constructive criticism is every bit as valuable as praise.

Unfortunately a lot of criticism – including some of my own -- tends to be far more self centered than insightful.

Some of the best advice I’ve ever received was to separate the art for the artist. For all I know Van Gogh might have been a difficult prick much of the time.

But no matter. I don’t have to live with him and I’m not seeking validation or a kindred spirit. I’m eagerly seeking out someone’s unique view of the world that can hopefully add to my own ever-changing landscape.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 05/30/09 7:04pm

laurarichardso
n

SquirrelMeat said:

kewlschool said:



This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work.


But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw.

.
[Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm]

-----
All artists should be paid for their work. If you had your way, I guess all artist should give away their music or work for the record labels free.

It is ridiculous to expect an artist who is not signed to a label to foot the bill for a website and receive no revenue for the content.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 05/30/09 7:24pm

HonestMan13

avatar

We should be happy that Prince still makes music and does tours. He could've closed up shop ages ago if he wanted to. He has a gift for making music and feels that it's a part of what he's here for. I for one am grateful for every album he's put out. It doesn't mean I loved them all but I appreciate the time and effort that goes into each one. Sometimes when I read the posts here I wonder why people feel that they should dictate how Prince does what he does. You wouldn't want anyone telling you how to create/express something from your heart. I notice how easy it is for people to say what they hate but not what they love.

heart
When eye go 2 a Prince concert or related event it's all heart up in the house but when eye log onto this site and the miasma of bitchiness is completely overwhelming!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 06/01/09 1:05pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

laurarichardson said:

SquirrelMeat said:



But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw.

.
[Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm]

All artists should be paid for their work. If you had your way, I guess all artist should give away their music or work for the record labels free.

It is ridiculous to expect an artist who is not signed to a label to foot the bill for a website and receive no revenue for the content.


No one is saying he should do his stuff for free. The topic is discussing whether it's fair to critize the music.

I believe, if you charge for something, you have to be open to potential praise or critism.

When a musician receives rave reviews, you very rarely hear fans asking the critics to stop.

It cuts both ways.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 06/04/09 12:06am

kewlschool

avatar

No one is saying he should do his stuff for free. The topic is discussing whether it's fair to critize the music.

I believe, if you charge for something, you have to be open to potential praise or critism.

When a musician receives rave reviews, you very rarely hear fans asking the critics to stop.

It cuts both ways.[/quote]

eek Let's make this clear I never said that you couldn't, shouldn't, wouldn't critique a work (In this case music). Critiquing and criticizing are two different thought levels. One comes from a place of love and respect, the other from a negative ego perspective with a goal to find fault with such work/person. My point being, if you criticize you have already predetermine the results.
Watch for the contradiction....
Now, that being said, criticizing is a key component to comedy! biggrin
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Hypercritical of Prince?