Dibblekins said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

The release of Prince4Ever maybe?

That and the AMA I bet we will really see something when the PR remaster comes out in January.

Some of think we know who the trolls and snitches are and what there motives may be.

CooperC62057 said:

muleFunk said:

Didn't I tell you a couple of weeks ago that these new articles would be strategically released to coincide with an event connected with Prince???

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

If this would have been a regular OD this would have been over and done with in May.

Instead you were given information fed to you vis a vis gossip columns.

Since his passing you have heard stories about the charities and good deeds Prince has performed yet each meaningful date you have a piece of information thrown out there just to get you to think that this was a drug addicted rock star. His birthday almost 6 weeks after his death there was a release of information on the autopsy. Why ? The police knew that there was a fake pill.

Who released the info? The police don't have leakers to spread info to fake press sites.

If a person connected to law enforecement was discovered to have leaked infomation they would face both criminal prosecution and the loss of a job.

Then Prince has a posthumous release and wins an AMA and a new article appears.

Then people who have just joined the site will post information from 3rd rate sources like it is gospel.

This is a smear campaign and someone is using this drug angle to cover for the fact that Prince was given a fake Vicodin and it killed him. Prince had the means to get legit pills from legit sources IF he was addicted or dependent on these pills?

The DEA has looked at everyone in his circle. TMZ who started the smears said that they(DEA) didn't see the same signs of doctor shopping that MJ showed. Why?

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

muleFunk said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

If this would have been a regular OD this would have been over and done with in May.

Instead you were given information fed to you vis a vis gossip columns.

Since his passing you have heard stories about the charities and good deeds Prince has performed yet each meaningful date you have a piece of information thrown out there just to get you to think that this was a drug addicted rock star. His birthday almost 6 weeks after his death there was a release of information on the autopsy. Why ? The police knew that there was a fake pill.

Who released the info? The police don't have leakers to spread info to fake press sites.

If a person connected to law enforecement was discovered to have leaked infomation they would face both criminal prosecution and the loss of a job.

Then Prince has a posthumous release and wins an AMA and a new article appears.

Then people who have just joined the site will post information from 3rd rate sources like it is gospel.

This is a smear campaign and someone is using this drug angle to cover for the fact that Prince was given a fake Vicodin and it killed him. Prince had the means to get legit pills from legit sources IF he was addicted or dependent on these pills?

The DEA has looked at everyone in his circle. TMZ who started the smears said that they(DEA) didn't see the same signs of doctor shopping that MJ showed. Why?

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

:

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

yeahthat:

Anyone can see that this is not a simple O.D or it would have been closed a long time ago. Police departments want to close cases not keep them open. Ask yourself why the media is not interested in finding out why the case is not closed but instead publishes bullshit like that crap on the Digital Media.Com website today.

muleFunk said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

If this would have been a regular OD this would have been over and done with in May.

Instead you were given information fed to you vis a vis gossip columns.

Since his passing you have heard stories about the charities and good deeds Prince has performed yet each meaningful date you have a piece of information thrown out there just to get you to think that this was a drug addicted rock star. His birthday almost 6 weeks after his death there was a release of information on the autopsy. Why ? The police knew that there was a fake pill.

Who released the info? The police don't have leakers to spread info to fake press sites.

If a person connected to law enforecement was discovered to have leaked infomation they would face both criminal prosecution and the loss of a job.

Then Prince has a posthumous release and wins an AMA and a new article appears.

Then people who have just joined the site will post information from 3rd rate sources like it is gospel.

This is a smear campaign and someone is using this drug angle to cover for the fact that Prince was given a fake Vicodin and it killed him. Prince had the means to get legit pills from legit sources IF he was addicted or dependent on these pills?

The DEA has looked at everyone in his circle. TMZ who started the smears said that they(DEA) didn't see the same signs of doctor shopping that MJ showed. Why?

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

MULEFUNK: I totally agree with you!! I quote...." DON'T BELIEVE THE MEDIA"

laurarichardson said:

muleFunk said:

Didn't I tell you a couple of weeks ago that these new articles would be strategically released to coincide with an event connected with Prince???

--- You said it and you are correct. I also am giving you some of the newbies on this board the side eye. We got trolls.

CooperC62057 said:

laurarichardson said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, LR and Zena - so, you believe that all of these events or press releases are fabricated by the press and put out there to create the illusion that Prince was dependent on drugs to tarnish his image for what end result? What do they gain in the end? I am not being sarcastic, I am trying to understand where you are going with this. You believe that there are people on these threads that are purposely engaging in the same behavior for what purpose? I can think of one poster you may be referencing but again I would ask what would be the purpose? I can assure you that when I state my beliefs it is not to incite others, I am merely speaking my thoughts on the subject and have no problem listening and trying to understand others opinions. I don't claim to definitively know the truth and I welcome information from others that can possibly leave me looking at things in a different light. From your comments am I correct in understanding that you believe someone purposely gave P the fentanyl laced pill and purposely murdered him?

Forgive me if I am speaking out of turn - like you, Cooper, I am in a dilemma over all of this but very much open to opinions / theories...

If there is a deliberate agenda to release drug-related reports at key moments in Prince's posthumous media coverage, I wonder if it might not be to tarnish his legacy as such but MORE to do with wanting to ensure that every time people are reminded of him, they don't start to ponder alternatives to the 'self-administered accidental overdose' narrative.

Now that doesn't necessarily mean he was murdered, just that there might be more elements to the Prince story which some people (whoever they may be) don't want us to know or investigate too deeply.

All supposition, of course...

http://www.startribune.com/ag-examines-problems-fueling-minnesota-s-opioid-epidemic/402700625/

And your theory is, "They are orchestrating their plot against Prince, because Prince was African-American!" Right?

And it's Prince's race that makes his, "An Irregular OD"?

Have I understood you correctly — recalling previous discusions that were left with dangling questions — muleFunk?

Here's my opinion^® on your comments I've quoted and bolded above…

• The Associated Press is the most respected, most unimpeachable wire service in the history of humankind! Surely you're not lumping the AP in with "gossip columns"?!?! Are you?
  
  
• Journalists and law enforcement have always had a symbiotic relationship. Millions of crimes have been solved over the years, by Johnny Law strategically "leaking" information to the press. Thousands of prestigious journalism awards have been won, because the award-winning journo received exclusive, "off-the-record" intel from their "undisclosed sources" down at headquarters. That's old news {pun intended}, muleFunk my friend.
  
  
• You both deride TMZ, and also — in the same breath — use information from them, to support your theory. Why indeed.
  
  
• Please don't take offense. But I can't help but think that your theory reminds me of Charlie Manson's hair-brained, paranoia-inspired, racially-themed Helter Skelter^™ plot.
  
  
• Just because you're paranoid — that doesn't mean they are not out to get ya ; د )
  
  

Oh yeah. One other of your above comments piqued my curiosity. How do you rate FaceBook's veracity as a source of information? Greater Than? — Less Than? — or Equal To gossip columns? If you only answer one question, muleFunk — out of all the as-yet-unanswered questions that I asked you weeks ago — please at least answer that one? And thanks in advance.

Like clockwork...

paisleypearl said:

laurarichardson said:

No the plot does not thicken. The I'll Do Anything project and my Little Pill are from a movie that Prince wrote music for. The pill song is in the plot of the film. The movie studio removed all of the music from the file and decided to have the actors sing. The movie with the actors singing tested poorly and the music was completing removed. The film was put out with no music at all and is actually a pretty good film.

You realize when you are paid to write music for a film you are going to write songs that follow the plot.

this was a failed attempt at levity. Take a break. [Edited 11/24/16 3:42am]

I will take a break when you take a break from posting foolishness.

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, LR and Zena - so, you believe that all of these events or press releases are fabricated by the press and put out there to create the illusion that Prince was dependent on drugs to tarnish his image for what end result? What do they gain in the end? I am not being sarcastic, I am trying to understand where you are going with this. You believe that there are people on these threads that are purposely engaging in the same behavior for what purpose? I can think of one poster you may be referencing but again I would ask what would be the purpose? I can assure you that when I state my beliefs it is not to incite others, I am merely speaking my thoughts on the subject and have no problem listening and trying to understand others opinions. I don't claim to definitively know the truth and I welcome information from others that can possibly leave me looking at things in a different light. From your comments am I correct in understanding that you believe someone purposely gave P the fentanyl laced pill and purposely murdered him?

We just had a media figure elected President of the United States what would happen if a rock star who was unblemished by the sex,drugs, and rock and roll lifestyle ?

The United States of America had a policy vis-a-vis it's intellegence agencies to "Prevent the Rise of the Black Messiah. Any black person who was capable of obtaining a leadership position is subjected to this. One of the means of doing this is by DISCREDITATION ,smearing the person's reputation and legacy.

Why is it that AFTER Dr. Martin Luther King's death has information been put into the public about extramarital affairs? Last year a program about his assassination aired and they had a 80+ year old woman admitting that she was with him the night he was killed. Now what purpose could be served by doing this 48 years after his death?

Michael Jackson put world hunger in the spotlight and raised millions for We Are The World. He gets accused of child molestation and had his face destroyed. After his hair caught on fire filming the Pepsi Victory Tour commercial and 80% of his scalp was burned he became dependent on pain killers.

Tupac Shakur who comes from a family of miltant Black Panthers and Black Liberation Army members was quickly entangled in legal affairs. He had a strong message of Black Unity until he was shot in NYC and put in prison where he was surrounded by provacateaurs which started the tragic East Coast/West Coast War which ended both stars lives.

Prince which a lot of folks are finding out now gave millions of dollars to black causes. Marva Collins Private Schools in Chicago was funded by him until she closed them in the mid 2000s. Prince gave $1 million to Spike Lee for the completion of the movie Malcolm X. Prince also gave money to the Nation of Islam for the Million Man March in 1993 which inspired the song We March on the Gold Album. We do know that he was targeted after failing to attend the We Are The World recording sessions but what is little know is how he was targeted after the Cherry Moon movie in which he had a white female love interest which hurt the lady's career until she won an Oscar.

As to your question here about was Prince murdered?

When the Moline incident was announced I will admit that I was stunned that it was due to an OD however it was not shocking because anyone who is a long time member of this site knows that rumours of hip and joint problems have been around for at least 13 years or longer. When it was announced that he OD and died I thought at first that he mixed cold meds with these meds and it took him away. It was only after the June "leak" about clothes being on backwards and a Vicodin pill that was actually Fentanyl did I start to think that this could have been a possible assassination. I will say that I am only saying that it is an remote chance that this occured but it has to be included in the realm of possibility. There would be no need to a person with the means of Prince to have to get counterfeit meds.

Throw in the targeted "leaking" of news at EVERY positive Prince event that's a key indicator that an operation occured.

Dibblekins said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, LR and Zena - so, you believe that all of these events or press releases are fabricated by the press and put out there to create the illusion that Prince was dependent on drugs to tarnish his image for what end result? What do they gain in the end? I am not being sarcastic, I am trying to understand where you are going with this. You believe that there are people on these threads that are purposely engaging in the same behavior for what purpose? I can think of one poster you may be referencing but again I would ask what would be the purpose? I can assure you that when I state my beliefs it is not to incite others, I am merely speaking my thoughts on the subject and have no problem listening and trying to understand others opinions. I don't claim to definitively know the truth and I welcome information from others that can possibly leave me looking at things in a different light. From your comments am I correct in understanding that you believe someone purposely gave P the fentanyl laced pill and purposely murdered him?

Forgive me if I am speaking out of turn - like you, Cooper, I am in a dilemma over all of this but very much open to opinions / theories...

If there is a deliberate agenda to release drug-related reports at key moments in Prince's posthumous media coverage, I wonder if it might not be to tarnish his legacy as such but MORE to do with wanting to ensure that every time people are reminded of him, they don't start to ponder alternatives to the 'self-administered accidental overdose' narrative.

Now that doesn't necessarily mean he was murdered, just that there might be more elements to the Prince story which some people (whoever they may be) don't want us to know or investigate too deeply.

All supposition, of course...

You are making a very valid point. Big Pharma is making a tremendous amount of money off of pain meds and I have only come across one article that exposed the kickbacks, lawsuits and illegal activities of some of these companies.

I believe that the media is now about making money and getting clicks on their websites. Apparently someone thinks reporting on a drug addicted rock star with elements of the story that are not even factual will generate more income then reporting on a corupt industry that is killing people for profit.

Could be about making money and assisting a corupt industry.

I also find it interesting that the Opioid deaths were in the news before and after the death.

We know from DEA that these deaths are being caused by illegal pill mills in Mexico and China. That information would explain the death if we have more evidence of counterfeit pills.

BUT with millions on the line and with the knowledge that Tidal had not paid Prince and the release of bootleg material and the real history of Jay-Z, who's to say that someone couldn't have planted those pills.

If you are willing to immedately believe of a drug addicted Prince after people that he worked with has said otherwise then you have to at least consider someone killing Prince to get control of his songs.

ALL of this is supposition and I am only giving this 20% of a real possibility here but it's not utterly fantastic.

phatphuk said:

muleFunk said:

CooperC62057 said:

muleFunk said:

Didn't I tell you a couple of weeks ago that these new articles would be strategically released to coincide with an event connected with Prince???

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

If this would have been a regular OD this would have been over and done with in May.

Instead you were given information fed to you vis a vis gossip columns.

Since his passing you have heard stories about the charities and good deeds Prince has performed yet each meaningful date you have a piece of information thrown out there just to get you to think that this was a drug addicted rock star. His birthday almost 6 weeks after his death there was a release of information on the autopsy. Why ? The police knew that there was a fake pill.

Who released the info? The police don't have leakers to spread info to fake press sites.

If a person connected to law enforecement was discovered to have leaked infomation they would face both criminal prosecution and the loss of a job.

Then Prince has a posthumous release and wins an AMA and a new article appears.

Then people who have just joined the site will post information from 3rd rate sources like it is gospel.

This is a smear campaign and someone is using this drug angle to cover for the fact that Prince was given a fake Vicodin and it killed him. Prince had the means to get legit pills from legit sources IF he was addicted or dependent on these pills?

The DEA has looked at everyone in his circle. TMZ who started the smears said that they(DEA) didn't see the same signs of doctor shopping that MJ showed. Why?

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

And your theory is, "They are orchestrating their plot against Prince, because Prince was African-American!" Right?

And it's Prince's race that makes his, "An Irregular OD"?

Have I understood you correctly — recalling previous discusions that were left with dangling questions — muleFunk?

Here's my opinion^® on your comments I've quoted and bolded above…

• The Associated Press is the most respected, most unimpeachable wire service in the history of humankind! Surely you're not lumping the AP in with "gossip columns"?!?! Are you?
  
  
• Journalists and law enforcement have always had a symbiotic relationship. Millions of crimes have been solved over the years, by Johnny Law strategically "leaking" information to the press. Thousands of prestigious journalism awards have been won, because the award-winning journo received exclusive, "off-the-record" intel from their "undisclosed sources" down at headquarters. That's old news {pun intended}, muleFunk my friend.
  
  
• You both deride TMZ, and also — in the same breath — use information from them, to support your theory. Why indeed.
  
  
• Please don't take offense. But I can't help but think that your theory reminds me of Charlie Manson's hair-brained, paranoia-inspired, racially-themed Helter Skelter^™ plot.
  
  
• Just because you're paranoid — that doesn't mean they are not out to get ya ; د )
  
  

Oh yeah. One other of your above comments piqued my curiosity. How do you rate FaceBook's veracity as a source of information? Greater Than? — Less Than? — or Equal To gossip columns? If you only answer one question, muleFunk — out of all the as-yet-unanswered questions that I asked you weeks ago — please at least answer that one? And thanks in advance.

Disclaimer — The opinions expressed in this post are solely and exclusively, those of the poster. They in no way are sanctioned by the DEA, the FBI, the KGB, WB^™ nor The Manson Family.

Come over to Facebook and ask to be included into the NPGMC and let them know your name is Phatpuck and we will debate all day but I know who you are.

Let's take off the masks you and I.

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, LR and Zena - so, you believe that all of these events or press releases are fabricated by the press and put out there to create the illusion that Prince was dependent on drugs to tarnish his image for what end result? What do they gain in the end? I am not being sarcastic, I am trying to understand where you are going with this. You believe that there are people on these threads that are purposely engaging in the same behavior for what purpose? I can think of one poster you may be referencing but again I would ask what would be the purpose? I can assure you that when I state my beliefs it is not to incite others, I am merely speaking my thoughts on the subject and have no problem listening and trying to understand others opinions. I don't claim to definitively know the truth and I welcome information from others that can possibly leave me looking at things in a different light. From your comments am I correct in understanding that you believe someone purposely gave P the fentanyl laced pill and purposely murdered him?

Before I get stared I did want to say that know one is fabricating that Prince was dependent on pain pills. He was seeing a doctor for withdrawals it means he was trying to get off of them or in the process of doing so. To take that someone who is struggling with medical issues and exploit it for profit and smearing is shameful in and of itself.

----------

“Mulefunk, LR and Zena - so, you believe that all of these events or press releases are fabricated by the press and put out there to create the illusion that Prince was dependent on drugs to tarnish his image for what end result?”

1) Drug addicted rock star sells papers and gets clicks on the net. This type of story makes money and I can’t help but notice how the media is hell bent on dragging down any successful black man. You can’t get so far in the clouds in this world that you forget there are people walking around who actually think they are superior because of the color of their skin. We have a man who is going to be in the White House soon who ran his whole campaign on racist and stereotype comments about people who don’t look like him. He won the election by not proclaiming himself the President for all of the people in the nation. Race plays a huge role in how events, people and situations are reported on in the media. Over the last 7 months we have repeatedly seen good positive stories followed by negativity. Do you realize that Dez Dickenson said CNN put a comment on their website he did not even make? Do you realize that Anna Fantastic said the Daily Mail printed a whole interview she did not even give to them? Do you know I read an article a few month back were people in Channahansen were refusing to speak to the media because reporters kept trying to steer the interviews in a negative direction?

2) “You believe that there are people on these threads that are purposely engaging in the same behavior for what purpose? I can think of one poster you may be referencing but again I would ask what would be the purpose?”

These people could be reporters who are on the board trying to get information. You can get info a lot faster if you stir up trouble. Remember it is the Star Tribune that went to court to get Prince’s divorce papers unsealed not a tabloid. We have seen articles were information was taken from this board. This week I stumbled across this Ruffles Van Exel person who hangs around Londell Mcmilian. Mr. Exel is rumored to be a spy for TMZ. A simple goggle search brings up a lot of other things about him which are disturbing. Do you think it is okay for a TMZ spy to be hanging around the attorney for the music publishing of the estate? Do you realize how many greedy record companies would like to get a hold of Prince’s publishing? Do you know that the admins of MJ’s estate sold off the catalogue of music MJ owned for over 30 years. Don’t underestimate greed.

See the information below.

Interview with Sheila E in WHO magazine and an interview that did not take place with the Daily Mail that adds insider comments about Prince’s family. This came out the day after the greatest hits was released. The Daily Mail and Radar added those nasty comments about the family and put them in an article about Sheila E. It is called divide and conquer.

http://www.dailymail.co.u...cerns.html

http://www.who.com.au/art...ces-estate

Take some time to read about Van Excel.

http://www.lipstickalley....ght=Prince

Ha-Ha-a-a! Why do you keep saying, "I know who you are"? Has l'il ol me got myself one on them there cyberstalkers? Ha-Ha-a-a!

If you really knew who I was, muleFunk my friend, then…

1. You wouldn't have me confused with my hockey-playing second cousin, "phatpuck DeerMeat gonzález"
   
   
2. You would know that FaceBook ain't never been — and never will be — my scene
   
   
3. You would know what I think about any ideogology that can't be explained by simple, straightforward yes-or-no answers to simple yes-or-no questions put to its practioners in a one-to-one discussion

I gave you answers that were explained in very logical,easy to follow terms.

Now if you don't want to go to a private Prince FB page to have discussion mano e mano fine but I am not playing games here.

muleFunk said:

CooperC62057 said:

muleFunk said:

I gave you answers that were explained in very logical,easy to follow terms.

Now if you don't want to go to a private Prince FB page to have discussion mano e mano fine but I am not playing games here.

Mulefunk, what is the exact name for that FB page?

NPGMC rebirthed

muleFunk said:

Didn't I tell you a couple of weeks ago that these new articles would be strategically released to coincide with an event connected with Prince???

.

You gave me answers? When? Somehow, I missed the one to this multiple-choice question, muleFunk my friend…

Sorry mi amigo. I can't see you and I ever having a productive conversation. I foresee nothing but me getting super.duper frustrated by you consistently either evading my questions — {the way you evaded the one I just asked a second time} — or answering my simple, straightforward, yes-or-no questions with circuitously defensive questions fired back at me. Thanks. But no thanks, muleFunk. I already have way more productive outlets for frittering away my free time.

However. If you can convince me that you really do know who I am, by naming — ri'chere in this thread — either…

1. any one of the three colleges I went to?
   
   
2. what my degree is in?
   
   
3. which state I'm from?
   
   
4. the first jobbing band I played in?
   
   
5. my middle initial?

All the above info on me, is already out there somewhere on the internet under my "non-prince.org name". Just reveal any two of them, then I will be forced to reconsider your private FaceBook discussion invitation.

I'm dead serious, muleFunk. If you're half the sleuth you'd like prince.org to believe you are, I'm hereby giving you permission to reveal, "who I really am". And if you're wrong, then that might be a good reason for you to to honor your word of a few weeks ago.

We're all waiting for you to impress us, muleFunk P.I., my good man. Good luck ; د )

muleFunk said:

CooperC62057 said:

Mulefunk, I have seen you post before about this. What is the event that you are referring to currently or do you believe that one is about to happen? And for clarity, you believe that the directive to release these stories is being given by whom and for what purpose?

If this would have been a regular OD this would have been over and done with in May.

Instead you were given information fed to you vis a vis gossip columns.

Since his passing you have heard stories about the charities and good deeds Prince has performed yet each meaningful date you have a piece of information thrown out there just to get you to think that this was a drug addicted rock star. His birthday almost 6 weeks after his death there was a release of information on the autopsy. Why ? The police knew that there was a fake pill.

Who released the info? The police don't have leakers to spread info to fake press sites.

If a person connected to law enforecement was discovered to have leaked infomation they would face both criminal prosecution and the loss of a job.

Then Prince has a posthumous release and wins an AMA and a new article appears.

Then people who have just joined the site will post information from 3rd rate sources like it is gospel.

This is a smear campaign and someone is using this drug angle to cover for the fact that Prince was given a fake Vicodin and it killed him. Prince had the means to get legit pills from legit sources IF he was addicted or dependent on these pills?

The DEA has looked at everyone in his circle. TMZ who started the smears said that they(DEA) didn't see the same signs of doctor shopping that MJ showed. Why?

Yet there are some here that parade on here with glee saying others are hero worshipping when critical thinking questions are asked about this case.

.

Exactly! If this was just a case of OD, the case would have been closed by now.

.

There was an officer who was at the scene after Prince was found and he stated that it looked "suspicious". He was never identified. There will continue to be stories leaked from "annonymous" people.

.

TMZ has people who feed them information, then it gets leaked to the public; this Raffles person is just one of them who has been giving them info for many years (MJ & Whitney).

.

1Sasha said:

From Moline to April 20 bothers me. We know some things he did, but on the 20th a lot happened all day, and we only know pieces of that. Unless there is proof he lived beyond that night ... I have never felt he died in the morning of the 21st. Did someone slip him a pill, did someone put him in the elevator ... no security, no cameras, nothing?

.

Me too! After that night in Atlanta, something went terribly wrong. I also have the theory that Prince died on the April 20th, and not the 21st, as stated. Carver County Sheriff claims to have security footage. Just the fact alone that this is still an ongoing criminal homicide investigation tells us that there was foul-play. I have felt from day one that Prince's sudden death was shady!!

Dibblekins said:

Like clockwork...

.

Always on-time!