Handclapsfingasnapz said: what's this "started" crap?
Yeah!! What she said again!! LOL | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ifsixwuz9 said: TheBatman said: Geez... where do I begin? Let's see... oh: "somebody lied about the way somebody died." So let's see: 1. Change the lyrics to fit our new beliefs instead of writing a new song. It's his song, he can do pretty much anything he wants with it. 2. Larry Graham. Let's give him a singing part, so he can back up my new belief. see above answer 3. The message of the song is NOT the same, if you understand why he changed it, and what the new lyrics mean. see above 4. After singing "The Cross" for 11 years, he wants to force a change? WTF? see above | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
psykosoul said: TheBatman said: Uh... I believe I made it.
Keep strivin' for the things you believe You do the same! You asked for my thoughts then balked at my point... sorry, it struck me funny. Ifsixwuz9 said: In other words you have nothing to say. Bear in mind I never commented one way or another on his choices.
I know you didn't comment one way or another, but your answer: "It's his song, he can do pretty much anything he wants with it.," struck me funny too. Basically a cop out. He should go back and change all his songs then. Why just pick on a classic like The Cross? Think of what a dreadful world this would be, if all artists, pulled stupid stunts like this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
I think "Still Would Stand All Time" is truly a gospel song with a very gospel choir sound in the back ground.
Everytime I hear this I think I should be back at Newlight Baptist Church... sing it, child! Personally, I'd like to hear more like this. Amen. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: Basically a cop out. He should go back and change all his songs then. Why just pick on a classic like The Cross?
Think of what a dreadful world this would be, if all artists, pulled stupid stunts like this.[/b] Guess what... it ain't your song, genius. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: TheBatman said: Basically a cop out. He should go back and change all his songs then. Why just pick on a classic like The Cross?
Think of what a dreadful world this would be, if all artists, pulled stupid stunts like this.[/b] Guess what... it ain't your song, genius. ...also, there's plenty of other artists, musicians and non-musicians, who revamp and remake their work all the time. it'd be kinna boring if folks stuck to just one thing and leave it at that. i don't care much for "the christ" or whatever either, but hey...it was p's prerogative to switch it up cuz he felt like it. not a damn thing you can do but not listen to it, if it turns you off that much. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: Ifsixwuz9 said: 1. Change the lyrics to fit our new beliefs instead of writing a new song. It's his song, he can do pretty much anything he wants with it. 2. Larry Graham. Let's give him a singing part, so he can back up my new belief. see above answer 3. The message of the song is NOT the same, if you understand why he changed it, and what the new lyrics mean. see above 4. After singing "The Cross" for 11 years, he wants to force a change? WTF? see above that is exactly what i was thinking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince has been writing gospel songs forever
they may not have always contained gospel lyrics...but non-the-less they were gospel records The Cross is not a gospel record so those of you who want to act like it is need to see Ray the movie to understand what gospel music is or go to church How Come You Don't Call Me Adore On the Couch The Question of U Still Would Stand All Time U Make MY Sunshine Are all examples of gospel music wiritten and performed by Prince. Now the lyrics aren't traditional gospel clearly but anyone who knows anthing about music and not just Prince music or as I see on this sites his pop records knows this. Its not even debatable [Edited 11/19/04 8:30am] [Edited 11/19/04 8:34am] Dance... Let me see you dance | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stripe said: Dewrede said: More gospel songs ;
Last december (infact almost the whole "Rainbow children" album) The ladder Anna stesia God 4 the tears in your eyes The holy river The cross One of us Eye know I probably left a few out Honestly , i think that's enough songs about god already ! The man should get back to playing nasty guitar ! Tho i must say he's on the right track again i.m.o [Edited 11/12/04 17:37pm] "The Cross" "The Christ"??? the only song on your list that is remotely a gospel record is The Ladder. The rest aren't remotely gospel records. Their lyrical content do not make them a gospel record. Gospel just like POP, & RB is a style and form all to it self [Edited 11/19/04 8:33am] Dance... Let me see you dance | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alexandernvrmind said: Stripe said: "The Cross" "The Christ"??? not a sinbgle one of these is a gospel record...not one You don't consider "Last December" to be a gospel song? The Normal Whores Club | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: OdysseyMiles
can't nobody use my beeyotch-slap banner 'cept me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sorry, but he deserved it after making a comment like that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alexandernvrmind said: Its not even debatable
it is now. seems to me that you're listenin more to the musical content of each song, as opposed to the musical and the lyrical content. the songs you listed above may have a gospel-like tinge in their sound, but they're not gospel. and yes, "the cross" can be considered as gospel. dunno how hip you are to the gospel genre, but it has to do with telling of the coming of the lord. "the cross" is doing just that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: Sorry, but he deserved it after making a comment like that.
You mean after makin' some sense? Maybe you'd know what I was talking about if you created some art only to have others tell you what you should and shouldn't do with it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: TheBatman said: Sorry, but he deserved it after making a comment like that.
You mean after makin' some sense? Maybe you'd know what I was talking about if you created some art only to have others tell you what you should and shouldn't do with it. you beat me to it, i was just about to say...the banner usage got me all confuzzled, cuz what you said was on-point. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: You mean after makin' some sense?
Maybe you'd know what I was talking about if you created some art only to have others tell you what you should and shouldn't do with it. Dude... I'm in advertising. I get that all the time. Let's get Michelangelo to change the The Sistine Chapel Ceiling while we're at it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Alexandernvrmind said: Its not even debatable
it is now. seems to me that you're listenin more to the musical content of each song, as opposed to the musical and the lyrical content. the songs you listed above may have a gospel-like tinge in their sound, but they're not gospel. and yes, "the cross" can be considered as gospel. dunno how hip you are to the gospel genre, but it has to do with telling of the coming of the lord. "the cross" is doing just that. the Cross is rock/pop/metal song period. The "song" is what we distinguish and how songs are categorized Prince is so good because he cover all categories and well (except Rap) POP RB Phycadelic Gospel Rock all kille dall of it back in the 80s ...thats what made him so astonishing H eplayed all of these types/forms of music and well I guess we will have to agree to disagree but it would be like saying Kiss or Erotic City are rock records...when clearly they are not Dance... Let me see you dance | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alexandernvrmind said: Handclapsfingasnapz said: it is now. seems to me that you're listenin more to the musical content of each song, as opposed to the musical and the lyrical content. the songs you listed above may have a gospel-like tinge in their sound, but they're not gospel. and yes, "the cross" can be considered as gospel. dunno how hip you are to the gospel genre, but it has to do with telling of the coming of the lord. "the cross" is doing just that. the Cross is rock/pop/metal song period. The "song" is what we distinguish and how songs are categorized Prince is so good because he cover all categories and well (except Rap) POP RB Phycadelic Gospel Rock all kille dall of it back in the 80s ...thats what made him so astonishing H eplayed all of these types/forms of music and well I guess we will have to agree to disagree but it would be like saying Kiss or Erotic City are rock records...when clearly they are not ...you totally didn't see what i said. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: OdysseyMiles said: You mean after makin' some sense?
Maybe you'd know what I was talking about if you created some art only to have others tell you what you should and shouldn't do with it. Dude... I'm in advertising. I get that all the time. Let's get Michelangelo to change the The Sistine Chapel Ceiling while we're at it If he was still here, he might consider it....and he'd have every right to. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: TheBatman said: Dude... I'm in advertising. I get that all the time. Let's get Michelangelo to change the The Sistine Chapel Ceiling while we're at it If he was still here, he might consider it....and he'd have every right to. Well, you obviously have no sense of vision. An orginal creation is just that. Now if Prince is as creative as he leads us to believe, he would've made a new... MORE POWERFUL song about it. Instead of belittling himself to change the original... ooo, "just cause it's his." Last time I checked, Warners owned "The Cross," so it's not really his anymore anyway. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: Now if Prince is as creative as he leads us to believe, he would've made a new... MORE POWERFUL song about it. Instead of belittling himself to change the original... ooo, "just cause it's his."
Last time I checked, Warners owned "The Cross," so it's not really his anymore anyway. 1) no matter if he were to make a brand-spankin new version of the song, the premise would still be exactly the same. 2) ownership aside--warners didn't come up with "the cross", prince did--in that respect, it's still his creation....ew, now i feel like ol' boy all the sudden, only taller and with estrogen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: OdysseyMiles said: If he was still here, he might consider it....and he'd have every right to. Well, you obviously have no sense of vision. An orginal creation is just that. Now if Prince is as creative as he leads us to believe, he would've made a new... MORE POWERFUL song about it. Instead of belittling himself to change the original... ooo, "just cause it's his." Last time I checked, Warners owned "The Cross," so it's not really his anymore anyway. Dude, you have no clue about creative vision or art. You're probably one of those cats who whines about George Lucas making adjustments to the Star Wars movies. And yes, Warners owns "The Cross" on paper, but they didn't write it, now did they? As a songwriter, nobody will ever tell me what I can or can't do with a tune, so you and me will never see eye-to-eye on this. I'll defend any songwriter/artist in the world when it comes to their art/vision. Why? Simple. It's theirs, NOT YOURS. [Edited 11/19/04 9:15am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: You do the same! You asked for my thoughts then balked at my point... sorry, it struck me funny.
I didn't balk at your point, because I didn't see one. I saw no reason to go back in forth in discussion about your ideas because they haven't proven anything or provoked me to change my mind. Seems OdyseeyMiles and ifsixwuz9 have done a great job of breaking it down for you. All I can do is hope you learn something [Edited 11/19/04 9:57am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
All of you live in a different world than I do.
I am an artist. I have had my work used in many publications, and not always as my original intent. Bottom line is "The Christ" SUCKED! It made a mockery of the original vision. If you like "The Christ" listen to it. I will stick with "The Cross!" And by the way odyssey... as much as I love Star Wars, George did ruin certain parts of it, although improved on others... I'd still rather have the theatrical releases on DVD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I knew it!!!
TheBatman said: And by the way odyssey... as much as I love Star Wars, George did ruin certain parts of it, although improved on others... I'd still rather have the theatrical releases on DVD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So? I wasn't whining about it. Just stated opinion. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: Just stated opinion.
So did Prince when he sang "The Christ". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: TheBatman said: Just stated opinion.
So did Prince when he sang "The Christ". And in turned, ruined the original song (at least for some of us). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: OdysseyMiles said: So did Prince when he sang "The Christ". And in turned, ruined the original song (at least for some of us). Like you said, you've got your copy, so listen to that. When you say he shouldn't change his own art, then you take away your own artistic freedom to ever do the same if you so choose. My point was that we should all have that right. [Edited 11/19/04 11:20am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |