ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

zenarose said:

Did you notice that there was still activity up to 8/2010? Then motions were filed beginning 6/2016 with the case being reassigned 6/17/2016? I wonder if the case was ever settled at all?? Very confusing.

The June 2016 motions were filed by the Star Tribune.

AHHH. Thank you! I see that now.

tmo1965 said:

tmo1965 said:

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said: ---- What does it say about the house? The rumor going around was that he bulldozed them when she tried to get the properties in the divorce. Supposedly he packed up the remains of homes and sent them to her with note saying you want houses you got them. Don't know if this is true but when she said they had a friendly divorce I thought will the court had to have a judgement against him so friendly was it.

I thought he bulldozed the house to avoid paying taxes. During the days of the NPG Music Club, one of the PP's (I assumed it was Prince) posted a thread about having a nice peice of property and having to pay a lot of taxes because there is a house (or something to that effect). Later we learned that the house was bulldozed. I remember NPGMC members making fun that Prince was using the website to complalin about his taxes.

Ok. Makes sense.

morningsong said:

tmo1965 said:

I thought he bulldozed the house to avoid paying taxes. During the days of the NPG Music Club, one of the PP's (I assumed it was Prince) posted a thread about having a nice peice of property and having to pay a lot of taxes because there is a house (or something to that effect). Later we learned that the house was bulldozed. I remember NPGMC members making fun that Prince was using the website to complalin about his taxes.

Ok. Makes sense.

supposedly if u build on it or have house on it ..u have to pay taxes

rogifan said:

tmo1965 said:

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Does anyone have the link to the divorce file at court?

I need to look. Cant tell whether they said filed depositions or just depositions taken.

Oh no if they were filed.

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

Going to this website I found out that my nephew, currently in college, was charged with a misdemeanor for drug paraphernalia back in May.

laurarichardson said:

luvsexy4all said:

morningsong said:

Ok. Makes sense.

supposedly if u build on it or have house on it ..u have to pay taxes

Makes sense, since your property taxes change with the types of home improvements. I wasn't thinking. Imma go back and daydream about the house in Turks & Caicos, since my brain is gone on vacation anyway.

Mkilpatrick74 said:

rogifan said:

Going to this website I found out that my nephew, currently in college, was charged with a misdemeanor for drug paraphernalia back in May.

Oh snap!!!! That's a messed up way to find that information out

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

I see what you meant about a lot of activity. Is that what attracted ST, I wonder.

Maybe. I never looked at the divorce file before because I thought it was sealed. I didnt know you could see the docket and activity. In my city, sealed means you cant even see the docket. Something was going on for several years after the divorce. I didnt realize the divorce case went on so long. She filed a Motion for Temporary Relief along with Affidavits. A negative narrative can be contained in her affidavit. Who knows? I mean we know what he passed away from, how much worse can that get?

It looks like there was a pre-trial hearing that was canceled? I have experience in litigation but not family law but usually you don't do anything concerning "trials" without a request for a trial, right? It just seems like this wasn't as quick and easy and we origially thought...

rogifan said:

Mkilpatrick74 said:

Oh snap!!!! That's a messed up way to find that information out

That's what I get for snooping.

It's tempting, isn't it. We have one of these sites in my state (not all states have them). Hard not to put in a name or two just to see what turns up.

MoDrawersMoDrawers said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Maybe. I never looked at the divorce file before because I thought it was sealed. I didnt know you could see the docket and activity. In my city, sealed means you cant even see the docket. Something was going on for several years after the divorce. I didnt realize the divorce case went on so long. She filed a Motion for Temporary Relief along with Affidavits. A negative narrative can be contained in her affidavit. Who knows? I mean we know what he passed away from, how much worse can that get?

It looks like there was a pre-trial hearing that was canceled? I have experience in litigation but not family law but usually you don't do anything concerning "trials" without a request for a trial, right? It just seems like this wasn't as quick and easy and we origially thought...

In divorce cases the Judge will set it for trial just to light the fire under everyone so it doesnt drag out. If you dont give attorneys trial dates the case will go by the wayside, and then they will be scrambling at the last minute, right?

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

MoDrawersMoDrawers said:

It looks like there was a pre-trial hearing that was canceled? I have experience in litigation but not family law but usually you don't do anything concerning "trials" without a request for a trial, right? It just seems like this wasn't as quick and easy and we origially thought...

In divorce cases the Judge will set it for trial just to light the fire under everyone so it doesnt drag out. If you dont give attorneys trial dates the case will go by the wayside, and then they will be scrambling at the last minute, right?

Ahhh...good point! Thanks for the info

morningsong said:

tmo1965 said:

I thought he bulldozed the house to avoid paying taxes. During the days of the NPG Music Club, one of the PP's (I assumed it was Prince) posted a thread about having a nice peice of property and having to pay a lot of taxes because there is a house (or something to that effect). Later we learned that the house was bulldozed. I remember NPGMC members making fun that Prince was using the website to complalin about his taxes.

Ok. Makes sense.

I'm relatively new to the Org so PLEASE don't kill me for asking this question. I have always assumed that Mani and Mayte signed prenups and got NOTHING - is that not the case? Since Prince hated being taken advantage of financially, I can see him bulldozing the house out of anger or dragging out the final settlement with either of his exes. Just speculating......but would love to know if their was a financial settlement for the exes. Especially for Mayte, that girl danced her tail off for years (even if she was lucky to get the job).

DollyDagger said:

morningsong said:

DollyDagger said:

I'm relatively new to the Org so PLEASE don't kill me for asking this question. I have always assumed that Mani and Mayte signed prenups and got NOTHING - is that not the case? Since Prince hated being taken advantage of financially, I can see him bulldozing the house out of anger or dragging out the final settlement with either of his exes. Just speculating......but would love to know if their was a financial settlement for the exes. Especially for Mayte, that girl danced her tail off for years (even if she was lucky to get the job).

They both got something, but I don't know what. I always believed through rumor it was between 2-3 mil but I heard so many different amounts until I'm not sure anymore.

Wow!! That sounds doable for P. I had just assumed he dug in his "heels" and fought it through lawyers until the girls cried Uncle. Hope that figure is right. Both wives surely worked hard to keep up with him and keep him happy. Our beautiful Prince was complex, demanding and a genius. Like someone said, he was like being in love with Picasso. Only, much more beautiful.

purplethunder3121 said:

morningsong said:

udo said: And this is about the estate how?

Nothing whatsoever.

Yeah, I was under the mistaken belief that udo was a regular orger who was just angry and frustrated right now, but I've come to see they're just a person relishing in hate filled behavior, my patience is gone for that person.

morningsong said:

Yeah, I was under the mistaken belief that udo was a regular orger who was just angry and frustrated right now, but I've come to see they're just a person relishing in hate filled behavior, my patience is gone for that person.

.

Sure.

I am not angry. I am angry with the lack of energy, lack of focus, lack of speed.

Not just here, but in general.

.

Wouldn't the heirs not have a case against a person that delivered the pills to mr Prince?

Thus in my opinion the news is fairly relevant.

udo said:

morningsong said:

udo said:

Wouldn't the heirs not have a case against a person that delivered the pills to mr Prince?

Why are you bringing this to the estate thread? Are u that freakin' desperate for attention?

.

Are you reding what I wrote?

This is a situation in the US.

They are very sue-happy in the US.

Money is involved here.

Possible culpability is a game changer here.

Thus the heirs and others might (!) have a claim against a person that was involved.

.

udo said:

So the judge has ordered that Ms. Boyd must stop making demands to the estate with the exception of appeals, that was interesting. Also, Carlin Q has requested an alternate DNA testing. I wonder why Carlin Q wants alternate testing? The Judge gave a deadline to have the testing done, Sept 14, and the choice of facility has to be done by Aug 31.

nelcp777 said:

morningsong said:

nelcp777 said:

So the judge has ordered that Ms. Boyd must stop making demands to the estate with the exception of appeals, that was interesting. Also, Carlin Q has requested an alternate DNA testing. I wonder why Carlin Q wants alternate testing? The Judge gave a deadline to have the testing done, Sept 14, and the choice of facility has to be done by Aug 31.

Carlin just wants a 2nd test from an alternate facility. expecting different results

The two nefarious litigants wont give up.

The Judge has had enough of Claire.

Carlin and his dubious attorney dont like the DNA results and want another stab at it.

I am surprised the Judge is allowing this when they had a qualified facility to complete the first DNA testing.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

nelcp777 said: Carlin just wants a 2nd test from an alternate facility. expecting different results

The two nefarious litigants wont give up.

The Judge has had enough of Claire.

Carlin and his dubious attorney dont like the DNA results and want another stab at it.

I am surprised the Judge is allowing this when they had a qualified facility to complete the first DNA testing.

Thanks to you and Morningstar for your insight and thoughts. I was suprised too by the Judge allowing the second testing. Perhaps the Judge thinks it is not going to change anything, Carlin's loss of time and expense?

Dixon and Boyd have worn the patience of the Judge and Bremer I am sure. Any word on a possible ruling of the DNA testing on the siblings and Duane's kin?

We are at 4 months, when do you expect the inventory to be submitted?

udo said:

morningsong said:

udo said: Why are you bringing this to the estate thread? Are u that freakin' desperate for attention?

.

Are you reding what I wrote?

This is a situation in the US.

They are very sue-happy in the US.

Money is involved here.

Possible culpability is a game changer here.

Thus the heirs and others might (!) have a claim against a person that was involved.

.

Udo is correct in that Prince's personal representative (Tyka, perhaps) could bring a wrongful death claim against the supplier of the drugs that killed him. Finding the person(s) is another matter.

Claire has been forbidden from filing anymore claims with the court until she can provide a marriage license and/or will.

http://www.mncourts.gov/m...ssions.pdf

leftcoast said:

udo said:

.

Are you reding what I wrote?

This is a situation in the US.

They are very sue-happy in the US.

Money is involved here.

Possible culpability is a game changer here.

Thus the heirs and others might (!) have a claim against a person that was involved.

.

Udo is correct in that Prince's personal representative (Tyka, perhaps) could bring a wrongful death claim against the supplier of the drugs that killed him. Finding the person(s) is another matter.

That's criminal charges not Estate business. Talk about it somewhere else and don't clutter this thread with it.

morningsong said:

leftcoast said:

Udo is correct in that Prince's personal representative (Tyka, perhaps) could bring a wrongful death claim against the supplier of the drugs that killed him. Finding the person(s) is another matter.

That's criminal charges not Estate business. Talk about it somewhere else and don't clutter this thread with it.

A wrongful death claim is a civil action. If damages are awarded, the proceeds are a part of the decedent's estate.

tmo1965 said:

nelcp777 said: