How do you know this? Branca said not to long ago that the Estate was never selling the catalog and if there was a clause put in place in 2006, why did Branca affirm that he was not selling it? The executives can not be trusted. I have to see a receipt for me to believe anything. I don't think all their decisions have been in the best interest of Michael and his children. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Her guardians and parental figures are obviously not in her life to help guide her. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janet was right all along in participating in the intervention of her Mother & agreeing with Randy(who is the only Jackson that tells it like it is). Something is just not right in the Mj estate. Sadly the real Jackson legacy will be lost. will ALWAYS think of like a "ACT OF GOD"! N another realm. mean of all people who might of been aliens or angels.if found out that wasn't of this earth, would not have been that surprised. R.I.P. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KCOOLMUZIQ said: Janet was right all along in participating in the intervention of her Mother & agreeing with Randy(who is the only Jackson that tells it like it is). Something is just not right in the Mj estate. Sadly the real Jackson legacy will be lost. The real Jackson legacy was lost a very long time ago which led to the what happened this week [Edited 3/18/16 10:29am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A new book about Michael Jackson entitled ‘Off The Wall – From the Beginning, Brick by Brick’ is due to be released next week through independent media company, Sixteen11. The A4 paper is over 100 pages featuring licensed images of the star from his early years up to and including the release of Off the Wall. In addition, the book contains a series of historic overviews split in various chapters. “As Michael was such a visual artist, I wanted to see more as such an iconic time period is currently being revisited” says author Pez Jax. “Therefore I decided to set about filling in that gap and producing a book of stunning images and detailed historical overviews.” More details to follow shortly at www.sixteen11.com Source: MJVibe | Sixteen11 "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mijac, MJJ Productions, Optimum Productions, the master recordings, part of the video archive, and his belongings are still in the estate's hands Peacock, Jackson Productions, part of the video archive, is still in the family's hands Unfortnate that Sony/ATV is owned fully by Sony but with those entities still in the hands of Michael's estate and The Jackson family, I feel THOSE are more important "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Mijac, MJJ Productions, Optimum Productions, the master recordings, part of the video archive, and his belongings are still in the estate's hands Peacock, Jackson Productions, part of the video archive, is still in the family's hands Unfortnate that Sony/ATV is owned fully by Sony but with those entities still in the hands of Michael's estate and The Jackson family, I feel THOSE are more important This. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: A new book about Michael Jackson entitled ‘Off The Wall – From the Beginning, Brick by Brick’ is due to be released next week through independent media company, Sixteen11. The A4 paper is over 100 pages featuring licensed images of the star from his early years up to and including the release of Off the Wall. In addition, the book contains a series of historic overviews split in various chapters. “As Michael was such a visual artist, I wanted to see more as such an iconic time period is currently being revisited” says author Pez Jax. “Therefore I decided to set about filling in that gap and producing a book of stunning images and detailed historical overviews.” More details to follow shortly at www.sixteen11.com Source: MJVibe | Sixteen11 Off The Wall is getting this love all of a sudden | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OTW >> Bad in every way that matters as an album. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Scorp said: bboy87 said: A new book about Michael Jackson entitled ‘Off The Wall – From the Beginning, Brick by Brick’ is due to be released next week through independent media company, Sixteen11. The A4 paper is over 100 pages featuring licensed images of the star from his early years up to and including the release of Off the Wall. In addition, the book contains a series of historic overviews split in various chapters. “As Michael was such a visual artist, I wanted to see more as such an iconic time period is currently being revisited” says author Pez Jax. “Therefore I decided to set about filling in that gap and producing a book of stunning images and detailed historical overviews.” More details to follow shortly at www.sixteen11.com Source: MJVibe | Sixteen11 Off The Wall is getting this love all of a sudden everything that's not Thriller is finally getting love. For years when he was alive, it was believed by many that books about his music or books about him that were positive wouldn't sell, but recent releases have been proved that wasn't true "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They are more important but it is still shady how this deal went down. It still minimizes the credibility of the Estate. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree, Sony/ATV is not Michael Jackson's legacy. Sony/ATV is an investment, a means to an end . Sure there is an emotional connection since MJ fought so hard to keep it. But did he plan to keep it forever or was it as a means to an end. Michael Jackson's own legacy is his own music, publishing etc which his estate owns.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mjscarousal said:
They are more important but it is still shady how this deal went down. It still minimizes the credibility of the Estate. It's the record industry, of course it's shady :lol: That clause is in a contract Michael himself so he knew. I honestly feel if he had sold it and Neverland, he wouldn't have had to do This Is It, could've released material on his own terms, get rid of the snakes,raised his kids, and lived his life "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
True but I still think the clause talk is b.s. I have to see a receipt honestly. I don't trust those executives and you make great points but I believe Michael's decision should still be respected even in death. He expressed that he did not want it sold. IMO, it was a great investment and the reason why he was a target was because he was the most successful BLACK entertainer/artist that owned the Beatles, Elvis etc. That is why he was a threat. I loved how he followed his heart and tried to change the system. The reason why he did not want to sell Neverland and SONY catalog is because it meant a lot to him and stood for everything he represented, Neverland in particular. So I don't see anything wrong with the fact that he fought for what he believed in and to save apart or piece of his legacy. Regardless of how some feel, that catalog and Neverland were APART of his legacy that has now been stolen from him. [Edited 3/18/16 23:06pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I feel like the catalogue and neverland were a blessing and a curse. His life and quality of life was never the same again. People have said the same of Thriller blowing up, and then this being the snowball effect. I'm not saying he shouldn't have made investments, I think for me it's mainly about his drive and long term benefits of those investments and inspiration representing his success with great results, even though with it came a lot of leeches later on. Nothing is forever. If what he did inspired many generations later to aspire to do what he did and show what could be done in music, business, the arts, etc. and gave him a chance to give rights back artists who deserved them eg. little richard, then he's done his job and told the system to fuck off, and others will and continue to keep fighting the power. [Edited 3/19/16 10:09am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^ I agree with this too 100% But I still think the executives are taking advantage and are only thinking about their own interests. Really if we do the math, none of this adds up. 750 million for a billion dollar catalog? That's. B.S. I understand the catalog caused alot of strife for Michael but it still doesn't change that the catalog was HIS and he verabitimly expressed that he did not want it sold and the executives of the Estate took complete advantage of that. For me, its not even about the catalog, its about the fact that his OWN Executives took complete advantage of him. They obviously can not be trusted.
[Edited 3/19/16 10:22am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't understand the crying that MJ's music will be used for commercials. Ever since MJ's passing there's a national commercial that uses Thriller to sell Halloween costumes. Plus MJ leased The Beatles music for sneaker commercials so why should his music be too good for commercials? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thedoorkeeper said: I don't understand the crying that MJ's music will be used for commercials. Ever since MJ's passing there's a national commercial that uses Thriller to sell Halloween costumes. Plus MJ leased The Beatles music for sneaker commercials so why should his music be too good for commercials? True | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
For what it's worth, Joseph and Katherine Jackson are happy about the sale of Sony/ATV: A Job well done
It is every fathers dream to secure the financial well being of his children. That is what drove me to work 2 jobs in my youth while struggling to make it through the Entertainment world. Today, although my son Michael Joseph Jackson is no longer with us, I know he is looking down on his children from heaven as a proud father would, knowing he has secured a lifetime financial foundation for each of them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is old but really?? http://nypost.com/2015/04...-side-gig/ The man who holds the purse strings to Michael Jackson’s estate has also managed to carve out a lucrative side gig at the late singer’s music publishing company. John Branca, a top entertainment lawyer and one of two executors for Jackson’s estate, sits on the board of Sony/ATV, which owns the bulk of the singer’s song catalog. He also has landed a role as a senior adviser to parent Sony. His salary, which started at $500,000 in 2014, is set to rise to $1 million next year, according to emails leaked by Sony hackers. Several sources tell The Post that Branca has sought a top role at Sony/ATV, which is run by CEO Martin Bandier, for some time but that Sony offered alternative arrangements instead. His dual roles as a paid adviser to the Sony/ATV board of which he is also a member led to some handwringing within the company, according to the emails that came to light this week on WikiLeaks. Top Sony executive Nicole Seligman scratched her head trying to figure out to whom Branca should report without ruffling feathers. She wrote in one email: “Bandier is awkward because Branca is on the Board (as is Bandier), the Board is awkward because he is on it, so why pay him to advise it?” The fact that Branca wears more than one hat is also raising some questions among outside observers. Branca, along with co-executor John McClain, is tasked with assuring the financial future of Jackson’s three children — with much of their income derived from the Gloved One’s song catalog. Sony/ATV is co-owned by Jackson’s estate and Sony. The music venture has been expanding, including teaming with an investor consortium to acquire the publishing assets of EMI in 2012. “It’s a serious conflict of interest,” said one person, referring to Branca’s two hats working for the kids and the company. “How can he be taking money from the asset that the kids own 50 percent of?” Branca was said to be overseas and unreachable. His lawyer, Joel Katz, declined to comment. But Branca’s supporters say he is only looking out for the Jackson family’s interests by getting even closer to their profit source. As a consultant to Sony, he can help maximize the value of the music assets, such as advising on the purchase of new catalogs. Branca is one of the top lawyers in the field of music and is a partner in the law firm Ziffren Brittenham. He has represented the likes of The Beach Boys, The Doors and Berry Gordy, among others. In his consulting role, Branca will provide “legal advice on matters related to music publishing, artist development and relationships, and other matters of importance,” according to the emails. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
will ALWAYS think of like a "ACT OF GOD"! N another realm. mean of all people who might of been aliens or angels.if found out that wasn't of this earth, would not have been that surprised. R.I.P. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So prince Jackson now has his own film production company, Kings son. Thoughts anyone? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Who cares that Joe and Katherine thinks. lol
Joe is the same father that dropped restitution charges against Conrad Murray And Katherine is the one that went after AEG, calling her son a drug addict
So what do you expect? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But for some people, who are against the sale of Sony/ATV and think Michael's parents are saints and can do no wrong, them being in favor of it, might create a problem. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bottom line is, I still enjoy listening to Michael's music, and I couldn't give a darn what his family are up to. They've got their lives and I've got mine. Michael's music shaped my youth and that I can still relate to. And the Jackson 5 (or Jacksons). [Edited 3/20/16 17:01pm] "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. If some people don't have a problem with the sell than that is their feelings. However, there is nothing wrong with fans who have a problem with the sell. Michael is on record insisting that he did not want his catalog sold as late as 2009 and he expressed people were trying to kill him over his catalog. As a fan, I don't take something like that "lightly" because it turns out he was right. They got what they eventually wanted. And if he expressed he did not want it sold and the executives went out their way to sell it, it shows they obviously did not respect his feelings so its understandable if fans would be upset about that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He got killed, because he chose to let his hack doctor shoot him up with Propofol.
His estate didn't go out of their way to sell it. Last year they were even considering buying Sony's half themselves. They chose to not do that, which I kinda understand, as it is not that wise to put the estate further in debt. Now they are debt free.
And what if you get all upset for nothing. What if in the current climate, Michael would have changed his mind and decided to sell. You have no idea what Michael would want, would he still be alive. And apparently the clause that one partner could buy the share of the other was put in in '06. If he never wanted that, then he should never have signed that contract, which to me is madness anyway, when one partner has so much more money at it's disposal than the other. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |