independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > RAINBOW CHILDREN, A CLASSIC RUINED?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 10/28/02 3:47am

blackboab

RAINBOW CHILDREN, A CLASSIC RUINED?

I BELIEVE THAT THE RAINBOW CHILDREN CD WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF HIS TOP 3 ALBUMS IF IT HAD NOT BEEN RUINED BY THE VOICEOVER RUNNING THROUGH MOST OF THE TRACKS.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FELLOW FANS IF THEY COULD HAVE THE CHOICE, WOULD THEY HAVE THE VOICEOVER OR NOT?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/28/02 3:49am

ladymisskat

avatar

The fact that 'wedding feast' is on there allows me to forget about the voiceover
The Hottest chip of them all - www.hotchip.co.uk - Get down with Prince
www.wirelesstheatrecompany.co.uk
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 10/28/02 3:49am

Heavenly

there's another orger who forgot to hit the Caps Lock key... neutral

Now to answer your thread...
I think the voice over is part of the album. If you're listening to what he's saying and singing, it works fine. if you're just listening to the music, then you could do without it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 10/28/02 3:53am

james

avatar

It doesn't bother me in the slightest ! What's the big deal ?
It's like saying "Lets Go Crazy" would be better without the "Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today..." voice at the beginning.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 10/28/02 4:11am

blackboab

i would love to let people listen to the great music and felings behind them on the album but the darth vader voice means most people just think its crap im afaid.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 10/28/02 4:20am

LaVisHh

I would have preferred the album without the voice-over. However, that was what the person who wrote it wanted to release...sooo biggrin That's like asking an artist to erase a part of his picture. biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 10/28/02 4:55am

Tibor

avatar

When I listened to MP3 song "Gold" it make me member of New Powers Generating at end and now I am a Rainbow Children because all the album is one MP3!

It's time to rise!
My name is Tibor and I am funky!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 10/28/02 5:30am

CrozzaUK

i wouldnt mind it, but it's often hard to tell what he's saying. I have often wondered how good it would sound if prince spoke it in his normal voice.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 10/28/02 7:49am

SexLovely

avatar

TRC in my opinion is the best listen from beginning 2 end. The voice over neither helps the album nor hinders it.
And I cant understand why ppl disrespect The Wedding Feast. It was just 4 laugh 4 fuck sake. Its not like Prince would have ever considered it 4 a single release, so leave it alone.
"...because no-one gets there alone." - "...I like the floor. It's the only thing that seems real."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 10/28/02 8:04am

fragisexy

avatar

james said:

It doesn't bother me in the slightest ! What's the big deal ?
It's like saying "Lets Go Crazy" would be better without the "Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today..." voice at the beginning.


The big deal is that it runs throughout the entire album and lasts for minutes at a time, whereas the "Dearly beloved..." bit is a brief intro to one song. Not to mention the fact that he digs into bullshit themes like "she in subjection to the Wise One," which makes me gag every time. I'm in the camp that considers "TRC" his best album in years, but when will he get over stupid voiceovers between songs??? ("Come," for example). Yeah, yeah, I know it's integral to the TRC concept, but jeeesus!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 10/28/02 8:06am

fragisexy

avatar

SexLovely said:

[color=blue:089d06d5f8:c89d2eadc7]And I cant understand why ppl disrespect The Wedding Feast. It was just 4 laugh 4 fuck sake. Its not like Prince would have ever considered it 4 a single release, so leave it alone.


Thank you! I like "The Wedding Feast" personally. So do my kids. The 2-year-old runs around singing, "A feast! A beast! A munch! A lunch!" Reminds me of the Grinch. lol Maybe I'm biased cuz I don't eat meat...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 10/28/02 8:29am

paisleypark4

avatar

I liked The Voice in Rainbow Children I tprobably would've been cooler if it was a speeded up voice though, like Camille. It tells the story of the album. I would've been cunfused if the voice DID NOT tell the story of the album.
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 10/28/02 8:45am

tackam

Yeah, I would be much more likely to listen to the album from begginning to end if it weren't for that voice over. . .or if the voice over were just in his own voice, rather than the distorted one.

And I like Wedding Feast! It's funny.

Doves,
Mel!ssa
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 10/28/02 9:26am

Sly

avatar

Personally the voice ruins the album for me.
Every friend i've lent or played the album to asks why the fuck that voice is there.
it was not needed, and detracts from the music.
"London, i've adopted a name that has no pronounciation.... is that cool with you?"

"YEAH!!!"

"Yeah, well then fuck those other fools!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 10/28/02 9:32am

PFunkjazz

avatar

blackboab said:

I BELIEVE THAT THE RAINBOW CHILDREN CD WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF HIS TOP 3 ALBUMS IF IT HAD NOT BEEN RUINED BY THE VOICEOVER RUNNING THROUGH MOST OF THE TRACKS.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FELLOW FANS IF THEY COULD HAVE THE CHOICE, WOULD THEY HAVE THE VOICEOVER OR NOT?



KUDOS, dawg

You are absolutely correct!
(Well, at least in line with my opinion.) wink
Also, the final version should have been individually tracked. As it is, I only find TRC listenable when I actually have the time to listen to the whole thing. It starts up cool, but when "Wedding Feast" cues up and i eject that trifling piece of bullshit! finger
test
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 10/28/02 9:43am

calldapplwonde
ry83

PFunkjazz said:

blackboab said:

I BELIEVE THAT THE RAINBOW CHILDREN CD WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF HIS TOP 3 ALBUMS IF IT HAD NOT BEEN RUINED BY THE VOICEOVER RUNNING THROUGH MOST OF THE TRACKS.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FELLOW FANS IF THEY COULD HAVE THE CHOICE, WOULD THEY HAVE THE VOICEOVER OR NOT?



