VenusBlingBling said: Maybe because people always expect to hear Controversy, Purple Rain or Sign O' The Times part 2 and then get disappointed when the new album... isn't that. Then when they actually give the new songs a chance and forget about being hung up on the Prince from the past they actually hear the music.
Your statement is probably the most precise and truthful EVER in this forum. It should receive a prince.org quote of the year or something like that. _______________________________________________________________________________________ You can hate me for who I am, cuz I won't be something that i'm not. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AbucahX said: VenusBlingBling said: Maybe because people always expect to hear Controversy, Purple Rain or Sign O' The Times part 2 and then get disappointed when the new album... isn't that. Then when they actually give the new songs a chance and forget about being hung up on the Prince from the past they actually hear the music.
Your statement is probably the most precise and truthful EVER in this forum. It should receive a prince.org quote of the year or something like that. or, maybe you just have bad taste. it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
stanleylieber said: i think there's some truth to this but i also think everyone can agree there is a significant difference between prince's '80s work and his post- '80s work. some of us think it's all good and some of us think the '80s work is good and some of us think the post- '80s work is good. but the point is it's not always simply being blind to the present that leads people to dislike the new stuff. sometimes, with clear eyes, people can simply not like the new stuff.
it seems like there is always some kind of grand explanation or complex psychological theory being posed that will somehow "explain" why people who don't like modern prince music are deluding themselves. why is it so important to do that? There IS a real difference. I some ways the new stuff is better, in some ways it's worse. He was more experimental back then, and his music was more ahead of its time. The times have caught up to him a bit. But then, some stuff sounded a little unfinished to me back then. Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement. I don't think he'd do a song like it today. Many people love it, I have mixed feelings about it musically speaking. IN fact a lot of the Sign music feels really simple compared to his later music. It, I Could Never Take the Place, Hot Thing, Forever, Starfish & Coffee, If I Was Your Girlfriend are all really simple in places. I'm not putting them down, I like them, but they sound almost unfinished at times. I hear that MPLSound is not exactly genius, but I like the rich arrangements, and I think the songs are genuinely catchy & fun. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement. I don't think he'd do a song like it today. Many people love it, I have mixed feelings about it musically speaking.
Is this the musician side of you or just the NDRU side? 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's definitely true he wouldn't do a song like that today. it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: NDRU said: Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement. I don't think he'd do a song like it today. Many people love it, I have mixed feelings about it musically speaking.
Is this the musician side of you or just the NDRU side? well, I don't really know that I can separate them. Part of me likes the song and part of me feels it never found it's way home. But part of creating great stuff is taking chances like that, recording a song in such an unconventional way, and that's something I think he doesn't do as much of today. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: In 1996 I first joined the world of online Prince fandom. Back then, there was a consensus by a certain portion of fans that Prince had lost "it" after 1988. You'll still see this claim pop up around here now and again.
Now and again? Dude, that view is just as widespread now as it was then. It is now 2009. As time has moved on, less than appreciated albums like Batman, Come, Emancipation, and even Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic seem to be much more loved than they were 10 years ago.
Just a few months ago there was a poll here to find out what people's favorite P albums were. Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic was way down at the bottom. Emancipation was down in the lower half too. The Top 5 consisted exclusively of 80s albums. IIRC there were only two albums in the whole Top 10 that weren't released in the 80s. This revisionism seems to be taking place more inside your head than anywhere in the real world. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: stanleylieber said: i think there's some truth to this but i also think everyone can agree there is a significant difference between prince's '80s work and his post- '80s work. some of us think it's all good and some of us think the '80s work is good and some of us think the post- '80s work is good. but the point is it's not always simply being blind to the present that leads people to dislike the new stuff. sometimes, with clear eyes, people can simply not like the new stuff.
it seems like there is always some kind of grand explanation or complex psychological theory being posed that will somehow "explain" why people who don't like modern prince music are deluding themselves. why is it so important to do that? There IS a real difference. I some ways the new stuff is better, in some ways it's worse. He was more experimental back then, and his music was more ahead of its time. The times have caught up to him a bit. But then, some stuff sounded a little unfinished to me back then. Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement. I don't think he'd do a song like it today. Many people love it, I have mixed feelings about it musically speaking. IN fact a lot of the Sign music feels really simple compared to his later music. It, I Could Never Take the Place, Hot Thing, Forever, Starfish & Coffee, If I Was Your Girlfriend are all really simple in places. I'm not putting them down, I like them, but they sound almost unfinished at times. So true. I think Forever In My Life is a great song, but I really think it could have done with some damn chords. Even just a strumming guitar or a simple pad would've been nice. I actually think the minimism is perfect on Starfish & Coffee though. It's such a quirky song with such a charming story that it doesn't miss those extra layers imo. I Could Never Take The Place of Your Man is perfect to me. Hot Thing is cool, but it should've been a b-side. SOTT has some of his best material on it, but it's far from perfect. It's a rough, unruly overflowing of ideas. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In life it's all about growth and maturity and our musical taste mature. I didn't listen to slow jams before I started listening to Prince. I became a fan in 1996 when Jam of The Year came to South Florida. I love each album on it's own merit. There may be some songs on it that aren't my favorite and then there are songs, of course, you know that I love.
It's all about personal growth and our musical tastes change. The 1st 10 years of P's music is like when we were kids in school learning about life and girls (for me). I was girl crazy. LoL ... Peace ... & Stay Funky ...
~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~ www.facebook.com/purplefunklover | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There was no psychedelic trends of the 80's
that psychedelic vibe came from the 60's and 70's music Susannah Wendy & Lisa exposed him too as well as his appreciation of Joni Mitchell I disagree with you on that view. I am sure Wendy and Lisa brought in some of the (psychedelic) pop influences, but in the mid-eighties you also had a movement called 'the Paisley Underground' that was quite popular among (alternative) rockfans. The name was used for a number of bands, mostly coming from LA, whose music harked back to the psychedelic pop of the sixties (using influences from the three B's: Beatles, Byrds, Beach Boys, among others) in their guitar-music. I am talking about bands like: Dream Syndicate, the early Bangles, Rain Parade and Three'o'clock. Its no coincedence Prince did write Manic Monday for, yes, the Bangles and that, yes, Three 'o' Clock became signed to Paisley Park. [Edited 4/28/09 7:30am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement.
Very meandering melody? Its just a 'traditional' verse, chorus, verse, chorus composition. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: It is a curious thing.
In 1996 I first joined the world of online Prince fandom. Back then, there was a consensus by a certain portion of fans that Prince had lost "it" after 1988. You'll still see this claim pop up around here now and again. It is now 2009. As time has moved on, less than appreciated albums like Batman, Come, Emancipation, and even Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic seem to be much more loved than they were 10 years ago. Hell, I even read one orger who held up New Power Soul as being "better" than Prince's latest release. Why is this? [Edited 4/24/09 7:47am] They are not attached to a blockbuster film release.. These people are getting older, and have a fondess of the music of their youth. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: There was no psychedelic trends of the 80's
that psychedelic vibe came from the 60's and 70's music Susannah Wendy & Lisa exposed him too as well as his appreciation of Joni Mitchell I disagree with you on that view. I am sure Wendy and Lisa brought in some of the (psychedelic) pop influences, but in the mid-eighties you also had a movement called 'the Paisley Underground' that was quite popular among (alternative) rockfans. The name was used for a number of bands, mostly coming from LA, whose music harked back to the psychedelic pop of the sixties (using influences from the three B's: Beatles, Byrds, Beach Boys, among others) in their guitar-music. I am talking about bands like: Dream Syndicate, the early Bangles, Rain Parade and Three'o'clock. Its no coincedence Prince did write Manic Monday for, yes, the Bangles and that, yes, Three 'o' Clock became signed to Paisley Park. [Edited 4/28/09 7:30am] Yeah someone else responded concerning the Paisley Underground I'm researching it though, But what I'm saying is how prevailent was that in 1980's pop culture as far as music/movies were concerned I didn't remember much of a psychedelic influence on music There was a lot of fusion going on in all genre of music back then I look at the 80's music as Fusion influenced. There was a lot of tight pants-leather jeans, breaker belts, skinny ties big hair, Michael Jackson, Poison, Van Hallen, Bruce Madonna & Janet Jackson I still think Prince's music had a large impact on late 80's early 90's music [Edited 4/28/09 8:26am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Linn4days said: skywalker said: It is a curious thing.
In 1996 I first joined the world of online Prince fandom. Back then, there was a consensus by a certain portion of fans that Prince had lost "it" after 1988. You'll still see this claim pop up around here now and again. It is now 2009. As time has moved on, less than appreciated albums like Batman, Come, Emancipation, and even Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic seem to be much more loved than they were 10 years ago. Hell, I even read one orger who held up New Power Soul as being "better" than Prince's latest release. Why is this? [Edited 4/24/09 7:47am] They are not attached to a blockbuster film release.. These people are getting older, and have a fondess of the music of their youth. Lazy and dishonest post. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement.
Very meandering melody? Its just a 'traditional' verse, chorus, verse, chorus composition. Forever In My Life has a chorus? “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement.
Very meandering melody? Its just a 'traditional' verse, chorus, verse, chorus composition. so that means it doesn't have a meandering melody? My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: NDRU said: There IS a real difference. I some ways the new stuff is better, in some ways it's worse. He was more experimental back then, and his music was more ahead of its time. The times have caught up to him a bit. But then, some stuff sounded a little unfinished to me back then. Just one example...Forever In My Life is great, but it's so minimal. It's a very meandering melody over a totally sparse arrangement. I don't think he'd do a song like it today. Many people love it, I have mixed feelings about it musically speaking. IN fact a lot of the Sign music feels really simple compared to his later music. It, I Could Never Take the Place, Hot Thing, Forever, Starfish & Coffee, If I Was Your Girlfriend are all really simple in places. I'm not putting them down, I like them, but they sound almost unfinished at times. So true. I think Forever In My Life is a great song, but I really think it could have done with some damn chords. Even just a strumming guitar or a simple pad would've been nice. I actually think the minimism is perfect on Starfish & Coffee though. It's such a quirky song with such a charming story that it doesn't miss those extra layers imo. I Could Never Take The Place of Your Man is perfect to me. Hot Thing is cool, but it should've been a b-side. SOTT has some of his best material on it, but it's far from perfect. It's a rough, unruly overflowing of ideas. yeah, when that guitar comes in at the very end of Forever in my Life, I wonder why it wasn't there before. And again in the movie, he uses guitar to great effect. I really like all those songs, though. Not trying to take away from them. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |