ThatWhiteDude said:

disch said:

purplefam99 said:

NotACleverName said:

ChocolateBox3121 said:

disch said:

purplefam99 said:

disch said:

how on earth do his chefs benefit financially from their employer being dead? I doubt their gig planning the Paisley Park visitor lunch menu pays what Prince was paying to be on call every day. And how does the medical examiner fit into this conspiracy? Did the chefs pay her off to have her label his death an accident?

What if Prince was particularly picky or harsh with the chefs. We have all heard the stories about being nice to the waiter or they will spit in your food. What if P hacked them off in someway???

Go take a seat.

purplefam99 said:

disch said:

how on earth do his chefs benefit financially from their employer being dead? I doubt their gig planning the Paisley Park visitor lunch menu pays what Prince was paying to be on call every day. And how does the medical examiner fit into this conspiracy? Did the chefs pay her off to have her label his death an accident?

What if Prince was particularly picky or harsh with the chefs. We have all heard the stories about being nice to the waiter or they will spit in your food. What if P hacked them off in someway???

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? Now the chef?

voph said:

purplefam99 said:

ChocolateBox3121 said:

Exactly!

I've also read several interviews by the Chef's(there were two)and they came off as very nice,humble, and compassionate people that had Prince's best interest at heart. He had NOTHING to worry about with them.

[Edited 4/1/18 19:11pm]

I read one where the chefs said that one time the container of food they left For P had a greasy thumb print left on it and P didn’t like that and Called it to the chefs attention the next day and the chef said that P said to them “I’m watching you” or something of that nature. It was an interview someone did with the chefs right after he passed. Who are these chefs?? Do we know? I never thought about the poisoning angle until catching up here today. There have been crazier “Lifetime channel” scenarios. Who the heck knows really??

I know they're a husband and wife team.

[Edited 4/1/18 21:34pm]

ChocolateBox3121 said:

damn, this theme is going to be causing a record for locked/blocked threads huh?

PeteSilas said:

damn, this theme is going to be causing a record for locked/blocked threads huh?

If certain folks keep flinging poo it might cause a shut down of this discussion. Why some folks get personal is not a good thing.

Those certain folks should take their personal beefs to orgnote rather than derail this thread with their nonsense and two year old attitudes.

purplefam99 said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

^^ And WHY is it obvious? Why can't people believe that it was an accident? It's like there can only be two options:Murderer or Suicide.

Agree.

because, i think it's a bit too coincidental, prince had never od'd like that, and to do the same thing a few days later not because he took too much but because he "got a bad pill by happenstance" doesn't make sense. Maybe if took the same thing the week before but if he'd done that, wouldn't he see that they were bad and get another stash? whole thing stinks to high heaven, some of the fans don't wanna know and that's cool with me, you know, the whole "ignorance is bliss" thing. but I ain't happy with it.

Maybe he thought he would not survive if he took something on the plane? Then, oops - two hits of NARCAN to the rescue. We simply don't know.

PennyPurple said:

And this is why we need an ignore button.

I totally agree. This voph guy/girl is probably from one of this FB groups.

PeteSilas said:

purplefam99 said:

ThatWhiteDude said: Agree.

because, i think it's a bit too coincidental, prince had never od'd like that, and to do the same thing a few days later not because he took too much but because he "got a bad pill by happenstance" doesn't make sense. Maybe if took the same thing the week before but if he'd done that, wouldn't he see that they were bad and get another stash? whole thing stinks to high heaven, some of the fans don't wanna know and that's cool with me, you know, the whole "ignorance is bliss" thing. but I ain't happy with it.

I already told in another thread, that it is not uncommon to OD twice within a week without being suicidal, your body is still weak after the first one. I've seen it in a documentary and there was a guy who OD'd twice within six days on Fentanyl. He didn't try to kill himself, he just didn't think it would happen again, but he needed it. Just like Prince needed his pills (not fentanyl, since he didn't know that they contained fentanyl) for pain management and he recognized that he had a problem, he wanted to get help, but I guess he didn't realize HOW serious it really was.

