cloveringold85 said:

Menes said:

Clover, you're not alone in thinking this. I hope they get the court to rule that releasing the information would not impede the on-going investigation. Most people believe that they can handle being deposed and grilled, until they're actually deposed and grilled. Every single digital footprint ( like the statement you pointed out) will have to be accounted for and they are numerous. Opposing counsel will have a field day with similar statements that are in the public domain.


Someone may find themselves in the unenviable position of being accused of withholding information , which in context, may be interpreted as consciousness of guilt . This will be a prelude to President Trump testifying and mangling his own tongue. What they knew, when they knew and what they did, or intended to do about it ,may just be what some crazy individuals interpret as part of "Prince's master plan/wishes" after his death. Good luck with that fantastical story.


This "hail mary" audible is primarily seeking an insurance payout and it just may unearth much more than they bargained for.

On a side note , I think there is this one part in the warrant where Kirk alluded to different doctors that Prince would see when on tour (or something to that effect"). No names were given and may not have been a part of the investigative process , but it seems strange to me that Kirk isn't screaming his head off by aligning himself with some of these siblings who hired counsel to investigate Prince's death as one of prescription opioid.

Note that counsel hired/copied in Ohio, specializes in prescription overdose death. It is apparent someone believes that Prince did not die from ingesting an illicit substance(s) . Rather, he was dying and the "prescribed fentanyl" he ingested just kind of sped it up, ya know? Very interesting.

.

Amen! I know I sound like a broken record, however; I keep reiterating the comments that Tyka made, because it does not correlate with the ME's findings in that they did not list any other underlying illnesses/disease at time of death. Now, I know we haven't seen the full autopsy report, and we are not privy to that information -- so, that leads us back to why Tyka even bothered to make those comments because it is moot.

.

I'm sure the investigators have reviewed all of her emails to and from Prince. Surely, they think her comments are rather odd as well.

.

Prescription overdose? Hmmm, now things are getting very twisty indeed.

Yes ,Prescription overdose death. Imagine that! All along, the world and relevant investigative bodies, have been looking for this illusive point of contact that Prince had because we all believe that he procured said substances illegally. We now know that it was prescription opioids that killed him . I mean, after two years of turning over every other stone, they(investigative bodies) probably didn't think it obvious to look into whether there was a connection between Prince and prescription overdose. They probably didn't want the public to know what kind of pill it was for fear that it would fly off the shelves like a bag of new and improved skittles.

Let's just get right to it. The poor bastards started writing things in the warrant that appears to show that they were in fact looking into whether or not he received prescription medication that was related to his death but they just didn't look hard enough! Dr. Schulenberg was the poster child for that prescription investigation, and when that didn't pan out, they probably just trotted off to get some grub. You can't make this stuff up!


So you see, the DEA, U.S. Attorney's office, Carver County Sheriff's Dept., North Memorial Medical Center and the ME, probably had a meeting and decided to hide everything related to the the prescription pills that killed Prince Rogers Nelson. I may have missed an agency/entity/person there.

Caution: The sarcasm in the above mentioned paragraphs ,may be construed as factual.


I would have preferred them to stick to the "cancer'' claim and let that pan out some day. Even if he had it, this is going to be one hell of a ride. We are now in rabbit hole territory. As in: (a) sources relative to the investigation, legally prescribed Prince something that killed him and (b) there was a cover up after it was revealed that said sources did in fact prescribe Prince something that killed him.

[Edited 2/11/18 18:22pm]

Menes said:

It can get expensive. They might have to go on tour or get Sharon back in the studio to cut another one of those tracks that was trending in Tunisia.

Okay Menes, you've got me laughing my ass off here

Mumio said:

Mumio said:

Menes said:

It can get expensive. They might have to go on tour or get Sharon back in the studio to cut another one of those tracks that was trending in Tunisia.

Okay Menes, you've got me laughing my ass off here

. It's true. Spotify reported that Londell ( her business advisor) wanted to test the North African market first before releasing the "Hidden Talent" E.P. in the U.S.

The pill that he took with the fentanyl in it was not prescription. It was marked Watson with the number on it. Those LEGAL Watson pills do NOT have fentanyl in them. A prescription pill didn't kill him, it was the fentanyl in the illegal pill that did.

cloveringold85 said:

cloveringold85 said:

Menes said:

Mumio said:

Okay Menes, you've got me laughing my ass off here

. It's true. Spotify reported that Londell ( her business advisor) wanted to test the North African market first before releasing the "Hidden Talent" E.P. in the U.S.

PennyPurple said:

The pill that he took with the fentanyl in it was not prescription. It was marked Watson with the number on it. Those LEGAL Watson pills do NOT have fentanyl in them. A prescription pill didn't kill him, it was the fentanyl in the illegal pill that did.

Please relay that to the family if you have access to their private Facebook hub. It is apparent that they believe otherwise.

The attempt to get information released by counsel is not about anything resembling" illegal". It shouldn't boggle the mind as to why a personal injury law firm coupled with counsel who specialize in prescription overdose deaths would be hired at this juncture.

Menes said:

PennyPurple said:

The pill that he took with the fentanyl in it was not prescription. It was marked Watson with the number on it. Those LEGAL Watson pills do NOT have fentanyl in them. A prescription pill didn't kill him, it was the fentanyl in the illegal pill that did.

Please relay that to the family if you have access to their private Facebook hub. It is apparent that they believe otherwise.

The attempt to get information released by counsel is not about anything resembling" illegal". It shouldn't boggle the mind as to why a personal injury law firm coupled with counsel who specialize in prescription overdose deaths would be hired at this juncture.

Are you talking about the sibs or Chazz?

laurarichardson said:

cloveringold85 said:

.

Amen! I know I sound like a broken record, however; I keep reiterating the comments that Tyka made, because it does not correlate with the ME's findings in that they did not list any other underlying illnesses/disease at time of death. Now, I know we haven't seen the full autopsy report, and we are not privy to that information -- so, that leads us back to why Tyka even bothered to make those comments because it is moot.

.

I'm sure the investigators have reviewed all of her emails to and from Prince. Surely, they think her comments are rather odd as well.

.

Prescription overdose? Hmmm, now things are getting very twisty indeed.

Her comments I believe have a lot to do with this motion. Also if Prince had cancer that had gone into remission and returned and was terminal it may have been in recent weeks or months before he died. He would have not have been getting treatment if it had turned terminal he would have been taking pain killers. It would have no bearing on the criminal case. If Dr. S claims he never wrote Prince pain pills perhaps he was treating him for something else or another doctor is involved. [Edited 2/11/18 19:05pm]

So the cancer was in remission within the (3) three years she said she already knew he was dying of cancer? Then he stopped taking the medication and became terminal within recent weeks or months before he died? Do I have that right?

PennyPurple said:

Menes said:

Please relay that to the family if you have access to their private Facebook hub. It is apparent that they believe otherwise.

The attempt to get information released by counsel is not about anything resembling" illegal". It shouldn't boggle the mind as to why a personal injury law firm coupled with counsel who specialize in prescription overdose deaths would be hired at this juncture.

Are you talking about the sibs or Chazz?

Any of the above .

Menes said:

PennyPurple said:

Are you talking about the sibs or Chazz?

Any of the above .

You do realize that several of them are here on this very forum, and they are listening and watching what we say, and sometimes they participate in the threads....

PennyPurple said:

Menes said:

Any of the above .

You do realize that several of them are here on this very forum, and they are listening and watching what we say, and sometimes they participate in the threads....

Well, Chazz, if you're here, I hope you never testify . Take heed. You're all over the map . To the others, good luck. Careful what you wish for.

PennyPurple said:

Menes said:

Any of the above .

You do realize that several of them are here on this very forum, and they are listening and watching what we say, and sometimes they participate in the threads....

wouldn't doubt it one bit.

Menes said:

laurarichardson said:

voph said: ——Prince has five sibs not one. She has not changed the story the second time around she added the e-mail and picture. If the family is trying to bring s wrongful death suit against some doctor or hospital how would she get away with making up stuff? Personal injury attorney work on contingency I doubt the lawyers would take the case and file a motion if they did not think a good case could be made for some maltreatment could be drugs or could be something else. I am pretty sure the lawyers have those e-mails.

For the record, personal injury attorneys do not soley work on contingency. Every case/client is different.

I am going to disagree with you on this Menes.

I have been practicing law for over 30 years and have never heard of an attorney taking a personal injury/wrongful death case on an hourly basis.

If you go into an attorney's office for a PI/WD case and they say they are charging hourly then the attorney does not believe your case has merit and you need to run out the door as fast as you can.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

For the record, personal injury attorneys do not soley work on contingency. Every case/client is different.

I am going to disagree with you on this Menes.

I have been practicing law for over 30 years and have never heard of an attorney taking a personal injury/wrongful death case on an hourly basis.

If you go into an attorney's office for a PI/WD case and they say they are charging hourly then the attorney does not believe your case has merit and you need to run out the door as fast as you can.

If you dont have any money, you would run out.

Menes said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

I am going to disagree with you on this Menes.

I have been practicing law for over 30 years and have never heard of an attorney taking a personal injury/wrongful death case on an hourly basis.

If you go into an attorney's office for a PI/WD case and they say they are charging hourly then the attorney does not believe your case has merit and you need to run out the door as fast as you can.

If you dont have any money, you would run out.

I was injured and paid by the hour.

Menes said:

Menes said:

If you dont have any money, you would run out.

I was injured and paid by the hour.

Then you got fucked and didnt get kissed.

you guys are expensive as fuck, my east indian buddy had a case that cost 14,000 for immigration, you motherfuckers are ridiculous. I got an old warrant that I need to take care of but i ain't even close to having the dough to approach you motherfuckers.

PeteSilas said:

you guys are expensive as fuck, my east indian buddy had a case that cost 14,000 for immigration, you motherfuckers are ridiculous. I got an old warrant that I need to take care of but i ain't even close to having the dough to approach you motherfuckers.

Dont bark at me Pete!

If you lived near me I would do it for free.

Its not difficult to get a warrant set aside.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

I was injured and paid by the hour.

Then you got fucked and didnt get kissed.

Don't think so. I already knew how to calculate exactly what I would settle for. That's the key.

PeteSilas said:

you guys are expensive as fuck, my east indian buddy had a case that cost 14,000 for immigration, you motherfuckers are ridiculous. I got an old warrant that I need to take care of but i ain't even close to having the dough to approach you motherfuckers.

Im sending you an orgnote.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

PeteSilas said:

you guys are expensive as fuck, my east indian buddy had a case that cost 14,000 for immigration, you motherfuckers are ridiculous. I got an old warrant that I need to take care of but i ain't even close to having the dough to approach you motherfuckers.

Im sending you an orgnote.

ya, thanks, i wasn't barking at you, just mentioning how expensive it is, i won't even be thinking about it until i get at least five grand saved up.

Menes said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Menes said:

For the record, personal injury attorneys do not soley work on contingency. Every case/client is different.

I am going to disagree with you on this Menes.

I have been practicing law for over 30 years and have never heard of an attorney taking a personal injury/wrongful death case on an hourly basis.

If you go into an attorney's office for a PI/WD case and they say they are charging hourly then the attorney does not believe your case has merit and you need to run out the door as fast as you can.

So do you think the law firm that is taking this case is taking it on a contigency basis because they think it is a good case?

I think we're reading way too much into this motion. Until suits are filed, when/if that happens, we don't know what or who the sibling(s) and their lawyer might target (other than the what's noted in the filing that the target(s) are likely to have insurance coverage, i.e., be medical pros).

-

I would not assume that this motion signifies anything about the specific origins of the fentanyl that killed him. Even if that fentanyl was not supplied by a doctor, that doesn't mean a lawyer couldn't attempt to build a case against a doctor for doing other illicit things along the way that facilitated his addicton or didn't treat to it properly.

-

This is a lawyer we're talking about. They are going to try to build a case where they can, because this is a payday opportunity for them. Let's just wait and see if anything even comes from this.

Menes said:

cloveringold85 said:

.

Amen! I know I sound like a broken record, however; I keep reiterating the comments that Tyka made, because it does not correlate with the ME's findings in that they did not list any other underlying illnesses/disease at time of death. Now, I know we haven't seen the full autopsy report, and we are not privy to that information -- so, that leads us back to why Tyka even bothered to make those comments because it is moot.

.

I'm sure the investigators have reviewed all of her emails to and from Prince. Surely, they think her comments are rather odd as well.

.

Prescription overdose? Hmmm, now things are getting very twisty indeed.

Yes ,Prescription overdose death. Imagine that! All along, the world and relevant investigative bodies, have been looking for this illusive point of contact that Prince had because we all believe that he procured said substances illegally. We now know that it was prescription opioids that killed him . I mean, after two years of turning over every other stone, they(investigative bodies) probably didn't think it obvious to look into whether there was a connection between Prince and prescription overdose. They probably didn't want the public to know what kind of pill it was for fear that it would fly off the shelves like a bag of new and improved skittles.

Let's just get right to it. The poor bastards started writing things in the warrant that appears to show that they were in fact looking into whether or not he received prescription medication that was related to his death but they just didn't look hard enough! Dr. Schulenberg was the poster child for that prescription investigation, and when that didn't pan out, they probably just trotted off to get some grub. You can't make this stuff up!


So you see, the DEA, U.S. Attorney's office, Carver County Sheriff's Dept., North Memorial Medical Center and the ME, probably had a meeting and decided to hide everything related to the the prescription pills that killed Prince Rogers Nelson. I may have missed an agency/entity/person there.

Caution: The sarcasm in the above mentioned paragraphs ,may be construed as factual.


I would have preferred them to stick to the "cancer'' claim and let that pan out some day. Even if he had it, this is going to be one hell of a ride. We are now in rabbit hole territory. As in: (a) sources relative to the investigation, legally prescribed Prince something that killed him and (b) there was a cover up after it was revealed that said sources did in fact prescribe Prince something that killed him.

