Vendetta1 said:

Lisa10 said:

I'm very late coming into this, but I don't really understand why women fight over men. In my opinion, they just end up making themselves look stupid.

If the man has 2 or more girls on the go and the girls aren't ok with that, walk away and don't massage his ego with bitch-fights.

that's just my

who axed ya?

that's prolly the only

real exersise they gonna get

for a good while, and whutz wrong

with a lil massagin? with the right touch,

one may choose to stay for a minit

[Edited 3/7/12 17:43pm]

Ottensen said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Sure, but there are equal opportunity cellmates, too

Bravo. But I come from a pretty large family where bail money is not an issue, and being related to enough lawyers and government bureaucrats, I'm sorry to say my response to that essentially is:

Listen, in all sincerity, for me the formula is pretty simple. Don't harrass, don't stalk, don't mess with people's kids (like the silly trick that follwowed my friend's kid to kindergarden, under the auspices of just bumping into them while they were on their way to school ), and you won't get your ass kicked. Point.Blank. Period. And point again.

Not saying that this is the way to approach every situation regarding adultery at all. But I am of the opinion that a whore needs to learn how to stay in a whore's place: know your boundaries as a spurned mistress, or you might just risk running face first into the palm of another woman's hand...and whether anyone here agrees with me or not, that opinion will not change.

I didn't mean Glen Close crazy For her kind, you need weapons of mass destruction. If a woman is a physical threat to you and your family, then by any means necessary, take her out. Self defense. I'm speaking of taking the initiative to go to this woman's job or residence, and beating the living crap out of her. In that case, then cellblock 14 is waiting for you Post #8 explains why to me, it's not worth it, but do you

^ I'm sorry. I meant post #82. I agree with KingBad.

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Ottensen said:

Bravo. But I come from a pretty large family where bail money is not an issue, and being related to enough lawyers and government bureaucrats, I'm sorry to say my response to that essentially is:

Listen, in all sincerity, for me the formula is pretty simple. Don't harrass, don't stalk, don't mess with people's kids (like the silly trick that follwowed my friend's kid to kindergarden, under the auspices of just bumping into them while they were on their way to school ), and you won't get your ass kicked. Point.Blank. Period. And point again.

Not saying that this is the way to approach every situation regarding adultery at all. But I am of the opinion that a whore needs to learn how to stay in a whore's place: know your boundaries as a spurned mistress, or you might just risk running face first into the palm of another woman's hand...and whether anyone here agrees with me or not, that opinion will not change.

I didn't mean Glen Close crazy For her kind, you need weapons of mass destruction. If a woman is a physical threat to you and your family, then by any means necessary, take her out. Self defense. I'm speaking of taking the initiative to go to this woman's job or residence, and beating the living crap out of her. In that case, then cellblock 14 is waiting for you Post #8 explains why to me, it's not worth it, but do you

Actually, Cellblock 14 is not waiting for me or anyone else here Beautiful, I was not advocating anybody beat an ass just for beating ass sake. I was very clear I was referring to handling spurned women who decide they want to become a threat to the family and destroy it in their vengeful wake. Either you didn't read what I wrote, or you're choosing to twist the context and scenario into something I neither asserted, supported, or endorsed.

..but thank you for agreeing to disagree. My world is simple, drama free, & my life decisons have held me in good stead throughout many a year, so as far as I'm concerned my oinions got good credit and do not need co-signing. Therefore as you suggested, I will continue to do me. 'Cause trust, it's worked out pretty well thus far

Ottensen said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

I didn't mean Glen Close crazy For her kind, you need weapons of mass destruction. If a woman is a physical threat to you and your family, then by any means necessary, take her out. Self defense. I'm speaking of taking the initiative to go to this woman's job or residence, and beating the living crap out of her. In that case, then cellblock 14 is waiting for you Post #8 explains why to me, it's not worth it, but do you

Actually, Cellblock 14 is not waiting for me or anyone else here Beautiful, I was not advocating anybody beat an ass just for beating ass sake. I was very clear I was referring to handling spurned women who decide they want to become a threat to the family and destroy it in their vengeful wake. Either you didn't read what I wrote, or you're choosing to twist the context and scenario into something I neither asserted, supported, or endorsed.

..but thank you for agreeing to disagree. My world is simple, drama free, & my life decisons have held me in good stead throughout many a year, so as far as I'm concerned my oinions got good credit and do not need co-signing. Therefore as you suggested, I will continue to do me. 'Cause trust, it's worked out pretty well thus far

Well, back at cha

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Ottensen said:

Actually, Cellblock 14 is not waiting for me or anyone else here Beautiful, I was not advocating anybody beat an ass just for beating ass sake. I was very clear I was referring to handling spurned women who decide they want to become a threat to the family and destroy it in their vengeful wake. Either you didn't read what I wrote, or you're choosing to twist the context and scenario into something I neither asserted, supported, or endorsed.

