Reply #120 posted 06/08/16 12:40pm
Reply #121 posted 06/08/16 12:58pm
Jon1967 |
Hmm turn it into a b&b .. whatd I say .. f that keep it a concert venue, a recording studio, school .. something [Edited 6/8/16 17:06pm]
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #122 posted 06/08/16 4:42pm
RachB65 |
"Almost all art is trying to become an anaesthetic and at the same time a healing session drawing up the magical electrics.” |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #123 posted 06/08/16 9:31pm
bilbolives |
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PRINCE_ESTATE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
A judge has granted Bremer Trust's request to hire entertainment industry experts while the matter of the lack of finding a will so far and multiple claims of purported heirs, etc. are being sorted out. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #124 posted 06/08/16 9:38pm
bilbolives |
http://www.startribune.com/judge-rules-in-favor-of-bremer-trust-in-prince-estate-dispute/382280121/
The Minneapolis Star Tribune has also reported on the judge granting Bremer Trust's request to hire industry experts while the matter of determining heirs, etc., is still being sorted out. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #125 posted 06/09/16 4:11am
1Sasha |
I hope it does not become a museum or tourist attraction. Could it become a school for the arts or some type of annex for a state school? I don't think, because of its location, that, it would draw musicians to rehearse, film, etc., there because Prince is no longer physically present. However, if someone like Jay Z or Pharrell was to buy the place outright, they might be able to maintain the property in the appropriate manner and draw well-known musicians to PP. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #126 posted 06/09/16 7:49am
Se7en
|
1Sasha said:
I hope it does not become a museum or tourist attraction. Could it become a school for the arts or some type of annex for a state school? I don't think, because of its location, that, it would draw musicians to rehearse, film, etc., there because Prince is no longer physically present. However, if someone like Jay Z or Pharrell was to buy the place outright, they might be able to maintain the property in the appropriate manner and draw well-known musicians to PP.
Honest question, why would you not want it to become a tourist attraction or museum? I personally have never been to Paisley Park, and I would love to visit it. I'd love the hear the place filled with his music, and an expert guided tour would be nice too.
I'm of the exact opposite opinion from you about someone like Jay Z or Pharrell buying it. They're too far removed from Prince's legacy and each has their own agenda. Paisley Park would be "theirs" -- not Prince's. It would probably be remodeled into what they wanted.
I'd love to see a consortium of related artists take over Paisley Park (Sheila E., W&L, etc.)
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #127 posted 06/09/16 8:51am
1Sasha |
Se7en said:
1Sasha said:
I hope it does not become a museum or tourist attraction. Could it become a school for the arts or some type of annex for a state school? I don't think, because of its location, that, it would draw musicians to rehearse, film, etc., there because Prince is no longer physically present. However, if someone like Jay Z or Pharrell was to buy the place outright, they might be able to maintain the property in the appropriate manner and draw well-known musicians to PP.
Honest question, why would you not want it to become a tourist attraction or museum? I personally have never been to Paisley Park, and I would love to visit it. I'd love the hear the place filled with his music, and an expert guided tour would be nice too.
I'm of the exact opposite opinion from you about someone like Jay Z or Pharrell buying it. They're too far removed from Prince's legacy and each has their own agenda. Paisley Park would be "theirs" -- not Prince's. It would probably be remodeled into what they wanted.
I'd love to see a consortium of related artists take over Paisley Park (Sheila E., W&L, etc.)
For me. it is a "sacred" place. I simply wouldn't want it to be cheapened as a "tourist attraction." JMO
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #128 posted 06/09/16 11:44am
RachB65 |
1Sasha said:
Se7en said:
1Sasha said:
I hope it does not become a museum or tourist attraction. Could it become a school for the arts or some type of annex for a state school? I don't think, because of its location, that, it would draw musicians to rehearse, film, etc., there because Prince is no longer physically present. However, if someone like Jay Z or Pharrell was to buy the place outright, they might be able to maintain the property in the appropriate manner and draw well-known musicians to PP.
Honest question, why would you not want it to become a tourist attraction or museum? I personally have never been to Paisley Park, and I would love to visit it. I'd love the hear the place filled with his music, and an expert guided tour would be nice too.
I'm of the exact opposite opinion from you about someone like Jay Z or Pharrell buying it. They're too far removed from Prince's legacy and each has their own agenda. Paisley Park would be "theirs" -- not Prince's. It would probably be remodeled into what they wanted.
I'd love to see a consortium of related artists take over Paisley Park (Sheila E., W&L, etc.)
For me. it is a "sacred" place. I simply wouldn't want it to be cheapened as a "tourist attraction." JMO Didnt Sheila E say that Prince kept alot of stuff on display with the idea that one day it might become a museum or tourist attraction? If that was what he wanted then its a great idea "Almost all art is trying to become an anaesthetic and at the same time a healing session drawing up the magical electrics.” |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #129 posted 06/09/16 11:46am
Jon1967 |
I wanna go there just once please open it to the public .. plez plez plez .. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #130 posted 06/09/16 12:02pm
Se7en
|
1Sasha said:
Se7en said:
Honest question, why would you not want it to become a tourist attraction or museum? I personally have never been to Paisley Park, and I would love to visit it. I'd love the hear the place filled with his music, and an expert guided tour would be nice too.
I'm of the exact opposite opinion from you about someone like Jay Z or Pharrell buying it. They're too far removed from Prince's legacy and each has their own agenda. Paisley Park would be "theirs" -- not Prince's. It would probably be remodeled into what they wanted.
I'd love to see a consortium of related artists take over Paisley Park (Sheila E., W&L, etc.)
For me. it is a "sacred" place. I simply wouldn't want it to be cheapened as a "tourist attraction." JMO
I see where you're coming from, but there have been thousands of people walking through there over the years during the Celebrations, concerts, Paisley Park After Dark, etc.
Maybe it's just not the same without Prince there?
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #131 posted 06/09/16 12:04pm
Se7en
|
An earlier post (I think on this thread) had the suggestion of having it be open to the public during the warmer months, and a working studio (either for recording or for teaching) off-limits to the public during the colder months. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #132 posted 06/09/16 12:09pm
sonshine |
http://www.nbcnews.com/ne...rt-n588561
Eek! God, no. It seems so TACKY. I understand the need to get the place bringing money in again, but I'd like to see it used for its original purpose - producing and recording, and as an entertainment venue. Hopefully they will do both. After all PP did tours during performance events and it worked out. I'd hate to see all the production equip etc go to waste when other musicians could use it. Would make me feel better if there was still legit music being created there. They can still do tours if they want but please no tacky tourist trap!!! [Edited 6/9/16 12:10pm] It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #133 posted 06/10/16 7:10pm
bilbolives |
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PRINCE_PAISLEY_PARKS_FUTURE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
The Associated Press is reporting that close friends of Prince's said he told them he wanted to turn Paisely Park into a museum someday, and now Bremer Trust and the sibilings are exploring the possibility. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #134 posted 06/10/16 7:48pm
bilbolives |
http://www.startribune.com/a-prince-wish-paisley-park-eyed-for-museum-like-graceland/382529341/
The Minneapolis Star Tribune is also reporting on Prince's apparent desire to turn Paisely Park into a museum, with Bremer Trust "likely with the backing of Prince's siblings" in exploratory stages of the idea. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #135 posted 06/10/16 9:38pm
spastic78 |
I hope they turn it into a working museum with part of it being a school of music as well as a recording studio.
It's location is great for a school of music as there are lots of students in the area. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #136 posted 06/12/16 7:52am
Se7en
|
If it's anything like other museums, it will be available for renting out in the off-hours for events like weddings, birthdays, company picnics, etc.
Imagine a wedding done on the Paisley Park grounds with the reception inside? It could (and probably will) happen! |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #137 posted 06/12/16 7:06pm
morningsong |
sonshine said: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/prince-estate-trustee-wants-turn-paisley-park-tourist-attraction-court-n588561 Eek! God, no. It seems so TACKY. I understand the need to get the place bringing money in again, but I'd like to see it used for its original purpose - producing and recording, and as an entertainment venue. Hopefully they will do both. After all PP did tours during performance events and it worked out. I'd hate to see all the production equip etc go to waste when other musicians could use it. Would make me feel better if there was still legit music being created there. They can still do tours if they want but please no tacky tourist trap!!! [Edited 6/9/16 12:10pm]
I just want it to survive. Hopefully it can resume to it's original purpose later on down the road. I've aready asked about somethings in another thread things that I've never seen talked about, I'm assuming folks don't care so whatever. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #138 posted 06/13/16 6:27am
Se7en
|
morningsong said:
sonshine said:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/prince-estate-trustee-wants-turn-paisley-park-tourist-attraction-court-n588561 Eek! God, no. It seems so TACKY. I understand the need to get the place bringing money in again, but I'd like to see it used for its original purpose - producing and recording, and as an entertainment venue. Hopefully they will do both. After all PP did tours during performance events and it worked out. I'd hate to see all the production equip etc go to waste when other musicians could use it. Would make me feel better if there was still legit music being created there. They can still do tours if they want but please no tacky tourist trap!!! [Edited 6/9/16 12:10pm]
I just want it to survive. Hopefully it can resume to it's original purpose later on down the road. I've aready asked about somethings in another thread things that I've never seen talked about, I'm assuming folks don't care so whatever.
There are so many overlapping threads now about Paisley Park, the Estate, etc. I'm sure no offense was intended - your post probably just got overlooked.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #139 posted 06/13/16 11:04am
morningsong |
Se7en said:
morningsong said:
sonshine said: I just want it to survive. Hopefully it can resume to it's original purpose later on down the road. I've aready asked about somethings in another thread things that I've never seen talked about, I'm assuming folks don't care so whatever.
There are so many overlapping threads now about Paisley Park, the Estate, etc. I'm sure no offense was intended - your post probably just got overlooked.
I'm not really offended. It's not a theory. It's just weird that the last 2014 RS interview has him saying what he intended to do with PP and it's virtually going overlooked around here. It's just funny what gets repeated and what doesn't. Ok, maybe I am a bit annoyed. But I can let it go quite easily.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #140 posted 06/15/16 7:01am
XxAxX |
morningsong said:
Se7en said:
There are so many overlapping threads now about Paisley Park, the Estate, etc. I'm sure no offense was intended - your post probably just got overlooked.
I'm not really offended. It's not a theory. It's just weird that the last 2014 RS interview has him saying what he intended to do with PP and it's virtually going overlooked around here. It's just funny what gets repeated and what doesn't. Ok, maybe I am a bit annoyed. But I can let it go quite easily.
i saw that. i'm afraid that unless his will and/or estate plan turns up its in the hands of his heirs. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #141 posted 06/15/16 11:10am
Superfan1984 |
I have an art piece that I would like to send to PP (Prince inspired) It's a really nice piece but I don't know if it would be pointless. Does anyone know if they are doing anything with the stuff left on the fence etc.? If they are doing something with Prince inspired artwork, I would like to send it but if they are throwing these things away I will keep it for myself. Does anyone have any idea? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #142 posted 06/17/16 8:36pm
Reply #143 posted 06/17/16 8:37pm
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.