independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > So Rolling Stone just listed "Chaos and Disorder" as one of the worst albums by brilliant artists
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 02/16/23 1:31pm

paisleyparkgir
l

avatar

Someone created a poll asking how people feel about C&D being bad, on Prince reddit and so far 163 have voted.

40 agree with Rolling Stone Magazine

123 think Rolling Stone Magazine is crazy.

[Edited 2/16/23 13:32pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 02/16/23 4:48pm

SoulAlive

It's an okay album.Nothing special.

"Dinner With Delores" is nice.I like the lyrics."Dig U Better Dead" is cool too.

"I Rock,Therefore I Am" is the big clunker on the album.That song is garbage.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 02/17/23 1:03am

JorisE73

nayroo2002 said:

'Come' + 'The Gold Experience' + 'Chaos And Disorder' + 'The Vault:Old Friends 4 Sale' =

THE DAWN


According to the people who have seen the tracklist(s) this was not it.

[Edited 2/17/23 1:05am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 02/17/23 12:43pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

It's all in Prince's marketing of the album.


He labeled them as "contractual obligation" blahblahblah, so the media and a honestly a good portion of the famzz (historically anyway) go with what he said.


"oh okay, it's a throwaway" etc., then for music press it makes it easier because they can just focus on the circumstances surrounding release in their reviews and phone-in a shuffle skim with some derisive adjectives and skip any involvement or effort in actually absorbing the release like you would a normal album.


Eventually they wise up. Look at Come. 10-15 years ago that was the buzz on Come. I avoided that album my entire teenage years it was so derided as his #1 worst work. Now the famz have wised up on it for the most part, and the media is probably following suit, so we gotta defer to the next-up "contractual obligation" step-child..


It's a solid album, honestly, maybe better in concept than actual execution, but it's solid. It clearly has a sense of purpose to it. It's got character. No where near his worst...

[Edited 2/17/23 12:45pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 02/17/23 1:21pm

rockford

So Rolling Stone finally got something right? Crazy.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 02/17/23 1:27pm

onlyforaminute

avatar

The funny thing is, too many times the things the critics hate, I like better than the things they rave about. And that's how I ended up here. I like what I like. I give no apologies.
Time keeps on slipping into the future...


This moment is all there is...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 02/19/23 8:42pm

FunkyStrange

avatar

paisleyparkgirl said:

https://www.rollingstone....234672895/

Prince fans on twitter are mad.

Mission accomplished.

Rolling Stone are just pathetic and sad these days trying to stay relevant. So they put out these ridiculous lists to rile up the fan bases and manufacture interaction and clicks.. and people fall for it every single time..

Hard to believe I've been on the org for over 25 years now!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 02/20/23 1:27am

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

FunkyStrange said:

paisleyparkgirl said:

https://www.rollingstone....234672895/

Prince fans on twitter are mad.

Mission accomplished.

Rolling Stone are just pathetic and sad these days trying to stay relevant. So they put out these ridiculous lists to rile up the fan bases and manufacture interaction and clicks.. and people fall for it every single time..

To be fair, they were doing it pre-social media with their "Top 10 greatest albums of all time" consisting of 7 Beatles albums and 3 Dylan albums or whatever.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 02/20/23 5:51am

Prog5000

avatar

paisleyparkgirl said:

https://www.rollingstone....234672895/

Prince fans on twitter are mad.

This time I agree with RS.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 02/20/23 8:47am

paisleyparkgir
l

avatar

Prog5000 said:

paisleyparkgirl said:

https://www.rollingstone....234672895/

Prince fans on twitter are mad.

This time I agree with RS.

I disagree that Chaos and Disorder is his worst.

They should have picked Rave.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 02/20/23 9:16am

eyewishuheaven

avatar

Emancipation was the real stinker that year. If we hadn't had C&D and Girl 6 to balance it out, I would have been so let down...

PRINCE: the only man who could wear high heels and makeup and STILL steal your woman!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 02/20/23 2:29pm

GustavoRibas

avatar

I disagee completely. It was a cohesive rock album (with the exception of ´Dig U better dead´ and ´I rock therefore I am´with some cool songs and a great band.

