independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince fans: Trouble with living in the now?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 04/24/09 5:03pm

Dayclear

confused
[Edited 4/24/09 17:04pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 04/24/09 5:21pm

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

2elijah said:

L4OATheOriginal said:



xactly, there is new music being made thus no need 2 keep doing the same songs over and over like he does in his shows, let the new music thrive in his set


I hear what you are saying, but that will be impossible. Why? Remember now, Prince has fans from back in the day (hardcore) that basically know all of his music, and are up-to-date on his music, then you have the casual fans-those that may have just returned as fans, either since Purple Rain or the Musicology tour.


fuck 'em! big grin

Then there's the new fans, some younger, some older. Remember not every fan visits unofficial fan sites or his previous and current official sites.



fuck em 2 ..catch up! big grin
.

You may be one of the hardcore fans and show up at his concert desiring to only hear his new material, meanwhile a casual fan may be at the same show expecting to hear "Kiss," "Purple Rain", but yet you both could have been fans since he first started his career, but let's say only one of you kept track of all his albums/concerts, etc.,


and i will fishslap anyone next me 2 screaming 4 that old tired shit nod and boo @ prince 4 playing it


I can't see him doing a major tour and not playing classics


sounds like it's time 2 do another ONA type tour then woot! .
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 04/24/09 5:22pm

2elijah

L4OATheOriginal said:[quote]

2elijah said:



and i will fishslap anyone next me 2 screaming 4 that old tired shit nod and boo @ prince 4 playing it


I can't see him doing a major tour and not playing classics


sounds like it's time 2 do another ONA type tour then woot! .


falloff...lawd. lol
[Edited 4/24/09 17:23pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 04/24/09 7:30pm

utopia7

avatar

who knows I will never forgive him for Lion of Judah. I am healed now THANK GOD
for LOTUSFLOW3r lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 04/24/09 7:49pm

mzsadii

avatar

Sometimes it depends on my mood as to whether I relate to the songs. Those I said I didn't like, but revisted and changed my mind. I look for the meaningin songs not in comparison to earlier years. Everyone evolves and adapts with time. Why not allow Prince to have the same pleasure & right?
Prince's Sarah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 04/24/09 8:16pm

DreamyPopRoyal
ty

avatar

I'm so new to all this that I can't really help living in the past lol

But I always try to consider the past and present whenever I listen to his music. I look at the progression between albums, seeing what's changed from album to album and try to find the reasons why. If I can't read about it, I just go into my theories cool

When it comes to his new albums, I look at his newest sound and embrace it if I can. Planet Earth was my first new album in that the album was released when I'd only been listening to him for six months.
It wasn't love at first listen, but I was very blasé about it. Some songs clicked (the first three, Mr. Good-night and All the Midnights) and some didn't (Chelsea Rogers and Lion of Judah). Didn't know what to think of the whole right away, but the new sound was refreshing after hearing the same stuff. And there's something about a brand new album that's actually brand new lol

I still need to get a move on with the newer albums. It's too early to say anything yet because I won't know what I'm saying ;lol:
But with his new albums, I try to think of how they'll fit with the current pattern and whether or not its a sign of things to come or its the newest big thing he's doing.

Past-present-future... I try to take all three into account if I can
had 2 run away... pride was 2 strong. It started raining, baby, the birds were gone
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 04/24/09 9:05pm

bellanoche

stanleylieber said:

bellanoche said:



Really? Hmmm, during which conversation with Prince did he share with you his intentions?

Also, why can't an artist want to get paid for his art? Why are making art and making money mutually exclusive to some people. I love the fact that Prince is not going out like all the other "poor" artists who were just happy to share their art, while the execs got paid. That's just foolish to me. He has been blessed with a gift and there is nothing wrong with wanting to get paid for sharing it.


which songs did jesus sell?


Are you comparing Prince to Jesus? eek
perfection is a fallacy of the imagination...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 04/24/09 9:41pm

stanleylieber

avatar

bellanoche said:

stanleylieber said:



which songs did jesus sell?


Are you comparing Prince to Jesus? eek


not in the way you think. that's prince's game.

but i am comparing prince's actions against the standard set by jesus. you know, the guy whose name prince wanted to put on the screen and then let people deal with it.

i was responding to the idea of an artist wanting to be compensated for their work. the thought occurred to me, "how would jesus want to be compensated for his work?"
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 04/25/09 12:44am

jtfolden

avatar

tricky99 said:

Once a album recedes to the past it can stand as a representative of a moment in time that will never return. It is released from xpectations and hype. its not judged by what's happening at its moment of release anymore (i.e. the current culture). It also becomes part of a timeline as we can now identify what came after as well as before. In essense it becomes purely its self.


So true...and it seems some fans have trouble separating the buzz around an album at the time of it's release (and the culture it was released into) and the contents within. Dirty Mind, for example, was noteworthy at the time of release - If he released that album today it would probably be roundly rejected as inferior to his prior work. falloff

Also, Prince has frequently followed trends whether it was the disco of the 70's, the new wave/punk of the early 80's, the psychedelic trends of the mid 80's, rap/hip-hop of the early 90's, etc... He's always wrestled with modern trends and incorporated them back into his own music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 04/25/09 5:56am

spiritandtruth

avatar

stanleylieber said:

bellanoche said:



Are you comparing Prince to Jesus? eek


not in the way you think. that's prince's game.

but i am comparing prince's actions against the standard set by jesus. you know, the guy whose name prince wanted to put on the screen and then let people deal with it.

i was responding to the idea of an artist wanting to be compensated for their work. the thought occurred to me, "how would jesus want to be compensated for his work?"


But Jesus did not come to promote art or to be compensated; he freely gave his life as saviour - I don't understand the comparison.
http://prince.org/msg/105/307615
"Eternity is just one kiss away"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 04/25/09 6:38am

SCARLETTPUZY

avatar

i can't stannndddd when others say to me "oh..your a prince fan??? and then soo am i and say "purple rain"..i'm like jeezz..prince has made soo much music that sounds like they SHOULD be on the radio every 5 minutes...i allways put people on to Prince's albums new and old...and ask them, what year do you think this came out in?? they have no idea!! like jimi hendrix wasn't understood by most till he died..he was soo ahead of his time..Elvis was as well..Prince's music is timeless! i think his music now is more polished, and refined..and like anything fine, "it gets better in time"if he was pumping out "purple Rain" every year,,i dont think i'd still really be content or ensaitable..then he'd just be a one hit wonder...that is what makes Prince soo different from alot of the other Artists..he keeps people wondering, what style is next..as him being an "artist, and creating his "art"..he needs to be secluded..and able to be 100 percent dedicated to his music..thats the sacrifice of having to experience phenominal music..Prince loves and appreciates his fans..his true fans that really apreciate HIM.. biggrin
Marry me 2day and 2night we'll make love until the world stops turning
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 04/25/09 8:12am

violetblues

I don't think it has anything to do with living in the now or past, I think it just has to do with musical preference.

Sir Paul was just 28 when he left the Beatles, its all the past now but I prefer his Beatles work, likewise for many artist in many fields have a certain period of their lives that will define them, that will always be considered their prime, or peak.

I honestly do not believe that not now or somewhere in the future will his post 80's will will ever be considered that great.

Sure you will always have a fringe like here, that will declare someone like Nixon or Bush to be a good president, and maybe as a fans we should just embrace free discussion and who is anyone to burst their bubble and say otherwise. For example, after some declared that Lotusflow3r was in the same vein as TRC, I grudgingly decided to give it yet another listen. After another listen I still think its cheese and mediocre, but what fun would anything be if we agreed on everything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 04/25/09 11:00am

OldFriends4Sal
e

jtfolden said:

tricky99 said:

Once a album recedes to the past it can stand as a representative of a moment in time that will never return. It is released from xpectations and hype. its not judged by what's happening at its moment of release anymore (i.e. the current culture). It also becomes part of a timeline as we can now identify what came after as well as before. In essense it becomes purely its self.


So true...and it seems some fans have trouble separating the buzz around an album at the time of it's release (and the culture it was released into) and the contents within. Dirty Mind, for example, was noteworthy at the time of release - If he released that album today it would probably be roundly rejected as inferior to his prior work. falloff

Also, Prince has frequently followed trends whether it was the disco of the 70's, the new wave/punk of the early 80's, the psychedelic trends of the mid 80's, rap/hip-hop of the early 90's, etc... He's always wrestled with modern trends and incorporated them back into his own music.


There was no psychedelic trends of the 80's
that psychedelic vibe came from the 60's and 70's music Susannah Wendy & Lisa exposed him too as well as his appreciation of Joni Mitchell

The 80's musically was probably the best time for Prince in that different musical genre had a lot of fusion going on.

Jazz took on a pop feel: I remember trumpeter Herb Alpert/Janet Jackson's Diamonds R a Girls Best Friend sound just like Minneapolis Music

I was a fan of gospel recorder Edwin Hawkins and his mid 80's music incorporated rock vibes even having guitar solos that sounded like it was influenced by Purple Rain.

His PurpleRain/ATWIAD look even had influence on Madonna(I think it was her Like A Virgin period) she dressed like a Prince protege with the cut off coats, lace & paisley

the 80's all around had a techno/digital/rock vibe, even RnB & Rap used electric guitar sounds and solos one of the biggest rap groups RunDMC used serious rock guitar (King of Rock) and they helped revive Aerosmith(Walk this Way) Public Enemy used to sample Princes guitar riffs most famous was the Let's Go Crazy guitar solo.
a lot of music in the 80's even into the 90's was actually influenced by Prince's 1999-Parade sounds: I remember rnb group Toni Tony Tone copied certain element of Princes ATWIAD/Parade sound the use of the strings and finger cymbols.
It got so prevalent that you always thought he had a new protege band out:Klimaxx, Ready 4 the World Shalamar(Jodi Watley/Howard Hewitt/)Miki Free used to dress like Prince, even Michael Jackson tried to get on the boat and his Dirty Diana was a direct borrow from Darling Nikki
of course Jimmy Jam & Terry Lewis(ex proteges) had the Minneapolis Sound as well and the acts they produced sounded like Purple soldiers themselves: Alexander O'Neal, the SoS band, Janet Jackson
90's group Jodeci's Divante was a big fan of Princes Dirty Mind - Purple Rain work and the slow jams dirty jams was his inspiration. I even remember he had a magazine cover(I think Interview) were as a nod 2 Prince curled his hair and held a red rose in his mouth
Prince started using rap in the 80's as well but without changing his style or sound. In the 90's he changed his style and sound or tried to adapt to the prevailing influence rap was having on music in general.
[Edited 4/25/09 11:45am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 04/25/09 11:37am

NDRU

avatar

stanleylieber said:

bellanoche said:



Are you comparing Prince to Jesus? eek


not in the way you think. that's prince's game.

but i am comparing prince's actions against the standard set by jesus. you know, the guy whose name prince wanted to put on the screen and then let people deal with it.

i was responding to the idea of an artist wanting to be compensated for their work. the thought occurred to me, "how would jesus want to be compensated for his work?"


to be resurrected, I guess, and worshipped for 2000 years lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 04/25/09 12:52pm

stanleylieber

avatar

spiritandtruth said:

stanleylieber said:



not in the way you think. that's prince's game.

but i am comparing prince's actions against the standard set by jesus. you know, the guy whose name prince wanted to put on the screen and then let people deal with it.

i was responding to the idea of an artist wanting to be compensated for their work. the thought occurred to me, "how would jesus want to be compensated for his work?"


But Jesus did not come to promote art or to be compensated; he freely gave his life as saviour - I don't understand the comparison.


based on what you say here i think you do understand it perfectly. basically, i'm accusing prince of not following christ, but instead following his own desires (to make music, to make money, to teach people from his own understanding rather than from an understanding of the truth).

when it comes down to it, we're getting a face full of preaching from a guy who rides to the cleaners in a pinstripe suit.

jesus called people to drop everything, to leave their lives and follow him. jesus owned no possessions. he sacrificed everything for the truth (not just a contract he had no hope of fulfilling even if he willingly played along with its terms). jesus even submitted himself to being murdered.

what we find in prince is a very, very rich man who is a part of the system he preaches against, who nevertheless wants to tell us how to live our poor little lives. prince thinks he is different than other participants in the system because he is black and because black people have historically been underprivileged in the united states. but how many people is prince preaching to who are not beneath himself in financial and social status? even his hollywood peers look up to him. he has a long record of treating his own employees in exactly the same way he preaches against being treated by his own corporate masters.

prince is obviously not jesus. in spite of his career-long, tacky innuendo. being supremely talented in one area (or in several areas) does not make you "more equal" than other human beings. but he speaks from a position of authority. this tendency is exacerbated by the tenets of his religion. in jw, prince has found a final justification of all his personality quirks that used to cause people to get angry with him. now he realizes he doesn't have to change. everybody else are the ones who are wrong.

prince brings religion and race into the discussion about music business corruption. when we compare his actions with those of the rest of the music industry, what is it he really seems to be saying? in the end his demands are no different than those of anyone else trying to grab more than their share of the pie: "you need me, i don't need you; do what i say; give me the money."

if prince really had balls of steel he would have done what he seemed to be suggesting back in 1993: he would have walked away from his old image and music and started over. built something new on the foundation of his stated principles. instead, he wants to be mega famous and respected and acknowledged and rich and in control.

just like jesus. right?
[Edited 4/25/09 12:52pm]
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 04/25/09 12:56pm

NDRU

avatar

stanleylieber said:

...but he speaks from a position of authority...


A lot of people do that. I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think it makes him better or worse than anyone else, including those who criticize him for it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 04/25/09 12:58pm

stanleylieber

avatar

NDRU said:

stanleylieber said:

...but he speaks from a position of authority...


A lot of people do that. I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think it makes him better or worse than anyone else, including those who criticize him for it.


it's all about context. prince talks to you with the authority of god.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 04/25/09 1:05pm

evatorres

stanleylieber said:

NDRU said:



A lot of people do that. I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think it makes him better or worse than anyone else, including those who criticize him for it.


it's all about context. prince talks to you with the authority of god.



eek eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 04/25/09 1:07pm

2elijah

Lawd...how did Jesus get into this conversation about the music industry? lol
[Edited 4/25/09 13:08pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 04/25/09 1:08pm

NeptuneHQ

we all are really beautiful strange!
There is too much snow in Hollywood!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 04/25/09 1:12pm

WisdomNLove

skywalker said:

It is a curious thing.

In 1996 I first joined the world of online Prince fandom. Back then, there was a consensus by a certain portion of fans that Prince had lost "it" after 1988. You'll still see this claim pop up around here now and again.

It is now 2009. As time has moved on, less than appreciated albums like Batman, Come, Emancipation, and even Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic seem to be much more loved than they were 10 years ago.

Hell, I even read one orger who held up New Power Soul as being "better" than Prince's latest release.

Why is this?

[Edited 4/24/09 7:47am]


just want to add, in my opinion Planet Earth is as great as an album as Purple Rain minus All The midnights, I appreciate the new stuff as much as the classics
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 04/25/09 1:15pm

jtfolden

avatar

OldFriends4Sale said:


There was no psychedelic trends of the 80's
that psychedelic vibe came from the 60's and 70's music Susannah Wendy & Lisa exposed him too as well as his appreciation of Joni Mitchell


Actually, there WAS a moderate interest in psychedelic music in the mid 80's and more than one reviewer of ATWIAD commented on how quickly Prince latched on to it. I know all about W&L's influences but that is beside the point as to how those albums were received at the time.

Also, Joni is not an artist associated with psychedelic music. Folk or Jazz, sure...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 04/25/09 2:03pm

spiritandtruth

avatar

stanleylieber said:

spiritandtruth said:



But Jesus did not come to promote art or to be compensated; he freely gave his life as saviour - I don't understand the comparison.


based on what you say here i think you do understand it perfectly. basically, i'm accusing prince of not following christ, but instead following his own desires (to make music, to make money, to teach people from his own understanding rather than from an understanding of the truth).

We are so gonna get moved to P&R biggrin

Perhaps I am just too dense, but I don’t understand comparing Prince, an imperfect human, to Jesus Christ. How do you presume to say that just because Prince is paid for his vocation, the only one he’s ever known btw, that he is "not following Christ"? Prince is brilliant and very successful at what he does, and is compensated for his contributions to the industry in which he has chosen to make his living.

when it comes down to it, we're getting a face full of preaching from a guy who rides to the cleaners in a pinstripe suit.

So? It seems as if you are accusing him of some sort of hypocrisy here.

jesus called people to drop everything, to leave their lives and follow him. jesus owned no possessions. he sacrificed everything for the truth (not just a contract he had no hope of fulfilling even if he willingly played along with its terms). jesus even submitted himself to being murdered.

This is 100% correct. Are you saying that Prince is asking us to drop everything? Or do you feel that because he professes to follow Christ, that he should drop everything? Again, comparing Prince to Christ is unreasonable here.

what we find in prince is a very, very rich man who is a part of the system he preaches against, who nevertheless wants to tell us how to live our poor little lives.

Yes, he is rich, he is successful, he has worked tirelessly his entire life and this is his station. But aren’t we all a part of this system... doing the best we can to make a living and at the same time uphold whatever values to which we may adhere?

prince thinks he is different than other participants in the system because he is black and because black people have historically been underprivileged in the united states.

eek I can’t presume to answer to how he may or may not feel in this regard.

but how many people is prince preaching to who are not beneath himself in financial and social status? even his hollywood peers look up to him. he has a long record of treating his own employees in exactly the same way he preaches against being treated by his own corporate masters.

The majority of us are indeed "beneath" him in regard to financial and social status. So? How does his financial and social status automatically preclude him from being a follower of Christ?

prince is obviously not jesus. in spite of his career-long, tacky innuendo. being supremely talented in one area (or in several areas) does not make you "more equal" than other human beings. but he speaks from a position of authority. this tendency is exacerbated by the tenets of his religion. in jw, prince has found a final justification of all his personality quirks that used to cause people to get angry with him. now he realizes he doesn't have to change. everybody else are the ones who are wrong.

Thank you, that was my point... he is NOT Jesus. I personally do not see where he has marked himself as "more equal" or superior to any one else. The position of authority from which he speaks I think is two-fold - 1. From his extensive expertise in life and his career and 2. From his faith and the accurate knowledge he has acquired in his spiritual journey. It is silly to me to say he realizes that he doesn’t have to change when he in fact has made many significant changes over the past decade.

prince brings religion and race into the discussion about music business corruption. when we compare his actions with those of the rest of the music industry, what is it he really seems to be saying? in the end his demands are no different than those of anyone else trying to grab more than their share of the pie: "you need me, i don't need you; do what i say; give me the money."

I think you are confusing greed with a desire to be treated fairly. Jesus did not say there was anything wrong with being compensated for our honest, hard work, he did not even say it was wrong to make a lot of money. It is greed and the love of money that we are counseled against. I don’t know all of Prince’s past or present business dealings, but it is obvious that there have been issues of inequities in the past and it seems to me he just wants to be dealt with fairly.

if prince really had balls of steel he would have done what he seemed to be suggesting back in 1993: he would have walked away from his old image and music and started over. built something new on the foundation of his stated principles. instead, he wants to be mega famous and respected and acknowledged and rich and in control.

But he has started over and built something new... he has made monumental changes based on his stated principles. I don’t know so much if it is that he currently wants to be "mega-famous and respected and acknowledged and rich and in control" as that precedent was set decades ago - it is what it is.

just like jesus. right?
[Edited 4/25/09 12:52pm]

No, nothing like Jesus.
http://prince.org/msg/105/307615
"Eternity is just one kiss away"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 04/25/09 2:23pm

kumala75

avatar

Well, rolleyes

I can understand both sides, people who, after giving a listening to P's last album (whatever it is at the time), may like it or dismiss it. Prince has a vast discography (official and non-official) with such a blend of styles that you end with your own list of likes and dislikes. And the reason why you choose one instead of the other is a matter of heart/mind/soul/a-mix-of-everything.

My opinion is that every time Prince has a new album it will a-u-t-o-matically be compared with his former work, his later work, the work of all artists around him at the time, P's higher standards and even our P's standars - what we consider to be good or crap in P's world. And it's only after all this comparisons, only after time and distance, that the new album starts having a life on its own.


[ omg, it took me so long to find the proper words and type them that hey what was the question? confuse boxed lol ]
Lion -- Go Peter go!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 04/25/09 7:30pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

jtfolden said:

OldFriends4Sale said:


There was no psychedelic trends of the 80's
that psychedelic vibe came from the 60's and 70's music Susannah Wendy & Lisa exposed him too as well as his appreciation of Joni Mitchell


Actually, there WAS a moderate interest in psychedelic music in the mid 80's and more than one reviewer of ATWIAD commented on how quickly Prince latched on to it. I know all about W&L's influences but that is beside the point as to how those albums were received at the time.

Also, Joni is not an artist associated with psychedelic music. Folk or Jazz, sure...



I'm a big 70's 80's pop culture buff
Can you share with me examples of the psychedelic music interests in the 80's
I help moderate a group that deals with Popular Culture from different eras, I'd like to be able to research that.

Your right Joni was more with Folk music but it was associated with 60's 70's music that Wendy Lisa & Susannah exposed to Prince. He even had Joni at the listening party for Around the World In A Day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 04/25/09 7:55pm

blackguitarist
z

avatar

Riverpoet31 said:

Co-sign! I am so sick of folks living in the past. It's so tired and played out.


I am so tired of being attacked by people for 'living in the past', simple because I don't like MPLsound, or, in the past, Come, New Power Soul and Rave.. to name a few...lol. Because that simply isnt the case.

I dont want Prince to sound like he did in the eighties. In fact, one of the reasons why I became 'a fan' was his ability back then to change and grow in sound, compostionwise and in arranging-skills with every album.

My main criteria for good music (what style it might be) have to do with the QUALITIES of the music: the strength of a composition, a brilliantly programmed drum pattern, the golden melodies of a 'perfect popsong', the use of daring arrangement, the way an album is produced etc..
And in that perspective i think Prince is underachieving for...well... lets say quite a long period....

I am not expecting Purple Rain part 2, I am not hoping for the follow up of Sign of the Times, i simply find that his 'recent work' lacks certain qualities I look for in music.

The thing that I always find to be a trip is that a lot of folks, on here and elsewhere, get sincerly upset with me cuz I DON'T like some of his 80's shit. They flat out flip out cuz I never dug these albums as a whole, ATWIAD, Parade, Signs and LoveSexy. Those are VERY much 80's albums but for me personally, I didn't dig them at the time of their release and STILL don't. The 1999 album could have been released in 1943 or in 2005 and I STILL would champion this album as brilliant. I dig Diamonds and Pearls, Come, The Gold Experience, Chaos & Disorder, The Undertaker, The Rainbow Children and Lotus. Point is, for me, it never mattered when P's thing was released or from what era. If it's bangin', it's, well u know the rest.
[Edited 4/26/09 9:23am]
[Edited 4/26/09 11:59am]
SynthiaRose said "I'm in love with blackguitaristz. Especially when he talks about Hendrix."
nammie "What BGZ says I believe. I have the biggest crush on him."
http://ccoshea19.googlepa...ssanctuary
http://ccoshea19.googlepages.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 04/25/09 11:08pm

jtfolden

avatar

OldFriends4Sale said:

I'm a big 70's 80's pop culture buff
Can you share with me examples of the psychedelic music interests in the 80's
I help moderate a group that deals with Popular Culture from different eras, I'd like to be able to research that.


What immediately comes to mind is the Paisley Underground out of LA which included The Salvation Army/The Three O'Clock (which, incidentally, were later signed to Paisley Park for their final album)from 1981 on. Wikipedia could probably do a better job of covering the period, though. I was aware of it at the time but it wasn't among my main interests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w...rock#1980s

Your right Joni was more with Folk music but it was associated with 60's 70's music that Wendy Lisa & Susannah exposed to Prince. He even had Joni at the listening party for Around the World In A Day


Yup, nod and W&L contributed to "The Tea Leaf Prophecy (Lay Down Your Arms)" on her album "Chalk Mark In A Rainstorm" which was finally released in 1988.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 04/25/09 11:44pm

P2daP

kumala75 said:

Well, rolleyes

I can understand both sides, people who, after giving a listening to P's last album (whatever it is at the time), may like it or dismiss it. Prince has a vast discography (official and non-official) with such a blend of styles that you end with your own list of likes and dislikes. And the reason why you choose one instead of the other is a matter of heart/mind/soul/a-mix-of-everything.

My opinion is that every time Prince has a new album it will a-u-t-o-matically be compared with his former work, his later work, the work of all artists around him at the time, P's higher standards and even our P's standars - what we consider to be good or crap in P's world. And it's only after all this comparisons, only after time and distance, that the new album starts having a life on its own.


[ omg, it took me so long to find the proper words and type them that hey what was the question? confuse boxed lol ]




Co-sign. So many fans on here will always compare each new Prince album to their all-time fav. album. Many fans on here would say Sign O The Times is Prince's greatest album and maybe the greatest album ever. So what fans do (and we're all guilty of this) is when Prince releases a new album they say.. "Is this the greatest album of all-time?" if the answer is no (and there is a very good chance it will). They declare it stinks. Over time fans will no longer compare it to the greatest album of all time. As they have already established that it's not, and with that it will take on a life of it's own. This is true of some many Prince albums. Most notable to me are "Come" and "The Rainbow Children" These albums we're crapped on to the high heavens when they're were released, but now it's fair t say that the general feelings is that those are both great albums. I look at myself and see that when i first got into Prince, I naturally compared him to Michael Jackson. Who was my fav. artist at the time. I said "does Prince sound just like Michael Jackson?" The answer was no. So i thought Prince was just okay. It wasn't until after i disconnected Prince from Michael Jackson and looked at Prince in his own right. That was when i started to really get into his music and now Prince is my fav. artist whom i compare everyone too.


imo. It not just Prince fans who have trouble with living in the now. It's people in general who have trouble with living in the now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 04/25/09 11:50pm

stanleylieber

avatar

i think there's some truth to this but i also think everyone can agree there is a significant difference between prince's '80s work and his post- '80s work. some of us think it's all good and some of us think the '80s work is good and some of us think the post- '80s work is good. but the point is it's not always simply being blind to the present that leads people to dislike the new stuff. sometimes, with clear eyes, people can simply not like the new stuff.

it seems like there is always some kind of grand explanation or complex psychological theory being posed that will somehow "explain" why people who don't like modern prince music are deluding themselves. why is it so important to do that?
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 04/26/09 12:51am

Wilco321

avatar

Really... someone should give Prince an honorary Doctorate - I think he deserves one!

the diversity and variety of personality on this site is truly beautiful rainbow
[Edited 4/26/09 0:51am]
sweet for my sweet, sugar for my honey.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince fans: Trouble with living in the now?