[Edited 4/2/18 6:49am]

voph said:

disch said:

how on earth do his chefs benefit financially from their employer being dead? I doubt their gig planning the Paisley Park visitor lunch menu pays what Prince was paying to be on call every day. And how does the medical examiner fit into this conspiracy? Did the chefs pay her off to have her label his death an accident?

They own restaurants dealing with organic foods that were not doing well. Laugh all you want. All will be revealed.

If the restaurants aren't doing well, how are they benefitting financially?

purplefam99 said:

NotACleverName said:

Help me understand why Prince, a man who despised swearing so much that he would make others pay a fee for doing so around him, would choose this foul mouthed woman to represent him. Additionally, by all appearances, Prince promoted peace. Abigail is going out of her way to stir up controversy and incite anger as it relates to Prince and his death. She is the very antithesis to everything that Prince was. When has the chef been on the LE's radar? Never, to my knowledge. Seems as though this should have been wrapped up two years ago based on Abigail's "inside info", no? Frankly, nothing has been verified by Abigail. Not one single claim.

^^^ maybe it is foul “mouth era Prince” she is channeling?

great points!

voph said:

disch said:

Sorry, I don't "trust and believe" without facts and sources (reputable ones). You declaring it on this message board is not a fact and source. If you want to link to or name a source for your theory, have at it. Because I recall nothing about him having "40 million in cash." The January 2017 inventory submitted to the court listed $110k in personal bank accounts and about $12MM total in his 2 business' accounts. The bulk of his estate was in the value of his musical property, and in his real estate holdings (and oh yeah, $840k in gold bars).

[Edited 4/1/18 19:50pm]

Google 40 million dollars in cash found in Prince’s home and business. Cash money.

Out of curiosty, I googled it.


https://www.msn.com/en-us...ar-BBIA3L3

And it links back to The Blast: https://theblast.com/prin...lion-cash/

The article disch linked to, doesn't list everything. The fact that it is reported that he had this amount doesn't mean it "disappeared", otherwise, how would they know about it? If someone stole that money, it would not have been there to be counted or acknowledged that he had. If it suddenly disappered, the courts would step in during probate to request an accounting of where the money disappeared to. You are reaching for straws.

Yes the article I linked to referenced an inventory for a court filing in the first week of January 2017. The court filing with the higher cash total came later -- January 31. So how does this point to money being stolen? That later inventory showed more cash, not less. This whole thing is silly and I'm gonna do as other have advised and ignore this conspiracy theory weirdness (not what you posted benni -- the stuff voph is posting).

benni said:

voph said:

disch said: Google 40 million dollars in cash found in Prince’s home and business. Cash money.

Out of curiosty, I googled it.


https://www.msn.com/en-us...ar-BBIA3L3

And it links back to The Blast: https://theblast.com/prin...lion-cash/

The article disch linked to, doesn't list everything. The fact that it is reported that he had this amount doesn't mean it "disappeared", otherwise, how would they know about it? If someone stole that money, it would not have been there to be counted or acknowledged that he had. If it suddenly disappered, the courts would step in during probate to request an accounting of where the money disappeared to. You are reaching for straws.

disch said:

Yes the article I linked to referenced an inventory for a court filing in the first week of January 2017. The court filing with the higher cash total came later -- January 31. So how does this point to money being stolen? That later inventory showed more cash, not less. This whole thing is silly and I'm gonna do as other have advised and ignore this conspiracy theory weirdness (not what you posted benni -- the stuff voph is posting).

benni said:

Out of curiosty, I googled it.


https://www.msn.com/en-us...ar-BBIA3L3

And it links back to The Blast: https://theblast.com/prin...lion-cash/

The article disch linked to, doesn't list everything. The fact that it is reported that he had this amount doesn't mean it "disappeared", otherwise, how would they know about it? If someone stole that money, it would not have been there to be counted or acknowledged that he had. If it suddenly disappered, the courts would step in during probate to request an accounting of where the money disappeared to. You are reaching for straws.

Exactly, disch. It's absolutely ridiculous that anyone would buy what voph is selling. The fact that the money was there to be counted in the first place, and reported that it was there, shows without a doubt the lie being perpetrated. If the money were stolen, no one would know it had even existed. I agree, the best course of action, ignore.

morningsong said:

I might as well say what's in my head. I believe the plane incident was an accident. There are 2 documented incidents with Prince. One mentioned by Kirk in the warrants, one with the "aspirin and wine" that was rumor untit was confirmed in Mayte's book. Both times he must have bounced back just fine. Who knows if there were other incidents where he pulled it together and bounced back. No reason why those in the know not to expect he'd do whatever he needed to do to pull it together again. Except there is this extra unknown element.. The red flag to me is the sudden emergency where the need for the doctor in Cali needs to take a red-eye flight, and Prince felt the need to get blood work done, nobody could make him see the local doctor if he didn't want to. God knows the mixture that was in those pills and how those various"meds" affected not only his body but his thought process. And for how long he'd been ingesting God knows what., he simply had no tolerance for. All that plays a role.

I agree, it was a trajectory that was gaining speed, spinning out of control...body, mind, soul...all of him.

voph said:

The media is not getting involved because they are corrupt. Let me break it down for you. Prince was fighting with the industry mafia Warner Brothers Records for years and wrote Slave on his face, told other artists not to sign contracts and stay independent, talked about chem trails, and gave us other knowledge that the powers that be don’t want us to know. Basically he had a big target on his back and he was getting death threats which the so called media left out. Prince beat them and they didn’t like that because the Industry wants to own the artists to profit from them forever. Time warner owns TMZ, CNN, Warner Brothers Records and more. Wow, are you with me now. Wake up people, you know damn well Prince did not die of any accidental overdose. Planted Pills at Paisley Park, fake intervention doctor, cameras tampered with at Paisley Park and the real kicker is his chefs who prepared Prince’s food validated what Abigail Noel said. She said Prince did not know why he was sick for 2 years. He had all the signs and symptoms of arsenic poisoning. She said Prince asked for juices because he had a hard time swallowing due to being poisoned. She also said the chefs made him a meal which Prince did not eat but he drank the pineapple drink that they dosed with the Fentanyl. She said they put it in the pineapples in liquid form by using syringes. The chefs did a interview a few days after Prince died and confirmed what Abigail said. They said they made Prince juice drinks because it was hard for him to swallow and the first thing they did when they were allowed into Paisley Park was, they checked the refrigerator to see if Prince ate his food. The man just died and all they are concerned with is did he eat and Abigail said they put that food down the garbage disposal to get rid of the evidence because his meal was poisoned. Paisley Park should have been shut down and treated like a crime scene with no one allowed in for a few weeks. That’s just some of the things Abigail said. [Edited 4/1/18 14:59pm] [Edited 4/1/18 15:01pm] [Edited 4/1/18 15:10pm]

I do agree that PP should have been classified a crime scene immediately so that the proper investigations could have been performed. Who knows what was altered or removed - or brought on to the property - when the doors were flung open for days after April 21. The rest of it? I can't agree with the reasoning, but it is no more facetious than what I think (suicide).

1Sasha said:

I do agree that PP should have been classified a crime scene immediately so that the proper investigations could have been performed. Who knows what was altered or removed - or brought on to the property - when the doors were flung open for days after April 21. The rest of it? I can't agree with the reasoning, but it is no more facetious than what I think (suicide).

A warrant was issued that day. The first warrant list what was taken from PP that day, so I think it was classified as a crime scene that day.

1Sasha said:

I do agree that PP should have been classified a crime scene immediately so that the proper investigations could have been performed. Who knows what was altered or removed - or brought on to the property - when the doors were flung open for days after April 21. The rest of it? I can't agree with the reasoning, but it is no more facetious than what I think (suicide).

It was.