[Edited 2/11/18 18:22pm]

PennyPurple said:

If they are doing it on a contingency basis the lawyers are not taking the case without believing they can win. ( The firm has to be since I do not know how the sibs would have the funds and no one is taking a case like this for free.) I do not think they would have a case if they were going after a doctor or hospital concerning the illegal drugs that killed him unless he obtained it from a doctor or hospital which seems unlikely.

I believe there is a whole another element that we the public have not been made aware of and I really think some fans (not all ) need to get ready to accept it.

If the sibs are successful with the motion and move forward with a suit we the public are going to find out a lot of things that we probably do not want to know.

disch said:

I think we're reading way too much into this motion. Until suits are filed, when/if that happens, we don't know what or who the sibling(s) and their lawyer might target (other than the what's noted in the filing that the target(s) are likely to have insurance coverage, i.e., be medical pros).

-

I would not assume that this motion signifies anything about the specific origins of the fentanyl that killed him. Even if that fentanyl was not supplied by a doctor, that doesn't mean a lawyer couldn't attempt to build a case against a doctor for doing other illicit things along the way that facilitated his addicton or didn't treat to it properly.

-

This is a lawyer we're talking about. They are going to try to build a case where they can, because this is a payday opportunity for them. Let's just wait and see if anything even comes from this.

Menes said:

Yes ,Prescription overdose death. Imagine that! All along, the world and relevant investigative bodies, have been looking for this illusive point of contact that Prince had because we all believe that he procured said substances illegally. We now know that it was prescription opioids that killed him . I mean, after two years of turning over every other stone, they(investigative bodies) probably didn't think it obvious to look into whether there was a connection between Prince and prescription overdose. They probably didn't want the public to know what kind of pill it was for fear that it would fly off the shelves like a bag of new and improved skittles.

Let's just get right to it. The poor bastards started writing things in the warrant that appears to show that they were in fact looking into whether or not he received prescription medication that was related to his death but they just didn't look hard enough! Dr. Schulenberg was the poster child for that prescription investigation, and when that didn't pan out, they probably just trotted off to get some grub. You can't make this stuff up!


So you see, the DEA, U.S. Attorney's office, Carver County Sheriff's Dept., North Memorial Medical Center and the ME, probably had a meeting and decided to hide everything related to the the prescription pills that killed Prince Rogers Nelson. I may have missed an agency/entity/person there.

Caution: The sarcasm in the above mentioned paragraphs ,may be construed as factual.


I would have preferred them to stick to the "cancer'' claim and let that pan out some day. Even if he had it, this is going to be one hell of a ride. We are now in rabbit hole territory. As in: (a) sources relative to the investigation, legally prescribed Prince something that killed him and (b) there was a cover up after it was revealed that said sources did in fact prescribe Prince something that killed him.

[Edited 2/11/18 18:22pm]

Laura, as I wrote, we don't know what the suit might be, if it materializes. There are myriad claims they could make against a doctor/hospital for malpratice that don't have to do with the specific ingestion of the fentanyl on April 21, but focus on the events that led up to that.

-

As for "finding things we don't want to know," if you're alluding to cancer or something of that nature, I have no idea why we "wouldn't want to know" that. Cancer isn't more devastating or tragic than an opioid addiction leading to a fatal accidental overdose.

-

I would wait and see what happens before we starting jumping to all kinds of conclusions about this.

laurarichardson said:

If they are doing it on a contingency basis the lawyers are not taking the case without believing they can win. ( The firm has to be since I do not know how the sibs would have the funds and no one is taking a case like this for free.) I do not think they would have a case if they were going after a doctor or hospital concerning the illegal drugs that killed him unless he obtained it from a doctor or hospital which seems unlikely.

I believe there is a whole another element that we the public have not been made aware of and I really think some fans (not all ) need to get ready to accept it.

If the sibs are successful with the motion and move forward with a suit we the public are going to find out a lot of things that we probably do not want to know.

disch said:

I think we're reading way too much into this motion. Until suits are filed, when/if that happens, we don't know what or who the sibling(s) and their lawyer might target (other than the what's noted in the filing that the target(s) are likely to have insurance coverage, i.e., be medical pros).

-

I would not assume that this motion signifies anything about the specific origins of the fentanyl that killed him. Even if that fentanyl was not supplied by a doctor, that doesn't mean a lawyer couldn't attempt to build a case against a doctor for doing other illicit things along the way that facilitated his addicton or didn't treat to it properly.

-

This is a lawyer we're talking about. They are going to try to build a case where they can, because this is a payday opportunity for them. Let's just wait and see if anything even comes from this.