..but thank you for agreeing to disagree. My world is simple, drama free, & my life decisons have held me in good stead throughout many a year, so as far as I'm concerned my oinions got good credit and do not need co-signing. Therefore as you suggested, I will continue to do me. 'Cause trust, it's worked out pretty well thus far

Well, back at cha

this is starting to feel like one of those crazy friday threads...or maybe I'm just not in the mood to be serious at.all. just one day too soon

Ottensen said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Well, back at cha

this is starting to feel like one of those crazy friday threads...or maybe I'm just not in the mood to be serious at.all. just one day too soon

Well, I'm sorry if disagreements drives you crazy, but nevertheless, have a nice day

Beautifulstarr123 said:

Ottensen said:

this is starting to feel like one of those crazy friday threads...or maybe I'm just not in the mood to be serious at.all. just one day too soon

Well, I'm sorry if disagreements drives you crazy, but nevertheless, have a nice day

Are you new here? Because that's hardly my personality, on the org or in 3d. Where did I say disagreemnts drive me crazy, and what posts are you reading from me? Because what you're quoting is clearly not anything that I actually posted

You misunderstood what I wrote. My statement meant that it's almost as if this topic is one of the crazy kind we do around here, that catch fire round about the time Friday kicks in. I'm actually enjoying this thread and being silly with it. (even though it's not Friday yet). See, having fun and joking around is the purpose of clicking onto a thread started by Hot Gritz. It's really not that deep darlin', and I don't get crazy by anything on the org after all these years, least of all disagreements. Life, in general, is too blessed to be stressed. So you have a nice day, too. Friday will be here soon and things will hopefully really get crackin' around here.

HotGritz said:

:confused:

This is so incredibly tacky, tasteless and beneath us as females. While a woman may try and steal your man, shouldn't you be angry at your man for being open to another woman's advances? Why fight her especially when there will be another chick like her in 5...4...3...2...1! I can't think of any other species where this occurs. It's usually the males fighting over females.

Men don't do this as much IMHO. They seem to want to kick their woman to the curb if she even thinks about riding other dick.

Converse.

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

TonyVanDam said:

HotGritz said:

:confused:

This is so incredibly tacky, tasteless and beneath us as females. While a woman may try and steal your man, shouldn't you be angry at your man for being open to another woman's advances? Why fight her especially when there will be another chick like her in 5...4...3...2...1! I can't think of any other species where this occurs. It's usually the males fighting over females.

Men don't do this as much IMHO. They seem to want to kick their woman to the curb if she even thinks about riding other dick.

Converse.

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

No, but it would be more in alignment with nature. In virtually every other animal species, the males fight over the females. Of course, there are also multiple baby daddies but we already have that in our species so it wouldn't be a foreign concept.

Women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species.

TonyVanDam said:

HotGritz said:

:confused:

This is so incredibly tacky, tasteless and beneath us as females. While a woman may try and steal your man, shouldn't you be angry at your man for being open to another woman's advances? Why fight her especially when there will be another chick like her in 5...4...3...2...1! I can't think of any other species where this occurs. It's usually the males fighting over females.

Men don't do this as much IMHO. They seem to want to kick their woman to the curb if she even thinks about riding other dick.

Converse.

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

That wasn't what Gritz was implying. In fact she about agreed it's just as dumb about men fighting over women... it takes two to tango you know?

HotGritz said:

TonyVanDam said:

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

No, but it would be more in alignment with nature. In virtually every other animal species, the males fight over the females. Of course, there are also multiple baby daddies but we already have that in our species so it wouldn't be a foreign concept.

Women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species.

Are you implying that some men can NOT evolve?

Timmy84 said:

TonyVanDam said:

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

That wasn't what Gritz was implying. In fact she about agreed it's just as dumb about men fighting over women... it takes two to tango you know?

It was still a fair question for me to ask regardless.

TonyVanDam said:

HotGritz said:

No, but it would be more in alignment with nature. In virtually every other animal species, the males fight over the females. Of course, there are also multiple baby daddies but we already have that in our species so it wouldn't be a foreign concept.

Women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species.

Are you implying that some men can NOT evolve?

I'm not implying any such thing. I have stated outright that women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species. If you're into anthropological studies and various writings on how men and women communicate, function and what makes us tick....the consensus always seems to be that women are more in touch with their feelings, more analytical, better able to articulate our thoughts, able to nest and hunt whereas men are supposed to be more one-track minded, they compartmentalize things versus seeing the interrelations of things. They are still more aggressive and into aquiring versus sharing etc.

Now if you belive any of that and believe it speaks to an inability to evolve then that is your opinion; an opinion I disagree with.

HotGritz said:

TonyVanDam said:

Are you implying that some men can NOT evolve?

I'm not implying any such thing. I have stated outright that women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species. If you're into anthropological studies and various writings on how men and women communicate, function and what makes us tick....the consensus always seems to be that women are more in touch with their feelings, more analytical, better able to articulate our thoughts, able to nest and hunt whereas men are supposed to be more one-track minded, they compartmentalize things versus seeing the interrelations of things. They are still more aggressive and into aquiring versus sharing etc.

Now if you belive any of that and believe it speaks to an inability to evolve then that is your opinion; an opinion I disagree with.

Well excuse me for being concern about how the statement such as "women are supposed to be the more evolved" sounds a little borderline sexist, never mind the fact (NOT an opinion) that is stereotyping all men.

Alll men are NOT the same. There are plenty of men that are in touch with their feelings. It's just some men do a far better job at hiding it better than others.

[Edited 3/9/12 6:24am]

HotGritz said:

TonyVanDam said:

Would it make you feel better if men were fighting over women?!?

No, but it would be more in alignment with nature. In virtually every other animal species, the males fight over the females. Of course, there are also multiple baby daddies but we already have that in our species so it wouldn't be a foreign concept.

Women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species.

Yeah, but the females are second class citizens in most of those cases where they're being fought over. What that basically means is, "Shut up and sit down while I beat this guy's brains out for the right to take you back to my cave and have my way with you." Women are no more or less evolved than men are, it's just that men have put them on a pedestal for so long, that they (some members of BOTH sexes) have that (misguided) idea that they are.

With that said, I think women are more likely to fight over a man while sober than vice versa. Guys have their limits and most guys seem to get that if a woman puts him in a situation where he has to fight over her, she's not worth a shit anyway.

I would say it's BECAUSE women are more in touch with their emotions that they're more willing to smack a ho over some dude they perceive as "theirs." It's kinda like that Chris Rock bit where he talks about how when a guy sees another guy with a woman he's attracted to he says to himself, "I'd like to have a girl like her." But when a woman sees another woman with a man SHE'S attracted to it's, "I want HIM!"

How could Women not fight over this guy?!

ok, one more time...

Aw fuckit, you know why

and i still find it a bit offensive....

there's really no winner anyway

but i guess it's just as well that

you do fight since the only one that

wins is the one that's not fightin

TonyVanDam said:

HotGritz said:

I'm not implying any such thing. I have stated outright that women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species. If you're into anthropological studies and various writings on how men and women communicate, function and what makes us tick....the consensus always seems to be that women are more in touch with their feelings, more analytical, better able to articulate our thoughts, able to nest and hunt whereas men are supposed to be more one-track minded, they compartmentalize things versus seeing the interrelations of things. They are still more aggressive and into aquiring versus sharing etc.

Now if you belive any of that and believe it speaks to an inability to evolve then that is your opinion; an opinion I disagree with.

Well excuse me for being concern about how the statement such as "women are supposed to be the more evolved" sounds a little borderline sexist, never mind the fact (NOT an opinion) that is stereotyping all men.

Alll men are NOT the same. There are plenty of men that are in touch with their feelings. It's just some men do a far better job at hiding it better than others.

[Edited 3/9/12 6:24am]

1) You're excused.

2) I am not responsible for how you interpret my statements.

3) Nobody said all men were the same. Nobody said men were not in touch with their feelings.

4) Hiding one's feelings is not necessarily a good thing. However, understanding your feelings and the actions/events that trigger those feelings IS a good thing. The better we understand ourselves, the better choices we make in life.

guitarslinger44 said:

HotGritz said:

No, but it would be more in alignment with nature. In virtually every other animal species, the males fight over the females. Of course, there are also multiple baby daddies but we already have that in our species so it wouldn't be a foreign concept.

Women are supposed to be the more evolved of our species.

Yeah, but the females are second class citizens in most of those cases where they're being fought over. What that basically means is, "Shut up and sit down while I beat this guy's brains out for the right to take you back to my cave and have my way with you." Women are no more or less evolved than men are, it's just that men have put them on a pedestal for so long, that they (some members of BOTH sexes) have that (misguided) idea that they are.

With that said, I think women are more likely to fight over a man while sober than vice versa. Guys have their limits and most guys seem to get that if a woman puts him in a situation where he has to fight over her, she's not worth a shit anyway.

I would say it's BECAUSE women are more in touch with their emotions that they're more willing to smack a ho over some dude they perceive as "theirs." It's kinda like that Chris Rock bit where he talks about how when a guy sees another guy with a woman he's attracted to he says to himself, "I'd like to have a girl like her." But when a woman sees another woman with a man SHE'S attracted to it's, "I want HIM!"

Damn those are some good points.

@ the Chris Rock comment. Why why why do we act like that??????????