independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Face it folks, Prince is a fool.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 08/17/04 9:57am

silentflute

avatar

tricky99 said:

And just because a song is about shaking your ASS or getting some lovin doesn't mean it can't be brillaintly written.



And where in my post did u get that from.Some of the genuinly brilliant dance songs have had great lyrics.
However in Prince's case,a lot of his stuff is very basic ,blatant in your face lyrics that a your average 13 yr old could write.
[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 9:57:53 2004 by silentflute]
"Pam...that's just stupid."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 08/17/04 10:15am

laurarichardso
n

BlaqueKnight said:

laurarichardson said:


You seem to think that Prince and Andre's dislike for voting will influence people. I am saying it will not.



[color=blue:2234dd12a4]Are you absolutely sure? Prince certainly has a few drones around here trained. Whenever he says something, some people immediately start looking for the hidden message. Many people would rather listen to Prince & Andre's opinions than politicians. [/color]

-----
It is not that deep brother. I just saw Prince perform on Friday and people feel a emotional connnection to him but not a polical connection. I really don't think in Dear Mr. Man he is saying don't vote I think he is putting it out as a question. Like the candidates are not any different and with the Florida mess a lot of people are questioning the polical process. Besides I was told that JW's don't vote. If this is true this could be all about his religion.

Which in 5 years he could be on to something else.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 08/17/04 10:18am

laurarichardso
n

BanishedBrian said:

laurarichardson said:


-----
Prince has sold a lot more records that Talib !!! Having respect from the independent scence does not mean anything when you no longer have a recording contract. Which Talib will not have despite his great lyrics. The brother just does not have flow or star power.

Who said Talib had star power? He has no interest in being a star or trying to sell. He is interested in making good music, which thanks to the internet and places like hiphopsite and sandboxautomatic, can be easily distributed without major label support. In many ways, Prince and him have a lot in common. Prince didn't release TRC, ONA, N.E.W.S or Xpectation in an attempt to sell CDs or be a star again, he did it to release great music.

By the way, "Get By" was more of a staple on urban radio stations than any song Prince has released since ... wow, Eye Hate U perhaps?

-----
I don't even recall "Get By" and I listen to urban radio everyday at work. If I went out on the street and mentioned Talib's name I bet I could not find 10 people who know who this brother
is.

Prince has enough of following to go independent. Talib does not have that kind of following.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 08/17/04 10:26am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

BlackandRising said:

BlaqueKnight said:

[color=blue:40d7756c18]Ah, the ever-defensive Laura. Spare us the bullshit, sweetie. Telling people not to vote is telling people to throw away choice. PERIOD. If you agree with Prince on this issue, you Prince and Androne 3000 are all WRONG for that. Like I said, its not just about the politicians, its about the issues, too.[/color]



Um, I really don't think he was stating that people should not vote; given that the song highlights the way many people feel today about the current power structure, I think he was simply pointing out that this is the way many people feel about voting and who the choices are, and kind of forcing "Mr. Man" to ask himself the question "why do people feel that their votes do not count, and why do they think all politicians are the same?" I mean, the song is a letter to "Mr. Man," so I assume that these are questions being asked of him. Which goes to the fact that there are only two parties to choose from. Which, in and of itself is fucked up. So when you get down to it, are the two parties really that different? I don't think so, and never have. I think the song is pretty simple. It states a very simple message that is being over-analyzed here. It may not be Bob Dylan, but he gets his point across. If Prince is a fool for saying something as basic as this, then what is anyone supposed to say? Do singers now have to create a mini-novel to say somethng this obvious?



First off, that response was in regards to Prince's overall stance. He's discussed this in interviews, etc. before.
Secondly, given the fact that Prince is an admitted JW and JWs are against voting, is it really so far-fetched to believe that PRINCE MIGHT NOT CONDONE VOTING? Sheeessshhh!
People around here go to great lengths to defend ANYTHING Prince says, regardless of what it is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 08/17/04 10:35am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

laurarichardson said:


I don't even recall "Get By" and I listen to urban radio everyday at work. If I went out on the street and mentioned Talib's name I bet I could not find 10 people who know who this brother
is.

Prince has enough of following to go independent. Talib does not have that kind of following.



Urban radio is shit. Here: Talib Kweli
4 CDs and no following? LOL! Y-O-U don't know, but others do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 08/17/04 11:15am

OdysseyMiles

BlaqueKnight said:

BlackandRising said:




Um, I really don't think he was stating that people should not vote; given that the song highlights the way many people feel today about the current power structure, I think he was simply pointing out that this is the way many people feel about voting and who the choices are, and kind of forcing "Mr. Man" to ask himself the question "why do people feel that their votes do not count, and why do they think all politicians are the same?" I mean, the song is a letter to "Mr. Man," so I assume that these are questions being asked of him. Which goes to the fact that there are only two parties to choose from. Which, in and of itself is fucked up. So when you get down to it, are the two parties really that different? I don't think so, and never have. I think the song is pretty simple. It states a very simple message that is being over-analyzed here. It may not be Bob Dylan, but he gets his point across. If Prince is a fool for saying something as basic as this, then what is anyone supposed to say? Do singers now have to create a mini-novel to say somethng this obvious?



First off, that response was in regards to Prince's overall stance. He's discussed this in interviews, etc. before.
Secondly, given the fact that Prince is an admitted JW and JWs are against voting, is it really so far-fetched to believe that PRINCE MIGHT NOT CONDONE VOTING? Sheeessshhh!
People around here go to great lengths to defend ANYTHING Prince says, regardless of what it is.


I personally don't feel that any artists' expression deserves to be defended or railed against. It's simply he/she's expression, no more no less.
Yes, Prince is one of Jehovah's Witnesses. Yes, that is a factor in why he may not be voting in November. Why anyone here could give two vegan craps is beyond me. shrug In all honesty, I think we all "at times" have placed a little too much importance on what an artist has said. It's whether or not we recognize it and check ourselves that really matters.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 08/17/04 11:16am

17ways69days

avatar

tricky99 said:

17ways69days said:



Good post. And no doubt AG and MG had their insecurities! It’s not that I’m disparaging Prince or neglecting to appreciate his talent for the cryptic. It’s just that Prince’s cryptic, consciously ambiguous song writing allows him to only go so far and say so much. Of course, Prince’s style allows him to create a kind of interactive space for the listener that MG, AG, etc. did not create but when you get down to it the things that matter most to me in a song writing and singing are generally (not always) lacking in Prince. I’m talking about emotional honesty and sincerity. Yeah I suppose it’s possible to be consciously ambiguous and emotionally sincere but after a while don’t you begin to ask yourself if the cryptic is a mask? Just to take this conversation to another place - Joyce as well as Ulysses, Blake wrote Songs of Innocence and Experience as well as Jerusalem. Prince’s has very few “serious” songs that are also direct. Why is that? There are many more direct love songs (although still generally operatic, showy, and impersonal) but very few direct songs about politics and religion. When I listen to Curtis I really feel like I’m listening to a person who struggles with all his being over religion and politics. When I listen to Prince I here someone who’s latching onto something in a very momentary and shallow way - and the indulgence in the cryptic does not help. Take a song like “Amen” or “Something to Believe In” and compare it to ANY religious Prince song. Take a song like “Family Name” and compare it to “Don’t Call me Nigger, Whitey”…I’m not trying to come out like my shit is objective truth but I have a hard time seeing how the brilliantly cryptic Prince can hang (in lyrics and intellect) with his precursors. Prince has always lacked the edge and sophistication of the Great soul singers of the 60's and 70's.


Well i'm not sure how we could judge who has the greater intelllect. I never got the sense that Mayfield, Gaye or Wonder are towering intellectuals. Just becuase u can write a heartfelt song about the state of the world doesn't denote some genuis IQ. I'm not familiar with the songs u namecheck with the exception of "Whitey". I don't find it particularly brilliant musically. The conundrum that it explores about our prejudices is however memorable. But its a product of that time. I don't know that it would work now. I find a song by prince like "Race" to be just as interesting without the hot-button words (whitey and nigger). To me a phrase like "were all bones when were dead" succently puts across the point in the song that the idea of race is a fallacy. Plus its got a good beat lol. Prince lacks edge? Surely u jest. The brotha has been edgy since day one. I mean that in that he has always played by his own rules. He doesn't fit cateogories and can't be completely defined. Even now this far into his career we all wonder what's next. Plus prince is not a soul singer. That just something is does amongst other things. Keep it coming.


Again good points. I pretty much agree with this post from top to bottom so let me clarify a little bit. Yes, I also don’t have the sense that MG, SW, or CM are “towering intellectuals” but all three have the gift of touch – of being in touch with their audience and articulating through lyrics + feeling the mostly unstated thoughts of their audience. This talent (which I misleadingly labeled “intellect”) is something that Prince has lost long ago.

Perhaps you’re right about the Sly stone song – the music is not exceptional and, aside from the catch words, there’s not much going on but still, even though the song is very much a product of its moment, I find that this song has an edge that neither “Race” nor “Family Name” nor any other race-related political inspired Prince song has. “Controversy” is one of my favorite Prince songs and this song is perhaps P’s best commentary on race but, despite the biblical references, it’s pure pop camp.

As for P’s edge, I overstated my point. Prince has edge (had edge) but again the edge is not the political and religious angst of Curtis or Sly or the almost too intimate and uncomfortably personal MG, rather it’s the edge of Madonna or Boy George, the pop star who is pushing the conventional boundaries without any real guiding force or coherent trajectory. As for Prince not being a soul singer, true enough but my point is not that soul music is better than pop or that Prince should be a soul singer, rather I’m just using soul music as a point of reference to make a point about Prince.
ego tripping out
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 08/17/04 11:20am

tricky99

avatar

silentflute said:

tricky99 said:

And just because a song is about shaking your ASS or getting some lovin doesn't mean it can't be brillaintly written.



And where in my post did u get that from.Some of the genuinly brilliant dance songs have had great lyrics.
However in Prince's case,a lot of his stuff is very basic ,blatant in your face lyrics that a your average 13 yr old could write.
[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 9:57:53 2004 by silentflute]


U do your argument an injustice by trying to equate Prince with a 13 yr old. Give him a lil respect. Why don't u list some of these songs that a 13 yr old could write and then we could actually discuss them. I might even agree with u. Really neighter side of the debate is absolutly true. Plus u claim these greats all have brilliant songs, thats highly unlikely either. Plus most of the cats listed don't write with the range that prince does. If we want to debate we must get more specific.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 08/17/04 11:40am

Number23

Are we differentiating between Prince's personal intellect and his song-writing ability?

To emphaise my wee point, Stephen Hawking probably couldn't put pen to paper conveying his emotions with a few verses and a chorus, whereas I wouldn't trust Bob Dylan to split the atom. Neither are 'fools', whatever that means.

Coincidently, regarding Prince Nelson's songwriting talent - which I won't bore anyone with my opinion - I came by an interview with Bob Dylan recently conducted in the mid-90s, where he was asked who he rated as a songwirter.

Now, Bob-cats all know the man like to pull legs and extract urine from his inquisitors, but according to said inquisitor Bob got passionate and had a 'take me serious here kid' tone in his voice when he said that Prince was a great songwriting genius who could 'write great words about anything in no time' but would never be taken seriously because of his overtly flamboyant image. Or something along those lines. I'll see if I can dig it out. He also added that Prince made him sick because he was so talented.

In Bob we trust. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 08/17/04 12:02pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

bigsexy said:

JUST SIT BACK HAVE A COKE AND A SMILE AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.

falloff

clapping
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 08/17/04 12:13pm

BlackandRising

BlaqueKnight said:

BlackandRising said:




Um, I really don't think he was stating that people should not vote; given that the song highlights the way many people feel today about the current power structure, I think he was simply pointing out that this is the way many people feel about voting and who the choices are, and kind of forcing "Mr. Man" to ask himself the question "why do people feel that their votes do not count, and why do they think all politicians are the same?" I mean, the song is a letter to "Mr. Man," so I assume that these are questions being asked of him. Which goes to the fact that there are only two parties to choose from. Which, in and of itself is fucked up. So when you get down to it, are the two parties really that different? I don't think so, and never have. I think the song is pretty simple. It states a very simple message that is being over-analyzed here. It may not be Bob Dylan, but he gets his point across. If Prince is a fool for saying something as basic as this, then what is anyone supposed to say? Do singers now have to create a mini-novel to say somethng this obvious?



First off, that response was in regards to Prince's overall stance. He's discussed this in interviews, etc. before.
Secondly, given the fact that Prince is an admitted JW and JWs are against voting, is it really so far-fetched to believe that PRINCE MIGHT NOT CONDONE VOTING? Sheeessshhh!
People around here go to great lengths to defend ANYTHING Prince says, regardless of what it is.


The mere fact that you see this as a defense fo him shows where your head is. I simply stated that what he says is simple and to the point. Nothing cryptic. Just because he's a JW does not mean he advocates that everyone do as they do. He's singing a song for God's sake.
My point is that in the song, which is what we are discussing, is that taken in the context of the song, he seems to simply state that this is a problem, what do you think about it?
You are obviously entitled to think what you want. As am I. But you are obviously taking it a lot more seriously than I am. *Sheeeeessshhh!*
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 08/17/04 12:20pm

ufoclub

avatar

This post is dead on... and I knew it the moment I was intitially forced to listen to Purple Rain (which was slyly put on the back of a loaned cassette tape of the Dune soundtrack). Prince is cheesy, he didn't go to college, and he doesn't exactly hang out with a crowd that's gonna push him intellectually higher... but he still makes cool albums and sounds and shows, if you swallow the sometimes cheesy preaching, politics, philosophy, and humor that makes your friends make fun of you.

But then again they made fun of the Beatles and more so, John Lennon for the their silly shit (the politics, cheesy concepts, and philosophical idiocy)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 08/17/04 12:31pm

nammie

avatar

Where's Dansa!! LOL
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 08/17/04 1:08pm

silentflute

avatar

tricky99 said:

silentflute said:




And where in my post did u get that from.Some of the genuinly brilliant dance songs have had great lyrics.
However in Prince's case,a lot of his stuff is very basic ,blatant in your face lyrics that a your average 13 yr old could write.
[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 9:57:53 2004 by silentflute]


U do your argument an injustice by trying to equate Prince with a 13 yr old. Give him a lil respect.
First of all,I've been into Prince since '85--no lack of respect over here bro.Secondly.i wasn't equating the man with a 13yr old,I was simply pointing out that the lyrics to a majority of his songs are pretty basic.

Why don't u list some of these songs that a 13 yr old could write and then we could actually discuss them. I might even agree with u.
Way too many to list bro but here's a few: jack u off,feel u up,ATWIAD,do it all night,319,shhh,endorphinemachine,trust etc.
Again,don't get me wrong--it's not that I don't like these songs,it's just that lyrically, they're nothing special.



Really neighter side of the debate is absolutly true. Plus u claim these greats all have brilliant songs, thats highly unlikely either.

I never said that all their songs are brilliant,but their ratio is a lot higher then Prince's


Plus most of the cats listed don't write with the range that prince does. If we want to debate we must get more specific.

If that's what you believe the you obviously haven't been paying attention,cuz Stevie,Sting and TTD run circles around P--lyrically.If anything,he hasn't shown the range (even in his brilliant songs) that these gentleman have with his songwriting/storytelling.My suspicion is that he's not as well read or as versatile as those guys.His songs fall into 2 categories: 1. sex 2. i been done wrong by a woman .Ocassionally,u get something else,but you can count those songs on your fingers. Again,his strength is in his musicianship and arranging--not his lyrics.



[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 13:09:00 2004 by silentflute]
[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 13:14:00 2004 by silentflute]
"Pam...that's just stupid."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 08/17/04 2:06pm

Supernova

avatar

ufoclub said:

Prince is cheesy, he didn't go to college, and he doesn't exactly hang out with a crowd that's gonna push him intellectually higher... but he still makes cool albums and sounds and shows, if you swallow the sometimes cheesy preaching, politics, philosophy, and humor that makes your friends make fun of you.

Please. Him not going to college doesn't have a hell of a lot to do with it. Throughout history the arts have been littered with great artists who never went to college.
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 08/17/04 2:14pm

OdysseyMiles

silentflute said:

My suspicion is that he's not as well read or as versatile as those guys.His songs fall into 2 categories: 1. sex 2. i been done wrong by a woman .Ocassionally,u get something else,but you can count those songs on your fingers. Again,his strength is in his musicianship and arranging--not his lyrics.


hmmm Are we talkin' about the same artist and body of work here?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 08/17/04 2:34pm

Abrazo

namepeace said:

BlaqueKnight said:

"but generally cryptic social commentary is the product of the uniformed and naïve."

[color=blue:c02c005ec3]Wow, that was kinda harsh, but I do agree with the above statement. This has been my problem with a few artists, but Prince has taken it above and beyond at times. So many of his fans are always searching for the "secret message in the song" because his lyrics are often fused with many double entenders, etc. Occasionaly Prince is clear, most times he is clever, but when it comes to politics & religion and social issues, taking poetic liscense just comes off as a cop out. Anyone seeking political understanding from Prince deserves all the confusion they're going to get. Sometimes with Prince's songs, the message gets clouded by the "puzzle". This generation is much more direct than the 70s kids who comprise a very large portion of Prince's audience. They don't want to hear double talk, they want clear and direct and respect nothing else. That is a small echo of the overall tone of society in general these days. They want Talieb Kweli, Jadakiss, Anthony Hamilton, etc. instead of cleverly masked vagueness. I guess you could say its a sign of the times. I just chalk it up to Prince being Prince. You can get caught up in the fun of it, then let it pass...or you can take Prince way too seriously and end up neurotic. Just take Prince's lyrics with a grain of salt, call it a Princeism and let it pass.[/color]


I think there is no better example of this than TRC. Much of his social commentary was obscured by unfortunate cryptic references to such topics as the Holocaust.

That being said, I can think of a few tracks that Prince has dealt with social issues in a fairly direct manner, such as Pop Life, America, Dance On, Sign O' The Times and Money Don't Matter 2Night. He'll never be Stevie or Marvin or Gil Scott-Heron or Chuck D but he's had some pretty good tracks along those lines over the years.


Darn, those are almost exclusively songs from the golden 80's....
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 08/17/04 2:36pm

Abrazo

Nocturnal said:

bigsexy said:

WHO FUCKIN' CARES!!! WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO ANALYZE EVERY
THING HE SAYS OR DOES? JUST SIT BACK HAVE A COKE AND A SMILE AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.


yeah, we should just have threads in which we all say:

"i'm having a coke and smiling". smile

"yeah, me too." smile

"great!" smile


yeah and then scream:

SHUT THE FUCK UP

at eachother


smile
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 08/17/04 2:43pm

Abrazo

skywalker said:

Actions speak louder than words anyways. Jimi's version of the National Anthem speak volumes more than anything Dylan or Lennon ever sang about the USA and it's role in the world.

disbelief please....
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 08/17/04 3:01pm

Abrazo

I think the only really good point being made on this thread is that Prince would be better off not writing cryptic political messages. His 80's political stuff was pretty clear, not really cryptic and - perhabs even because of that - sometimes pretty brilliant.

But in an age as this... misinterpretations and offended people are easily made when opinions - and worse self -proclaimed "facts" - on sensitive political issues are not being treated with great care by the artist. Therefore he is better off staying as clear as possible, or not publishing them at all.

For the rest of his lyrics Prince should really stay his own cryptic self.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 08/17/04 3:38pm

Hotlegs

laurarichardson said:

BanishedBrian said:


Who said Talib had star power? He has no interest in being a star or trying to sell. He is interested in making good music, which thanks to the internet and places like hiphopsite and sandboxautomatic, can be easily distributed without major label support. In many ways, Prince and him have a lot in common. Prince didn't release TRC, ONA, N.E.W.S or Xpectation in an attempt to sell CDs or be a star again, he did it to release great music.

By the way, "Get By" was more of a staple on urban radio stations than any song Prince has released since ... wow, Eye Hate U perhaps?

-----
I don't even recall "Get By" and I listen to urban radio everyday at work. If I went out on the street and mentioned Talib's name I bet I could not find 10 people who know who this brother
is.

Prince has enough of following to go independent. Talib does not have that kind of following.


thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 08/17/04 3:40pm

Hotlegs

laurarichardson said:

BanishedBrian said:


Who said Talib had star power? He has no interest in being a star or trying to sell. He is interested in making good music, which thanks to the internet and places like hiphopsite and sandboxautomatic, can be easily distributed without major label support. In many ways, Prince and him have a lot in common. Prince didn't release TRC, ONA, N.E.W.S or Xpectation in an attempt to sell CDs or be a star again, he did it to release great music.

By the way, "Get By" was more of a staple on urban radio stations than any song Prince has released since ... wow, Eye Hate U perhaps?

-----
I don't even recall "Get By" and I listen to urban radio everyday at work. If I went out on the street and mentioned Talib's name I bet I could not find 10 people who know who this brother
is.

Prince has enough of following to go independent. Talib does not have that kind of following.


thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 08/17/04 3:52pm

DTrickyB

avatar

17ways69days said:

Unfortunately, Prince does not really have that much to say.


OK, we're all on here to give up the Purple Praise, true enough, but our fellow orgers are entitled to their opinions.

However, 25+ year of talking bullshit won't get you paid. So somewhere along the line, Prince must have done something right to get all that loot he's been making. If he's speakn' it, I'm listening, and spending $ to hear what he's got to say. And so are you. So who's the fool?

By the way, the bytch fine as hell, so he actually doesn't have to say a word to get all my undivided....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 08/17/04 4:26pm

bigsexy

I wish Prince would make an all political CD just to hear you bitch even more. I vote Prince for President!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 08/17/04 4:28pm

CherrieMoonKis
ses

avatar

DTrickyB said:

17ways69days said:

Unfortunately, Prince does not really have that much to say.


OK, we're all on here to give up the Purple Praise, true enough, but our fellow orgers are entitled to their opinions.


Which gets lost in all the black haze around here. This sentence rings very true but seems to be irrelevant nontheless. sigh
peace & wildsign
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 08/17/04 4:48pm

laurarichardso
n

Number23 said:

Are we differentiating between Prince's personal intellect and his song-writing ability?

To emphaise my wee point, Stephen Hawking probably couldn't put pen to paper conveying his emotions with a few verses and a chorus, whereas I wouldn't trust Bob Dylan to split the atom. Neither are 'fools', whatever that means.

Coincidently, regarding Prince Nelson's songwriting talent - which I won't bore anyone with my opinion - I came by an interview with Bob Dylan recently conducted in the mid-90s, where he was asked who he rated as a songwirter.

Now, Bob-cats all know the man like to pull legs and extract urine from his inquisitors, but according to said inquisitor Bob got passionate and had a 'take me serious here kid' tone in his voice when he said that Prince was a great songwriting genius who could 'write great words about anything in no time' but would never be taken seriously because of his overtly flamboyant image. Or something along those lines. I'll see if I can dig it out. He also added that Prince made him sick because he was so talented.

In Bob we trust. nod

-----
Wow!! I think this should close this thread. Getting a complaint like that from Bob Dylan kind of seals the deal.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 08/17/04 4:51pm

laurarichardso
n

BlaqueKnight said:

laurarichardson said:


I don't even recall "Get By" and I listen to urban radio everyday at work. If I went out on the street and mentioned Talib's name I bet I could not find 10 people who know who this brother
is.

Prince has enough of following to go independent. Talib does not have that kind of following.



Urban radio is shit. Here: Talib Kweli
4 CDs and no following? LOL! Y-O-U don't know, but others do.

-----
Dude I listen to XM radio, I go out to clubs, I buy CD's every week. I have a cd collection that goes from the AWB to Zepplin. I don't hear a lot of people rocking Talib's music.

Dude's not gone to make it to a 25 year carreer like Mr. Nelson.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 08/17/04 4:59pm

BanishedBrian

laurarichardson said:

BlaqueKnight said:




Urban radio is shit. Here: Talib Kweli
4 CDs and no following? LOL! Y-O-U don't know, but others do.

-----
Dude I listen to XM radio, I go out to clubs, I buy CD's every week. I have a cd collection that goes from the AWB to Zepplin. I don't hear a lot of people rocking Talib's music.

Dude's not gone to make it to a 25 year carreer like Mr. Nelson.

Talib's got pretty much the same kind of following that the Roots, Common, Mos Def, Q-Tip and other cats like that do. You may not follow them, but plenty do... and the fact that you base your ideas on what you here on XM Radio and at clubs pretty much illustrates why you have no credibility.

When's the last time you heard songs off TRC and NEWS on XM Radio or at clubs? Does that mean that Prince has no following either?

Take a trip to www.hiphopsite.com and check it out, you might learn a little about how much of a big business independent (non-radio; non-club) rap music has become, and the kind of props that Talib Kwali gets.

While you're at it, you may wish to click on this link and then click on the Train of Thought ablum ... I think it might change your opinion: http://www.hiphopsite.com...9E64A802AB But to each his own I guess...
[This message was edited Tue Aug 17 17:08:14 2004 by BanishedBrian]
No Candy 4 Me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 08/17/04 5:16pm

tricky99

avatar

I'd like to congratulate the tread-starter and all u folks that have added to this thread. This is a great example of what i believe has been missing from the org of late. And that is discussion based on more than "i like this song" or "this song sucks". Prince is a serious artist and as fans surely we have deeper feeling for the art than comments like "this song is better then that one". Keep it rolling!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 08/17/04 5:49pm

tricky99

avatar

17ways69days said:

tricky99 said:



Well i'm not sure how we could judge who has the greater intelllect. I never got the sense that Mayfield, Gaye or Wonder are towering intellectuals. Just becuase u can write a heartfelt song about the state of the world doesn't denote some genuis IQ. I'm not familiar with the songs u namecheck with the exception of "Whitey". I don't find it particularly brilliant musically. The conundrum that it explores about our prejudices is however memorable. But its a product of that time. I don't know that it would work now. I find a song by prince like "Race" to be just as interesting without the hot-button words (whitey and nigger). To me a phrase like "were all bones when were dead" succently puts across the point in the song that the idea of race is a fallacy. Plus its got a good beat lol. Prince lacks edge? Surely u jest. The brotha has been edgy since day one. I mean that in that he has always played by his own rules. He doesn't fit cateogories and can't be completely defined. Even now this far into his career we all wonder what's next. Plus prince is not a soul singer. That just something is does amongst other things. Keep it coming.


Again good points. I pretty much agree with this post from top to bottom so let me clarify a little bit. Yes, I also don’t have the sense that MG, SW, or CM are “towering intellectuals” but all three have the gift of touch – of being in touch with their audience and articulating through lyrics + feeling the mostly unstated thoughts of their audience. This talent (which I misleadingly labeled “intellect”) is something that Prince has lost long ago.

Perhaps you’re right about the Sly stone song – the music is not exceptional and, aside from the catch words, there’s not much going on but still, even though the song is very much a product of its moment, I find that this song has an edge that neither “Race” nor “Family Name” nor any other race-related political inspired Prince song has. “Controversy” is one of my favorite Prince songs and this song is perhaps P’s best commentary on race but, despite the biblical references, it’s pure pop camp.

As for P’s edge, I overstated my point. Prince has edge (had edge) but again the edge is not the political and religious angst of Curtis or Sly or the almost too intimate and uncomfortably personal MG, rather it’s the edge of Madonna or Boy George, the pop star who is pushing the conventional boundaries without any real guiding force or coherent trajectory. As for Prince not being a soul singer, true enough but my point is not that soul music is better than pop or that Prince should be a soul singer, rather I’m just using soul music as a point of reference to make a point about Prince.



I do get where u are coming from. Yes i concede that those 3 artists convey a certain connection with their audience (particularly black folk). But i think they play to there audiences xpectations much more than Prince. Prince early removed himself from playing the role that was expected of him and proceded to alienate his audience at everyturn. He for the most part has not allowed our perceptions of him to stop him from going down the next rabbit hole. Remember prince has always cultivated an "otherness" or uniquesness. Prince has never allowed us to see him. He is not "real" like a Marvin or Mayfield. His is a persona that is presented to us like the Wizard of OZ. The "true" Prince is behind the curtain. Just because he obscures his personal reality doesn't mean he does not provide universal truth in his writing.

Explain what u mean by Controversy being pure "pop camp". What does that mean? Controversy was one of the first songs that told me that not only was Prince talented but that he was also brave in a way most people are not. Here is a young man asking questions about identity and belief in a context that was unique. I certainly had never heard anything like it. Who am I and who do u believe me to be? And what's this about Prince not having edge anymore. Think about it. What is a work like TRC if not edgy? Like it or hate it. What other artist does it sound like? It's both a biblical allegory and a narrative of a personal journey of discovery.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Face it folks, Prince is a fool.