New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
I have my doubts about Princepedia It may be a good idea, as long as it is accurate. Especially since the original Wikipedia always has stuff wrong on it. People's biographies have false information or added stuff that cannot be fully proven. I have my doubts about Princepedia being accurate. I trust my peeps, but you always know there will be haters coming in here to put grease on the stage. All you others say Hell Yea!!  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: It may be a good idea, as long as it is accurate. Especially since the original Wikipedia always has stuff wrong on it. People's biographies have false information or added stuff that cannot be fully proven. I have my doubts about Princepedia being accurate. I trust my peeps, but you always know there will be haters coming in here to put grease on the stage.
Boris and Lange will be on that shit (corrections) like white on rice. No worries lol. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
xlr8r said: Boris and Lange will be on that shit (corrections) like white on rice. No worries lol.
That's my hope. But that could be a full-time job for those two. If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
