rogifan said:

Mumio said:

To each his/her own but I've got no issue with how she wants to communicate, with or without profanity. She can tell her story however she wants to do so, using whatever words she wants to use.

[Edited 11/6/17 8:46am]

Obviously it’s a free country people can talk however they want. Others are free not to like it. I don’t. I think it makes her look trashy and missing a few screws. But hey if people want to keep wishing for juicy gossip from her go ahead if it makes you feel better.

What is wrong with Cat discussing things that happened when she was in the band? Did you listen to the interview she does not say anything about that time that is bad. She was actually very respectful as far any questions about her and Prince.

The other stuff is her opinion and she is entilted to it like anyone else.

rogifan said:

laurarichardson said:

Exactly, we know about the blind item and we know that two more names were out there as children that we now do not even see as dismissed they just got down from 7 to 5 with two people claims having vanished.

I also remember something about Tyka bringing some heir info to the court. I firmly belive settelments or trust were put in place a long time ago and we the public are not going to know anything until the money runs out.

It would not be the first time something like this has happened. Even the Jimi Hendrix estate set up money for one of Jimi's children in Sweden.

The Marley estate has included a couple of extra Marly spawn the public knows little about. It happens.

In addition, he could have just given Cat money to be quiet about him just in general. I would not be so quick to say she had no communication with him or knows nothing. She may know what he wanted her to know just like everyone else.

So you believe he has children out there that the public doesn’t know about and one of them is Cat’s.

I think Prince was more conservative then he let on and if he had any children out of wedlock the public would not know about it. Not to hide the child but to protect their privacy as well as the mom. He was just not about putting his private life out there.

I think if he had kids he would have set up a trust or some sort of settlement. I think he would have taken care of them just like he took care of everyone.

I kind of go with his cousin Charles who said if he had children they would not have wanted for anything because know one in their family went without.

laurarichardson said:

Strawberrylova123 said:

laurarichardson said:

What is wrong with Cat discussing things that happened when she was in the band? Did you listen to the interview she does not say anything about that time that is bad. She was actually very respectful as far any questions about her and Prince.

The other stuff is her opinion and she is entilted to it like anyone else.

People get offended on here if anyone mentions prince and women

Fear of sexuality from a very sexual artist. Only on the org.

laurarichardson said:

rogifan said:

laurarichardson said: So you believe he has children out there that the public doesn’t know about and one of them is Cat’s.

I think Prince was more conservative then he let on and if he had any children out of wedlock the public would not know about it. Not to hide the child but to protect their privacy as well as the mom. He was just not about putting his private life out there.

I think if he had kids he would have set up a trust or some sort of settlement. I think he would have taken care of them just like he took care of everyone.

I kind of go with his cousin Charles who said if he had children they would not have wanted for anything because know one in their family went without.

IF he had children, he might have provided for them, but did he participate in their life? OR, did money just take care of everything?...

laurarichardson said:

anangellooksdown said:

laurarichardson said:

I think Prince was more conservative then he let on and if he had any children out of wedlock the public would not know about it. Not to hide the child but to protect their privacy as well as the mom. He was just not about putting his private life out there.

I think if he had kids he would have set up a trust or some sort of settlement. I think he would have taken care of them just like he took care of everyone.

I kind of go with his cousin Charles who said if he had children they would not have wanted for anything because know one in their family went without.

More than that, he would have been there physically and emotionally for them. People focus on money so much here.

If he fathered children out-of-wedlock when he was a young man, before he matured and evolved--or as a married man, even--he might have reasoned that finance would have to do. In that event, he might have thought that he would one day have time to make amends.

Kinda hard to make amends to a grown child, when a parent doesn't participate in that child's life. IF of course he had a child.

laurarichardson said:

What is wrong with Cat discussing things that happened when she was in the band? Did you listen to the interview she does not say anything about that time that is bad. She was actually very respectful as far any questions about her and Prince.

The other stuff is her opinion and she is entilted to it like anyone else.

I have never heard Cat disparage P.

I dont care how much she cusses.

PennyPurple said:

Kinda hard to make amends to a grown child, when a parent doesn't participate in that child's life. IF of course he had a child.

I concur.

FlyOnTheWall said:

First, I'd like to eliminate Duane and his heirs from this discussion. This is about children potentially spawned by Prince.

That said, of course, the birth certificate doesn't establish parentage. But, basically, the only way a potential child of Prince could have a DNA test is if there were no father listed on the birth certificate, particularly if the father listed was married to the mother. If I'm wrong on this, I hope someone will correct me. I'm going to look back at the guidelines published by the Court just to be sure.

But, what if, Prince fathered a child with a married woman, even under common law, who named her husband as the "father" on the birth certificate???? Or, what if Prince fathered a child who was adopted, perhaps by a relative???

That's the point I'm trying to make. In these two scenarios, even if these were indeed Prince's child(ren), they would not have been eligible for genetic testing in this case and, thus, would have no legal avenue of pursuing their birthright in this intestate case of historic proportions.

That is what I'm asking: Would appealing be an option in these specific scenarios? And, if I were a potential Prince offspring in one or both of the situations I have laid out, this is the question I would be posing to the foremost experts in appellate law.

The answer is yes you can appeal but none of the individuals who were denied DNA testing appealed.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

First, I'd like to eliminate Duane and his heirs from this discussion. This is about children potentially spawned by Prince.

That said, of course, the birth certificate doesn't establish parentage. But, basically, the only way a potential child of Prince could have a DNA test is if there were no father listed on the birth certificate, particularly if the father listed was married to the mother. If I'm wrong on this, I hope someone will correct me. I'm going to look back at the guidelines published by the Court just to be sure.

But, what if, Prince fathered a child with a married woman, even under common law, who named her husband as the "father" on the birth certificate???? Or, what if Prince fathered a child who was adopted, perhaps by a relative???

That's the point I'm trying to make. In these two scenarios, even if these were indeed Prince's child(ren), they would not have been eligible for genetic testing in this case and, thus, would have no legal avenue of pursuing their birthright in this intestate case of historic proportions.

That is what I'm asking: Would appealing be an option in these specific scenarios? And, if I were a potential Prince offspring in one or both of the situations I have laid out, this is the question I would be posing to the foremost experts in appellate law.

The answer is yes you can appeal but none of the individuals who were denied DNA testing appealed.

Do you know the statute of limitations for such appeals?

FlyOnTheWall said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The answer is yes you can appeal but none of the individuals who were denied DNA testing appealed.

Do you know the statute of limitations for such appeals?

I dont know Minnesota law but it wouldnt be longer than 60 days from the date of the Judge's decision.

The time has passed for these claimants.

laurarichardson said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

Here's the thing. The first hurdle for any potential heir(s) would have been to have the judge allow him/her/them to undergo DNA testing. That was not easy. As I said earlier, the birth certificate was the first firewall. If there was a father listed other than P, you were bounced out of there in short order. I'm sure we've all heard of cases where a woman has a child that is not her husband's or boyfriend's, but the men are none the wiser. So, the mate is listed as the father of record...and the mother takes that secret to her grave, lest her cuckolded partner send her to an early grave. Also, if you were adopted, you could not be approved for testing.

I'm not sure if this is Minnesota law or if the judge set these parameters just for this EPIC intestate case. In any event, with stakes this high, I think I would try to find an attorney who would try to appeal that ruling, assuming that/those decision(s) is/are appealable. If so, it could have the potential to be a landmark case. Perhaps there's a lawyer in the house who could shed light on this bit of Minnesota inheritance law.

—/—— —If a trust or some settlement was set up years ago and the vehicle had a clause that stated be quiet or you lose your money trust me that person is going to be quiet. Coming out into public to try and obtain their full inheritance could mean getting nothing at all.

What about after obtaining said inheritance?

MMJas said:

laurarichardson said:

FlyOnTheWall said: —/—— —If a trust or some settlement was set up years ago and the vehicle had a clause that stated be quiet or you lose your money trust me that person is going to be quiet. Coming out into public to try and obtain their full inheritance could mean getting nothing at all.

What about after obtaining said inheritance?

We would have to turn to an attorney to find out if a child whose mom agreeded to a settlement or trust with the clause that they never publicaly disclose the father of the child can the grown child say my mom signed that not me and I want my full inheritence.

anangellooksdown said:

laurarichardson said:

I think Prince was more conservative then he let on and if he had any children out of wedlock the public would not know about it. Not to hide the child but to protect their privacy as well as the mom. He was just not about putting his private life out there.

I think if he had kids he would have set up a trust or some sort of settlement. I think he would have taken care of them just like he took care of everyone.

I kind of go with his cousin Charles who said if he had children they would not have wanted for anything because know one in their family went without.

More than that, he would have been there physically and emotionally for them. People focus on money so much here.

He could have been in their lives. Look at Clint Eastwoods two younger children that the public knew nothing about until recently. He was involved in their lives he just did not marry their mom.

laurarichardson said:

Strawberrylova123 said:

laurarichardson said:

rogifan said:

Mumio said:

To each his/her own but I've got no issue with how she wants to communicate, with or without profanity. She can tell her story however she wants to do so, using whatever words she wants to use.

[Edited 11/6/17 8:46am]

Obviously it’s a free country people can talk however they want. Others are free not to like it. I don’t. I think it makes her look trashy and missing a few screws. But hey if people want to keep wishing for juicy gossip from her go ahead if it makes you feel better.

What is wrong with Cat discussing things that happened when she was in the band? Did you listen to the interview she does not say anything about that time that is bad. She was actually very respectful as far any questions about her and Prince.

The other stuff is her opinion and she is entilted to it like anyone else.

People get offended on here if anyone mentions prince and women

rogifan said:

laurarichardson said:

I think Prince was more conservative then he let on and if he had any children out of wedlock the public would not know about it. Not to hide the child but to protect their privacy as well as the mom. He was just not about putting his private life out there.

I think if he had kids he would have set up a trust or some sort of settlement. I think he would have taken care of them just like he took care of everyone.

I kind of go with his cousin Charles who said if he had children they would not have wanted for anything because know one in their family went without.

Don’t beat around the bush, do you think he did or not?

Yes, I belileve he could have children out there living off a trust or settlement. We know some work product was given to the probate court by his former divorce attorneys. Who if you look them up also handle parternity matters?

I know from the court docs that one of the people that was turned down for a DNA test was turned down because she had one with Prince back in 2002. Taz Walker who claimed her mother dated Prince as a teenager in Minneapolis. He agreed to the test so he must have known her mom and knew he could possibly be the father. The women was in her 20s so he did not have to agreed to a test so I doubt he would have run off if he had kids and with his money no women would let him off the hook anyway.

rogifan said:

Strawberrylova123 said:

People get offended on here if anyone mentions prince and women

No I’m just not really interested in gossip or every single woman he might have had a relationship with. I don’t need to know if he was good in bed, had a big dick or liked to do kinky stuff or whatever. That’s not what interests me about the man.

Most of these women do not go into the details like that you have to remember they are also telling on themselves and some are probaly married now. The only person who has gone into details was Robyn Power and that was mostly done via org notes after she got booted off this board.

Even Cat has not said anything intimate about the two of them

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

Do you know the statute of limitations for such appeals?

I dont know Minnesota law but it wouldnt be longer than 60 days from the date of the Judge's decision.

The time has passed for these claimants.

WOW.

that gangsta cursin is hysterical..

larry graham is full of sh@t

F#$@ kirk johnson

prince is the janitor

too much....love it

Strawberrylova123 said:

I'm just curious as to how Glam slam is about Sheila E

Do really need to have that explained. They were seeing each other and they were not just looking each other in the face.

----

"Glam Slam"

laurarichardson said:

Strawberrylova123 said:

laurarichardson said:

Do really need to have that explained. They were seeing each other and they were not just looking each other in the face.

----

"Glam Slam"

This thing we got - it's alive!
It seems 2 transcend the physical
One touch and I'm satisfied
Must be a dream it's so magical

Glam Slam thank U ma'am
U really make my day
Glam Slam thank U ma'am
I pray U always stay

I know I hold U 2 tight
But I just can't seem 2 get close enough (I want to hold U)
I want 2 hold U every night
I'm so horny and U're the star

Glam Slam thank U ma'am
U really make my day
Glam Slam thank U ma'am
I pray U always stay

Heavy feather, flicka nipple
Baby scam water ripple
I don't understand
It means I love U
Come a butterfly straight on your skin
U go 4 me and I come again
Glam Slam, thank U ma'am
Sun is risen, moon is gone
Soda fizzin' on the lawn
Come a butterfly straight on your skin
Glam Slam

Glam Slam, thank U ma'am
U really make my day

This thing we got - it's alive!
It seems 2 transcend the physical
One touch and I'm satisfied (ooh, baby)
Must be a dream it's so magical

Glam Slam thank U ma'am
U really make my day
Glam Slam thank U ma'am
I pray U always stay

Glam Slam
U will always stay
U will always stay

It's all right, it's OK

I already know they were seeing each other but i always interpreted the song as a spiritual one not physical one

"I'm so horny and U're the star "

Not spritual to me

Come a butterfly straight on your skin.

Sheila is known for butterflies.

PennyPurple said:

Come a butterfly straight on your skin.

Sheila is known for butterflies.

Yes, she said in her book that Santana called her the "Black Butterfly" I think it is her nick name.

Can't we see Prince writing a song to a girlfriend that is coded so only the two of them know what it is about?

[Edited 11/7/17 11:51am]