.

.

If I had to choose a Prince album for that list it would be MPLSound (I dont even consider it an album) or one of those NPGMC releases (Chocolate Invasion, Slaughterhouse)

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 02/20/23 2:32pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 02/20/23 2:59pm

LoveGalore

WhisperingDandelions said:

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.



Oh hell yeah, those are definitely the sequels to PR. Lord knows PR had hella ballads and slow jams and elevator grooves. confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 02/20/23 3:22pm

paisleyparkgir
l

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.

Why is it a bad thing ?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 02/20/23 6:16pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

paisleyparkgirl said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.

Why is it a bad thing ?

...because it's diametrically opposed to everything he stood for as artist for the prior 25 years?

One of his trademark "hooks" as an artist, The artist, was giving the public a Purple Rain and then never ever giving them anything like it ever again, going everywhere else he could go, no matter how much both his label and the mainstream would have gleefully basked in more of the same. It's why following up that album with Around the World in a Day is the most defining moment of his career, and why MPLSound and 20Ten are forever The Bleh Experience.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 02/20/23 6:29pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

LoveGalore said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.

Oh hell yeah, those are definitely the sequels to PR. Lord knows PR had hella ballads and slow jams and elevator grooves. confused

Your asinine contrarian gimmick notwithstanding, MPLSound has 3 ballads, PR literally has 4.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 02/20/23 8:50pm

LoveGalore

WhisperingDandelions said:



LoveGalore said:


WhisperingDandelions said:

Yeah, MPLSound or 20Ten would be the best choice from a purely philosophic standpoint at least--Prince doing his best 80s Prince impression. Purple Rain II and III, 25 years too late.



Oh hell yeah, those are definitely the sequels to PR. Lord knows PR had hella ballads and slow jams and elevator grooves. confused

Your asinine contrarian gimmick notwithstanding, MPLSound has 3 ballads, PR literally has 4.



Four ballads on Purple Rain, you say???

The Beautiful Ones
Purple Rain

Umm...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 02/21/23 10:16am

paisleyparkgir
l

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

paisleyparkgirl said:

Why is it a bad thing ?

...because it's diametrically opposed to everything he stood for as artist for the prior 25 years?

One of his trademark "hooks" as an artist, The artist, was giving the public a Purple Rain and then never ever giving them anything like it ever again, going everywhere else he could go, no matter how much both his label and the mainstream would have gleefully basked in more of the same. It's why following up that album with Around the World in a Day is the most defining moment of his career, and why MPLSound and 20Ten are forever The Bleh Experience.

Not sure about that, he told Larry King that he could do something similar to Purple Rain if he had the right people around him. He wasn't opposed to recreating something like that but it seems like he wasn't in a rush at the time (after 84) because he wanted to explore other avenues as an artist.

With the right promotion MPLSound or 20Ten wouldn't have been bleh.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 02/21/23 6:52pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

LoveGalore said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Your asinine contrarian gimmick notwithstanding, MPLSound has 3 ballads, PR literally has 4.

Four ballads on Purple Rain, you say??? The Beautiful Ones Purple Rain Umm...

Take Me with U (this track always gets ignored, do you all apply your requisite protege shade to his solo albums too?)

Eye Would Dye 4 U

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 02/21/23 6:54pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

paisleyparkgirl said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

...because it's diametrically opposed to everything he stood for as artist for the prior 25 years?

One of his trademark "hooks" as an artist, The artist, was giving the public a Purple Rain and then never ever giving them anything like it ever again, going everywhere else he could go, no matter how much both his label and the mainstream would have gleefully basked in more of the same. It's why following up that album with Around the World in a Day is the most defining moment of his career, and why MPLSound and 20Ten are forever The Bleh Experience.

Not sure about that, he told Larry King that he could do something similar to Purple Rain if he had the right people around him. He wasn't opposed to recreating something like that but it seems like he wasn't in a rush at the time (after 84) because he wanted to explore other avenues as an artist.

With the right promotion MPLSound or 20Ten wouldn't have been bleh.

"could" but didn't, "could" but wouldn't, you're emphasizing my point, the exact point he was trying to make with that choice of words.


and what does promotion have to do with album quality? I don't care about whether his albums gets mainstream press or coverage, N.E.W.S. is in my top 5, and NPGMC internet obscuro era is my favorite era after the 80s pre-Batman era. The less promotion/press the better...

[Edited 2/21/23 18:57pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 02/21/23 7:08pm

lurker316

avatar

WhisperingDandelions said:

LoveGalore said:

WhisperingDandelions said: Four ballads on Purple Rain, you say??? The Beautiful Ones Purple Rain Umm...

Take Me with U (this track always gets ignored, do you all apply your requisite protege shade to his solo albums too?)

Eye Would Dye 4 U


Take Me With U is absolutely, positively not a ballad.

I don't think I Would Die 4 U is either.

A ballad doesn't just mean the theme of the lyrics are romantic. A ballad means the grove / tempo are slow.

In other words, a ballad is a song couple would slow dance to. No one is slow dancing to either of those songs.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 02/22/23 12:45am

leecaldon

lurker316 said:

WhisperingDandelions said:

Take Me with U (this track always gets ignored, do you all apply your requisite protege shade to his solo albums too?)

Eye Would Dye 4 U


Take Me With U is absolutely, positively not a ballad.

I don't think I Would Die 4 U is either.

A ballad doesn't just mean the theme of the lyrics are romantic. A ballad means the grove / tempo are slow.

In other words, a ballad is a song couple would slow dance to. No one is slow dancing to either of those songs.


Yeah, those two songs are 100% not ballads.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 02/22/23 6:31am

PurpleColossus

avatar

I think Chaos and Disorder doesn't get a ton of love because it was preceded by such a long train of legendary albums. Its an album that gets lost in the shuffle. If Chaos and Disorder was released in say...2008 or something, I think it would be much more widely praised by everyone.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 02/22/23 6:05pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

PurpleColossus said:

I think Chaos and Disorder doesn't get a ton of love because it was preceded by such a long train of legendary albums. Its an album that gets lost in the shuffle. If Chaos and Disorder was released in say...2008 or something, I think it would be much more widely praised by everyone.

If it were released in 2008, it'd have been a blessing compared to other stuff in that period.

But seriously folks - I think a lot of Prince fans back then took Prince's mood on as their own. He shit on the album (despite making 2 or 3 videos for it) as a "contractual obligation" and fans took on that "fuck Warner Bros" notion and pretended not to like it. It's ridiculous, but it happens.

I always thought that maybe if it were shaved down by a couple of songs or something, it could've been a bonus disk for Come or The Gold Experience. The way Upper was tacked onto Older by George Michael.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 02/22/23 9:26pm

bboy87

avatar

Rolling Stone has resorted to clickbait in recent years. I don't see how they're taken seriously in 2023

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 02/23/23 6:49am

PurpleColossus

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

PurpleColossus said:

I think Chaos and Disorder doesn't get a ton of love because it was preceded by such a long train of legendary albums. Its an album that gets lost in the shuffle. If Chaos and Disorder was released in say...2008 or something, I think it would be much more widely praised by everyone.

If it were released in 2008, it'd have been a blessing compared to other stuff in that period.

But seriously folks - I think a lot of Prince fans back then took Prince's mood on as their own. He shit on the album (despite making 2 or 3 videos for it) as a "contractual obligation" and fans took on that "fuck Warner Bros" notion and pretended not to like it. It's ridiculous, but it happens.

I always thought that maybe if it were shaved down by a couple of songs or something, it could've been a bonus disk for Come or The Gold Experience. The way Upper was tacked onto Older by George Michael.

That's interesting to hear about some fan perspective about the whole Prince vs Warner Bros situation at that time. A shorterned version could have worked as a bonus disk, but I guess Prince wanted it to count as an full album release, so he could move on from Warner Bros.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 02/23/23 7:07am

LoveGalore

TrivialPursuit said:



PurpleColossus said:


I think Chaos and Disorder doesn't get a ton of love because it was preceded by such a long train of legendary albums. Its an album that gets lost in the shuffle. If Chaos and Disorder was released in say...2008 or something, I think it would be much more widely praised by everyone.






If it were released in 2008, it'd have been a blessing compared to other stuff in that period.

But seriously folks - I think a lot of Prince fans back then took Prince's mood on as their own. He shit on the album (despite making 2 or 3 videos for it) as a "contractual obligation" and fans took on that "fuck Warner Bros" notion and pretended not to like it. It's ridiculous, but it happens.

I always thought that maybe if it were shaved down by a couple of songs or something, it could've been a bonus disk for Come or The Gold Experience. The way Upper was tacked onto Older by George Michael.



I think that's part of it - that people take on the attitude toward the material as presented to them. But I also think it's just not what people were looking for at that time. Most of the material on Come, Gold, and Chaos were all done together and all out there in the atmosphere in different configurations. It was a shock to see how it all shook out - I can't be the only person who was stunned that Gold didn't have three of the most ever present songs of the era: Days of Wild, Ripop, and Acknowledge Me.

And then I think people were a little let down with Chaos because it was characterized as a rock record but it was missing yet more of the rockier stuff people were familiar with but hadn't been put on Come or Gold - namely, Calhoun and What's My Name (and we later discovered Da Bang was originally on the Chaos tracklist too). What it did have were a few familiar songs, some really cringey reggae instead of the reggae we wanted, more rapping that we had thought we escaped with the exit of Tony M, and yet more ultra pasteurization on music we already knew (similar to what happened to Endorphinmachine).

Taken out of context and decades later, yeah Chaos can be seen in its own light and much of the missing material saw the light of day eventually.

But you're sitting down listening to a record that's still missing the new classics he hyped and instead you get "Dig U Better Dead" and some (lovely, but) mellow Rosie crooning on "I Will." You wanted to hear the crunch and grind of The Undertaker on a rock record produced during the same sessions (more or less) but you're hearing a (lovely but) minimal solo on "Into the Light" (which we saw yet more of "The Holy River").

Those of us who were there and were disappointed by what we got prob do still have some lingering disappointment to some degree because we know what it coulda been.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 02/23/23 7:37am

dodger07

LoveGalore said:

TrivialPursuit said:

If it were released in 2008, it'd have been a blessing compared to other stuff in that period.

But seriously folks - I think a lot of Prince fans back then took Prince's mood on as their own. He shit on the album (despite making 2 or 3 videos for it) as a "contractual obligation" and fans took on that "fuck Warner Bros" notion and pretended not to like it. It's ridiculous, but it happens.

I always thought that maybe if it were shaved down by a couple of songs or something, it could've been a bonus disk for Come or The Gold Experience. The way Upper was tacked onto Older by George Michael.

I think that's part of it - that people take on the attitude toward the material as presented to them. But I also think it's just not what people were looking for at that time. Most of the material on Come, Gold, and Chaos were all done together and all out there in the atmosphere in different configurations. It was a shock to see how it all shook out - I can't be the only person who was stunned that Gold didn't have three of the most ever present songs of the era: Days of Wild, Ripop, and Acknowledge Me. And then I think people were a little let down with Chaos because it was characterized as a rock record but it was missing yet more of the rockier stuff people were familiar with but hadn't been put on Come or Gold - namely, Calhoun and What's My Name (and we later discovered Da Bang was originally on the Chaos tracklist too). What it did have were a few familiar songs, some really cringey reggae instead of the reggae we wanted, more rapping that we had thought we escaped with the exit of Tony M, and yet more ultra pasteurization on music we already knew (similar to what happened to Endorphinmachine). Taken out of context and decades later, yeah Chaos can be seen in its own light and much of the missing material saw the light of day eventually. But you're sitting down listening to a record that's still missing the new classics he hyped and instead you get "Dig U Better Dead" and some (lovely, but) mellow Rosie crooning on "I Will." You wanted to hear the crunch and grind of The Undertaker on a rock record produced during the same sessions (more or less) but you're hearing a (lovely but) minimal solo on "Into the Light" (which we saw yet more of "The Holy River"). Those of us who were there and were disappointed by what we got prob do still have some lingering disappointment to some degree because we know what it coulda been.