KUDOS, dawg

You are absolutely correct!
(Well, at least in line with my opinion.) wink
Also, the final version should have been individually tracked. As it is, I only find TRC listenable when I actually have the time to listen to the whole thing. It starts up cool, but when "Wedding Feast" cues up and i eject that trifling piece of bullshit! finger


You know that the CD release is tracked, don't you?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 10/28/02 10:18am

dewmass

avatar

In a way I understand people don't like the narrative, but on the other hand they are there and so to say the album is "ruined" by them seems foolish to me.
In England there is a very common phrase that goes like this. France is a very nice country, shame is full of French people!!
To me, this kind of comment is just as silly. The voice-overs are there, they've never not been there, so you like the album or not, with the whole material as offered. I don't see how else this can be viewed.
IMO
-----------------------------------------
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 10/28/02 10:23am

PlastikLuvAffa
ir

p coulda done that voiceover ala donald duck and it still wouldn't phase me. i could care less about it...neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 10/28/02 10:33am

Supernova

avatar

I can definitely understand how some people are annoyed by the narrative voice-over, but it doesn't bother me. It didn't from the first time I listened, and it doesn't now. Maybe the only time I could have done without it is during the end of "Digital Garden." I'd rather hear the distorted guitar without the voice.

But I wouldn't expect a non-kooky aspect on an album by a kook like Prince.

And actually the voice is not featured thru the entire album, because it's not on every song.

Btw, PFunk, the album is tracked and has been since the day it was released on the retail market.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 10/28/02 10:46am

childofthedawn

I actually liek the voice over parts of the album! i think it adds 2 the puzzle u need 2 solve in order 2 work out the meaning of the album as a whole. It makes u listen hard 2 wat hes saying and when u get it and what the meaning truly is the it becomes almost essential 2 the album. Although i do agree i do cringe alittle at the wedding feast bit but hey who doesnt? All in all i rate TRC as a musical masterpiece of divine spiritual depth which challenges the soul but it delivers the challange cleverly packaged in a wrapping of the funkiest, sweetest shakin yo ass music eva created.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 10/28/02 10:47am

joeycoco

Even without the voice-over it wouldn't even had made it into his top 10 albums.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 10/28/02 11:07am

PFunkjazz

avatar

Supernova said:

I wouldn't expect a non-kooky aspect on an album by a kook like Prince.




wink



By the time I got a prod release, it was too late. The boot is what I last heard in the CD-CHANGER.


You oughta come to HOB Sat nite, We gonna funk thangs up righteously when GC hits!!
test
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 10/28/02 2:47pm

Supernova

avatar

PFunkjazz said:

Supernova said:

I wouldn't expect a non-kooky aspect on an album by a kook like Prince.




wink



By the time I got a prod release, it was too late. The boot is what I last heard in the CD-CHANGER.


You oughta come to HOB Sat nite, We gonna funk thangs up righteously when GC hits!!

Really? Hmmm...Saturday night.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 10/28/02 4:57pm

allanb

avatar

1.Cut the voice-over shit.
2.Cut Wedding feast, Digital Garden and instrumentals.
3.Edit some of the tracks.
4.Add Judas Kiss,Silicon,U Make My Sunshine and When I lay My Hands On U
and you have the finest Prince release since 1987!!

My CD-R
1.Rainbow Children(edit)
2.Everlasting Now(edit)
3.When I lay My Hand on U
4.1+1+1=3
5.Judas Kiss
6.U Make My Sunshine
7.The Work Pt.1
8.Muse 2 the Pharoah
9.Silicon
10.Mellow
11.Family Name(edit)
12.She Loves Me 4 Me
13.Everywhere
14.Last December
15.Everlasting Now (reprise)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 10/28/02 5:02pm

CherrieMoonKis
ses

avatar

I like THE RAINBOW CHILDREN.
& everything that comes with it...ya'll jes need to get ova it bored
peace & wildsign
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 10/28/02 5:25pm

Janeau

avatar

I dont mind teh voice over on TRC...The interludes on Gold and the Exodus has begun annoy the hell out of me.
Interludes on any album by any artist are annoying.
free ur mind
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 10/28/02 5:32pm

origmnd

This subject NEVER dies...at first couple of listens , it gets in the way...
At this stage after listening to it over 10-15 times --I hardly notice it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 10/28/02 5:46pm

rdhull

avatar

Voice over doesnt bother me a bit...that Vanessa Bartholomew crap on Symbol cd is whats really shit.
"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 10/28/02 7:38pm

TheBluePrince

avatar

It doesn't bother me...The Album is a story...with some Slammin! music behind it. The voice acts as a narrator...actually if it were to go away, it would just run through my head anyway, I've long memorized that album.

That's my shit! mr.green

Blue
Times...times
Blue music
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 10/28/02 7:42pm

jthad1129

avatar

allanb said:

1.Cut the voice-over shit.
2.Cut Wedding feast, Digital Garden and instrumentals.
3.Edit some of the tracks.
4.Add Judas Kiss,Silicon,U Make My Sunshine and When I lay My Hands On U
and you have the finest Prince release since 1987!!

My CD-R
1.Rainbow Children(edit)
2.Everlasting Now(edit)
3.When I lay My Hand on U
4.1+1+1=3
5.Judas Kiss
6.U Make My Sunshine
7.The Work Pt.1
8.Muse 2 the Pharoah
9.Silicon
10.Mellow
11.Family Name(edit)
12.She Loves Me 4 Me
13.Everywhere
14.Last December
15.Everlasting Now (reprise)




Now thats the cd i was looking for!
Great job (with no narrative)
---------------------------------
rainbow Funny and charming as usual
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > RAINBOW CHILDREN, A CLASSIC RUINED?