Back then at the time I loved it cos as you say Come, Gold, C&D and even Exodus were from the same great batch.

.

Thinking about it there were 4 videos made (that we know of) from C&D which goes towards dispelling the 'throwaway album' notion.

.

And yes I was totally stunned and gutted at the time to not get Days Of Wild and Acknowledge Me on TGE. I watched those 2 on repeat on my VHS copy of TBE movie.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 02/23/23 8:32am

LoveGalore

dodger07 said:



LoveGalore said:


TrivialPursuit said:



If it were released in 2008, it'd have been a blessing compared to other stuff in that period.

But seriously folks - I think a lot of Prince fans back then took Prince's mood on as their own. He shit on the album (despite making 2 or 3 videos for it) as a "contractual obligation" and fans took on that "fuck Warner Bros" notion and pretended not to like it. It's ridiculous, but it happens.

I always thought that maybe if it were shaved down by a couple of songs or something, it could've been a bonus disk for Come or The Gold Experience. The way Upper was tacked onto Older by George Michael.



I think that's part of it - that people take on the attitude toward the material as presented to them. But I also think it's just not what people were looking for at that time. Most of the material on Come, Gold, and Chaos were all done together and all out there in the atmosphere in different configurations. It was a shock to see how it all shook out - I can't be the only person who was stunned that Gold didn't have three of the most ever present songs of the era: Days of Wild, Ripop, and Acknowledge Me. And then I think people were a little let down with Chaos because it was characterized as a rock record but it was missing yet more of the rockier stuff people were familiar with but hadn't been put on Come or Gold - namely, Calhoun and What's My Name (and we later discovered Da Bang was originally on the Chaos tracklist too). What it did have were a few familiar songs, some really cringey reggae instead of the reggae we wanted, more rapping that we had thought we escaped with the exit of Tony M, and yet more ultra pasteurization on music we already knew (similar to what happened to Endorphinmachine). Taken out of context and decades later, yeah Chaos can be seen in its own light and much of the missing material saw the light of day eventually. But you're sitting down listening to a record that's still missing the new classics he hyped and instead you get "Dig U Better Dead" and some (lovely, but) mellow Rosie crooning on "I Will." You wanted to hear the crunch and grind of The Undertaker on a rock record produced during the same sessions (more or less) but you're hearing a (lovely but) minimal solo on "Into the Light" (which we saw yet more of "The Holy River"). Those of us who were there and were disappointed by what we got prob do still have some lingering disappointment to some degree because we know what it coulda been.

Back then at the time I loved it cos as you say Come, Gold, C&D and even Exodus were from the same great batch.


.


Thinking about it there were 4 videos made (that we know of) from C&D which goes towards dispelling the 'throwaway album' notion.


.


And yes I was totally stunned and gutted at the time to not get Days Of Wild and Acknowledge Me on TGE. I watched those 2 on repeat on my VHS copy of TBE movie.



Honing in on the videos - bear in mind, he was doing videos for damn near everything at the time. And C&D was put together much later once the previous two had been released and the dust on that era had settled. I think that is why you see so much new stuff on there. Prince was funny because I don't think he hated any of that material and I think the album artwork and blurb were just really conceptual art. If he didn't care about the record and how it fit into the grand scheme of things, he wouldn't have bothered putting material on it that bled into the next era thematically.

Into the Light and I Will, and perhaps even that whole side of the album, is clearly bridging the gap between Gold and Emancipation. I think Prince had a habit of doing that even with other hodge podge albums like The Black Album. He couldn't help but put the latest song he recorded on there to give a little nod to the future.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > So Rolling Stone just listed "Chaos and Disorder" as one of the worst albums by brilliant artists